| Revision as of 12:37, 10 April 2007 editCallix (talk | contribs)40 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:26, 1 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''<span style="color:red;">d</span>elete'''. - ] 09:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | |||
| :{{la|Dimelo! Records}} | :{{la|Dimelo! Records}} | ||
| :{{la|La Charanga Cubana}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|La Charanga Cubana}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 6: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nominator. They don't even try to assert notability. --] 12:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nominator. They don't even try to assert notability. --] 12:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' no references, only 1st party sources, and no assertations of notability beyond its devotion to salsa. This looks like failing ] to me. ] 12:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' no references, only 1st party sources, and no assertations of notability beyond its devotion to salsa. This looks like failing ] to me. ] 12:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''', because companies are signigficant and it's useful to learn more about them for consumers. --] 16:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *:<small>{{user|Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?}} just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. ] 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Delete''', non notable, no references. <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">]] (], ])</span> 17:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per Cremepuff222. ] 18:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Strong Keep''' Ok so how do I fix the entry so you all will accept it? per Dimelo! Records. ] 10:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **'''Comment''' Review ]. --] 11:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 12:26, 1 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Dimelo! Records
- Dimelo! Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- La Charanga Cubana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Vanispamcruftisement. Contested prods. MER-C 03:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. They don't even try to assert notability. --RaiderAspect 12:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete no references, only 1st party sources, and no assertations of notability beyond its devotion to salsa. This looks like failing WP:CORP to me. Callix 12:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, because companies are signigficant and it's useful to learn more about them for consumers. --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? (talk · contribs) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, non notable, no references. Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 17:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Cremepuff222. Acalamari 18:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Ok so how do I fix the entry so you all will accept it? per Dimelo! Records. User:Dimelorecords 10:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Review WP:CORP. --RaiderAspect 11:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.