| Revision as of 15:44, 9 April 2007 editPatGallacher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers49,425 edits David Ervine← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:01, 29 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,132 edits Removed: Talk:Death of Mahsa Amini. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
{{shortcut|]<br>]}} |
|
|
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{RFCheader|Politics}} |
|
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*] Should we have an external link to a critical obituary? 15:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
*] There is a dispute about whether or not the infobox should contain a flag16:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
The opening to the ] article read: |
|
* ]: Should a mention of ]'s three months working for ] in 1985 be part of the ]? 10:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Whether or not to include national flags in teh article, and if so, whether those flags should represent the present nation that city resides in, or the historical nation the city was capital of. 04:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] '''Primary question:''' Is making the charactarization or drawing the conclusion that ''"the Drudge Report sets the tone for national political coverage"'', or is it an interview/book review that only reports the charactarizations of other parties? '''Secondary question:''' If the conclusion is being drawn or charactarization made, can that conclusion be appropriately attributed to ABC News, when authorship of the source is not disclosed (no byline), or is an additional reliable secondary source required to make that attribution? - 23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Is claiming that the Santa Cruz Sentinal article is referring to Zombie's (only) photo of an antisemetic sign Original Research ? Is claiming that a copyrighted but unsourced pic on an antisemtic conference site, which might be Zombie's, as being Zombie's pic Original Research? (see discussion) 21:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Should this article have inline citations and footnotes or are they not applicable to the article? An editor thinks they are not applicable to the article. Does the US National Archive meet WP:V and WP:RS? Should the article detail the United States embargo against Cuba and similar episodes, or is that POV? 07:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] This is a dispute about the inclusion of an anonymous article published by a reliable magazine, which is critical of the Union 06:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Is AEI's rebuttal to accusations made by the Guardian fairly characterized? 02:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] and ] - What's the best way to avoid ] problems? Is it appropriate for two editors to remove tags from an article when there is a lack of consensus? 16:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - What's the best NPOV way to handle the lead about a controversial documentary concerning contentious scientific topics? 20:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Want to remove POV terms in the title to stop debates over how to frame the article. PRevents edit wars and POV forks and other problems. 17:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- How much weight to give to those who claim the term itself is perjorative; and there is a disagreement over what consitutes Original Research, and what is needed in terms of cites.15:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Does belong in an article about black supremacy? 11:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Should a section on "Use by Neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers" be included in the article? Is undue weight given in the article to criticisms of Shahak? 10:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Are National Socialism, Nazism, and Fascism forms of "collectivism" and thus related to all forms of socialism? This dispute has gone on for over two years. 12:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
* -- Dispute regarding whether info offering historical context in an FA should remain. 01:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Is a newly-added section "Principles of constitutional design" POV? 17:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*Is appropriate? Note, a non-neutral RFC, admiteed by third party at the time, was filed last year by a ] which resulted in merge yet the current version is not identical and has new sources. ] 17:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - a Dispute over whether a given quote is appropriate for the lead of the article. 20:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] — The smaller dispute is whether or not tamilcanadian.com may be used as a reliable source. The larger dispute is whether the ] are a Hindu nationalist party. 00:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Is there a POV problem with listing groups referred to as cults in government reports, in the article: ]? 15:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC). |
|
|
