| Revision as of 06:40, 12 April 2024 editSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →Dwarkadhish Temple: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:32, 24 December 2024 edit undoAfghanParatrooper19891 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,305 edits →Stop stalking me: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply | ||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 2 == | |||
| == Have a look == | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. | |||
| Have a look at . Thanks. - ] (]) 19:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| (].) --] (]) 19:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Undefined references == | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 12 == | |||
| Hi Chariotrider555. You've added references for "Sandera 1981" and "Dwyer 1995" to ], but neither work is defined in the article. Could you add the required cites to the article or let me know what works these refer to? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 16:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :], |
||
| ::Thanks Chariotrider555. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. | |||
| == Source == | |||
| (].) --] (]) 19:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Here is the source for changing r̥ṣi to ṛṣi ] (]) 06:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Kathi people == | ||
| Dear @], | |||
| The content deleted by you in ] page are perfectly cited.surdas biography clear states that he is saraswat Brahmin and was born in the village of Sihi, near Delhi, as the son of Ram Das, a Saraswat Brahmin but in the main page they are giving primary sources. | |||
| The article is full of error and bias towards specific community. We have successfully challenged many book publishers through the high court and they have made public apology and removed the articles from their books. | |||
| Second content I am mentioning page number. | |||
| The substantial cost of the legal process was also had to pay by the publishers. In the Olden days, all the princely states including jagirs used to have their own authors and poets who used to praise only their owners and often used to write bias articles about the opponents. Many English writes have taken the references from those books and poems. ] (]) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| In Western and South India, the Saraswat Brahmins are Rigvedi Brahmins and they follow Ashwalayana Sutra and are of Shakala Shaka.Saraswat Brahmins are divided into two groups based on the Vedanta they follow, the first of which follows the ] of ] and second group are followers of ] of ].<ref>Kamath, Suryanath U. (1992). The origin and spread of Gauda Saraswats,Archana Prakashana.Page number 14-15</ref>] (]) 11:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| :@] | |||
| :Pillai, P. G. (n.d.). The Bhakti Movement: Renaissance Or Revivalism?. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis,chapter-17 | |||
| :High end Taylor and Francis reference. ] (]) 11:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == February 2024 == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently ] from ] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. ''The content is more then enough reliably sourced by historians, please don't remove sourced content and take concerns to the talk page.''<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 18:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Bania == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Have a look at additions by an IP. Thanks. - ] (]) 13:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Removal at ] == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 --> | |||
| == Notable individual people == | |||
| Hello. removed about a quater of the content from the page ]. These removals included information about Rajput Resistance against Akbar, Jahangir, Bahadur Shah, Babur, Arab Invasions because the mentioned page was poorly cited.<br> I have reverted those edits and added appropriate citations. I would like to point out that your edit was not a net constructive contribution to Misplaced Pages as you removed content which could be verified very easily upon miniscule investigation. Instead of attempting to improve the verifiability and citations on this page per ], you blanked several sections.<br>Such removal could only be justified under conditions mentioned at # like when the content is obviously nonsense, violations under BLP, obviously non factual. <span style="font-family:Monospace;color:black">>>> ].]</span> 11:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :], it is the ] of whoever added the material to provide the citation. It is completely acceptable for any material that does not have such to be removed, and Misplaced Pages only encourages users to try to reference unreferenced material before removing (], ]). Moreover much of the content I removed had been sitting there unreferenced for months and even years, and likely would have continued being in that state for months and years to come had I not made the executive decision to remove it. Given that about 1/4 of the page's contents was unreferenced content, the article was in a pretty poor state, and its removal was a net-positive. I applaud you however for finding proper references for some of the content. ] (]) 14:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] See my post below, ] ] 13:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, I saw your edits on some articles where you Remove photos of notable people from caste articles | |||
| == ] == | |||
| If this is the rule then it should be for every article, Like in ] there are so many photos of notable individuals and also alot of POV content based on non reliable sources, please look into that or just restore sitush's version on that article if possible ] (]) 11:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| you removed one sentence from a two sentence paragraph as unsourced yet left the other unsourced sentence. I'd like to know why. As I can't restore unsourced material, or rather if I could I'd violate policy, I'll remove the other one. ] ] 13:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :], as per ], "Because the lead usually repeats information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none.". I generally lean toward the side that as few as possible citations should be in the lead while it still fulfils its function as a summary of the body. I removed the sentence about Vajranabha because it neither had a citation in the lead nor a mention in the body. However, the destruction of the temple by ] while not having a citation in the lead, is properly and reliably referenced in the body ]. On closer inspection the year in the lead is one off from the body (possible Hijri-Gregorian conversion error by whoever originally added the sentence?).] (]) 14:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop stalking me == | |||
| ::@] Thanks. I don't know how I missed that, and as you say, the year should be 1473. If that is a reliable source of course. I'm not sure. ] ] 14:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::], I believe the work is a reliable source. Commissariat is a notable historian, and the series that the book was the first volume of continued to be published after independence as well (Volume II in 1956, III postumously in 1980). ] generally applies to castes, rather than general history, but more recent sources can be found which will likely substantiate the paragraph as well. ] (]) 15:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Why am I being watched by you for everything I do? ] (]) 18:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::See ]. Whilst RAJ may have the appearance of applying "generally to castes", it actually is a comment on all sources of Raj origin. They aren't good and there is a longstanding consensus that they should be avoided. - ] (]) 06:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::NB: Commissariat is rarely cited by academics nowadays, from what I can see. That isn't a good sign. - ] (]) 06:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :], I am not singling you out, just generally making sure Misplaced Pages policies are being followed. ] (]) 20:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Touch grass ] (]) 15:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:32, 24 December 2024
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nandgaon, Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bannu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Kathi people
The article is full of error and bias towards specific community. We have successfully challenged many book publishers through the high court and they have made public apology and removed the articles from their books. The substantial cost of the legal process was also had to pay by the publishers. In the Olden days, all the princely states including jagirs used to have their own authors and poets who used to praise only their owners and often used to write bias articles about the opponents. Many English writes have taken the references from those books and poems. KathiWarriorDarbar (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Notable individual people
Hello, I saw your edits on some articles where you Remove photos of notable people from caste articles
If this is the rule then it should be for every article, Like in Rajpurohit there are so many photos of notable individuals and also alot of POV content based on non reliable sources, please look into that or just restore sitush's version on that article if possible 2409:4089:AB0C:709A:0:0:2DCB:290C (talk) 11:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Stop stalking me
Why am I being watched by you for everything I do? AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- User:AfghanParatrooper19891, I am not singling you out, just generally making sure Misplaced Pages policies are being followed. Chariotrider555 (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Touch grass AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)