*]- At least three editors involved in a prolonged dispute on ] and ] status of the entire article. Help needed!17:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - if a conspiracy theory of LaRouche is described in the article, and it involves prominent living individuals, is this a violation of ]? 15:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Despite mutliple, credible sources provided that are in line with criteria elucidated at that page, and with Misplaced Pages policy in general, multiple editors are reverting inclusion of Palestinians into the ]. Sources provided have included UN Working Group on Indigenous Peoples reports that cite Palestinians as participants, and academic sources from comparative DNA studies to sociological studies, both by Israeli authors. The counter-arguments focus around the political bias of the UN and the characterizing of the sources provided as "dubious". Please come check it out. 03:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - are recent changes to the article helpful and do they adhere to NPOV? Which of two versions of the article is preferable? 15:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] is a photoblog by an anonymous male, female, or transgendered person in San Fransisco who fanatically conceals their identity, and even sex. (odd, but that's their right) The <S>hagiography</S> article is largely OR and POV, and is mostly written by someone so enamored with Zombietime that his/her username is Zombiefan. What sourcing it does have largely comes from non-inclusionable blogs. I would edit it but the fact that an editor who I was falsely charged with Wikistalking has edited there. This article needs major work. Bring your pruning shears ;-)- 11:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*It has become apparant that after a couple of weeks User:Ishu and User:HongQiGong never intend on evaluating my 50 citations they have removed on the ] article. Their stated reason for removing them was that they felt I added too many citations in too short a period. Other than there not existing a Misplaced Pages Policy even remotely connected with this reasoning, it doesn't make sense. Are citations no good when they have been added too quickly? Does the slowness in the addition of citations make the citations more credible? User:Ishu claims that s/he will evaluate each citation edit-by-edit to determine if they warrant inclusion in this article which sounds as if s/he believes s/he is the sole self-appointed ]. It has been two weeks and they have not personally evaluated my citations from peer-reviewed sociological sources. Will these citations ever be evaluated? For outside observors, . My citations were from credible Asian American sociological books I rented from the library, so they were not removing the citations based on a lack of credibiility. Here is the article as User:Ishu and User:HongQiGong would like it to be which comprises their own opinions on issues. They are flagrantly disregarding the ] policy with their discussions on the talk page. Many of their discussions boil down to having this article reflect their ]. -- 00:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*] article seems to have two editors who have difficulty with discussions of the mechanisms of voting and the mechanisms of representation, specifically with the "majority votes/limited votes" issue and the "voter-representative disconnect" issue. Progress on this issue has been virtually impossible on the ] page. Also, noting no response to the issue of poor article organization raised on the same page. This article requires much more attention and discussion for improvement from the larger Politics Wiki community. -- 16:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil El-Sisi'''{{Efn|{{langx|ar|عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي}}}} (born 19 November 1954) is an Egyptian politician, ],<ref name="dictator"> |
|
*] There are only really two main editors at this page for a 2008 US presidential candidate, myself and ]. We are having difficulty restructuring the article to seperate bio from senate career, as well as dealing with whether or not Brownback's itslef campaigning should be included on the page. 15:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Sources that categorize Sisi as a dictator: |
|
|
{{bulleted list|{{Cite news |title=Egypt’s rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous |url=https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/10/03/egypts-rushed-election-shows-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-is-nervous |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613 |quote="Last month Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s military dictator..."}}|{{Cite web |last=Dunne |first=Michele |date=2019-04-08 |title=Why Is Trump Helping Egypt’s Dictator Entrench His Power? |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/08/donald-trump-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-egypt-226579/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO Magazine |language=en}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |title=President Trump, Condemn This Sham Egyptian Election {{!}} The Washington Institute |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/president-trump-condemn-sham-egyptian-election |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=www.washingtoninstitute.org |language=en |quote="...issued a statement praising the Egyptian dictator's magnificent work for the country"}} |
|
|
|{{Cite news |title=A Blank Check for Egypt's Dictator |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-26/u-dot-s-dot-gives-egypts-dictator-a-blank-check?embedded-checkout=false |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=Bloomberg.com |language=en}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Toosi |first=Nahal |date=2021-07-12 |title=In D.C. visit, Egypt spy boss claims U.S. agreed — in writing — to jail American activist |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/egypt-spy-boss-jail-american-498983 |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO |language=en |quote="...Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the Egyptian dictator who has imprisoned tens of thousands of dissidents."}}{{Cite web |last=Lawler |first=Dave |date=2019-04-23 |title=Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi could rule until 2030 after winning referendum |url=https://www.axios.com/2019/04/23/sisi-referendum-rule-egypt-2030-constitution |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Axios |language=en |quote="He has now cemented his status as Egypt's dictator without losing his position as a U.S. ally."}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Greenwald |first=Glenn |date=2015-03-31 |title=Obama Personally Tells the Egyptian Dictator That U.S. Will Again Send Weapons (and Cash) to His Regime |url=https://theintercept.com/2015/03/31/obama-lifts-freeze-weapons-transfer-egyptian-dictator/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Jennifer |date=2017-04-03 |title=Egypt’s president is a bloodthirsty dictator. Trump thinks he’s done a “fantastic job.” |url=https://www.vox.com/world/2017/4/3/15160358/trump-egypt-abdel-fattah-el-sisi-white-house |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}|{{Cite news |date=2020-12-01 |title=Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi: Ruler with an iron grip |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-19256730 |access-date=2024-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}|{{Cite news |title=Egypt is again under military rule, but Sisi lacks Nasser's appeal |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal |access-date=2024-11-25 |url-access=subscription|work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613|archive-url=https://archive.today/2021.08.26-144020/https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal|archive-date=2021-08-26|url-status=live}}|{{Citation |last=Grewal |first=Sharan |title=Egypt: A Coup against Democracy |date=2023-07-25 |work=Soldiers of Democracy? |pages=136–176 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/46755/chapter-abstract/414394851?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=2024-11-25 |publisher=Oxford University PressOxford |doi=10.1093/oso/9780192873910.003.0007 |isbn=0-19-287391-1}}|{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}}}</ref> and retired military officer who has been serving as the ] and current ] since 2014.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The word dictator been been removed for now while the RfC discussion takes place) |
|
*] - a current event article regarding Iran named initially "Iran international crisis" has been renamed as "Current international dispute with Iran" by some editors, on the ground that naming it ] is biased against Iran. Others argue that the Iran situation follows the definition of an ]: "a sequence of interactions between the governments of two or more sovereign states in severe conflict, short of actual war, but involving the perception of a dangerously high probability of war." 22:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should Sisi be referred to as a dictator? Some of these options are not mutually exclusive, so more than one can be selected: |
|
*] - should we give the location of the blog which is referred to in this article. 09:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)~ |
|
|
|
*'''A.''' Yes he should be, in a similar way as described above or found in the the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
|
*'''B.''' No he should not be, but he should be described as an authoritarian ruler, leader of an authoritarian regime, or leader of a military dictatorship somewhere in the lead, similar to the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
|
*'''C.''' No he should not be, but some variation of "Many observers see Sisi as a dictator" should be included in the lead. |
|
|
*'''D. ''' No he should not be, and he should '''not''' be described as an authoritarian ruler. Instead, different arguments regarding his form of rule should be summarized in the body. |
|
|
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) |
|
|
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Squad be described in the article as "far left?" ] (]) 22:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the bottom of the infobox in this election and all elections that follow it, which use the mixed-member proportional system, show the Prime Minister and their party alone (similarly to other Westminster systems, such as ], ], and ]), or the Cabinet and its member parties (similarly to other systems that have coalition governments, such as ], ], and ])? ] (]) 13:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
*]. I've created a new article to address concerns of undue weight in the Fred Baron article of a notable event. I've tried to keep it NPOV, but would appreciate a neutral set of eyes to double-check it for NPOV. 00:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
*] POV and accuracy problems created by editor's retaliatory reversion. 15:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ] (]) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Riverina chapter of the NSN be included in the infobox? ] (]) 16:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article include the guard’s actions (grabbing the camera lens and touching Hersant’s shoulder) and the court’s findings regarding Sewell’s claims on racial motivation and self-defence? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
*]. Should the ] be listed once on the first occurrance and an indication made that it is a regularly occurring annual event, or should each individual occurrance be listed? 08:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
] |
|
|
|
The current lead contains a simple mention of Trumpism. Should a brief description be added to this mention? A proposed wording for the added text, which is also up for debate here: {{tq|characterized by ], "]" nationalism, and economic ].}} — ] (]) 04:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Is the Syrian civil war over? ] (]) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Debate is ongoing as to whether content should be included in this article. This RfC covers two questions: |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Question 1:''' Should this article mention the John Conyers report "What Went Wrong In Ohio" |
|
|
*'''Question 2:''' If so, what wording should be used? |
|
|
'''] ]''' 18:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Does this sentence violate NPOV and should it be removed from the lead and the body? |
|
|
|
|
|
"Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible" ] (]) 18:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|pol|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |