Revision as of 20:49, 18 April 2024 editCordless Larry (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators56,542 edits →WP:BLP violation: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:37, 24 December 2024 edit undoPerfect4th (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,575 edits →Britannica books Pre 2012: reply | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Community Q&A hub for |
{{Short description|Community Q&A hub for new editors}}{{skip to top and bottom}} | ||
{{skip to top and bottom}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 400K | |maxarchivesize = 400K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 1244 | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 15 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = |
|minthreadstoarchive = 25 | ||
|algo = old(48h) | |algo = old(48h) | ||
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/Questions/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/Questions/Archive %(counter)d | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
<!-- Questions go here. Please post new questions at the BOTTOM of the page. --> | <!-- Questions go here. Please post new questions at the BOTTOM of the page. --> | ||
== Cyprus military ranks == | |||
== When to remove the Orphan Template == | |||
I need help with the NCO ranks, i already made the png files how the ranks look but i dont know how to modify the code so i make it look like the greek one, cypriot army have 2 nco ranks for every rank, one for permanent NCOs that completed military academy and the other for SYP-EPY (in Greece EPOP-EMTh) for contracted NCOs that cannot become Warrant Officers, example bellow. | |||
I have expanded an article to un-orphan another article. Does one connection suffice to remove the orphan warning template at the top, or should more be established? The previously orphaned article in question is ] ] (]) 10:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== NCO and other ranks === | |||
:You can remove it if there is at least one link. By the way, you should probably add a citation to the addition you made to the other page just so the section and link don't get removed. ] (]) 11:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
NCO ranks (excl. OR-9 and conscript ranks) have undergone some changes through the years, the latest being in 2004.<ref>{{Cite web |last=tanea.gr |date=2004-10-11 |title=Aλλάζουν το εθνόσημο και οι «σαρδέλες» |url=https://www.tanea.gr/2004/10/11/greece/allazoyn-to-ethnosimo-kai-oi-sardeles/ |access-date=2024-06-10 |website=ΤΑ ΝΕΑ |language=el}}</ref> | |||
::@] - "Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count)." Quoted from banner on one the monthly backlog categories. More info at ]. Regards, ] (]) 18:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #8888aa; background-color:#f7f8ff; padding:5px; font-size:95%; margin: 0px 12px 12px 0px;" | |||
:::But ] also states: ''More colloquially, editors also sometimes use "orphan" to refer to pages that do not have as many incoming links as they ought to, even if they do not meet the technical definition for orphan status.'' <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 19:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OR/Blank}} | |||
::::That's true, but it basically means one link needed, though ] (]) 20:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OR/Greece}} | |||
:'''''<sup><sub><s><code><u><big><small>@</small></big></u></code></s></sub></sup>''''' ] (]) 17:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| rowspan=2| '''{{flagcountry|Greece}}'''<br/><small>'''(Conscripts)'''</small> | |||
| colspan=6| ] | |||
| colspan=4 rowspan=2| '''''No equivalent'''''{{Hr}} | |||
| colspan=6| ] | |||
| colspan=6 rowspan=2| | |||
| colspan=4| ] | |||
| colspan=2| ] | |||
| colspan=6| ] | |||
| colspan=2| '''No insignia''' | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| colspan=6| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Dokimos Efedros Axiomatikos}}{{efn|name="Greek Warrant"}} | |||
| colspan=6| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Lochias}} | |||
| colspan=4| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Dekaneas}} | |||
| colspan=2| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Ypodekaneas}} | |||
| colspan=6| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Ypopsifios Efedros Bathmoforos}} | |||
| colspan=2| {{lang|el|]}}<br/>{{lang|el-latn|Stratiotis}} | |||
|} | |||
<references /> | |||
{{Talk reflist}} | |||
{{Talk notelist}} | |||
== Userpage question == | |||
== I have a hypothetical questions about Freedom Caucus? == | |||
I know I've already asked about ] before but I've done a lot of work on it since then. Does my userpage go a bit overboard, especially with the inline links? I joined the welcoming committee and I am expecting at least a few new users to come to my userpage from my signature on my welcome messages so I tried to leave a lot of inline links for them to click on and get a feel for the scope of the encyclopedia. ] | ] | ] 15:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
What If Freedom Caucus was a hypothetical European political party? would it belong to ] or ]? If so, why do you think it would belong to the party. I am willing to hear your opinion and explanation why. ] (]) 06:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Compared to ] (takes awhile to load, and I don't recommend it as a role model), or myself, for that matter, I find your page quite respectable. ] (]) 15:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi! That's not really relevant to Misplaced Pages; we answer questions ''about'' Misplaced Pages here. If you have any questions relating to editing or other aspects of the project, that's the purpose of this page. Happy editing <templatestyles src="Template:Color/styles.css" /><span class="tmp-color" style="color:#618A3D">... ] * <small>he/they</small> * ]</span> 06:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I feel I do the most good by being a warning lesson parents can point out to their children. ]] 15:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::To be perfectly clear, speculation by editors is not permitted on Misplaced Pages. The role of Misplaced Pages editors is to summarize what reliable sources say. Nothing more and nothing less. ] (]) 06:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::<small>if i learned one thing from you, it's that puns are the scourge of all things good</small> '''] <sub>] ]</sub>''' 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Sorry, If I was going off topic. I was curious to sees, but I promise to stay on topic and uses Teahouse properly.  ] (]) 06:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::No, no, they've got a point. The reason we exist on this world is to get as many rules added to the book as possible. No one ever told me I ''couldn't'' add an inline link containing some sarcastic joke for every single word on my userpage, but I'm sure they wouldn't like it if I did so why don't we make it official? ] | ] | ] 16:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::If I have a hypothetical question, where should I go to? ] (]) 03:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::oh my that isn't a userpage that's a whole-ass user''book.'' I guess mine is better than I thought ] | ] | ] 15:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Wait, why does anonymous numbers change every time? ] (]) 03:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::406,519 bytes, that's a lot. ] (]) 15:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::you're ], which are reassigned periodically. as for your other question, you're welcome to ask hypothetical questions of that nature elsewhere on the internet, like Reddit, but you should keep things relevant to Misplaced Pages here. <templatestyles src="Template:Color/styles.css" /><span class="tmp-color" style="color:#618A3D">... ] * <small>he/they</small> * ]</span> 03:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::To put it into context, the largest article on Misplaced Pages has ]. ]'']'' 15:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I understand, but I unfortunately have no reddit account and I want to hear if Freedom Caucus would belong to ID party or ECR party. ] (]) 03:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Wow, we have an article that's almost an entire gigabyte? Does it just have a lot of text or are images, GIFs, code spaghetti, and videos taking up some of that space? ] | ] | ] 16:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::you're not going to get an answer here <templatestyles src="Template:Color/styles.css" /><span class="tmp-color" style="color:#618A3D">... ] * <small>he/they</small> * ]</span> 03:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::@] That's not a ], only just below a ]. The whole encycopedia can be downloaded at about 24 GB. See ]. ] (]) 16:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::You know what? I actually chose CER for Freedom Caucus.  | |||
:::::::oh yeah sorry I forgot the ratios. I'm surprised Misplaced Pages is only 24 gigs, I thought 6 million articles would be closer to a terabyte ] | ] | ] 16:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::# Both support economic freedom and limited government.  | |||
::::::::{{tq|As of February 2013, the XML file containing current pages only, no user or talk pages, was 42,987,293,445 bytes uncompressed (43 GB). The XML file with current pages, including user and talk pages, was 93,754,003,797 bytes uncompressed (94 GB). The full history dumps, all 174 files of them, took 10,005,676,791,734 bytes (10 TB).}} | |||
:::::::::# Social Conservatism is also common with ECR like Brothers of Italy.  | |||
::::::::{{tq|As of August 2023, Wikimedia Commons, which includes the images, videos and other media used across all the language-specific Wikipedias contained 96,519,778 files, totalling 470,991,810,222,099 bytes (428.36 TB).}} ]'']'' 16:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::# Both support national identity.  | |||
::::::::Text is very small, especially ] characters in ] (the majority of characters used on the English Misplaced Pages), which are one byte each. – ]<small><sup> ]</sup><sub>]</sub><sup>she</sup><sub>her</sub></small> 19:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::# ECR and Freedom Caucus have devolution of power.  | |||
:::::Interesting, per that article has 2 words. And 1,541 unique references. ] (]) 16:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::# Freedom Caucus and European Conservatives & Reformists also have right-wing populism like Law & Justice (Poland), JA21 (The Netherlands), Sweden Democrats (Sweden) and Vox (Spain). | |||
:Looks great, especially the storm chaser part. :) ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 15:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::So, therefore, it would be more likely to be European Conservatives & Reformist if Freedom Caucus were an European party. ] (]) 04:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::what can I say, I just have zero sense of ] and I want to see the ] up close :D ] | ] | ] 15:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Again, this isn't the place to ask this type of question. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 04:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:I liked your userpage. Quite interesting username too. ] (]) 16:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks! The "apteryx" in my name is the scientific name of my favorite bird, the kiwi, and "RainWing" is a reference to my favorite tribe from the book series Wings of Fire ] | ] 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::What is the difference between liberalism and social liberalism as I noticed that some ideology has the same meaning that I removed them, ex. in Swiss People's Party, swiss nationalism, national conservatism and anti-immigration have the same meaning, so I removed these.  I was told that we have to keep Political Parties' articles simple in its template and ideologies. How do I carefully removed something from templates, so it will not get messed up.  ] (]) 17:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you so much for taking your time to let me know the real meaning about your username. You're a creative guy. Wishing you good luck. ] (]) 05:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::If you edit too much, can you get blocked for it since I am fixing some political party's article to make it simpler on template as some have same meaning or just too much. When is it too much?  | |||
:::::::::::::Thank you from 174.135.36.220 ] (]) 21:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::::@174.135.36.220 | |||
::::::::::::::Hi and welcome to the Teahouse, your question does not reflect Misplaced Pages but there is an article about European Freedom Caucus, I suggest you look there. Thanks! ] (]) 02:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::::I meant European Political Party Freedom Caucus. My Bad. ] (]) 02:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Rules of recommendations to add links in an article == | |||
== Notability of ] == | |||
Hello ! I'd like to know if there are rules or recommendations to add links in an article. | |||
There seem to be enough references for ] in the lede of ]. Could someone check, opine, and maybe remove the warning? Thx ] (]) 04:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Trzb}} Six refs in the Lead to confirm he is a dipiomat is over-referencing. (Perhaps some of those can be moved to the section about the Russian invasion.) In general, government appointments (diplomats, government, military) are less likely to have Misplaced Pages-notable careers compared to elected. ] (]) 10:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@], thank you for your response. I don't disagree about moving the refs (and can make the changes when the main issue is addressed), but hope this in no way affects sufficient media coverage per ]. Not sure how Kushneruk's being appointed affects the interpretation of media coverage. ] (]) 08:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm talking about internal links to Misplaced Pages in English. | |||
As an example. We can choose the article "]". <br /> | |||
: Hello | |||
If there are a section or a sub-section citing "]" '''(This is an example but I could take another subject mentionned on this article)'''. | |||
: please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra | |||
: see and change it | |||
: https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55104710/Haridarshan_Pooja_2021_The_influence_of_the_childhood_experiences_of_women_in_Bangalore_India_upon_their_aspirations_for_their_children_socio-cultural_and_academic_perspectives_A_community_based_study.pdf | |||
If Moscow is linked one time in the article. Can I do it for others sections or sub-sections if this is not the same sub-section or section ? | |||
] (]) 09:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
If you don't understand what I means with words '''"section"''' and '''"sub-section"'''. <br /> | |||
:This page is for questions on how to edit Misplaced Pages. The place to propose improvements to an article is the talk page of that article, in this case ]. Please provide a ] source for your proposal. The fact that some source does '''not''' assert something is irrelevant. ]|] 09:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
You can see the example below. | |||
::: Hello | |||
::: please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra | |||
::: see and change it | |||
::: https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55104710/Haridarshan_Pooja_2021_The_influence_of_the_childhood_experiences_of_women_in_Bangalore_India_upon_their_aspirations_for_their_children_socio-cultural_and_academic_perspectives_A_community_based_study.pdf | |||
::] (]) 09:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Stop adding this everywhere. Please. You did this to my talk page already. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 09:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::When it will get updated?? ?? | |||
::::How long time it will take!? ] (]) 09:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{u|Harishsk2022}} You have made edit requests at ] which have all been denied. Asking the same here at Teahouse has no purpose. Please stop. ] (]) 09:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I don't want to edit you just remove that word shudra from the devanga Misplaced Pages page | |||
::::::: Hello | |||
::::::: please find reliable source in the below link no where it is mentioned that we are shudra | |||
::::::: see and change it | |||
::::::: https://pure.northampton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55104710/Haridarshan_Pooja_2021_The_influence_of_the_childhood_experiences_of_women_in_Bangalore_India_upon_their_aspirations_for_their_children_socio-cultural_and_academic_perspectives_A_community_based_study.pdf | |||
::::::] (]) 09:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Suggestions for Monte Zovetto page == | |||
At ] there is now a recommendation that ] be indefinitely blocked. ] (]) 10:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Good morning, everyone, | |||
:I have blocked them for one week for "disruptive editing" and have left an explanatory message on their talk page so they understand why their constant demands everywhere to make an edit they want has proven disruptive to everyone else. Hopefully, they will not try the same tactic again once the block expires, or it may become permanent. ]. ] (]) 10:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
My team and I recently finished our ] wiki page (a mountain in northern Italy) for a school project. It was approved, and we received a grade C. | |||
::UPDATE: Now blocked for a further week for continuing their disruptive tactic on their talk page! ] (]) 13:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::As a heads up, they came onto #wikipedia-en-help on IRC and demanded we unblock them and "address concern". —] ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 02:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks for the heads up. ] (]) 19:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
We already made some improvements (also thanks to other editors), but do you have any suggestions on how we can improve it to achieve a grade B? Thank you! | |||
== I keep getting this "parsoid" error whenever I try to edit an article == | |||
] (]) 07:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 07:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I've tried restarting my computer, and the error still pops up. Any way I could fix this? ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 15:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I saw there are the pronunciation in "]" indicated in "]". <br /> <br /> | |||
:...okay, it's gone now? ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Maybe someone can add it in "]" ? It is not a great improvement but it is a good one. <br /> <br /> | |||
::Same here, the visual editor is not working, It worked that’s why I removed my topic from but as I am checking from phone it is not loading. ] (]) 15:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:Why not add the pronunciation with IPA transcription in "]" ? ] (]) 07:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
Please see ] and ] and how that's putting ] and your classmates in an unfair position and lots of unneeded stress. ] (] '''·''' ]) 10:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Now it's back again. ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 15:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{tracked|T356157}} | |||
::Technical discussion since January, when it first occurred. ] (]) 15:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] | |||
:Hi! And welcome to the Teahouse! It seems like there is a Technical Difficulty going on here. I have not gotten the error yet but have you tried resetting the cache? Maybe try that and see if it works. ] (]) 16:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Seems to work. Thank you! ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 18:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Np. Glad I could help! ] (]) 18:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:], you say "It was approved, and we received a grade C." I "accepted" the draft, promoting it to article status. I didn't give it a "C", and nobody else did either. I don't see anyone calling it "Start", "C", or "B". Do you mean that your teacher approved it and gave it a C, for university rather than Misplaced Pages purposes? If so, we people here who aren't affiliated with LIUC don't know either how grading is supposed to work in LIUC or what particular criteria your teacher uses in order to grade. -- ] (]) 11:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Inactive user == | |||
::@] Actually . However, @] probably doesn't realise that these assessments are somewhat arbitrary and only ] and ] go through a formal process here. I suggest that LIUCsmarties and colleagues relax after doing a good job of creating the article and focus now on the rest of their schoolwork. ] (]) 12:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Well, ], so I did. Duh. (I plead senility!) Anyone (other than the author or their classmates) who thinks it merits a B is welcome to give it a B. And I have to say that though I'm usually unimpressed by class-assigned article creation, this set does impress me (in a good way). -- ] (]) 12:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] I recently reviewed the Assessments for many articles at ]. I would say this is a pretty complete article, easily meriting a B-class (which I have just given it). With some further careful work on sourcing and on ] formatting, it could well be put forward for a ], though seeking more detailed feedback at ] could be worthwhile. However, these further steps would need the commitment to see this through beyond the unfair deadline set by their tutor (]), as discussed in recent threads from their other students. I think @] and colleagues should be extremely proud of their work. It's impressive. ] (]) 22:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{u|LIUCsmarties}} Consider deleting the Legends section, as not clear it is specific to Zovetto (and perhaps adding it to ] instead). ] (]) 13:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello. I can't find the page about the guidelines and criteria on reporting inactive users, could you please direct me toward it? I just realized that ] has been gone from en.wiki for an unusual amount of time compared to how much he usually edits. Cheers. ] (]) 16:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Can I draft an article about myself and get it published on this site? == | |||
:Just read the talk page archives and turns out he hasn’t been editing since his last topic ban. ] (]) 16:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] I don't understand why "reporting inactive users" would be of interest to anyone. To whom would you report them and why? Most people here are volunteers who might give up editing for any number of reasons. On the other hand, if you know of a deceased editor, see the guidance at ]. ] (]) 17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I remember a page explaining how and when to put a template "inactive user" or something like that. Maybe it’s just me, and that doesn’t actually exist. ] (]) 17:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::: {{Ping|Encyclopédisme}} See {{Tl|Not around}}. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 19:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks ] (]) 19:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi Everyone, | |||
== Editing a page that was removed == | |||
I am new here and I want to contribute a page of my own life story, but it may not work with the management since they prefer to have someone else to write about it. That's my understanding, but what if a person wants to do what I want with integrity and facts? I am trying to establish just one short page on the topic to start later edits by other editors. Thank you, ] (]) 22:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Hi {{u|Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor}}. I suggest you take a look at ], ] and ] because it sounds like you might be misunderstanding some things about Misplaced Pages and how it works. -- ] (]) 22:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::To succeed, a draft submitted to AfC for review must have content verified by references to succeed. You are prohibited from creating a draft about yourself based on what you know to be true with the hope that other editors will provide the references (if there are any). ] (]) 23:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you, David notMD. ] (]) 20:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Hi Marchjuly, thank you for your suggestion. I've checked the contents you suggested me to look into and I gathered that there would be no chance for anyone to contribute their biography on Misplaced Pages. The only way apparent to me now is that other people who are willing to cover someone who are noted write a piece about that individual. Am I not misunderstanding now? ] (]) 03:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::In addition @] | |||
:::I feel there is need for you to understand basic editing, See ] before creating articles as this can be very difficult for beginners who just joined the project. ] (]) 05:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You're not quite understanding. People who are truly notable ''can'' write biographies about themselves and have them published, and some have. But this is hard to do when you have a conflict of interest, as we all do about ourselves. | |||
:::See ]. That is what's required, in a nutsheell. Are there published reliable sources that are ''independent'' of you, providing ''significant coverage'' of you? If there are multiple such sources, then yes, you can write a biography citing them. The biography cannot use any information other than what is published, so you cannot write what you know, you must write what has been covered. ~] <small>(])</small> 05:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thank you for your comments and clarification. I do multiple have published reliable sources in English and Chinese that are independent of myself. I think I will tive i.rLetyme know if you have any more comments. I'd appreciate that. now? ] (]) 18:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Yes, I get it. Thank you. ] (]) 20:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{ping|Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor}} As posted above, even though creating an article about yourself isn't expressly prohibited, it can be quite hard and those who try often end up feeling quite frustrated when they start running into problems while trying to do so. My suggestion to you would be to use the ] process to first work on ] and then submit that draft for review when you think it's ready. If the draft is declined (even multiple times), the reviewer will explain why and otherwise leave feedback on what further is needed for the draft to someday be accepted as an article. There's no real deadline when it comes to drafts, and you can work at your own pace on it. The only thing you need to do is continue working on improving it and avoid submitting the same declined version over and over again; you also need to make sure you don't "]" the draft by not making any meaningful edits to it for six months because such drafts are eligible for speedy deletion. You're not required to start a draft per se, but once something gets added to the ], pretty much anything goes and the page can be edited by anyone at anytime; this could mean improvements, but it could just as easily mean being nominated, proposed or tagged for ]. Before pressing ahead, you might want to take a look at ], ], ] (particularly the ] and ] sections), ] and ] because you'll have pretty much zero final editorial control over any article you create about yourself, and all of it's content will be expected to be in accordance with relevant Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, which in some cases might not be the same as what you want it to be. -- ] (]) 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Again, thanks for the thorough explanations. I have gained a lot more understanding now. So, it's the best for other people to write about someone else. I get it, but how about people have someone other than themselves write their biography, for example, people who know the topic person well, or hired writers? ] (]) 21:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::It's best to avoid COI editing, especially paid editing. It tends to attract hostile scrutiny. | |||
:::::::Depending on who you are, there may be someone who would be interested in writing an article about you. Many editors specialize in certain types of biography: sports figures, academicians, scientists; the bios I write are often about chefs. But that would require you to disclose your identity, which you may not want to do. ] (]) 21:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::: {{ping|Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor}} Any type of "paid" editing needs to be done in accordance with ]; it's not expressly prohibited to have an article created by paying someone to do it for you, but basically that's a contract between you and the other party that has nothing to do with Misplaced Pages. It's your money and you're free to spend it as you please, but there are lots of ]s out there that promise all kinds of things that simply are impossible to deliver; so, if you do decide to take that path, you should make sure to ask lots of questions before giving someone your money because Misplaced Pages won't help you get it back if things go wrong. Other options to consider might be trying ] (which seems to be more miss than hit) or asking on the talk page of a ] that might be related to whatever you think makes you Misplaced Pages notable. Whatever you do, you're going to most likely find it hard to remain anonymous because Misplaced Pages operates in the ], and the way it's set up can make it easy for others to connect the dots and figure out who you really are.{{pb}}Personally, I still find it a bit odd when people seek to either create Misplaced Pages articles about themselves or try to find/pay someone to create such an article on their behalf. That sort of indicates to me that said person might be mistaking Misplaced Pages for some type of social media site or other kind of online profile site, which it's most definitely not. The most natural way for someone to have a Misplaced Pages article created about them is for them to do enough Misplaced Pages notable things so that reliable sources start covering them to the point that someone completely unconnected to them wants to create such an article. Of course, since this tends to work better for really famous people like movie stars. musicians, pro athletes, etc. than it does for other types of people who tend to be ignored by main stream media sources, I can somewhat understand feeling "I've got to do this myself because nobody is going to do it for me". Still it comes down to someone wanting to have a Misplaced Pages article written about them despite the fact that they're pretty much going to have zero control over what that article becomes over time. There seem to be much better ]s these days for someone to establish an online presence that they'll have total editorial control over and be able to use to let the world know about all about themselves. -- ] (]) 23:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Sorry to bother you again. Did you mean that the persons (such as celebrities, known politicians) who have a page written by unconnected people is not able to edit that page which is about the very themselves? ] (]) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::They can edit it, but anyone else is free to edit, too. Article subjects have no control over the articles about them. Other editors can add stuff you'd prefer not to include and can remove stuff you'd like to include. ] (]) 20:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: {{ping|Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor}} The subjects of articles can edit said articles, but they're going to be expected to do so in accordance with relevant Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines just like any other editor; the subjects of articles don't "own" the articles in the sense that they've got total control over what's written in the article, and they can't stop others from editing the article. When the subject of an article has a problem with what's written about them, Misplaced Pages has processes in place to try and help them sort things out as explained ]; Misplaced Pages, however, doesn't do what the subject wants just because the subject wants it done. -- ] (]) 00:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::The general guidance is that the subject of an article can make minor corrections to grammar, spelling, numers, names, etc, can add citations to reliable ''independent'' sources, and can revert obvious vandalism. Anything more substantive than that should be proposed on the article talk page. | |||
:::::::::That's after the article has been published. While it's still a draft, the subject is free to make any edits to it, and a reviewer would either accept the draft for publicaiton or decline it. ~] <small>(])</small> 00:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How do I request a move on Misplaced Pages? == | |||
:The page was moved to a ] on 5 November, 2022 for "Quarantine likely ]" The draft was then deleted under ] on 3 May, 2023 because it was deemed to be abandoned. You can request that it be refunded to you at ]. ]'']'' 16:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for informing me. I do not understand "refunding" it to me. I did not pay for anything- I was only going to edit or update it. Does "refund" in this instance mean, I would take "ownership" of it or it would then be put in my hands for editing? Thank you for your guidance. ] (]) 16:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::It means you could edit it, not that you own it. What is your connection to the page? ] (]) 16:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I have connection to it in that I specialize in retail communications in the space of CPG (consumer packaged goods) and retail media. My connection to the page is I formerly worked on PR projects for that company prior to them being sold. I continue to work in the retail media space, but with other clients and companies. TLN27 (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2024 I would appreciate any help in how to properly restore it and resolve any issues. I am new here-- so I'm sorry if this is like hand holding. ] (]) 17:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Refunding essentially means that it will be returned to its draft state. As Equine above asked, do you have a connection to this page at all? ]'']'' 16:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I have connection to it in that I specialize in retail communications in the space of CPG (consumer packaged goods) and retail media. My connection to the page is I formerly worked on PR projects for that company prior to them being sold. I continue to work in the retail media space, but with other clients and companies. ] (]) 16:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hello, TLN27. "REFUND" here has nothing to do with the ordinary English word "refund", but is a bit of Misplaced Pages jargon for "Request For UNDeletion". ] (]) 18:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{Ping|CommissarDoggo}} Please don't use jargon like "refunded" here on the Teahouse page. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 19:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
] gives you a guide on requesting a ], but it isn’t clear enough for me to request. How do I request it? ] (]) 12:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Notability and Neutral Point of View. == | |||
:Which page do you want moved to which title? ] (]) 13:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::] to {{No redirect|Voiceless palatal-velar fricative}}. ] (]) 06:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::On a side note, '''''always''''' check for ] if the target page already exists. If not, check for broken redirects. ] (]) 07:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::The article is 19 years old, it has been moved before, and its title has been discussed on the talk page, so it should be treated as a potentially controversial move with the procedure at ]. The talk page is ]. Note ] which may be mentioned by opponents. Is that sufficient help? ] (]) 22:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Weird message on my talk page from IP user == | |||
Hi Edit support, | |||
an IP (2003:DE:E714:EA46:83D:9568:35AD:7CE8) left a weird string of gibberish on my Talk page. what should I do about it? I'm going to delete it, of course, but should this go to ANI or something? ] | ] 14:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I am trying to build a Misplaced Pages page for Victoria Wyeth, I am receiving no benefit for my actions. I do not know Victoria but I do have her permission to proceed with this endeavor. My first submissions has ben denied approval on the grounds of notability and neutrality. I do believe that Victoria is sufficiently notable because she is an active part of the Wyeth legacy. Victoria is working to improve the public knowledge through her presentations. | |||
:@] Seasons Greetings from the Teahouse! I see you've already removed it, but, no, ANI would not be appropriate. This user made just two random edits - for what reason, we've no idea. Test edit? Error? Vandalism? You've reverted it. Great. That's all you need to do. I always check a user's contributions to see if they're doing it to others. . Nor is their IPv6 address , which is always worth checking. So, just walk away and ignore it, unless it happens again. It's never worth ]. | |||
But, when I try to develop a better submission to get over the notability question, I fall foul of the neutrality rule. | |||
:But, even then, this would be a case of disruption or vandalism, were the pattern to be repeated elsewhere. So, then you warn the user (Twinkle is a very easy tool for automating that process). Having warned them, check if they continue their behaviour. If they do so, warn them again, but with a higher level template and, if they still continue, report them at ], not ANI, as that's the place for vandals to be assessed and blocked if they're continuing to be disruptive. I hope this helps. ] (]) 14:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::thank you ] | ] 14:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:could it be that the user tried to literally "roar with you"? If you make a clever...(a good word for it escapes me right now)(your signature makes me smile everytime I see it) you must be aware of some unusual repercussions. ] (]) 11:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::sorry to say, but AGF doesn't apply here. After looking at it, it was most probably an attempt on ]. ] (]) 12:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Feedback on Draft? == | |||
What can I do to correct or improve my submission? | |||
Hoping this might be a place where someone might offer a bit of feedback on ] to see if there are any issues, formatting or content related - or anything else that seems problematic. | |||
Paul ] (]) 16:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
If not please advise any alternative. Thanks in advance! | |||
:The large majority of the ] is uncited and does not at all sound like it's presented in ]. | |||
:As an example, the first paragraph reads {{tq|"Victoria Wyeth is an accomplished and passionate lecturer, traveling world wide, her audiences benefit from her unique perspective through her first hand experience combined with her extensive research. As the granddaughter of renowned artist Andrew Wyeth, she carries forward a legacy of creativity and talent. Additionally, being the great-granddaughter of the celebrated illustrator N.C. Wyeth and the niece of contemporary realist Jamie Wyeth, Victoria is an active part of a remarkable artistic dynasty. The daughter of Nicholas and Jane Wyeth. Her father, Nicholas, is a private art dealer, while her mother, Jane, is an art advisor with a background in art history."}} To put it simply and rather bluntly, it reads like a PR ] piece. | |||
:I would personally ] and completely rewrite it, focusing on what ], ] sources are saying about this person. If you cannot find reliable, secondary sources, then you do not have a page. See ] for more on that. ]'']'' 16:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I’d also steer clear from editing the page due to your possible conflict of interest. ] (]) 16:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] Editors with a ] are not prohibited from creating articles, provided they use the ] process, which Paul is doing. ] (]) 16:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Agreed, but they should also declare such COI beforehand. ] (]) 16:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Apart from the tone of the draft, you are not complying with ], which you need to read carefully. You also need to show that she is ]. Interviews are not an acceptable way to do that, since inevitably people talk about themselves in a favourable way. You need sources which meet ]. As a newcomer to editing, you might be better to build your skills by editing existing articles on topics that interest you. ] (]) 16:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I deleted a lot of the laudatory content, but in my opinion she has not accomplished anything that makes ] Misplaced Pages-notable. ] (]) 18:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] At risk of a "pile-on", I would add that being {{tq|"an active part of the Wyeth legacy"}} is really not sufficient to justify an article about a person. All I see is that Victoria is active in giving lectures about her illustrious ancestors and relatives, but that she, herself, has not garnered much attention otherwise. In essence: Notability is not inherited. | |||
:A good source that shows her ancestry and her activity (like ), could possibly be used in a single sentence on the articles about those ancestors to show her family ties and their artistic legacy that she promotes today. But it would need to be short, very carefully worded, and not forced into an article for its own sake. | |||
:I was slightly bemused by one other statement you made, namely, {{tq|"I do not know Victoria but I do have her permission to proceed with this endeavor."}} Firstly, if you've made some contact with her, it suggests you do in some way know her but, more importantly, we do not ever need the approval of any notable subject to create a Misplaced Pages article about them. We only use sources that are in the public domain to compile articles, so permission is never needed. | |||
:I'm sorry this does not sound too positive. Until she becomes notable ''in her own right'' (see ] or ]), I fear you might be struggling to make progress. Regards, ] (]) 19:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you, I didn’t understand the rules sufficiently to make a good submission. I have listened to one zoom presentation by Victoria and I watched a presentation of hers at an organized event. I haven’t spoken with her directly. I sent her some communications about Misplaced Pages. I was very impressed by her work, that’s it really. I can see that opening the page is going to be difficult. Thank you for considering my submission. ] (]) 23:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 15:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== False Banning == | |||
:To get feedback you need to submit ] for review but I can tell you now that IMDb and Discogs are NOT reliable independent sources. ] (]) 15:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for this quick note. Will have to eliminate/replace IMDb and Discogs links and citations then. A bit challenging since about 1/2 of our references come from them. Good to know this would be a problem though (in advance!) ] (]) 15:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hi @], I am not seeing evidence from the sources you've provided that Karyn meets our ], unfortunately. If these are the best sources you have, then it doesn't look like Karyn merits an article on Misplaced Pages at this time. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 16:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::A LOT of unreferenced name-dropping that all has to be deleted. For example: "She became a technical consultant and friend to many - including Christopher Cross, Stewart Copeland, Timothy B. Schmidt, Elton John (band), Jon Anderson, Ray Charles, Billy Corgan, Eric Carmen, Butch Vig, Al Schmitt. Bruce Swedien, Oscar Peterson, Stevie Wonder, and countless others." ] (]) 20:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== DRAFT PAGE UNIVERSITY PROJECT == | |||
I've recently started editing and I saw a story about someone who got falsely banned and I'm wondering if it could happen to me? ] (]) 19:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello, i'm actually working on the draft page "Villa Fraccaroli" for a university project, i need the page to be accepted before the 31 of december, i was wondering if you could look at it, and if there's something to improve, i can work on it. | |||
:Hello. It's difficult to respond without knowing what you saw. There is a difference between a ] and a ]. Many blocked(or banned) users think their block/ban is false when it actually isn't. ] (]) 19:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thank you in advance! | |||
::Thanks that helps a lot! ] (]) 19:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Micol ] (]) 16:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{U|Liucmicol01}} We cannot guarantee acceptance before a certain date- we have ] on this volunteer project. and your professor has put you in a difficult position by making you do this. Your professor should review the ] materials to design lessons that don't depend on review by volunteers. Please show your professor this message. ] (]) 16:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Request to move Draft:Silvia Steiger to my userspace == | |||
:This has been reported on the Education Noticeboard: ] as a few other class members have posted queries. | |||
:@] please tell your instructor they have set you an unfair task: new drafts are reviewed by volunteers in their own time, and the current wait time is eight weeks or longer. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 16:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Qcue's answer is not true. The system is not a queue. Any draft can be reviewed in days, weeks, or (sadly) months. Each reviewer decides what they want to review next. ] (]) 20:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::For the curious, it has been accepted and is now at ]. ] (]) 20:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Obviously good submissions can be accepted fast, and problem ones can be declined fast. But those in between that are difficult to evaluate may be left for someone else to check. ] (]) 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Categories == | |||
I like to request that the ] is moved to my userspace, so I can continue to work on it. | |||
The article about Robert P.Black who died recently still has the category "Living person" at the bottom of his Misplaced Pages page. He died recently and that category should be removed from his page. How does one accomplish that? ] (]) 19:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I don't understand how I do so. | |||
:Welcome to the Teahouse, @]. Looking at the article, it doesn't look like it has been updated yet to account for his death, if he did die. Can you provide a ] (per ]) about his death so that we can add this information? ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 19:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The article has already been updated to indicate his death. My question relates to removing the category "living person". ] (]) 19:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::While it does say that ] died (my bad), it still isn't sourced and a quick Google search didn't find anything. Can you find a reliable source? ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 19:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::There is an obituary for this economist . ] (]) 19:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] The category has been removed and Black's death is added with a source. To remove categories in the future, you can click "Edit" at the top right of a page (assuming you're using a computer), click on the box of categories at the bottom of the page, and remove the respective category. ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 20:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== What do I do with this article == | |||
I found this article called ] and it doesn’t provide any citations and the only references are two Japanese websites that I can’t read. I really need help on whether I should draftify it or leave it be. I know absolutely nothing about Osaka or the train station, so for me I have no idea how to expand it. ] (]) 21:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thanks and kindly regards | |||
:Hm...marked as unrefrenced since 2011. @], any chance you'd be willing to do a google search to see if there are references? If there are, you can add them. If there aren't, or if you just don't feel like doing that work, you could redirect to ]. An attempt to fix is always best, but a unsourced article that's been tagged for that long, a redirect is a reasonable choice. ] (]) 21:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 20:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Also, @], be sure to study ] thoroughly before moving any articles to draftspace. An article that is older than 90 days should not be moved to draftspace. ] ] 21:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Valeree, if I were to leave a redirect, where would I redirect it to? ] (]) 14:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I'd say to ]? That article was also largely unreferenced, too, and both references were dead; I fixed them with the 'fix dead links' in the history. | |||
:::Just FTR, we don't require references to be in English, and if you open them in your browser, you may be able to see the translation. ] (]) 15:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Preference on editing style == | |||
: {{Ping|Vandepaerela}} Now at ]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I was wondering if it is prefered if, for consecutive edits/contributions for an article all written in the same edit period, that the edits be merged into a single large edit when publishing or if smaller but multiple edits are prefered. | |||
== Templates == | |||
] (]) on 22:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] It very much depends e.g. whether the topic is controversial and whether there are lots of other editors watching the article. We work according to a standard ] process and if you add one large edit, another editor may dislike just one part (e.g. because it is not sourced) and decide to revert the whole edit. If, instead, you add short sections then another editor will be unlikely to revert all your work and can focus on just the edit(s) they object to. If you are making a new article as a draft or in your sandbox, then large edits would be fine. ] (]) 22:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
How to create templates on Wiki and can it be created visually? ] (]) 01:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ec}} @] Welcome to the Teahouse. I would suggest making relatively small edits and saving each one with a short, helpful ]. At the largest, I would write one paragraph based upon one citation, though usually much smaller. Should you lose power or forget to save your edits, you could lose them. If an article is likely to be edited by other people at the same time, then saving in shorter packets helps you avoid ]S. If you describe each 'save' clearly, it also lets you go back through the 'View History' tab to find a particular edit that you had previously made - possibly to revert or review it easily. That also applies when working in your sandbox, where nobody else is going to be editing. Hope this helps and ''Welcome to Misplaced Pages''! ] (]) 22:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:There's a bit of variation available. As Mike Turnbull says, ff you're writing an article from scratch, large bulk edits are probably fine, while for controversial topics smaller edits are preferred. However, I'd advise not to go too far in either direction. Many small edits clog the edit history and might obscure significant changes you make in with minor copyediting or the like, which makes it harder for other editors to review and process the changes. For article-writing, I find trying to cram everything into one big edit clogs up my thinking; I prefer to start with a stub and build it up over a few days. '']'' ‹ ] — ] › 01:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::For large existing articles at which I intend to make lots of changes, sometimes as preparing for a Good Article nomination (see ]) I am always doing multiple edits. At most, I copy a section into my Sandbox, work there, then replace the original with my revised. ] (]) 11:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== I would like to correct a page William John Swainson == | |||
:See ] and ]. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 02:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
*{{Courtesy link|William John Swainson}} | |||
This name is incorrect it should be William Swainson. He did not have a middle name of John. I have a copy of his death certificate which clearly has his full name as William Swainson, as does his grave stone and the memorial plaque of his first wife Mary Parkes. | |||
I have not sighted any books that he illustrated or wrote that had John as a middle name | |||
I have sighted newspaper articles and letters as well as places were he is referenced in the committees, Societies, and groups he was in. I have never seen any of his sketches signed William John Swainson or WJ Swainson or William J Swainson. Remember that there are also sketches done by his sons, including William John Swainson (Willie), and his daughters. Even the sources have him as WIlliam Swainson. Can anyone help me as this is the first time I have tried to do this. Thanks ] (]) 01:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The formal place to propose a rename is on ]. Present your evidence. Various reliable sources do include the name "John", so you will ahve to counteract them. Also the page ] is already a disambiguation page, so you would have to go to a different name such as ]. Once a decision is made the page can be "]d" to the appropriate title. ] (]) 03:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I haven't looked through all the sources cited, but none of the ones I have looked at say "John" anywhere, including the ], and the obituary in ] which is titled "William Swainson", despite it being cited as "William John Swainson". ] (]) 10:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::User "Judge Nutmeg" seems to have introduced the name John in ] in 2007, with no citation to support it. The article was moved to the present title in August 2008. Which are the sources which support "John" @]? (These replies should be on the Talk page, but I haven't the time to create a discussion there now). ] (]) 11:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Some sources include . They are just input for a decision of the name and need to be compared with other sources that don't use "John". ] could be a better name for our article. ] (]) 20:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::The first source points to William's son William John. The others point to say William John Swainson then talk about William Swainson. The last source is a newer one and probably got for Misplaced Pages? Any old source refers to William Swainson. I think that since the name was changed in 2007 - 2008 without any sources the new sources after that date may be invalid. How could I load a picture of his death certificate? I am really new to this so am struggling. I appreciate any help. I agree with the new name for our article ] (]) 22:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Probably a birth certificate is more relevant, but it was so long ago, they probably did not exist. There might be a christening record though. Anyway you don't have to prove via a death certificate, just a preponderance of sources. ] (]) 02:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Article Making == | |||
== Saving a sandbox environment. == | |||
I am the grandson of Joseph A. Burgundy and I thought his life was interesting so I tried to make an article on him I don't have any other resources I can find except my father and he died in 2011 so I don't know what to do ] (]) 02:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi all. I'm working on big changes to a company page. My mentor helped me create a sandbox environment to create a draft for these changes. I have now asked for an independent editor review of the page but am concerned my changes in the sandbox aren't saving. There is no 'save changes' button, only 'review changes' and 'publish changes'. If I hit publish, will the changes only be reflected in the sandbox environment, or will they update the actual company page in Misplaced Pages? ] (]) 05:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{ |
:Hello {{yo|Doodledoo4}}. On Misplaced Pages, articles are based off information that is already published. So you can search online, books, and newspaper indexes. But if the only information is from relatives, then it is not a suitable topic for Misplaced Pages. So if it is like that then you can choose to do something else instead. ] (]) 03:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: |
::If you cannot find newspaper articles about your grandfather (for example, an obituary), then there is no path to your draft being accepted as an article. You can either ask that it be deleted or just abandon it, leaving it to be auto-deleted six months from now. ] (]) 11:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I see that you've replaced the description "Singaporean liquefied natural gas exchange", which explains what the business is, by "Provider of enterprise solutions to the global commodities market", which is meaningless promotional guff. In my view that is not an improvement. ] (]) 07:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:And worse - before your edits, it cited six sources. Now it cites none (though it does list some). Misplaced Pages articles should be be based on the sources that they cite - so that's definitely not an improvement. ] (]) 08:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{u|JessZoiti}}, please see ] in order to improve the article. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 08:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== " " tag appearing in some edits I make == | |||
:Thank you for . Very likely each client hopes that its article will impress readers with its experience, skills, probity, etc. But Misplaced Pages is only concerned with what reliable, disinterested sources say about a demonstrably ] subject. These "big changes" you're working on -- are they perhaps intended to aggrandize the subject? As it is, your draft reads like corporate PR sludge. As a humdrum example: "GLX Digital pivoted away from The Global LNG Marketplace in July 2021, discontinuing the product", which doesn't obviously mean anything other than "GLX Digital discontinued the Global LNG Marketplace in July 2021". -- ] (]) 08:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The existing ] has properly formated refs embedded in the text. Copy those as needed into your Sandbox. For new refs, use proper ref format and placement. P.S. No hyperlinks in text. ] (]) 12:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You face a large problem: As a declared PAID editor, you are not supposed to edit the article directly. Instead, you are supposed to propose changes on the article's Talk page so that a non-involved editor can approve and implement, or deny. There are a few exceptions that allow for editing the article directly, such as simple facts about headquarters location, number of employees, etc. ] (]) 12:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::HI @] thank you for your help here. I'm new to Misplaced Pages and am unsure of the most appropriate ways to navigate the platform - my intentions are to see the page reflect current and correct information. From this point onwards, I'll make edit suggestions on the Talk page as you recommend. Appreciate it. ] (]) 00:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I am curious as to why some of my edits lately include adding " " tags when I am not intentionally adding them. Examples include , , and . I corrected them with , , and , respectively. I wonder if pages that are prone to having the " " tag appear when I intend to make a different change have some script or formatting issue that I do not know about until I make the edit. If anyone can help identify this issue, I would appreciate it. ] (]) 03:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== New topic == | |||
:Hello, {{u|Z. Patterson}}. That is just the code for a ]. It prevents an unwanted line break. ] (]) 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@]: I understand now. Thank you. ] (]) 04:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Sandbox == | |||
I just want to add that that Jonathan Hager "played a crucial role," by emphasizing his significant influence and active involvement in political processes. This, I hope, will underscore his importance in the local history of Maryland and portrays him as a key figure in the region's development. ] (]) 06:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Is there any way to use existing articles as template sorta things for the sandbox? Any help is appreciated! ] (]) 04:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:], thank you for trying, but in the article ], you've presented as the source for this added tidbit a page that seems to have been "]", and you've put the link to it in the body of the article. Neither is acceptable in a Misplaced Pages article. Please see ], -- ] (]) 08:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, {{u|Willzdawgh}}. Yes. you can copy an existing article into your sandbox, but for attribution purposes, you should use an edit summary of something like "Copying (article title) into my sandbox for article development purposes". Wikilink the article in question where I said (article title). ] (]) 04:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Copying ] into my sandbox for article development purposes | |||
::Like that? ] (]) 04:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::That is a ''massive'' and highly controversial article, {{u|Willzdawgh}}. Why on earth would you select that article? ] (]) 04:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::srry if I did something wrong bro. I'm new and I also forgot to mention that I was wanting to do this merely bc I was bored. I'm sorry if that's a problem. More specifically I wanted to mess around with hypertranslate and replace the article's text with the result on hypertranslate. I'm sorry if I'm unknowingly planning on doing something I'm not allowed to. I'll refrain from doing this if that's the case. Once again, very sorry. ] (]) 04:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::No need to apologize. If you're here to experiment, I recommend scouting scouting out stub articles via ], pasting the wikitext into your sandbox, and messing around with the source there. If you need any help, you can refer to the tutorial at ], the cheatsheet at ], or an experienced editor (not me.) Thanks for asking, ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 04:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{u|Willzdawgh}} Applying the Hypertranslate software to the text of an existing article and then replacing the original text would be considered vandalism and would result in your account being indefinitely blocked. If all you are is curious about what repeated Google Translate would do to any Misplaced Pages text, do that on your own computer and do not bring it back to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 11:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== New article submission, but before I start… == | |||
== Hello. I would like to ask for help if it is possible to edit the title of my draft article? == | |||
Dear Wiki Help, I’ve tried and failed to enter a new article because of the notability and my tone being too biographical. I didn’t know about these rules when I started. I’d like to try again but with a different subject. My niece is an actress Flora Dawson, she comes up first if you google her. If I write a short submission and cite her achievements do you think she is noteworthy enough to be published as an article on Misplaced Pages? ] (]) 09:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello. I would like to ask for help if it is possible to edit the title of my draft article? ] (]) 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Paul7384}} Hello and welcome. Please read ] first. You will want to see the ] to see if she meets it, and gather independent ] that give her significant coverage- those should be summarized in an article, it should not merely document her achievements. ] (]) 09:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Most of the content I see on Google is based on her IMDb entry. Misplaced Pages does not consider that a reliable source (see ]). So your approach could be to take the IMDb listings only as a starting point to delve into her career and see whether theatre critics etc. have written specifically about her. Choose only high-quality newspaper journalists and avoid anything substantially based on interviews. You must use the ] process because of your ] and should declare that on the Draft's Talk Page. Good luck. ] (]) 12:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you Mike, very helpful. ] (]) 12:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] You would have to ] an article via the toolbar on the right side of the screen to do it, but only ] can do it. If you would like, I can move it for you, as long as you can specify the desired title. ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 04:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Photo of corpses == | |||
:Hello! Thank you so muchc much appreciated if you can edit the title and make it like "Atty. Howard Calleja et, al. vs. Executive Secretary et, al." ] (]) 12:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Note that the specific title of a draft is not particularly relevant to the draft process. If accepted, the draft will be placed at the proper title. ] (]) 12:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Passive voice in articles == | |||
Hi all. Wondering about the photo of corpses in the ] infobox. It's the only image on the topic available on wiki commons, which isn't surprising. My reading of ] is that it should probably be removed, but I'm curious about what editors with some experience with WP:OM have to say. Cheers. ] (]) 10:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Courtesy link|User:Sparkle & Fade/sandbox|linktext=Sacred Reich (sandbox)}} | |||
:@] I see that you asked this back in January on the Talk Page of the article and I'm surprised you haven't had any replies there given the page had 77 watchers. My own view is that this image (from 1892) is by no means the most graphic we have on Misplaced Pages and would not fall into the most egregious categories where specific consensus to use them would be needed. I note that the image is widely used in multiple-language Wikipedias, so I don't think that the English version is an outlier in this case. ] (]) 11:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Also see ]. ] (]) 12:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, that's in the first sentence of the guidance Robincantin has already linked to. ] (]) 13:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@], ] Given the topic, I suspect the en.wikipedia was the original, the other languages just followed its example. Ok, I'll leave it unless a discussion going in the other direction develops on its Talk page (looks like it won't). ] (]) 14:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{u|Robincantin}}, since we have individual photos of ], ] and ], a collage of those three could be created for the infobox, and the photo of the corpses could be moved to the Coffeeville bank robbery section. I left this suggestion on the article talk page as well. The policy language is at ]. ] (]) 17:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm working on a draft for the ] article (at my sandbox) for a major edit, and I ran my text through numerous grammar/spellcheckers like EasyBib and Grammarly. The most common—and most confusing—is on the use of ]. For context, passive voice is "the ball ''was kicked by'' Jeremy", while active voice is "Jeremy ''kicked'' the ball". I don't know whether or not I should be using passive voice in my prose (i.e. "Greg Hall was fired from the band and was replaced by drummer Tim Radziwill). I have attempted to use featured articles as examples, but usually doesn't seem to happen because of the abundance of information on the subject (i.e ] or ]) compared to a band like Sacred Reich. In my opinion, I'm not sure whether or not to use passive voice because it sounds rough when introducing a new member. | |||
== Image: copyright holder has approved publication == | |||
For example, "Greg Hall ... was replaced by Dave McClain ... later that year." vs. "Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall later that year." usually justifies using passive voice, but in context, this his ''first mention'' in the article and it disrupts the flow of the prose. In context: | |||
Hello Wikipedians, | |||
{{blockquote|text=Sacred Reich toured for nearly two years in support of The American Way, headlining major tours with Atrophy, Obituary, and Forced Entry. They also supported Venom in Europe and for Sepultura on their Arise tour in both Europe and North America. In 1991, the band released an EP, titled A Question. Former S.A. Slayer member Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall, who found their extensive touring to be difficult, later that year.}} | |||
] | |||
I'm still not sure if it justifies using active voice or not. If it does, please let me know. On a side note, I've noticed an abundance of the phrase "later that year" in my writing, and I don't know how to rewrite it properly because of vague dates in the source material. If anyone can help me with that as well, ''please'' let me know so I can get rid of the repetition. Thanks for reading. —] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 04:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
This image has the following text underneath: | |||
:I think it's clunky because of where you put 'later that year'. It reads much better if you put it first - Later that year former S.A. Slayer member Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall, who found the extensive touring difficult. I don't think you should worry too much about active vs passive voice. Despite what grammar checkers might tell you, there's no one right way to write. ] (]) 06:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Blockquote|The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2015102610015282.}} | |||
::Thanks for the tip, ]. I appreciate the advice, it does actually seem more about the word placement than the voice construction, and I'll make sure to refactor the article to read better. Thanks, ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 06:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::In my view, {{u|Sparkle & Fade}}, the active voice is almost always best for writing encyclopedia articles. We favor a direct, clear and concise style of writing. is a good explanation from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. ] also offers a lot of good advice. ] (]) 07:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::passive voice is best used when you have to avoid to ascribe an action to someone. Example: somebody was fired from the band. The reference uses passive voice, thereby avoiding to say who did it. Now you have a choice. Either search for a reference, that says who was firing or use passive voice too to avoid to say who did the firing. What you can't do is to figure out who ''could'' do the firings in general and then ascribe that firing to him in active voice! ] (]) 12:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::When it matters (and you know) who took the action, use the active. When it's not important who was the actor, by all means use the passive. Grammarly and its friends express a prejudice against the passive which appeared in the early 20th C, often by writers who failed to follow their own injunction, and sometimes appeared unable to detect a passive accurately. See http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/003380.html. ] (]) 15:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== New editor needs some help. == | |||
I would like to upload some good images to Misplaced Pages. Some I took myself and hold copyright that I can release. For other pictures, however, I would need to get the copyright holder to send the confirmation. | |||
Hi there, I'm new. I wrote 2 drafts: 1 about an Internship Program which I found interested in, 1 is a course in social science field. I submitted 2 drafts and all rejected. | |||
When copyright holder approves the publication: | |||
After editing few more things. I still don't know how to make references more reliable, or which content is the promoting material? | |||
# Where do I or copyright holder sends that email? | |||
# Where do I send or upload the image? ] (]) 10:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Here is my 2 drafts: ] and ] ] (]) 08:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: '''Clarification''': | |||
: Basically, if I'd like to upload an image in the same way as the example I provided – how do I do that? :) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::@] Commons has its own Help Desk where you can ask if you run into problems. The email address to send permission is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org See ] for alternative ways you can get people to use the system. For your ''own'' pictures taken on your own camera, the process is much simpler. Just use the ] and carefully follow the prompts. ] (]) 11:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Hi Benevolent Bureocrat. Just going to add that if you upload your own photos to Commons, you need to make sure they are not photos of entirely of or that include too much of someone else's creative content because in many cases you will need that person's consent as well. For more on this, see ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. -- ] (]) 12:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Miyano25}} Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Note that "rejected" has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Your drafts were "declined", meaning that they may be resubmitted. | |||
== How do we qualify a "reasonable" paid source? == | |||
:Misplaced Pages is not a place to just tell about something. A Misplaced Pages article summarizes what independent ] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Misplaced Pages definition of ]- such as ]. Regarding MIP, you did a great job telling about the structure of the program and its offerings- but that's not what we're looking for(alone, at least). We're looking for a summary of what others say about the program. The same goes for the Vietnamese course. You can't "make references more reliable"- they either are, or they're not. Reliable sources are those which have a reputation of fact checking and editorial control- like reputable news outlets(just one example). ] (]) 08:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Oh I see, thanks for explaining. Is it okay if I can summarize what other people say about the program but don't have a source to back it up, or have a source but it's not reliable to make it as a source? ] (]) 14:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Article not visible on google == | |||
There's been a handful of changes recently using ]'s paid fantasy football guide (ex. ) to cite full names, birth dates, and birth places. Is this allowed? I know we can cite paid publications, but these guides feel kind of commercial and are likely not accessible in the long term (and therefore, unarchivable). Any suggestions on what to do here? --] (]) 12:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
i created this article ] 7 months ago, moved it to mainspace but still not showing on google, what could be wrong ?, please reply with either of the two editor ] (]) 13:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:In line with the current sourcing policies, I don't see why this wouldn't be allowed. Editors can cite rare books that very few editors will ever be able to read in order to verify the claims made, so as long as the author is reliable, The Athletic's guide would be a usable resource. In terms of "unarchivable": is there precedent of previous years' draft guides being deleted? That would be my main concern here. ]] 14:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I think the nature of fantasy football journalism (vs. sports journalism) is it is and can be transient and inconsistent, so I would imagine the url of these things can and do change as years go by, but such is the nature of the Internet. Appreciate your input; I think I'll let this go; my concern was if this file is used to cite the birth dates for dozens of articles and is gone in a year, we are stuck back at square one in a couple years time! --] (]) 15:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::That is a concern for sure, but even now there are plenty of printed books that can be bought for the past few decades of NFL drafts still out there, and The Athletic still hosts news articles regarding fantasy football from 2018 that pop up on Google. ]] 15:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] The article was marked as reviewed on 31 August, so search engines ''could'' index thereafter. However, Misplaced Pages has no control over when they actually do so. There have been no edits to the article since that date. In my experience, if you make even a minor edit now, Google will pick it up very quickly. ] (]) 13:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== MOS:ELLIPSES and MOS:LQ ''seem'' contradictory. == | |||
::Wow, thank you! This really helped, and I feel like I understand it much better now. we learn everyday. ] (]) 19:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@], please note that Misplaced Pages is not for ]. The articles you created are written in a promotional tone, and I have tagged them as such. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::oh thanks for your contribution, i will check through again and fix it. ] (]) 13:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: does not magically make the article neutral. You'll need to rewrite most of the article, which contains promotional terms like {{tq|significantly influenced}}, {{tq|difficult to fit in due to his elaborate style}}, and more. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Further, @], Who says that it "quickly emerged as a leading force"? Evaluative statements like that never belong in any Misplaced Pages article, unless they are directly cited to a ]. (And that is just one more example of the promotional language). {{HD/WINI}} ] (]) 15:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thank you for pointing that out. This page happens to be one of my first articles on Misplaced Pages, which is why I take particular interest in it. I would like to clarify that I am not affiliated with the individual or the company; I am simply contributing to the platform as others do. | |||
::::The article was initially reviewed and approved. However, I have revisited, re-edited, and thoroughly checked the content based on your feedback. If there is a better approach to further improve it, I would genuinely appreciate your suggestions. After all, the purpose of this community is to collaborate and learn from one another. | |||
::::I have implemented all the changes you highlighted, yet it seems you remain unsatisfied. I am open to constructive feedback, as learning and growing are integral parts of this journey. | |||
::::Thank you again for your time and input. ] (]) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== HELP == | |||
The following guidance ''seems'' contradictory. | |||
]:<blockquote>But where an ellipsis is immediately followed by any of <code>. ? ! : ; , ) ] }</code> or by a closing quotation mark (single or double), use a non-breaking space before the ellipsis, and no space after it: | |||
<code>Jones wrote: "These stories amaze me. The facts suffer so frightfully{{nbsp}}..."</code></blockquote> | |||
Kindly help me how best I can use this reservation system ] (]) 14:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
]: <blockquote>If the quotation is a single word or a sentence fragment, place the terminal punctuation outside the closing quotation mark. When quoting a full sentence, the end of which coincides with the end of the sentence containing it, place terminal punctuation inside the closing quotation mark. | |||
:@] could you clarify what you mean by {{tq|reservation system}}? <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 14:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Your account is blocked for name problems. Either stop using this account and start a new one with a name that does <ins>not</ins> imply a business, or else use the name change process described on your Talk page. ] (]) 18:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{small|I added "not" to the above sentence, since that's clearly what was intended. ] (]) 07:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
== Enquiry == | |||
*{{xt|Miller wanted, he said, "to create something timeless".}} | |||
*{{xt|Miller said: "I wanted to create something timeless."}}</blockquote> | |||
this article ] is about a deceased person, but its without image, i tried to find the image i could add for a proper recognition, but this is the only image of her i found online https://independent.ng/wp-content/uploads/Funmi-Martins.jpg, can i add it regardless ? ] (]) 14:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
My guess is that MOS:ELLIPSES is not as clear as it could be. For example, perhaps it should be edited like this (or similar):<blockquote>But where an ellipsis is immediately followed by any of <code>. ? ! : ; , ) ] }</code> or by a closing quotation mark (single or double), use a non-breaking space before the ellipsis, and no space after it: | |||
<code>Jones wrote: "These stories amaze me. The facts suffer so frightfully{{nbsp}}...".</code>(Note that the period ending the sentence should be placed outside the quotation mark; see ].)</blockquote> | |||
Or am I totally misunderstanding? | |||
:No, @], you probably cannot. When adding images to Misplaced Pages (or Commons), you need to make sure they are free of copyright. This file from the Independent is likely non-free, and therefore you cannot use it here on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thanks! – <span style="font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 14px;">] ]</span> <span style="font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 11px;"></span> 14:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::hi, thanks for your response, this image in question is all over the internet, how do i know who to contact for license and how do i know if it has a free license or not? ] (]) 14:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Something being on the internet does not mean it has a copyright compatible with Misplaced Pages’s. I think that the media outlet that owns the copyright would be unlikely to release the image for use on Misplaced Pages, but you could ask them. ] (]) 15:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::If the person is dead, you can upload a fair-use image locally here on Misplaced Pages (which for me shows up as an 'upload file' button under contributions in the left side of the page.) ] (]) 15:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{u|Iamtoxima}}, the policy language regarding use of a non-free photo of a deceased person when no freely licensed or public domain photo is available can be found at the policy ] point #10. You need to carefully follow every step in the policy, because there are legal implications. With all due respect, {{u|Win8x}}, you are incorrect on the general point, as some non-free images are permitted on Misplaced Pages in narrow circumstances. Careful evaluation is needed regarding this specific image. ] (]) 08:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Apologies. I genuinely did not know about NFCI #10, I guess you learn something every day. ] (]) 14:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Autoconfirmed == | |||
:@] My interpretation is that an ] is the set of (usually) three dots that indicates something is missing: in this case from a quote. That being so, it would be confusing to place another punctuation dot immediately after the ellipsis but it does need a non-breaking space before it. Another way to think of this is that any quotation ending in an ellipsis must indeed be a fragment, so the advice at ] is good: put the quotation mark before the final punctuation. Your suggestion to alter the guidance could lead to extra clarity, so if no-one else here at the Teahouse has a different idea, you could ] and add that. ] (]) 14:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Excellent - thank you! <span style="font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 14px;">] ]</span> <span style="font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 11px;"></span> 16:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I wanted to know how to become a autoconfirmed user, like, is there a test you have to pass or a certain amount of edits or certain amount of years. I also ask this question about extended confirmed and those other ones. ] (]) 16:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== IP Address Exemption == | |||
:Your account has to be more than four days old and have a certain amount of edits (how many, I can't remember, I think, like, 10-ish) ] (]) 16:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::] should help. ] (]) 16:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Well, is there like a notification that you get because I have 513 edits and have been on for almost a month ] (]) 16:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, you are autoconfirmed. You can check here: ] 16:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Wow, that link was cool and definitely helpful. Thanks! ] (]) 16:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::How do you put the autoconfirmed sign at the top of your user page, like the tiny Misplaced Pages globe that says your autoconfirmed? ] (]) 16:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::That is called a topicon (top icon)! That one is here ] but there are plenty of topicon templates out there. ] 17:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Ok thanks! ] (]) 17:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Am I able to edit the page that you showed me Cmrc23? In case it needs updating, like, the statistics page? ] (]) 15:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::My statistics page ] (]) 15:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Xtools updates automatically, and I do not think you can edit it. ] 15:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::Ok, but there is one thing wrong about one part of it ] (]) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::Can you tell me what that is? You might simply be reading the page wrong ] 15:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::It says I got 0 thanks, even though I got 1 from someone some 10 days ago ] (]) 15:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::Under "basic information", it states that you have been thanked one time. Under "actions" it states that you have thanked 0 users. They are in two different sections so it can be a bit tricky to notice! ] 15:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::::Oh, ok ] (]) 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::::By the way, thanking in this context refers to the specific action of clicking the "thank" button on the relevant entry on a page's edit history. ] 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Subject: Request for Guidance on Improving Draft Article == | |||
:@]: Welcome to the Teahouse! What issues are you having? If you're not able to edit at all, see ]. If you're having a different issue, please provide more details. Thanks! ] (]) 17:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] My account was created by a user due to the fact I couldn't create it on my own which was then because my IP address was abused previously. I'm just concerned about future problems here on Misplaced Pages. Thank you for trying to help me but I need more directions. ] (]) 17:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hi, {{u|Caleb Ndu}}! As long as you're logged into your account, the editing status of your IP shouldn't matter and you should be good to go! What other directions are you looking for? Happy editing, ] (]) 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@]I am happy to receive clarifications. Now, my nerves are calm. I need a mentor here. How do I apply for? ] (]) 17:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{u|Caleb Ndu}}, there are various ways you can get mentorship or help on Misplaced Pages. It looks like your automatically assigned mentor is {{#mentor:Caleb Ndu}}{{snd}}you can ask your mentor questions on their talk page ]. You can also continue to ask questions here at the Teahouse. Did you have a specific question you wanted an answer for? Happy editing, ] (]) 17:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::@] Thanks for this direction, I have written @] on his talk page and I wait response from him under 24 hours from this moment. I want to see if he's interested, else I move on with another editor. I love the way you reply me. ] (]) 18:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Dear Misplaced Pages Editors, | |||
== Submitting a draft through articles for creation == | |||
I hope this message finds you well. I recently submitted a draft article on Dr. Toula Gordillo and received feedback indicating that the references provided do not sufficiently establish the subject’s notability. I am eager to improve the article and ensure it meets Misplaced Pages’s notability criteria. | |||
Hi! I am a newbie but want to submit a draft through articles for creation. Do I go straight there, or is it best to ask someone here to review my draft? Any help would be MUCH appreciated :) ] (]) 17:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Could you please guide me on the following: | |||
What types of references would be considered more appropriate or substantial to establish notability? | |||
Are there specific sources or types of coverage (such as academic publications or in-depth media articles) that would strengthen the article? | |||
How can I best demonstrate the subject’s significance using independent, reliable secondary sources? | |||
Here is the draft link for your reference: ] | |||
I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions you may have to help improve this draft and make it suitable for full publication. | |||
Thank you for your time and assistance. | |||
Best regards, ] (]) 19:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:You need the independent, reliable, secondary sources that you mention above. (I clicked on a few of the links currently provided: not one of them was independent of the subject.) ] (]) 20:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for your feedback. I understand the importance of including independent, reliable, secondary sources to establish notability. I am currently in the process of identifying and incorporating such sources to ensure the article meets Misplaced Pages's guidelines. I appreciate your time and guidance. ] (]) 21:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, @]. As the IP says, ] is the main issue. {{HD/WINI}} | |||
:Check each of your sources against the triple criteria in ]. If they're not reliable, (eg Shadowwork Solutions), don't use the at all. If they don't have significant coverage of Gordillo, what are they even doing in the article? If they are not independent, then it is possible that they could be used to verify uncontroversial factual data such as locations and dates, but they will not contribute to ]. | |||
:Get rid of the media section - if the sources are valid to verify some information about Gordillo, then cite them, otherwise including them is pure promotion, which is forbidden. Ditto appearances at conferences: why does a reader of an encyclopaedia article care waht conferences she has spoken at? ] (]) 21:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for your detailed feedback. I now better understand the need for independent, reliable, secondary sources to establish notability and avoid promotional content. I will carefully review all existing references and only retain those that meet the criteria outlined in WP:42. Moving forward, I will also remove sections that could be seen as promotional or irrelevant to an encyclopedic article. Your guidance is greatly appreciated and will help me refine the draft accordingly. ] (]) 21:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, but please don't use a LLM ("AI") here. Thanks! ] (]) 23:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== how can citations be removed completely from a submitted article? == | |||
:@]Where's the article draft namespace? I wish to contribute to it's improvement. ] (]) 18:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Use ] as a path to creating a draft. Be sure that you understand the essential need for references, and how to format references. AfC then allows you to submit your draft. There is a backlog. The system is not a queue, meaning that any draft may be reviewed in days, weeks, or sadly, months. All that said, general advice is to gain experience editing existing articles before attempting to create a new article. P.S. Teahouse hosts are here to advise, but do not wear a second hat as reviewers. ] (]) 18:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{u|Caleb Ndu}} While wanting to help other editors is admirable, given that you have had your account for less than two weeks, I suggest refraining from offering to co-author drafts by other editors. ] (]) 19:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] That's not an issue. I wish to be directed to where I could be more friendly. I wish to interact with other editors as much as I can. I didn't join 2 weeks ago. I joined 2 months ago. ] (]) 19:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you! :) ] (]) 14:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hi! I have created a draft page through the article wizard on the page you linked above. Do I need to click publish for it to be reviewed - is there anything I need to add when publish? ] (]) 14:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, Becca33, and welcome to the Teahouse. I echo David's advice: every day we see dozens of drafts written by eager new editors before they have spent time learning how Misplaced Pages works. Hardly any of them are acceptable as they stand, and many are never going to be acceptable, because the creators have not begun by determining whether or not the subject meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for ]. Naturally, the enthusiastic creators get disappointed (at the very least) that their efforts appear not to be appreciated. | |||
:I see that you are a Marketing professional: to be honest, you may find that more of a hindrance than a help, because often the ways of writing which are entirely appropriate in your work are entirely '''in'''appropriate in Misplaced Pages. So, as David says: go slowly, and make sure you understand fundmental concepts such as ], ], ] and ] before you venture to follow the advice in ]. | |||
:And I'd address most of that to @Caleb Ndu as well. ] (]) 19:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks so much! :) ] (]) 14:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, | |||
== Biography pages == | |||
I have citations in my submitted article that need to be deleted entirely. I fail to see the process for doing this edit. Kindly advise. Thank you! ] (]) 22:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Edu.Report}}, the quality of the ] that you cite is all-important. If you neutrally summarize high quality, independent sources that devote significant coverage to the person, you will be well on your way to success. ] (]) 18:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks that is a great advice. ] (]) 18:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:] may have something helpful. ] (]) 18:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::That is what I was trying to do, I started a draft and then I was deleted. I could not even edited. How can I work on the article before it is deleted? ] (]) 18:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You could work in your ]. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 19:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Not being an Administrator, I cannot see the draft that was Speedy deleted, but as explained on your Talk page, it was considered too promotional. I recommend you look at existing biographies to get an idea of how content is presented to be neutral versus promotional. Biographies, especially, must have content verified by references. ] (]) 19:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hello, Edu Report. If you make sure you ignore absolutely everything said, written, or published, by the subject or their associates, and write summarizing only what ] commentators have published about the subject, your work will be less likely to be regarded as promotional. ] (]) 19:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{Ping|Edu.Report}} You can request a copy of the deleted page be put in your sandbox, so you can improve it, by asking at ]. Please note that pages deleted as a copyright violation will <u>not</u> be restored. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I think you meant "will '''not''' be restored". ] (]) 21:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Corrected. Thank you. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 13:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Which article (or draft) are you talking about? ] (]) 23:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Auto-archive for page == | |||
::Appears to be ]. ] (]) 02:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Click on Edit at top. This opens the entire article for editing. Go to where those pesky citations are and delete. That will remove the citation from the list of references. ] (]) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::And it will update the numbering of refs that are used later in the article. ] (]) 16:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Edit to template by blocked user == | |||
I have difficulties sometimes properly setting up the automatic archive feature on some pages. I attempted just now to setup a automatic archive for the talk page at ], but I cannot be positive that it was setup correctly. Could one of you please help me in checking just to ensure that that was created correctly and that it should then begin auto-archiving in 14 days as currently configured? ] (]) 18:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] since there are not a lot of threads on that page, it might be better to manually archive them with a tool like ], which will move an individual thread to an archive. 14 days seems awfully short for the number of threads there are. – ] (]) 19:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Ok. How do I change the time. I think 30 days might be best. I just do not know how to set that up. If you could help me that would be really nice. ] (]) 19:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I'm not sure whether to be concerned, but a blocked editor has been using an IP range to edit & . I saw that someone in the blocked range has removed hidden text from a template . Is it something that needs fixing? I experimented with undoing it myself, but there are subsequent edits & I'm woefully inexperienced with templates. Can someone more experienced please cast their eye on the edit? ] (]) 01:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{od}} | |||
:Hi @]. The hidden text that was removed is just boilerplate instructions for adding episode descriptions. Once a description has been added for an episode, there's no need to retain the instructions, so this edit is okay. Always good to check though, thanks! ] ] 14:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Ping|Iljhgtn}} Paste this at the top of the talk page: | |||
::@] That's really useful to know, thank you! ] (]) 14:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Watchlist preferences and settings == | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang="moin"> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 75K | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(28d) | |||
|archive = {{SAFESUBST:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{archives|search=yes}} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
My watchlist continues to show categorization edits, despite checking <Hide categorization of pages> in my preferences. I've tried both the javascript and the non-javascript watchlists. The unwanted watchlist edits that do appear seem to all be made via either ] or ]. They aren't marked as minor edits, but I actually don't want to hide all minor edits. I have also selected the watchlist filter <Human (not bot)>, without luck; perhaps because they're merely semi-automated edits (as opposed to actual bots?). I have checked the tag to exclude all AWB edits, which does work for those. Does anyone have any thoughts? ] (]) 02:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Change <code>old(28d)</code> (28 days) to a more suitable number if you wish. Adjust <code>|counter = 1</code> to account for any existing archive pages. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Are you speaking about the Watchlist for Misplaced Pages in English language ? <br /> <br /> | |||
:I added a lowercasesigmabot that would appear to be working. If you want to check my work, it looks like it already archived some content and left some still yet to be archived. ]. ] (]) 20:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Can you make screenshots ? I can possibly help you with some screenshots but I can't guarantee I can help you with efficiency. ] (]) 04:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for your reply. The English Misplaced Pages, yes. I just was hoping that someone might already know how to filter out streams of edits made with ] or ] that sometimes flood my watchlist. If not, I can take a pair of pruning shears to my watchlist--an activity which might make a good ]. ] (]) 14:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Are you seeing edits to pages on you watchlist that happen to change the categories? Or is the category itself on your watchlist? Because I think the "Hide categorization of pages" setting only applies to categories you are watching. So if you uncheck that preference, and you add a category to your watchlist, you'll see any page that is ''added to or removed from that category'' show up in your watchlist. With the preference enabled, you won't see those changes, but you'd still see changes to the category itself, for example to the description. | |||
:I'm not sure if there's an easy way to filter out category-change edits to pages you see watching, because those edits are fundamentally just regular edits. And they are usually not minor edits, because category changes can be quite controversial sometimes, especially around ]s or other ]. --] (]) 03:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== I edited an article, but there is only problem... == | |||
== How do I create personalized user boxes? == | |||
I edited the article, "]" but my contributions don't show up in the real article, '''I am very new and can't quite figure it out'''. How shall I proceed? | |||
I am intoxicated by use of User box to explain my user page and I don't know exactly how to create them. I mean, custom User box. Somebody help me please comprehensively. ] (]) 19:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
''P.S. I am a beginner so expect I know nothing about Misplaced Pages, and how to navigate. Detailed tips are very appreciated.'' ] (]) 02:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] welcome to Misplaced Pages. I'm assuming you're referring to ? It was ], which is why it was reverted. If you need help, I'd recommend reading ]. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 02:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{re|XirMarvin}} Hi. Your edit was soon removed in ]. I'm guessing it was done because the content you added didn't look "encyclopaedic". —usernamekiran ] 02:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Welcome to the Teahouse, @]. To add onto CanonNi's comment, any editor can reverse another user's edit by ] it. This is done when the edit was problematic, and in this case, it was because your edit was unsourced (please see ]. Source your content!). Please see our ] for other rules we have around here. Remember that ] too. Thanks! ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 02:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, @]. As well as the things others have pointed you at, I would also recommend looking at ]: you can see that your edit and its reversion by somebody else are a normal part of how Misplaced Pages works. ] (]) 11:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Melbourne Shuffle Inventor == | |||
:{{ping|Caleb Ndu}} Often the easiest way to create a custom user box is to find on another user's page one whose general appearance you like, copy the code from that user page, and paste it on your page, replacing the text and image with what you want. That's what I did for the top box on my user page. ] (]) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Applying this now is my problem. I'm still new here. ] (]) 22:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You could use the template {{tl|userbox}} (click on that for more instructions). For instance, | |||
:::<code><nowiki>{{Userbox |border-c=black |#CCEEFF |white | How? |info-a=center |How do I make my own userboxes?}}</nowiki></code> | |||
:::creates | |||
:::{{Userbox |border-c=black |#CCEEFF |white | How? |info-a=center |How do I make my own userboxes?}} | |||
{{break}}<span class="nowrap">] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 12:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
This later article is by a journalist about a witness to the creation of the shuffle https://www.warnaplus.com/maurice-novoa-mengonfirmasi-sifu-joe-sayah-sebagai-saksi-terhadap-penemuan-melbourne-shuffle/ and this other one is also by a journalist and the site says they do not take money as tips for stories https://radarkaur.disway.id/read/651452/menyelami-gerakan-halus-wing-chun-kung-fu-sifu-maurice-novoa-maestro-di-balik-fenomena-melbourne-shuffle Interesting how the video of Maurice dancing is at falls festival on big screens that's the biggest music festival in Australia based in Melbourne. ] (]) 04:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] thank you. I'm satisfied with your answers. ] (]) 23:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Welcome to the Teahouse, @]. This forum is used to ask questions about Misplaced Pages. Do you have a question specifically about Misplaced Pages? ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 04:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== I am not happy == | |||
::Yes sorry I was not clear, the ] article is being prevented for being updated as Maurice Novoa as its inventor for no reason other than the sources not being English. ] (]) 06:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::That's a content dispute, not Teahouse question. It should be, and is being, discussed on the article's talk page. You are one of the participants in that discussion, in fact you started it seven months ago, and just restarted it. No-one has recently removed those references. No-one has touched the article in six weeks, no-one has attempted to add those references in the last year, and no-one has said that they are unusable because they are not in English. The article was protected for six months because of repeated block evasion by ], who was attempting to add similar claims about the supposed inventor of the Melbourne Shuffle, but I don't see any edits reverted for having non-English sources. I do see some claims reverted for having non-reliable sourcing, but reliability is not dependant on language,and sources do not have to be in English. The article has not been protected for the last six months. | |||
:::Your somewhat strange delayed claims and you picking up where Australianblackbelt left off suggests that you are the same user. Is this the case? ] (]) 08:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::User Novem Linguae's response is why I have not attempted to add the sources, I just wasn't sure ] (]) 08:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::] said nothing about a problem with the sources not being in English. Neither did ], who also replied to you. | |||
:::::And again, are you the same user as Australianblackbelt? ] (]) 08:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::No and if I was why not just edit the page like you said... I dont like where this is going so I am staying away from the Shuffle page. Good bye ] (]) 09:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Adding a photo == | |||
I am not happy by the treatment of this website, I am sick and tired of abusive moderators destroying contributions and violating pages. I want a formal complaint against Pmffl ] (]) 20:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
My great grandfather has a Misplaced Pages page about him but no photo. I have a photo of him. How can I add it to his page? ] (]) 10:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: This seems to relate to the recent history of ], which is now a redirect. Please follow the process at ]. See also ]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] that's great. Since you own the photo, you can upload it at ] and add it to the article by following the directions at ]. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 10:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::You may also want to ping someone when you are doing this so they are not taken by surprise. @] ] (]) 20:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:If I'm right. Photos have to be uploaded on "]". | |||
::I don't want information, I want direct link to get this page rolled back ] (]) 20:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:As I'm not sure about this information , I advise you to verify. <br /> <br /> | |||
:::Hello, Poppodoms. I have not looked at the issue, and I have no idea whether I would support your position or not. But Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project. If you take the position of "I'm right and they're wrong" you are not likely to be happy here, and you may find yourself blocked. | |||
:Do you know next informations : | |||
:::Incidentally, we don't have "moderators". Pmffl is another editor, like you and me. | |||
:1.Who did photographed your great-grandfather ? We need year of death of the person who photographed you ancestor if you know who did it. <br /> <br /> Without means to know who's the author , it could be considered as a photography with an unknown author. | |||
:::Please look at the pages Andy pointed you to. ] (]) 21:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:2.In which country the picture was taken ? <br /> <br /> | |||
::::Misplaced Pages contributor is abusing his power on it, this is not "I'm right and they're wrong" situation. It is simply abuse. ] (]) 21:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:3.Year of the photo '''(When the subject was posing for this photography)'''. <br /> <br /> | |||
:The answers to these questions can help to determinate is there are a copyright on the image. | |||
:You can own a thing without own the intellectual property. For example , you can own a DVD without own intellectual property on the content of this DVD. <br /> <br /> | |||
:I suppose the individual who photographed your great-grandfather is certainly deceased since more than 70 years old. | |||
:In the majority of countries in the world. There are no copyright in force if the person who photographed someone died since more than 70 years old. <br /> <br /> | |||
:If the person who made this photography died since less than 70 years old. | |||
:The heirs of the photogrpaher hold the copyright unless he/she did renounced to it during his/her lifetime with a legal document. ] (]) 12:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] As your great grandfather is dead, en:Misplaced Pages allows photos to be used in the infobox of the article about him even if you don't own the copyright. It should be uploaded to English Misplaced Pages and documented as explained at ], especially the part ], item 10. For an example, see the image ] which I uploaded. In that case the image came from a website but the principle is the same. Thanks for wanting to improve his biography. ] (]) 14:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Article review == | |||
] has the context. 2 items of note here: there is currently only one English reference for this topic, and Poppodoms is trying to unilaterally control this article, even to the point of in protest. I admit I was too hasty in some of my edits earlier today, but I stand by the redirect, as explained on the talk page. -] (]) 21:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Normally, articles that are submitted by an editor to Misplaced Pages for main space undergo an article review immediately and the page is curated. About four days ago, the article ] was created and posted, but it has yet to receive a review by a qualified Wikipedean. Is there a reason for the delay?] (]) 11:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I stand by the reverse redirect. Pmffl admitted that it was a browser engine on the ] ] (]) 21:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:For all: The article was created on 18 December as an article, so this is not about AfC review, but rather ]. ] (]) 12:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Wikipedians are volunteers , therefore there are no delay to hold. | |||
:I don't know which duration it can take. ] (]) 12:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Anywhere between a few minutes and a few years - currently the backlog is four years. They aren't reviewed in any particular order as such, but reviews of certain topics can happen quicker as their sources are easier to verify, there's some glaring issues or the question of notability is more clear cut. -- ]-'']'' -- 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks. I just assumed that new articles had to undergo an immediate review, and was worried that perhaps the language in this article was too strong and needed softening with "euphemisms". Again, thanks!] (]) 13:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] You wrote the backlog is currently four years. <br /> <br /> | |||
:::Have we to understand it can take average a duration of maximum four years ? | |||
:::I'm not certain I rightly understood therefore I prefer to ask to avoid misunderstanding. ] (]) 13:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@]: currently the ''oldest'' article in the unreviewed pool is approx four years old. That does not mean that ''average'' review time is four years. (If articles were reviewed in the order they're submitted, you might estimate that the average would be around ''two'' years. But they're not.) There are nearly 15,000 unreviewed articles in the pool. Some get reviewed within minutes, others take months or indeed years. I don't know what the average (whether that's mean, median or mode) is, or whether you can easily get that information from anywhere, but I'm sure it's nowhere near four years, thankfully. HTH, -- ] (]) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks for your explanation. @] when I'm talking about average. <br /> <br /> | |||
:::::I wasn't talking about a median but about "]" for the maximum time it can take. | |||
:::::I had to admit a median would be better because we understand more easily when a median is involved. ] (]) 16:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] reviewers review new articles. Articles considered suitable for inclusion are marked as 'reviewed', with a notification sent to the user that created it. There is a backlog numbering in the thousands. In theory, if a NPP reviewer does not get to an article within 90 days of creation it is auto-approved. ] (]) 14:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, I did admit it, but that doesn't change the lack of valid English refs for this topic. Hence the redirect. I want to emphasize again, this is nothing personal for me. I realize you created this article and may feel some "ownership" of it, but that's not how wikipedia is supposed to work. (But I get it; it can be hard not to feel that way about work done here.) -] (]) 21:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Search engines such as Google can 'see' NPP-approved articles and thus identifiy those as responses to searches, but the timing of searchability is a function of the search engines, not Wikiepdia. ] (]) 14:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I don't feel ownership to anything here, I only contribute with the citations, I feel that you are not doing your job as a contributor, in looking at things objectively, and allowing it to naturally grow. You come behind and feel entitled to act like a moderator like it's "suspicious", when you are mere contributor like myself. ] (]) 21:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::This should really be taking place on the relevant talk page and not here on the Teahouse I think. ] (]) 21:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::i understand. I apologise. It's resolved between two parties. Thank you very much, I appreciate it. ] (]) 21:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{od}}I am speaking as an administrator here and have no opinion on whether or not ] is notable. But I do want to advise both {{u|Poppodoms}} and {{u|Pmffl}} that your behavior regarding this matter is poor. Poppodoms, you came here with an inappropriate hot and heavy attitude. Your comment {{tpq|abusive moderators destroying contributions and violating pages}} is overly aggressive and indicates a deep misunderstanding of how Misplaced Pages actually works. Contributions cannot be "destroyed" because they always remain in an article's edit history. The term "moderator" is not normally used on Misplaced Pages, and even if if you mean "administrator" instead, Pmffl is not an administrator. Pmffl, here and elsewhere, you have repeatedly stated that English language sources are required to establish the notability of a topic. This is false. It is perfectly OK to provide references to reliable sources in languages other than English on the English Misplaced Pages. If reliable sources are plentiful, then English language sources are preferable. For example, there is no need to add Italian language sources to ] because the English language coverage is massive. But if English language coverage is limited, then references to coverage in other languages is just fine. Both of you, do not discuss concepts or refer to policies that do not exist here. Base your statements only on actual policies, guidelines and behavioral norms here on English Misplaced Pages. This is a collaborative project and hurling unfounded accusations and assertions is not the way to operate. ] (]) 02:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== moving my draft page to mainspace == | |||
== Twinkle Question == | |||
so previously when i created a draft, normally i submitted the draft for a review, then waited for other editors to approved it and moved it to mainspace. Recently i read that autoextended user can just moved it into mainspace themselves. does that mean i can move ] myself without waiting for it to be reviewed first by other editors? or am i reading the rule incorrectly ] (]) 11:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
:@] the Articles for Creation process is entirely optional for autoconfirmed users, so yes, feel free to move it into mainspace if you think it's ready. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 11:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
NOTE: Moved the following comment from where I think it was misplaced. ] (]) 15:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I just started using ] and I don't understand what an AGF Rollback is. Could someone explain? | |||
:You can. But considering that a reviewer judged that it did not (yet) have adequate references, and you have made no further edits, it might not be a sensible thing to do. It might well get nominated for deletion. ] (]) 14:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How do I experiment with my sandbox? == | |||
Also, when should I use Rollback and when should I use the "Vandalism" button when comparing edits? For now, I use "Rollback" for "test edits" and "Vandalism" for vandalism. Is this how I should use it? | |||
I was left some helpful advice to try and use my sandbox instead of editing in-line citations. How do I do that, and why should I do that? ] (]) 11:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thanks. ] (] · ]) at 20:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:First, as you are User:Skuncc, Skuncc should appear as your signature, not peeeeeee-yew!. ] (]) 12:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Your Sandbox (top right menu bar) is a place for you to practice and create content that you intend to later insert into articles. You can create a citation there, and only when sure the format is correct, paste it into an article. On a grander scale, you can copy a section of an article into your Sandbox, revise and re-reference it, then use your content to replace the section in the article. Doing this work in your Sandbox avoids having a large number of small edits and missteps appear in the edit history of the article. ] (]) 12:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Ohmy gosh thankyou! ] (]) 12:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Technical question about the long hyphen == | |||
:AGF stands for "Assume Good Faith". Rollback is a feature that lets you revert a whole series of edits in one click. Which is why it needs to be used with great care and caution. ] (]) 20:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I see. Thanks! ] (] · ]) at 20:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You are welcome. ] (]) 20:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi! | |||
== Article alerts not working? == | |||
I've been editing the timeline of Polermo where the long hyphen dominates, but I can't seem to generate one.Typing a regular hyphen, gives me just that - a regular hyphen, typing two hyphens gives me two hyphens (--) and trying to make one through the keboard shortcut which I found on internet forums (Alt+0151), just gives me one that's too long (—). So far I've been copying and pasting existing long hyphens which is kind of annoying, does anyone have any better solutions? | |||
After a few weeks of waiting, I'm not sure why the article alerts template for ] isn't working. I've assessed a considerable amount of pages with the project tag, and the bot seems to be updating the page. ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 21:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thanks! ] (]) 14:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== coi use of DISPLAYTITLE:title template == | |||
:Hello, @]. I think you're talking about an em-dash. See ] ] (]) 14:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, may I change the display title of an article (OutTV to OUTtv), supply references to a number of sources validating the updated stylization of the name (almost all the existing citations on the page where the title resides), remove the phrase: "'''OutTV''' (stylized '''OUTtv''')", as well as then update the article text to reflect the new title case? I have a displayed coi with the article and would also mention coi in the edit summary. The article currently exists with both styles used in the text. Or would this be better addressed via an edit:COI request? Thank you. ] (]) 23:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yes! That's what I meant! Thank you! ] (]) 15:15, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I don't think you could find a better character in '''"unicode table"'''. | |||
:This "]" is listing the most common characters. <br /> <br /> | |||
:There are also the "]" entry on Misplaced Pages that can be maybe helpful. ] (]) 14:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Excellent. Thank you too! ] (]) 15:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I don't think ressources I shared with you will help you but I hope it will. ] (]) 15:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Ignoring the ], there are three 'horizontal line' characters most commonly used in text, the hyphen, the ] and the ]. There are various ways to insert the latter two; usually I do so with +0150 and +0151. Despite being a former professional book editor, I have not previously encountered a "long hyphen" (a term not found anywhere in Misplaced Pages). Note that the lengths of all these characters may look different in different typefaces: I suspect your "long hyphen" is an N-dash. {The poster formerly known as 897.81.230.195} ] (]) 17:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, Oshentree. Thank you for your transparency. I think it would be better as an edit request. ] (]) 09:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::: All right, thanks for your response ColinFine. No problem, will do. ] (]) 16:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== How to thank a user == | ||
I had a friend who improved my article very much about a week ago, and I would like to thank him, how do you do that? ] (]) 15:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
my father has a wiki page and in the spouse column it says married with children, he wants me to edit that and put in the name of my mother and siblings, but wikipidea does not allow edits to the pages of people you are related to, what can i do to resolve this. | |||
:I think you figured it out {{u|Yuanmongolempiredynasty}} ;) ] (]) 15:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yes I did :) ] (]) 15:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== This may be the wrong place to mention this == | |||
] (]) 23:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
On the page ], there is a infobox; in that infobox lies an image of a supposed “plane” labeled “Lowercase sigmabot ||| archiving a discussion” or something like that. Is this a joke by the moderators of Misplaced Pages? ] (]) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, {{u|Tpiusukeyima}}. Misplaced Pages is quite strict about what it does and doesn't allow in ] (please read that project page). Generally, spouses and children are only named if they are notable (i.e. qualified for their own Misplaced Pages article) in their own right or are very relevant to matters discussed in the article. | |||
:Usually, for example, names of non-adult children are not listed just because they exist: this is to maintain their privacy and protection — criminals, kidnappers and scammers can read Misplaced Pages as easily as anyone else. | |||
:We have some advice at ]. What applies to the subject of an article applies also to non-notable relatives of the subject. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 00:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I have often seen spouse named and number of children, but not names. Typically in a Personal life section, along with where currently living. That info requires a ref. ] (]) 05:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:This is not an article but an Userpage. Humor is allowed on this kind of page. | |||
== young n restless == | |||
:If you click on my nickname. You could read my page. ] (]) 16:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No, @], it's a joke by whoever edited that page (actually the user, @]). We don't have moderators, and admins have no role in the content of articles (though the users who are admins may have, but not in their admin role) ] (]) 16:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Selectortopic}} It's a humorous remark added by the bot operator who is not an administrator. Many bot operators are normal users. ] (]) 16:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Someone know how to create a bot for a repetitive task ? ] (]) 17:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] See ] page where you can make a request. There may already be a bot to do what you want and you need to explain in detail what you want and why. ] (]) 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks ! ] (]) 20:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How to edit == | |||
how can i get in contact with young and restless star mark grossman | |||
I need to see a tutorial of how to edit an entry. It is my page; I'm the subject. My former assistant set up the page for me but I don't know how to update it. I tried to add references today. I wasn't successful. ] (]) 16:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{welcometea}} This, unfortunately, is beyond the scope of Misplaced Pages. —] ( ] • ] ) 00:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:There is a link to contact information within . It appears you have to sign up to IMDbPro to access it, but there seems to be a free-trial option. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 00:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Are you talking about an encyclopedic article ? ] (]) 17:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Is there any possible way to get the "Deplorable Instinct" article posted? == | |||
::@] I hope that the ressources we advise you to read will be sufficient. | |||
::The community is there if there are something you don't understand. <br /> <br /> | |||
::We are there to guide you. I hope we didn't seemed to be aggressive. ] (]) 17:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{courtesy link|Mari K. Eder}}. ] (]) 17:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::If I understood rightly. You are '"]" and you want to edit an article on yourself. <br /> <br /> | |||
::I'm sorry to say you that but accorded to rules in force in Misplaced Pages. You are in "]". <br /> <br /> | |||
::I know it can appear weird but rules are rules. In my knowledge , there are not possibility to get an exception. | |||
::Even if I was an administrator on Misplaced Pages. I could not have this power in my knowledge. ] (]) 17:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] To expand on what has just been said, article subjects are given advice at ] about what they may and may not do to biographies about themselves. We expect that you will suggest additions on the article's Talk Page at ], where you can start a new section with suggestions. There is an ] to make this relatively easy. What was not formatted correctly and I will shortly revert it to its previous state. ] (]) 17:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks for pages shared with us ! I didn't knew these. ] (]) 17:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::You can edit pages you do not have a conflict of interest with, and you should consider doing so! Make sure you read the guidance, I think you will find this can be a very enjoyable website to contribute to. ] 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::@] I liked your answer explaining the stuffs in a simple way. ] (]) 17:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::A lot of the above is from other users, signed by their username. I would be happy to explain more wikipedia policies if you have any questions (though I'm nowhere near as experienced as some people here!), do know that you can always ask on the teahouse (here!) or on my talk page ], though I'm on and off - or you can even put the ] (listed on the page]] on your own user talk page to request help. Welcome to Misplaced Pages! ] 17:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I might be responding to the wrong person. Oops! ] 17:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi MGMKE, You can request edits to the article about you using an edit request (]). You will need to include text that you want to change or add. You may need a reference for any changes you want to make. I will post a message on your talk page. ] (]) 17:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Hello, {{u|MGKME}}. Please note that if you are, as I suspect, the subject of the article ], you yourself should ''not'' normally* be editing it because of your obvious ]. Rather you should place proposed changes (with any relevant references to sources) on that article's Talk page together with an ], so that a disinterested editor will be alerted to review the proposal and implement it ''if it complies with Misplaced Pages's principles, policies and procedures''. (I'm afraid there are rather a lot of these.) This also applies to any of your work colleagues, relatives or friends. | |||
It's a very popular story, and is high ranking on Amazon. I feel it deserves an article completely. Can you help me out please? ] (]) 23:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::<nowiki>*</nowiki> The main exception is that you (like anyone else) may remove additions by others that are ''not'' supported by ] to ]. (Reading those linked Project pages should answer your question.) If something in the article is factually incorrect, but correctly summarises a cited source deemed reliable, you may not remove it, but may add contradicting information cited to other reliable sources. (For your interest, read the policy ] and the essay ].) | |||
:@]: {{welcometea}} For one thing, you have no ], which are required for a Misplaced Pages article. Please don't add ] in the body of the article. Also, be aware that sites like Fandom are supplied with ], which undermines any ] it would have had. —] ( ] • ] ) 00:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Please also note that it is Misplaced Pages's article about you, not 'your entry', and you cannot stipulate (though you can make requests about) what does or doesn't appear in it, provided that what does is correctly cited. Remember that this is an encyclopedia – see the essay ] and the rather more voluminous Project page ]. | |||
::] has an overly long Synopsis and no useful references, thus Declined. Teahouse hosts advise, but are not co-authors. ] (]) 05:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Finally, please carefully read ], and also ] (since you are one!). Hope this helps! {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 17:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::A read of '']'' should give you a good impression of what the AfC reviewers are looking for. I'd note that user generated content like fandom is considered pretty much useless as a source, as is book sellers like amazon. the press release may prove useful as a source but will <u>not</u> count towards notability. | |||
:::] until there is significant coverage in reliable independent sources, before resubmitting the draft. And in the meantime whittle down that synopsis to a couple of paragraphs. -- ]-'']'' -- 06:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{reply|Jasonsepice234}} I'll add that the "Literary significance" section seems to be your own editorial commentary, violating ]. Except for the synopsis, all statements ''must'' be cited to reliable sources that are independent of the article topic. If you cannot do that, then the topic cannot have a Misplaced Pages article. ~] <small>(])</small> 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Anything I should make? == | |||
== Need help getting an article reviewed. == | |||
I don’t know if this is the right place to ask this question, but does anyone have any suggestions on an article I should make that isn’t already on Misplaced Pages. I just finished the article ] and want to make another. Please consider that I am good in history in the 1200s and 1300s in Mongolia and that I would gladly make a article in those subjects. ] (]) 16:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I recently created this page: ]. However, it has not yet been reviewed by any editors. How do I request someone to review? | |||
:You could check out ], particularly ], although you're forewarned that the list is not curated for quality and the article prompts listed there are not guaranteed to be viable. You could also check out relevant WikiProjects, such as ] and check out whether they manage their own requested articles lists, or alternatively see if there are ] in the low-quality categories to see if you can expand them. <sub>signed, </sub>] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I have created articles in the past. They all got reviewed within a day or two. I didn't have to request for review or anything like that. ] (]) 00:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:In addition to what the other commenter wrote, you can also work on improving existing articles under that topic area, for example expanding start-class articles, adding citations, and copyediting articles. The folks over at ] might have some interesting pages for you to edit. ] 17:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you! ] (]) 17:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hello, @]. Please, please, please, please, please, don't think that the only way to contribute to Misplaced Pages is by creating new articles! We have thousands, maybe millions, of articles that are really not very good, and need somebody to take the time and trouble to improve them (in most cases the main thing wrong with them is that they haven't got adequate ] - by coincidence, this is often the most difficult and time-consuming part of working on any article). | |||
:::I remember when I started editing Misplaced Pages, nearly twenty years ago, I so much wanted to find a new topic to add. But in that time I have only created a handful of articles. ] (]) 18:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I could add many tasks. I think for example about the task consisting to add internal links to Misplaced Pages in English in articles. <br /> There are words that aren't in red that could need a link. ] (]) 18:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::] is a good place to find a wide range of "things to do" on Misplaced Pages. <sub>signed, </sub>] <sup>]</sup> 18:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How can i improve my page? == | |||
:Hi ], typically we don't really like requests for reviews. The backlog is currently and has been quite long so it might take a while. You do not have to request a review, it will be done sooner or later. ]]] 02:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] You created the article straight into ], as you are entitled to do. All new articles are eventually reviewed by the ] and won't be indexed by search engines until that happens, or 90 days have elapsed. The alternative process you could have used is to create a draft and submit it for review in a process described at ]. If you had done that, then when accepted the draft would have been marked as "reviewed" and it would have been open for search engines to index. Unfortunately, the new pages patrol has an even greater backlog (>14,000) than the AfC one, so indexing may take some time. Note that editors experienced with creating articles can request that they become ], which would mean that their future submissions would be indexed as soon as placed in mainspace. ] (]) 10:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for the clarification. ] (]) 04:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Devan.varun}} Do you have a particular need for a speedy NPP review? ] (]) 10:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Nope. I just asked because I wasn't sure what was going on. While I have created a few pages in the past, this is the time I experienced a delay in a page getting reviewed. Thanks for the clarification :-) ] (]) 04:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm actually working on the wikipedia page ] for a university project, i need to improve the page to be categorized as B before the 31 of december to get a good mark (it's actually start class), it is really difficult to find some good and reliable sources. | |||
== ] explained politely == | |||
Thank you in advance! ] (]) 17:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I think it is not realistic to expect this page be categorized B before the 31 of december. <br /> ] (]) 17:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi. How can I explain to a new editor that ] in a polite manner? Thanks. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 01:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:If someone has just started editing and then {{tlx|Welcome-foreign|<nowiki>lang=</nowiki>}} has some polite-but-firm text. If you think you can reasonably guess what their first language is, then the template also provides translations of the same welcome text (see docs). -- ]-'']'' -- 06:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Great. Thank you! <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 06:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hello, {{u|CanonNi}}. First, be aware that ] is an essay and therefore does not have the force of an official policy or guideline. That being said, I think the underlying concept that "competence is required" is widely accepted. This sentence is useful to think about: {{tpq|Rather than labeling them as "incompetent" in the pejorative sense, we should ease them out of the Misplaced Pages community as graciously as possible, with their dignity intact.}} The specifics of the lack of competence need to be considered. People who do not speak English well often perceive the English Misplaced Pages as more influential or as the "master Misplaced Pages". These editors should be gently encouraged to edit the Misplaced Pages language version in the languages they speak fluently. Other editors are so firmly dedicated to their ideology or religion or other strongly held point of view that they have difficulty writing policy compliant content. We need to politely explain that writing from the ] is a core content policy that is mandatory. Sometimes an editor simply will not accept the constructive feedback and persists with disruptive editing. In such cases, you need to provide convincing evidence to administrators, who can decide on the most appropriate restriction for the good of the encyclopedia. That may include page blocks, topic bans or sitewide blocks. ] (]) 07:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I understand. The editor seems to have understood. Thank you for this detailed answer! <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 07:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Liucmicol01}}, the lead (opening section) of an article should summarise the body of the article. As faar as I can tell, the second paragraph of ] does not relate to anything in the body of the article. ] (]) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== What is jargon? == | |||
:That seems like an unreasonable expectation, as the assessment depends on someone else doing the assessing, and Misplaced Pages has no deadlines. If your prof -- {{u|Limelightangel}}, it looks like? -- wants to do the assessments, they can, but it's not really reasonable to expect assessments to be done by others. ] (]) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, @]. As you were told ], there is no way to guarantee that the article will get any particular rating by a particlar date, and few editors are much concerned with ]s anyway. But since you are concerned with ratings, you would do best to ask at the talk page of one of the Wikiprojects related to the article. ] (]) 18:15, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] .... or just assign a "B" yourself and hope that your instructor doesn't notice who did that edit ;-) ] (]) 18:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Although as MDT pointed out, you could yourself change the rating from C-class to B-class, don't. The article does not qualify. From just a quick look at some of the content and references, the refs do not always verify the content. ] (]) 13:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Search suggestions have changed for the worse == | |||
I know this is going to be a stupid question but, what is Jargon? I have heard someone said "Don't use Jargon." What is Jargon? Can someone please explain to me? Thanks! ] (]) 02:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:We actually have an article on ]. CLick on that link and have a read, and come back here if you still have questions. ] (]) 02:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi IP! For a list of jargon on Misplaced Pages, see ]. We usually try not to use jargon while communicating to newer users as to not cause confusion. ]]] 02:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:On WP, jargon would be something like "You have a COI regarding that BLP." Insider language. ] (]) 07:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for explanation. I had thought that ] was a ] dialect. ] (]) 14:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::]. ] (]) 15:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::LOL. However, the science fiction author ] did write a novel called ''The Jargoon Pard''. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 16:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I have always been able to count on Misplaced Pages's search function to provide me with a list of articles connected with the term entered in the search field. Today, however, I'm not getting these, but rather only short and apparently arbitrary lists of articles that I've viewed or edited. When I type "A", for example, I get: | |||
== Transfer copy from Wikimedia to Misplaced Pages. == | |||
ajedrez<br> | |||
Please help me with https://commons.wikimedia.org/User:Gaw54. I accidentally drafted the page on wikimedia rather than wikipedia. How can I most efficiently transfer the draft to finish it in the right format? It has been a while since I've created pages here and am getting very lost in the weeds. Any assistance would be much appreciated. ] (]) 03:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Angelou<br> | |||
Alvin Bragg<br> | |||
Abbot and Costello<br> | |||
Athena<br> | |||
Ari | |||
When I add a "b" to this, the list becomes: | |||
:Unfortunately there isn't a way to move a page from Commons to Misplaced Pages. I'd suggest just copy-pasting the page and fix any formatting issues, which should be simple. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 03:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Just to support the idea of copy/pasting your draft, but to say that it should not be added into youe user page. That's for you to say a few words about yourself and your own editing interests. Instead, you should either work on it at ], or at ]. Then pop back here when you're read and we'll help you submit it for review at ]. Regards, ] (]) 09:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Abbot and Costello<br> | |||
:What ] says, but with the minor correction that it wouldn't be "Drafts:Bonnie Rychlak" (plural) but instead ] (singular). -- ] (]) 11:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Abe Fortas | |||
::Thanks. I've fixed the typo 'Draft' not 'Drafts' DOH! ] (]) 20:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
When I add an "r", I get nothing, no Abrahams or anything else. | |||
== Accuracy of content == | |||
And so on. This is a purely arbitrary example, but I hope it serves to illustrate. What I would always get before would be a list of a dozen or so articles, which was limited but very often helpful. I checked my preferences but all I saw was "Disable the suggestions dropdown-lists of the search fields", which was unchecked as always. Any info or advice on this would be very welcome, thanks. ] (]) 17:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
How is the submitted content examined for accuracy? ] (]) 08:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I personally always use advanced search, but you can try google with the modifier site:en.wikipedia.org to force it to only search wikipedia (or just type "wikipedia" before your search query) ] 17:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello. Be aware that Misplaced Pages does not guarantee accuracy, see the ]. That said, readers and other editors are relied on to check sources and determine if they are accurately summarized in the article. If you see content that you believe does not accurately summarize the sources provided, you should discuss that on the article talk page. ] (]) 08:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Are you using the current default ] skin? I find that its search box is better than for other, older, skins and the results for "Abr" are perfectly sensible, with the first suggestion being ]. ] (]) 18:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:More at ]. In general, errors can linger, more likely in areas with few interested editors. ] (]) 09:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for these suggestions, {{u|Cmrc23}} and {{u|Michael D. Turnbull}}. The Advanced search option does provide me with many good finds and I should have been using it previously, but Content pages gives me results like I used to get directly under the search text field only more of them. I checked my WP skin and saw I was using the current default but still not getting the suggestions, so then I could figure it was something on my end and checked to see if I had "Block scripts" activated in Brave Shields. I saw that I did, deactivated it and now I'm getting the suggestions as before. Sorry, false alarm, this wasn't a Misplaced Pages change as I wrongly suspected. It's interesting that I could get suggestions on pages I've frequented by turning "Block scripts" back on, and I'm curious as to how that works – I mean the apparently default behavior without whatever the script is. ] (]) 19:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::But wait a minute. Now I'm not getting the alternative search options (Content pages, Multimedia, Everything, Advanced). Claude AI tells me to type "Special:Search" in the search box to access these and this works, but I had them there just now today without doing this. (I couldn't have done it because I was unaware of the possibility.) So how did I have those options for a while but then didn't have them afterwards? And (what may be the same question) how do I get them without having to type "Special:Search" in the search box? I can do that, but it seems clunky and I have to remember the text to type it. ] (]) 19:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::There a variety of userscripts to enhance the search function: ] ] 10:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] I assume that by turning on "Block scripts" Brave Shields is preventing ] from running in your browser. The problem is that, as ] explains, Java is a core part of how much of Misplaced Pages works, both the standard Mediawiki software and many optional extras like gadgets and userscripts. So, if you are prevernting that running, you are sacrificing functionality for security. Is there an option in Brave Shields to exempt the Misplaced Pages domain from the block? ] (]) 11:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Misplaced Pages Timezone == | |||
== When to remove template message == | |||
Out of sheer curiosity, what Time zone does Misplaced Pages operate under? I'm in the Pacific Standard time zone, and the Did You Know... and On This Day... update at around 4:00pm every day. ] (]) 18:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I just edited ] to add a citation link to the website of the museum where the painting is currently on display. The page now has just this one citation. Is this enough to remove the template message? or should I leave it there for now until further links are added? Thanks... ] (]) 09:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] WP operates under ] but you can change the defaults you see in your preferences. ] (]) 18:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello! The template can be switched to <code><nowiki>{{more citations}}</nowiki></code> as there's at least one source now. If you could find a source to verify the other contents of the article, that'd be great. Otherwise the information not cited by the reference can be removed. Thank you for your efforts! ] (]) 09:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: |
::@] If you need help to change this in your preference. I can help. ] (]) 18:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::@] That's okay, thank you! Honestly, the daily change at 4:00 helps me stick to my schedule. Since I almost always have Misplaced Pages open, I know it's time to take a break from my other computer-related work when the DYK and OTD changes. | |||
:::@] Weeeell... Can't think of any at the top of my head. ] and ] may be of some help. ] (]) 10:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] Thanks for the quick reply, and my curiosity has been sated :) ] (]) 20:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Can anyone at least explain this sentence — “The template can be switched to <nowiki>{{more citations}}</nowiki> as there's at least one source now” — to me? How do I undertake this specific task in future, if I want to just do it myself? Thanks. ] (]) 12:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::That's wonderful ! ] (]) 20:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::@] New editors tend to use the visual editor as it is the easiest for simple text changes. Templates like the ones under discussion are much easier to swap using the source editor. There are tutorials for both at ]. If you "edit source" on ] you will see various templates at the top, under the one that provides the short description. Currently they are <code><nowiki>{{refimprove|date=April 2024}} and {{notability|date=April 2024}}</nowiki></code>. It was the former one that used to be <code><nowiki>{{more citations}}</nowiki></code> until Gråbergs Gråa Sång changed it and also added the second one. When changing templates like these, make sure you "Preview" before saving/publishing, to check that the new template does what you think it does. Incidentally, you don't need to add the date to the template if you don't want to: a bot will come along very quickly to do that if you omit it: . ] (]) 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Thankyou! That’s exactly what I needed. ] (]) 13:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] I changed the template, since the one in place was now wrong. ] (]) 09:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Ok great, thanks ] (]) 10:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Papiermark and other money from Weimar Germany == | ||
{{atop|No one was rude. Discussion can continue on OP's talk page. ''']''' ] 15:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
So, I was editing a page ] and somebody undid my edits, all I did was add famous quotes of the man and then a mod took it down, when I asked him why, he was extremely rude and impatient, what do I do this is only my 2nd day here. ] (]) 14:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I inherited some German banknotes from between 1908 and 1923 and I was wondering wether I could upload scans of them to Wikimedia. I scanned them in out of personal interest and then thought they might be useful. | |||
:{{Courtesy link|User talk:CDoug17#April 2024}} <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] By long consensus, Misplaced Pages has very strict rules about additions to ]. You may know that what you added were "famous quotes" but most other people would not know that and would want to be able to ] that what you added was true. Hence, when placing such information into articles, we insist you simultaneously cite the source for your content (see ]). As an aside, Misplaced Pages editors don't use the expression "mods". We have administrators but they have no more power to enforce the content of articles than anyone else. We have a guideline ] but not everyone is perfect (including you, judging by your very first edit)! ] (]) 15:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{ec}} No one was rude to the user. I left a standard warning, followed by a weird discussion between me and another administrator, but neither that administrator nor I was rude in the slightest.--] (]) 15:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{abottom}} | |||
My main question is about copyright, as in, do I have to ask someone for permission and if so who? But also whether I should digitally sharpen them and how do I properly sort them in? I'm quite new to this and any help is appreciated! The scans are at 1200dpi and saved as 98% JPEGs, with filesizes between 5 and 20MB. | |||
== A sudden deletion of ] with no actual reason == | |||
I already skimmed over ] but couldn't find anything related to money or bank notes and I read the copyright data of but I'm unsure if this also applies to my case. ] (]) 18:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, do you know who made the designs for the original banknotes? You might want to review the copyright information for this file: ] ] 19:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello everyone, a file ] was deleted by ] with no actual reason, and the file clearly didn't violate any rules. I'm guessing maybe he deleted it by mistake, but if not i suppose he should have given a deletion reason? '''<br/><i style='padding:5px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 1px #ffffff, 0 0 2.5px 2.5px rgba(0,0,0,0.16);'>] ]</i>''' 14:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, @]. The best place to ask about this sort of question is ]. ] (]) 19:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: {{u|Skylar Mlem}} Another place, possibly better?, is at ] where you will upload your images, and ultimately will have to defend copyright status. The help center for copyright issues at Commons is at ]. You might find this old, archived Commons discussion on the copyright status of {{slink|c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/07|German currency|nopage=yes}} interesting as well. ] (]) 06:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How do I welcome a new user? == | |||
: See ]: user has problem with understanding ] and was notified about this and other files. --] (]) 15:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Noted. But just to confirm, the ] indicates that YouTube items under the creative common licence are free to reuse or isn't? '''<br/><i style='padding:5px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 1px #ffffff, 0 0 2.5px 2.5px rgba(0,0,0,0.16);'>] ]</i>''' 15:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Youtube vids ''can'' be marked with a Commons acceptable license, like this one:. Most aren't. ] (]) 16:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] Thanks for your response, but please what's the easy way to distinguish between the YouTube video common licence and none common licence? '''<br/><i style='padding:5px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 1px #ffffff, 0 0 2.5px 2.5px rgba(0,0,0,0.16);'>] ]</i>''' 16:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::If you look at that video, there's a "more" you can click to expand. It lists the licensing. If that's not there, you can't add it to Wikimedia Commons. ] (]) 16:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Oww got it, Thanks for your reply. '''<br/><i style='padding:5px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 1px #ffffff, 0 0 2.5px 2.5px rgba(0,0,0,0.16);'>] ]</i>''' 16:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I noticed a new user that hasn't been welcomed yet. I've seen the templates used on other talk pages; should I just copy paste the source and adapt, or is there a welcome button I can use instead? ] (]) 22:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deleted for not fitting the narrative. == | |||
:Hi @]. There are a number of ] to choose from. Also, if you enable ], it has a dropdown menu that lets you select the welcome message that you want to leave on a user talk page, much easier that way. (Twinkle has a bunch of other really useful functions as well.) Hope that helps. ] ] 22:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] this might be of use to you, ] ] (]) 22:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Doesn't matter anymore, the user I wanted to welcome got blocked by the checkuser. I only wanted to welcome them because I posted them on WP:AN and I noticed they had never been welcomed. ] (]) 22:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Mystery Dungeon additional info == | |||
I edited the page on spirulina to include a link to a recent study. Editor Julius Senegal removed the edit, and when I asked him why he gave a bullshit answer. His honest answer would be that he's a shill for Big Pharma. What can I do? And why is Misplaced Pages becoming anti-science? | |||
Hey I just noticed that the mystery dungeon series is missing an entry and I wasnt sure where to ask to add it, this just seemed like the closest thing to an editor contact place. The entry in question is "Chocobo's Mystery Dungeon Every Buddy!" , released back in 2019 ] (]) 02:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:The article "]" is not at all long; adequately referenced material about individual items in the series could be added to this article. -- ] (]) 04:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== I have a edited page when I was not logged in,now I am logged in,how do I get it back? == | |||
] ] (]) 15:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:It wasn't a "bullshit answer". The removal was done because your source does not comply with ]. ~] <small>(])</small> 15:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:IP editor, I would suggest you refrain from making personal attacks and strike out your baseless accusations. @] gave you the relevant guideline and was correct to remove your addition. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 15:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Look at Julius' post. It's **NOTHING BUT** personal attacks. Again, his answer was bullshit. You are all showing that the once great Misplaced Pages has been ruined and is no longer a reliable source of information. ] (]) 23:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Please read ]. It is '''not OK''' to make a personal attack like that on another editor. You need to withdraw it, please. ] (]) 15:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::His original post was **NOTHING BUT** personal attacks (along with a racist attack on the people of an entire region of the planet). I will not withdraw it. And I have taken screen shots to preserve all of this. ] (]) 23:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You're pushing fringe theories ''and'' you're accusing those who remove the theories of being racist? The only thing that's gonna happen is that you're gonna be blocked. ''''']''''' <sup>(] / ])</sup> 01:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:IP, our rules for medical articles only allow the best sources, so it's not a matter of 'not fitting the narrative'. It's a matter of 'this source isn't considered high-enough quality'. You can find more at the ] link. ] (]) 16:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Is there nobody at Misplaced Pages who can be honest? You have all ruined a once-great source of knowledge and turned it into a pile of shit. ] (]) 23:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Rather than making racist personal attacks, he could have done a ten-second google search, found more sources (is NATURE a good enough source) and added to the entry. Again, Misplaced Pages has turned to shit. | |||
:::https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Spirulina+Covid&t=ftsa&atb=v416-1&ia=web ] (]) 23:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::That's just a DuckDuckGo search? The Nature source seems to say {{xt|Their broad-spectrum antiviral properties have been studied, however, their effect against SARS-CoV-2 remains unknown.}} ] (]) 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
How,how do I get it back? ] (]) 04:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
To revisit (again) the simple reason your addition to ] was reverted: a single clinical trial doe not qualify for the requirements stated at ]. All the other journal references - from the DuckDuckGo search - are in vitro studies, which also do not meet ]. ] (]) 03:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:You were not logged in when you made this post. When you are correctly logged in, you can edit your userpage to reflect articles that you have worked on as an IP editor. ] (]) 07:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::And to find the pages you edited, look for your contributions: ]. eg ] shows editing ], but Sumanuil reverted all the edits. ] (]) 08:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Moving my English Misplaced Pages user page to media wiki for a global user page == | |||
== Dear Teahouse staff == | |||
I can move ] to media wiki to have a global page for all sister projects? I know I can just ask to delete my English page and make a media wiki one but I kinda wanna move it for the edit history. If I can't move it to media wiki ill just move it to User:Anthony2106/old user page ] (]) 04:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
What should I do so that the User page: timbaraliris is modified and improved continuously. | |||
:What you are asking for {{yo|Anthony2106}} is an ]. You would have to find an administrator on meta, but even so may not be actionable. Instead I would advise you just to create a new page yourself on meta, as you will find that many templates are unavailable there. ] (]) 08:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::You saying they will only import important things -- not user pages? Also i'm not worried about the templates as I can use {{:w to get wikipedia templates. ] (]) 08:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::On this topic, I was wondering if making an account on english wikipedia counts as a global account for wikipedia purposes ] 10:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] Did you created your account on '''"Misplaced Pages in English language"''' as first account for projects of Wikimedia ? <br /> <br /> | |||
:Hey, @]. So, that's not what we do here. We create and maintain articles on subjects, including people, who are notable per Misplaced Pages standards, which you can read about at ]. If you're Tim Baraliris, you might also want to read ] and its links. ] (]) 19:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::If you go on any Misplaced Pages language version or another Wikimedia project. If you click on '''"login" '''you can log into it. | |||
:Hello, TimBaraliris. You should also read ] to discover what kind of thing is acceptable on a user page. ] (]) 20:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I created my account on '''"French Misplaced Pages"''' as first account for projects of Wikimedia. <br /> <br /> | |||
:::I can create accounts with the stuff I explained. ] (]) 11:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{courtesy link|User:TimBaraliris/sandbox}} | |||
: {{Ping|TimBaraliris}} I fear my colleagues have misunderstood, because you did not correctly give the name of the page to which you refer. The biography of Kujtim Baraliu in your sandbox appears to be written in Albanian. You can either copy it to the ], or rewrite it in English, then submit it for publication on this Misplaced Pages using the process described at ]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 13:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== a question == | |||
hey guys - does anyone remember the videos called strawberry shortcake sets the school on fire and charlie brown gets a gold card? they've become lost media and i'm trying to hunt them down at this point ] (]) 21:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Try ]. ] (]) 22:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi IP! And welcome to the Teahouse, though your question does not reflect Misplaced Pages. You could try other sources though! ] (]) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::thank you ] (]) 21:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Np. Glad I could help ] (]) 22:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Adding a photo == | |||
There is a Misplaced Pages page that lists the various mayors of the City of Richmond, CA. There are photos of some of the mayors along with the dates of their service. My father was one such mayor but he does not have a photo next to his name. If I provide the photo can someone insert it in the appropriate space? | |||
The page I would like to the picture to is: | |||
]. ] (]) 22:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:This can be done; however, it's important to realize that ''copyright on photos is complicated''. | |||
:Is this a photo that ''you'' took? If not, who was the photographer? ] (]) 02:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{re|Tahomadude}} Many of the photos on that page are official photos of the mayor created by the city and it seems are not covered by copyright. What is your father's name and is there an offical photo of your father as mayor? ] (]) 02:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{Ping|Tahomadude}} Please see ]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 12:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== When User is added to an article talk page will they get automatically notified? == | |||
If I update an article talk page and mention a user, i.e. ], will they automatically get a notification assuming they exist? Or do I need to go to their User talk page and refer them back to the article talk page? ] (]) 00:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi @]: depends on ''how'' you mention them; see ] and {{tl|Ping}} for info. Best, -- ] (]) 06:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== naming children == | |||
Is there a rule against naming the (minor) children of a person in a biographical article if they do not have an article of their own? I don't believe there is considering the multiple high profile examples of it on wikipedia, but I am in a dispute regarding this. <span style="font-family:Century;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 06:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@]: {{welcometea}} ] is probably most relevant for you, especially footnote e:{{tq2|This is generally interpreted by the community to include the removal of names of non-notable minors from articles about their notable family members, such as when a notable individual births or sires a non-notable minor. Notability is not presumed or inherited with extremely limited exception (such as heir to a throne or similar).}} —] ( ] • ] ) 06:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::What allows Elon Musk's children to be named on his article? <span style="font-family:Century;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 06:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Nothing allows it, {{u|Thornfield Hall}}, except that no one motivated to fix the policy violation has yet done so. There are 6,813,262 articles edited by people of varying levels of policy understanding. These problems should be corrected when noticed. ] (]) 06:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{re|Thornfield Hall}} At ] there is this: {{tpq|Names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced.}} ] (]) 06:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{u|Thornfield Hall}}, I am in complete agreement with {{u|Tenryuu}}'s interpretation and would like to add that ] links to policy language, and the policy in question is among the most important and vigorously enforced policies that we have. ] (]) 06:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How to show words in an infobox == | |||
In the article ], I'm trying to get the name in the category "disciples" to automatically show in the infobox without having to click on a thing that says "show", the way it works for other names in categories in that infobox like names in the category "teacher". Can anybody please either fix that for me or tell me how to fix it in a simple way? Thank you.] (]) 07:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|SigurdsSister}} Hello and welcome to the Teahouse! Without changing technical code, the simplest solution is auto-showing the names by setting the {{para|expand_disciples}} parameter of the infobox template at the ] article to {{code|true}}, which I've done in ]. If that is not the change you want, let me know. ] (] • ]) 12:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you!] (]) 14:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== biology == | |||
why a mule is not productive ] (]) 09:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi.IP editor and welcome to the Teahouse. The Teahouse is for questions about editing Misplaced Pages. Try asking your question at ]. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 09:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:There's information about this at {{Section link|Mule|Fertility}}. <span class="nowrap">] (])</span> 09:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How to change username == | |||
How ] (]) 11:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Did you look at ]? ] (]) 11:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi @] and welcome to the Teahouse. See ]. <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 11:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reliable source == | |||
good day. | |||
I have a question. | |||
I have restored link rot on the loserfruit wikipedia page. The article for reference there that was used as a source for the statement that she had the 2nd largest following has been restored. | |||
Problem is that the statement wich got quoted from in that article, was in their turn quoted from another site that is not a reliable source. It is also listed in that article as such that it was only a quote/info that came from the unreliable source "according to lineups.com". | |||
What is the policy on using an article as a reference in this? ] (]) 13:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Courtesy: ]. ] (]) 16:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How do I go about removing "This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points...." == | |||
Hello, | |||
Several years ago I created the wikipedia page on Joseph A. Tunzi. How do I go about removing the "This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (March 2024) | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/Joseph_A._Tunzi ] (]) 14:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] The lead (all the text before the first section heading) is five paragraphs and one sentence long. That is quite a long lead. This makes me wonder if @] in fact meant to add the ] template instead but added the short one by mistake. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 15:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::My apologies, yes I meant to add the lead too long template. As you can see, the lead is quite long. My mistake. ] (]) 18:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I've updated the page to limit the lead to four paragraphs. ] (]) 02:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] I've updated the page to limit the lead to four paragraphs. ] (]) 18:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] I've updated the page to limit the lead to four paragraphs. Could you please remove the "This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (April 2024)" at the top of the page. | |||
::Here's a link to the page: | |||
::https://en.wikipedia.org/Joseph_A._Tunzi ] (]) 19:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@], you can remove it yourself if you think you've satisfied the concern. -- ] (]) 19:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Profile Mismatch and Confusion == | |||
I need help with my profile. When I search the name Adamu Garba II on Google, the highlight that come from Misplaced Pages is that of one Adamu Garba Talba. He carries my picture, my schools and some details about me. While he is currently 72 years, i am 42 years. I need assistance on how to remove his details from my account, and create a robust Misplaced Pages profile for myself. | |||
I will appreciate a helping hand from the Teahouse community. Thank you ] (]) 14:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@]: {{welcometea}} If you're seeing this on Google, there's nothing Misplaced Pages can do; you'd have to use their feedback processes. Furthermore, Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia; it is not a site for profiles, particularly if they're used to ] the subject of an article. —] ( ] • ] ) 14:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:You should also be aware that many people in the world share the same name. Very few names are unique. When I Google my real name I see dozens of other people with the same name. I have never been confused with any of them. ]|] 15:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The information at Misplaced Pages ] appears to be only about that person. ] (]) 16:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::It appears you created a draft about yourself ] which was deleted due to six months of inactivity. ] (]) 16:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== TWA doesn't work == | |||
Hi, I'm trying to play TWA, but when it goes to the "Login or create an account" popup, the buttons stop working. I put this on the TWA talk page, but I wanted to put this in the Teahouse so this problem could get more attention. (idk if i'm allowed to put this on the Teahouse, i'm just trying to play the game :,) ) ] (]) 16:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Maybe try inputting a new URl for each step instead of relying on the buttons. | |||
:For example, you'd first open. After that, head to , and so on incrementing the number in the URL. This sounds like an issue with the first step, so maybe try skipping it. | |||
:TWA is known to be buggy and, honestly, we should probably stop recommending it to newcomets ] 17:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{U|Yyeeetlol}} ] 17:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@], thanks, but now it's stuck at the "Reply to Will" button, I'm just gonna read the normal introductions. Thank you ] (]) 17:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Sorry about that! I don't have any other advice unfortunately. ] 17:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{courtesy link|Misplaced Pages:The Misplaced Pages Adventure}} | |||
:Hello, {{u|Yyeeetlol}}. Please note that the page says {{tpq|This tour only uses the source editor. If you use the visual editor or have it enabled it won't work yet.}} That may be the cause of the problem you are experiencing. ] (]) 16:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi ], I changed it to the source editor, but it still doesnt work. When I try to press the button that "Im logged in", it still doesn't redirect to anything. ] (]) 17:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{u|Yyeeetlol}}, you will need to disable the visual editor, according to the instructions. ] (]) 17:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Draft feedback (+ question) == | |||
Hello friends! I have just created my first ever real draft article, which is ]. I was wondering if could get some feedback from Teahousers here on how I could improve my draft. I also have a question about sourcing, namely if I am allowed to use the website of the organization itself for basic factual information (such as headquarters and leadership info). That's all. Thanks! <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;color:#FFF;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#00897B,#48d9ab)">]</span> 17:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Antrotherkus}}, ] is the relevant guideline. It essentially states that you can use the website so long as the claims are believable. I'd read the section in full if I were you. ] 17:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, Antrotherkus, and welcome to the Teahouse. | |||
:Teahouse hosts aren't really here to do reviews: a reviewer will get to your draft in time. | |||
:In answer to your question: yes, you may use ] (which is a broader category than just "their own publications" for such information. However, the bulk of your draft must come from ], and more specifically, you need several sources each of which is ]. It looks to me as if the Sky&Telescope is largely based on what the FRIPON team have said, which means that it is not indepedent; and the ESA one does not contain significant coverage. ] (]) 17:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Article Wizard == | |||
Hi, here again. I'm in the article wizard right now, and I am looking to write a draft on a lake that I live near. For the three options of "I'm paid to edit, I'm writing about myself, or a close person/subject, and I'm not connected to the subject", which one of the last two should I put on? ] (]) 17:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:You should be fine with not connected to the subject, as I don't believe you'd have enough of a conflict of interest with a body of water without being under some sort of water regulatory or pumping organisation. ]'']'' 17:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: {{Ping|CommissarDoggo}} Please ping enquirers when you reply, here on The Teahouse. In this case, ]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Single-artist Museum == | |||
Please add the following to the Single-artist Museum Listing. | |||
DuryeaMuseum.com | |||
Thank you~ ] (]) 17:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@]: {{welcometea}} You have already been told on your user talk page that only single-artist museums that have Misplaced Pages articles will be added to ]. Do you have a vested interest in putting this museum on? —] ( ] • ] ) 17:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:See also ]. ] (]) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== vitruvian man == | |||
was he/it the very first in italy ] (]) 18:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I'm not sure what your question is, IP editor, but if it's not answered at ], you could try one of the reference desks - possibly ]. ] (]) 19:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Temporary Page for Wedding == | |||
I had the idea to make a funny, “gag” Misplaced Pages page for my brother at his wedding for my Best Man speech. My idea is just to have people use their phones to find his Misplaced Pages “page” while doing the speech and have something they can look at for fun throughout the evening, with the page simply being deleted the day after. Can I get a moderator or admin to “sponsor” me to let me publish a temporary article - again, one that would simply be deleted the day after? ] (]) 19:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{re|Mstanley92}} No, that's not something allowed on Misplaced Pages. You will need to find another website for your gag. ] (]) 19:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Hi {{u|Mstanley92}}. Please don't attempt do this. It will almost certainly end up quickly deleted per ], and it might lead to your account being blocked if you're too persistent in trying to do so. Take a look at ], and perhaps you'll find a website more appropriate for what you'd like to do. -- ] (]) 20:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Sandbox == | |||
== Problematic BLP and stubifying == | |||
Where can I find the sandbox? I wanna practice my editing before commencing. (] (]) 19:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)) | |||
: {{re|Discopleasant}} The sandbox for everyone is at ], and it gets cleared at regular intervals. There is also a link there for your individual sandbox, which won't be automatically cleared. ] (]) 19:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I've come across a ], ], which seems to be highly problematic. There is a high amount of unsourced information and likely ], and also substantial edits from a user named "SOBEL1" who I'm 90% sure has a ] or is a ]. Digging through the revision history, there doesn't seem to be much salvageable revisions/info to revert to, and I'm considering ] it. However, I have concerns regarding if I should do it or not. Should I try and seek consensus to do it, if so where? Should I contact ]? If anyone can give me an answer on this, it'd be appreciated. —] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 06:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Little Mermaid (2023) == | |||
:Thank you for the question, @]. Per ] (specifically: {{tq|'''contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion'''}} <small>emphasis not mine</small>), you should be free to remove such poorly sourced content since you're challenging it. Unless you're successful in finding good sources of course. ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 06:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== 2024 events == | |||
: ] | |||
What local incidents around the world, like the ] are allowed to be mentioned in the events section of the ] year article. ] (]) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Please don't remove the Bulletin Awards and the Fido Award. Here are the links to show that these awards are real, not fake : ; ] (]) 20:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, {{u|Marksaeed2024}}. In my view, this tragic attack which has been the subject of significant coverage worldwide, ought to qualify. But potentially gigantic list articles such as year articles need to be restricted somewhat by consensus among editors interested in year articles, especially the current year. So, feel free to make a bold edit, but if you are reverted, ] is the place to make your thoughtful case. ] (]) 07:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== wtf? == | |||
: {{Ping|Rincemermaid}} This is something you should raise on the article's talk page. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 20:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
since the fuck when is "black people" a "radical" term????? so is "white people" also considered radical? i am very curious to know.. seems pretty fucking retarded..... ] (]) 08:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Is source biased? == | |||
:Where did you see it being called radical? <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 08:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Can we watch the vulgar language here? We try to be friendly and civil on this page. ] (]) 08:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:If you look at ] it says "racialized classification", not "radical" ] (]) 10:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== New page for author == | |||
Hi, I'm looking to make an article on a lake, and I have a website for it but it's the cities parks and rec. Idk if this is a dumb question, i'm new to making an article but is this biased or will it hinder NPOV? https://parks.snco.us/136/Lake-Shawnee] ] (]) 23:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello | |||
:Hello, {{u|Yyeeetlol}}. Such a website can be used to corroborate uncontentious facts about the lake, but probably not to help demonstrate the lake's ]. | |||
:As for the uncontentious facts, to retain a Neutral Point of View, avoid repeating/paraphrasing anything that makes subjective value judgements. Statements such as "the lake's surface area is X square kilometers" or "it is the third highest lake in country Y" would be fine (if true); ones like "the lake lies in a beautiful setting" or "the lake is the pride of Municipality Z" would not, unless they were direct quotes of someone of relevant significance, such as '] wrote that "the lake lies in a beautiful setting"' . {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 01:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
i am a published author quoted on two Misplaced Pages pages . I would like to create a page about myself. It looks complicated and I need some help. This is my basic text: | |||
== How Much Context is Too Much Context? == | |||
Sarah Bax Horton is a British author of true crime and historical biography. Her first two books, One-armed Jack: Uncovering the Real Jack the Ripper (Michael O’Mara Books, 2023) and Arm of Eve: investigating the Thames Torso Murders were inspired by her great-great grandfather who worked on those original investigations. | |||
Heya, | |||
Bax Horton proposed new prime suspects in each of her published works, putting forward East End cigar maker Hyam Hyams as Jack the Ripper and Thames waterman James Crick as the Thames Torso Killer. ] (]) 09:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm a novice editor (as in not highly experienced, not the Misplaced Pages service award) that generally only makes the occasional tweak for various reasons, and I had a question about how much context to provide. On the ], it was mentioned that Dr. Abdullah has been selected as ] VP for the US 2024 election. | |||
:Read this : ]. Write about yourself isn't a thing to do. <br /> | |||
I had changed the line | |||
:Do you want more informations ? ] (]) 09:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|SCC68}} Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Writing about yourself is highly discouraged, please see the ]. Misplaced Pages is not a place for people to tell about themselves. Misplaced Pages articles summarize what independent ] say about topics that meet our special Misplaced Pages definition of ]- like ]. Also note that a Misplaced Pages article is ]. There are good reasons to not want one. ] (]) 09:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::and please don't promote your book on the ]. ] (]) 10:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I am an expert on this subject wishing to update an out of date and misleading page. I am also an author of books on this subject. ] (]) 13:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@], not an article, but ] is now a redirect. ] (]) 10:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you ] (]) 13:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:], you write: {{Olive|I would like to create a page about myself. It looks complicated and I need some help.}} People in a number of dodgy little companies are likely to read this, think "Maybe she'll pay" and may then solicit your business. (Perhaps individual Misplaced Pages editors will do the same.) But if you're wise, you'll ignore such offers. Please read and digest what's said in "]". -- ] (]) 12:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<code>In April 2024, independent presidential candidate Cornel West announced Abdullah as his running mate.</code> | |||
== Messed up title when reverting a non-discussed page move. Not sure how to proceed. == | |||
to | |||
Hi. I don't know whether it's appropriate to ask but I messed up reverting a page move on the ] article. (renamed it to the upcoming sequel show, not the original by mistake), and I cannot fix it as another redirect article already exists. I'm unsure how to fix it and I have royally messed up. Thanks. ] (]) 11:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<code><u>On</u> April <u>10,</u> 2024, independent<u>, self-described, "non-Marxist socialist," U.S. 2024</u> presidential candidate Cornel West announced Abdullah as his running mate.</code> | |||
:Hi {{u|Cheezknight}}, I've moved the page back to ] for you. Let me know if everything looks good now! If a similar issue happens again, feel free to submit a request at ]. That page is watched by a lot of ], who have more extensive permissions relating to moving and renaming articles than most users. ] (] • ]) 15:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
to add more context for unfamiliar readers, due to low media coverage of Dr. West, but most of the second half of the edit was removed. How much context is too much? | |||
::Thanks for the help! I really appreciate it as I was stumped on what to do. I don't usually move/ merge articles so thanks for fixing it and for pointing me in the right direction if future issues occur. ] (]) 16:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Citations == | |||
Should I put back <code>U.S.</code> into the edit to specify which country's election it is, since it assumes an American reader? Is mentioning a candidate's political leaning too much information, since it can be found in the linked article? | |||
How to present a citation? ] (]) 12:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Additionally, I've noticed that titles (Sir, Dr., Ph.D., etc.) are not generally used in articles. Why is this? | |||
:See "Referencing" at ]. ] (]) 12:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, {{u|Madamepestilence}}. The obvious problem that I see with your edit is that it is a self-description. Misplaced Pages has very little interest in how people describe themselves, and instead we prefer descriptions by ''independent '' reliable sources. Why is additional context even needed? Anyone who wants to know more can simply click the Wikilink ] for all the context they want. That is the beauty of a wiki. As for the policy on honorifics, please read ] and ]. With very rare exceptions such as ], we do not refer to people by their academic titles. We refer to them only by their surname after first mention, if their culture has a given name-surname tradition. That certainly applies to West. If a paragraph mentions his relatives named West, then it is permissible to refer to him as "Cornel" in that paragraph only, for the purposes of disambiguation. ] (]) 09:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Im trying to make a page for Jessica Christine Ritchie == | |||
:Hello, Madamepstilence, and welcome to the Teahouse. The answer to your main question is that this is in the area of editorial discretion, and different editors might disagree about any individual case - the thing to do is to discuss it on the article's talk page and get consensus. | |||
{{cot|Proposed article content}} | |||
:What I will say (without having looked at the article) is that at the very least, wording like that should not be included unless it cites an ] saying that about him. In an article about West, it would clearly be acceptable to say that he describes himself in a certain way, and cite his own publications, per ]; but in an article not about him, that seems inappropriate me. | |||
'''Jessica Christine Ritchie''', is an American entrepreneur, artist, and educator Who is of Apache and Blackfoot heritage. She is the founder of '''DeerWomen''', a luxury tea and beauty brand that merges herbal remedies with esoteric traditions. | |||
:Whether to say "US" or not is again a question of editorial discretion. I (as a non-American!) would say it is not necessary here, whereas it would be if it were in most other countries; but there's no harm in putting it in. | |||
:And you're right that we don't usually use titles and honorifics in articles, except once in the lead. See ]. ] (]) 09:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
=== Early Life and Education === | ||
Jessica Christine was born in California and raised in Spokane, Washington. Her upbringing amidst the natural landscapes of the Pacific Northwest nurtured a deep appreciation for nature, mythology, and esoteric sciences. She pursued her education at prestigious institutions such as the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp, Belgium. Along her journey, she was mentored by notable figures, including author Francesca Lia Block and scholar Maja D'Aoust, further shaping her interdisciplinary approach to creativity and learning. | |||
=== Career === | |||
I just got to know about “ignore all rules” I want to know when this is applied exactly and whats the benefit of it and how exactly is useful ? ] (]) 06:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
==== DeerWomen ==== | |||
:Hello and welcome. IAR is only relevant if the community feels that a particular action that may go against a rule nevertheless benefits the encyclopedia. It isn't a license for people to do anything they want. What IAR really means is that the spirit of the rules is more important than the letter of the rules. ] (]) 07:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
In 2016, Jessica founded '''DeerWomen''', a luxury tea and beauty brand. The brand reflects her passion for blending herbal remedies and ritualistic recipes with symbolic narratives drawn from folklore. DeerWomen offers a curated collection of products designed to enhance vitality and natural beauty, emphasizing the connection between self-care and authenticity. Relaunched in Antwerp, Belgium, in 2022, the brand’s offerings are now available in select stockists across the USA and Europe. | |||
::{{u|HarshalDhotre06}}, IAR is the most difficult policy to apply properly and here is the standard I would apply: If other editors say, "yeah, that makes good sense" then you have applied IAR correctly. On the other hand, if other editors respond "what the heck are you doing?", then you have applied IAR incorrectly. The only time in 15 years that I recall consciously applying Ignore All Rules was in the case of ], the very first screen actress to play ], the fictional character at the center of the Wizard of Oz stories. The "rule" is that notable actesses must have multiple roles. Remus had but one. I concluded that her well documented single role in a very early silent film was enough. I explained my reasoning at ] eleven years ago, and the article still stands. ] (]) 09:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
==== Creative Direction and STEM Education ==== | |||
== Fallout (series) article subject to terrible revisions by one editor == | |||
Jessica’s career extends beyond entrepreneurship. She has worked as a Creative Director, organizing international events that catered to high-profile dignitaries, including Belgian royalty. As a STEM educator, Jessica has taught coding and 3D printing using innovative methods involving gaming and robotics, showcasing her dedication to integrating technology with creative expression. | |||
=== Personal Philosophy === | |||
I’m new to this but I am hoping to receive some help on a specific article: one editor has spent the last hour repeatedly adding superfluous information and muddying a section of the Fallout (series) article. I think an article ban may be appropriate but again I am new so just having another set of eyes on this would be great ] (]) 06:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Jessica’s work is profoundly influenced by her Apache and Blackfoot heritage and a deep connection to nature. She advocates for personal rituals and self-care as essential elements of beauty, encouraging individuals to define beauty on their own terms. According to Jessica, true beauty arises when people engage passionately with activities they love. | |||
=== Legacy and Influence === | |||
:Hello. Before bans and blocks are discussed(if they are even warranted) you should first attempt to discuss this issue on the article talk page or with the editor directly. ] (]) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Jessica’s work bridges art, science, and cultural heritage, inspiring others to pursue their unique paths with intention and creativity. Her ability to harmonize traditional wisdom with modern practices makes her a significant figure in the realms of beauty, education, and entrepreneurship. | |||
::] and ] have both been blocked from editing ] for two weeks for edit warring. ] (]) 10:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
=== See Also === | ||
* | |||
Could anyone move ] to the AFD pages? ] (]) 07:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
* | |||
{{cob}} | |||
----''This article is a summary of Jessica Christine Ritchie Magdaleno’s professional and personal journey.'' ] (]) 14:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:This looks largely promotional - which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Furthermore this text does not contain any independent secondary sources. Simply put - this text is inappropriate for Misplaced Pages as it stands. ] (]) 14:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The OP has been blocked, but for future reference, the instructions for IP editors who want to create an AfD are ]. ] (]) 13:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, {{U|Qualek}}, and welcome to the Teahouse. {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} | |||
== Template/ Tag for "I'm making major changes to this article" == | |||
:{{HD/WINI}} So writing an article ''starts'' with finding reliable independent sources (see ]). What you know about the subject is irrelevant, except where it can be verified from a published source. --] (]) 15:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== How I can improve my page? == | |||
Is there a template or tag or something that says "I'm going to restructure this article over a couple of edits, in a short period of time" or something along those lines? For editors who are, for instance, moving sections around and saving between edits in a semi-intermediate state. e.g. deleting a section, then merging the content across other sections, for instance. | |||
Hi, I write here a few days ago, to ask if you all can help me to get my page approved (name page: ]), and you all help me but also all my colleagues to get our draft page approved (we really appreciate your help). | |||
I think I've seen something like this before but can't find it by searching. Thanks! | |||
I found myself here again to ask you what I can improve to possibly increase the score of the page. I already add the sources that were missing, as one of you recommended, any more suggestion? thank you in advance. ] (]) 14:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] 09:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:You can add pronunciation in "]" indicated in "]". ] (]) 14:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::] is rated C-class. See ] to understand the differences between C-class and B-class. Although any editor, including you, can change the rating, I personally perfer to not upgrade ratings on articles I have been editing. ] (]) 15:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::It was {{tl|in use}} that I was thinking of, which is linked from there, thank you! ] 09:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Where can we see class of an article ? ] (]) 15:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Top of Talk pages usually has ratings: Stub, Start, C-Class, B-class. For GA and FA there is additional detail as to when approved. | |||
:::::Back to article - in my opinion Biodiversity should be limited to what is near the trail, not the entire park. ] (]) 15:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Even if the path cross the park itself? it is not a dispersive area you can find and encounter, with a bit of luck, all those species during the trekking itself. ] (]) 16:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I have reassessed the article as "B". ] (]) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Diffs == | |||
== Show a tag next to the username whether a Misplaced Pages user is an administrator == | |||
I always forget the best way to show a "diff" in a post. Can someone explain to me how I'd show , in a diff? Did I do it right? Just link the URL? I feel as if some editors do it so seamlessly and easily. ] (]) 16:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
What is a Misplaced Pages script or gadget to show whether a Misplaced Pages user is an administrator next to the username? The administrator status is displayed automatically without any script on Russian Misplaced Pages by appending character A in parenthesis after the user name. | |||
:Thank you for the question, @]. Yes, you linked the diff perfectly. There are also other ways to link diffs which you may or may not find easier. You can see ] for more examples. Here's one form I really like to use: | |||
For example, see : in this example, the user Victoria (A) is an administrator (there is {{tq|(A)}} after the username Victoria), whereas the user Lumaca is not an administrator (no {{tq|(A)}} after the username Lumaca). | |||
:Typing this---> <nowiki></nowiki> | |||
:Would create this---> | |||
:I hope this all helps! ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 16:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I use visual editor except on talk pages where sometimes it is not possible or other pages where it might not be possible for some reason. I really wish they would enable visual editor everywhere too by the way! It is SO much better than source editor! ] (]) 16:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::But thanks, I am glad that my copying and pasting of the "diff" URL is essentially all that you need to do. I did not think it was that simple. ] (]) 16:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::What about finding a specific diff in the page history? Some people in talk page discussions seem to find tons of perfectly relevant diffs nearly instantly and it routinely blows my mind. ] (]) 16:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::For articles, the browser extension makes it really easy to locate when something was added. ] ] 16:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I use Microsoft Edge as my browser. Is that supported for this tool? Seems like such an interesting tool that it would almost make it worth to switch the browser that I use, though I'd rather not do that if I can avoid it. ] (]) 17:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::It does. {{smiley}} ] ] 17:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::@] Assuming you're using a PC to edit, clicking "page history" at the top right will show you the list of revisions the page has went through. Each revision has "prev" and "cur" next to them. Clicking prev will show you the difference (''diff!'') with that revision and the previous one. Cur will show the difference between that revision and the current one. ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 16:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Yes, I edit using a PC. Thanks for this information. ] (]) 17:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I have never quite figured out how to edit from a phone, plus I am worried that it would be from an IP then and might cause me problems somehow. ] (]) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::{{u|Iljhgtn}}, please read my essay ]. If you are logged in on your phone, your IP address will not be disclosed and you will not have any unusual problems. I have made about 100,000 phone edits going back many years. ] (]) 17:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Are "phone edits" logged any differently in your contribution history than PC-based edits? 100,000 on the phone is an impressive achievement! ] (]) 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::I was a bit discouraged to try phone editing too after the incident where there was a recent admin that seemed to really assault someone for trying to use phone editing and then it became a real ordeal for them to come back into editing. Though it looks like that admin has lost their adminship, rightfully so, so maybe I will look into it again. ] (]) 22:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You can force the visual editor in any namespace by adding ''?veaction=edit'' to the end of the URL (for example, en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Skarmory?veaction=edit would let me access my user talk page in VE). <span style="background-color: black">] ] ]</span> 20:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== I'm really not sure why my article was declined. == | |||
How to achieve the same in English Misplaced Pages? There is a gadget on English Misplaced Pages to strike out usernames that have been blocked, but not a gadget to show administrators. Please help. ] (]) 10:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
It is a biography of a living person who created a global food chain and is now writing poetry and songs. His journey to Canada was significant. ] (]) 16:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Welcome to the Teahouse. To be honest, I couldn't see the difference in the example you linked to. | |||
:You will need to show how he could pass the criteria at ], your draft gives no indication of that so far. ] (]) 16:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:But here on en.wiki there are a number of user scripts available to achieve what you want. Checking my commons.js file, I see that I have long been using ], which renders admin signatures in a nice, obvious cyan colour. A quick check of that script description suggests there might be a better script at ], although I've never tried that one. | |||
::Presumed - there is coverage in the Toronto Star Business section and in multiple newspapers globally. Many of the smaller papers have not archived all of their papers. Andy has a poem in the Kennedy Accessions Library (accessible online). | |||
:I also like seeing blocked usernames with a strike-through, but this, as you say, is a setting you can opt in for in Preferences>Gadgets>Appearance. | |||
::Significant coverage - no additional research is needed to extract the content. The history of his coming to Canada and how he grew his business here are clearly laid out. | |||
:There are innumerable other userscripts available for a wide range of tasks. You can find them all by following links at ]. I hope this gives you what you want. Regards, ] (]) 11:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Reliable - as mentioned above, I used verifiable sources and for a few instances, the smaller papers have not archived all of their earlier articles. | |||
::Thank you for referring the "User:Theopolisme/Scripts/adminhighlighter.js", I will use it and give my feedback. ] (]) 14:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Sources - I have used secondary sources. | |||
::Upon your advice, I used the script ] for a few hours and was very happy with it. This was exactly what I wanted. Although it used background colour rather than the "(A)" prefix, it served my purpose anyway. Than you, you've made my day! ] (]) 18:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Independent of the subject - there are many messages of congratuations and thanks for participating in events. I was having difficulty uploading their private photos. | |||
:::@] Very pleased to have been of help! ] (]) 19:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::If you can tell me what is wrong I can fix it. Right now I don't know what is wrong. ] (]) 17:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] You appear to have written that article ]. Please read that essay and if and when you have found ] start again. ]|] 17:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::What do you mean? I wrote the article in the time sequence it occured... ] (]) 17:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I am feeling frustrated right now. ] (]) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Hello, @], and welcome to the Teahouse. | |||
::::I'm afraid that that frustration is a common experience for editors who start editing Misplaced Pages and immediately plunge into the challenging task of creating an article without spending time learning how Misplaced Pages works first. Would you enter a major competation in a sport you have only just taken up? Would you expect to understand the feedback you got if you did? | |||
::::{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} | |||
::::When Shantavira says you have written your draft backwards, that is a link to a page that explains; but in short: you appear to have written what you know and then looked for sources. Baldly, Misplaced Pages doesn't care what you know (or what I know, or what any random person on the internet knows). Misplaced Pages only cares about material that is verified by reliable published sources, so writing an article ''starts'' by finding such sources. Then, if you have found several sources which each meet the criteria in ], you can start writing a summary of what those sources say (not what you know). ] (]) 17:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@], its not about time sequence. First, find the multiple reliable independent sources that describe the topic. Each such source must be in-depth, reliably published, and independent of the subject, all three at the same time. Next, write the article using only those sources. That is writing an article in the proper direction. Backward is writing what you know and looking for sources to support it later. That is almost never successful. ] (]) 17:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thank you StarryGrandma...at least this helps me know what to do. ] (]) 17:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::To expand on this, we are asking you to show that he is already well-known by providing material that people independent of him have written in-depth about him and published in places with editorial oversight. If he is not already well-known then he can still be a significant person, but we don't include him in this encyclopedia. ] (]) 17:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Race condition on talk page? == | ||
It seems like two people welcomed me to Misplaced Pages at the same time (thank you to ] and ] by the way), which has led to two different revisions where the current revision doesn't have the past revision's message and vice versa. What is the proper thing to do here? Should I "merge" the two revisions so both messages are visible? ] 18:38, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I think this article ] no longer belongs to the start-class rating because it has some reliable sources and is reasonably well-written with in-depth information. I wasn't sure how to re-rate it as a C-class or B-class (or if I have the permissions to do that at all). If someone else could confer on this topic, that would be much appreciated. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:Hello, @], and welcome to the Teahouse! Yes, you can "merge" the two revisions, make both messages visible, and say so in the ]. Please see also ]. ] (] '''·''' ]) 19:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Tangentially, I prefer to link revisions like so: ], replacing <code>cur</code> with the revision ID (the number after <code>&oldid=</code>). Doing something similar with ] shows what was changed from the previous version. ] (] '''·''' ]) 19:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you! ]<sup>]</sup> 13:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Awesome, that is way less clunky. Thanks! ] 19:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Question == | |||
== Can't send emails on this wiki == | |||
If an editor makes several blatantly RGW arguments for removing sections of content, refuses to read sources contradicting his arguments on the grounds that {{tq|I have been editing in this area for years and am very confident that no source exists}} and then states that what he really wants is for this article to redirect to a completely different article but that since he can’t do that he’s instead {{tq|grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty.}} but also that he doesn’t want to, and would much rather {{tq|save ourselves some time and just do the redirect}}, | |||
I am very new here and well, the thing is that I accidentally revealed my IP Address on an edit - so I've been trying to use the form to send an email to Oversight for suppressing said edit. However, I am unable to do so since I "cannot send email to other users on this wiki", which is the alert I get every time I submit the form. I have provided the email address and have allowed others to send me emails on my preferences. So, I really don't know what I'm supposed to do now. I wonder if it is because this is a new account? ] (]) 13:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Does that become a conduct issue? ] (]) 19:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi @] and welcome to the Teahouse. Have you tried ]? <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 14:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@], ] is about a contentious topic. I don't see any ''conduct'' issues in the discussion, just very strong opinions on both sides. It does seem as though you've cherry-picked quotes out of context; for example, the full sentence was {{tq|But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty.}} I recommend that you all continue to work through the issue via discussion. You can see ] for other options. ] ] 20:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Ah you see that was the form I was talking about - every time I try submitting it, it prevents me from doing so as "You cannot send email to other users on this wiki". I was hoping to know how to resolve that very issue ] (]) 16:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] The fuller quote was {{tq|But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty. We could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect.}}, operative phrase being “we could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect”, implying that is still the course of | |||
::: {{re|EnvinyatarElessar}} See ] for other options if email does not work for you. ] (]) 18:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::action being pursued and that, one way or another, the result is the same. | |||
::Regardless, my assessments have been wrong before, hence why I ask here instead of at ANI ] (]) 20:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::The even fuller quote is {{tq|The bold move would be to redirect this article to ] on ] grounds. Since I expect that would be immediately reverted, I am attempting to gain consensus first. It's good if you now agree that the passage in question is inappropriate and can be removed. But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty. We could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect. What do you think?}} {{pb}}I would not recommending going to ANI with this, @]. ] ] 20:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Would like some feedback == | ||
I have just, well you could say, abusing the recent changes page for things i need to revert. I've done my first few and it's going very quickly reverting all these users. Thoughts? ] (]) 20:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
escuchadme ] (]) 14:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I don't see anything wrong with that and I have no knowledge of any Misplaced Pages guideline articles discouraging/forbidding those actions. I, myself, have done the same before multiple times and I know a couple of Users doing the same thing as well. ] (]|]) 20:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@], do you have a question about editing Misplaced Pages? <code><nowiki>''']'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> (]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 14:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you very much. ] (]) 20:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hola Hectorinito. This is the English Misplaced Pages. If you have a question about Spanish Misplaced Pages, you'll have to ask there - try ]. | |||
:Hello, @]. What you're doing is actually encouraged and quite the noble act. Patrolling recent changes is a very efficient strategy to fighting vandalism. If you wish, you can download some tools like ] or ] to make this process even quicker. Those scripts also give you options to ] problematic editors in the hopes of preventing future disruptive editing.{{pb}}If you continue this process for a month, successfully reverting and warning vandals with those tools, you can request to get ] permissions at ]. Just keep in mind, the goal of reverting vandalism is not a race against other patrollers. Be slow and cautious if need be. Thank you for joining the fight against vandalism! ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 20:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:On the other hand, if this was about your edit to ] in English Misplaced Pages, then it was correctly reverted, as there does not appear to be any reason to say she is connected with Spain. ] (]) 14:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::WE STAND UNITED AGAINST VANDALISM! ] (]) 20:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Lol. ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Yeah I can be a bit chaotic sometimes xD ] (]) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::I put the humorous userbox on my user page ] (]) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Maintenance template removal? == | |||
== How can contribute to add a new page in Misplaced Pages? == | |||
Hello, I've made an and I was wondering if the sources that I added justify removal of the “This article '''does not ] any ]'''. Please help ] by ]” template at the top of the article? Also, are my sources good? I read ]. ] (]) 21:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I want to add a new page. Please let me know if it is possible? ] (]) 15:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Since you have cited sources, the template has done its job and now it should be removed. (Or it could be replaced by ]). ] (]|]) 21:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. It is possible, but it is the most difficult task to attempt on Misplaced Pages. It's much like asking "how do I give a violin recital at Carnegie Hall" or "how do I build a house". There is a lot to learn first. I suggest that instead of diving right in, that you first spend much time editing existing articles in areas that interest you, as well as use the ] to learn more about Misplaced Pages and what is expected of article content. ] (]) 15:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Username question == | ||
Hi there! I've bumped into a user whose name includes "42069". I checked through the username policy, and I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing that ought to be reported anyplace? Would it be considered "inappropriate" enough? | |||
We would like to translate ] as a good article in Egyptian Arabic, Urdu, Tamil, Bengali, Hindi, Marati, Malayalam, Haryanvi, and Punjabi. Would we need different accounts for these languages? Is there one clearinghouse and one community? Would we need to work within the Misplaced Pages communities in each language separately? Is there a way to bridge a single account across multiple languages? What if we want to add more languages? Should we be coordinating updates across languages? Is there a way to do this within these various communities? thank you ] (]) 15:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
The user showed up about a week ago, tried to upload and insert a couple of copyrighted images (deleted and reverted, respectively), and hasn't done anything since, so it's not really an immediate need - this is mostly for my own curiosity if a situation like this pops up in the future. ] (]) 21:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi, @]! Your account will work on all Wiki projects. You do need to have each of your students create their own account, though -- you can't all edit through one account. You will need to follow the rules for each language wiki, as all are different, but many of the differences are not huge, and as a good article here on en.wiki, it is very likely it meets requirements for other language wikis. ] (]) 15:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{nacc}} {{ping|NekoKatsun}} I don't thing strings of numbers are prohibited from being used in usernames, unless perhaps when read aloud they're something really vulgar that pretty much most people would clearly understand and find offensive. Even if this particular string of numbers means what Google says it can mean, I don't think that it meets such a standard. You can, however, ask for administrator input at ] or ] if you want, but it's probably better to just ignore it. If the account resumes editing and starts creating problems unreleated to its name, then you can seek administrator action because of that. -- ] (]) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature, and welcome to the Teahouse. The general answer is, yes, you may, but each different language Misplaced Pages is a separate project, and they may have different standards and procedures. You can find a general guide in ], but you'll need to examine each Misplaced Pages separately to check whether what you are doing meets its requirements. | |||
::I'm pretty sure they do indeed mean what Google says they do, and I can recall at least one instance where someone faced a lot of heat for having, ostensibly, the last two digits of their birth year in their username, which just so happened to be 88 (a white supremacist thing). I wanted to err on the side of caution. | |||
:You don't need different accounts: normally, accounts are automatically enabled on any Wikimedia project (you may get an unexpected welcome message the first time you visit a particular version). | |||
: |
::Since they're not doing anything I'll ignore, although that username sure won't do them any favors if they start back up with their copyright problems. Thanks for the reply! ] (]) 23:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
== How do I get enough credible sources when interviews go beyond webpages but videos, podcasts, etc? == | |||
== editing wikipedia == | |||
Hi, | |||
how do I edit a semi-protected page? ] (]) 16:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm trying to write a biography about an important contemporary muralist. His work has been in two Asian Art Museums in addition to murals all over the world and for corporations. He has many interviews; I included some in the citations but they were not accepted. Would love any guidance. Thank you ] (]) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hey, @], you should be able to. Which page are you trying to edit? ] (]) 16:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@] By waiting until you've been on Misplaced Pages for 4 days and made 10 edits, please see ]. There are several other protection types on that page too, so peruse them if you want. ]'']'' 16:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Hi ] as it appears you are an autoconfirmed user , you should be able to edit it like any other page (except extended confirmed and protected pages). What happens when you try? - ] (]) 16:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@], they already meet that standard. ] (]) 16:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I can see that now, I don't think I've ever heard of that issue before. ]'']'' 16:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: {{re|Ml5003}} If you click the "view source" tab, you should get a page that has a button to submit an edit request. If not, you can go to the talk page and place {{t|edit semi-protected}} in a new section along with a request for another editor to make the edit for you. (edit conflict) apparently you should be able to edit directly? ] (]) 16:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The AFC reviewer has left a comment saying that, "Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines". Some faults noted by me was the way the sections were displayed and most of the citations were unreliable and not properly generated. There's also no hyperlinks and no infobox. Fixing those faults would probably help your chance for the biography to be accepted. Hope this helps. ] (]|]) 22:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Misplaced Pages Layout == | |||
:Hello, @], and welcome to the Teahouse. | |||
:You have made several common beginners' errors: you have created your draft on your user page, which is not the right place for it. You have written your draft ] (writing from what you know, and then looking for sources) - Misplaced Pages doesn't care what you know: it only cares what independent reliable sources say about the subject. And {{HD/WINI}} So interviews don't count towards establishing ]. | |||
:There's nothing wrong with making mistakes: that's how we all learn. But newcomers who plunge straight into the challenging task of crating a new article often get frustrated and disillusioned. And it's even harder when you have a conflict of interest (thank you for declaring that). | |||
:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} ] (]) 23:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for the thorough reply. Where is the correct place to write a draft? | |||
::I don’t know why you think I cited sources backwards; I didn’t start that way. I did go back after I thought I needed more outside sources. I did look up what Misplaced Pages considers reliable sources, but I need to understand this better. I thought I went back and added, but they still dont seem to meet the criteria. I pulled from LA Times, ABC News, NPR, art websites and a local wiki. | |||
::I did not write the article about myself. ] (]) 00:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::The correct place to write a draft is ]. ] (]|]) 00:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "Content not properly deflated" sign == | |||
why did you change the layout of information? In particular the dates lide/death, places etc of said individual...its too hard to read..bring back the old layout. ] (]) 16:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{welcometea}} This sounds like it is specific to one article in particular, so any concerns should be brought to that article's talk page. —] ( ] • ] ) 17:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The poster is using the mobile version and describing an infobox so I guess it's the issue at ] and ]. It wasn't intentional and there is work to fix it. ] (]) 20:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I have gotten this sign several times during editing, idk why or how it came to be. Please help ] (]) 23:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== question == | |||
:I've never seen such a message, @]. Could you describe (step by step) what you did, on what page(s), and how the message displayed? ] ] 23:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::first I edit like I always do, I prefer to edit visually, so I want to put an image and caption into the article, that's it and then I clicked publish and this sign popped up "Content provided is not properly deflated" so I was unable to make such edit. | |||
::this page and several others | |||
::] ] (]) 00:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Britannica books Pre 2012 == | |||
how do I fix my "]" Page? - | |||
From, ] (]) 17:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@]: {{welcometea}} For one, your draft doesn't have any ] whatsoever, which are required to establish the subject's ]. Some of the external links you've put down lead to sites with ], which will not help in that aspect. —] ( ] • ] ) 17:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
How would a person attain copy's of all Encyclopaedia sets printed since 1768? ] (]) 01:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] violation == | |||
:Hello, {{u|Jarrod Samuel Burchett}}! The Teahouse is a place to ask about editing Misplaced Pages specifically. If you have other general knowledge questions, try asking at ], where editors who work in that area can help you. Happy editing, ] (]) 01:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Tools == | |||
I want to add this to the ] article: {{Talkquote|Rahul Gandhi has threatened that the whole of India will be on fire if the BJP wins the 2024 parliamentary elections and changes the Constitution, during an address at Delhi's Ramlila Maidan.<ref name="Hawk 2024 i967">{{cite web | title="If BJP wins these match fixed elections...country will be on fire": Rahul Gandhi | website=The Hawk | date=2024-03-31 | url=https://www.thehawk.in/posts/%22if-bjp-wins-these-match-fixed-elections...country-will-be-on-fire%22:-rahul-gandhi | access-date=2024-04-10}}</ref><ref name="Khanduri 2024 d940">{{cite web | last=Khanduri | first=Shailesh | title=India will burn if BJP wins 2024 Lok Sabha polls: Rahul Gandhi at Ramlila ground | website=NewsDrum | date=2024-03-31 | url=https://www.newsdrum.in/national/india-will-burn-if-bjp-wins-2024-lok-sabha-polls-says-rahul-gandhi-at-ramlila-ground-4437655 | access-date=2024-04-10}}</ref><ref name="Bangalore Mirror 2024 j240">{{cite web | title=Race to Lok Sabha: 'If BJP wins these match fixed polls...country will be on fire' | website=Bangalore Mirror | date=2024-04-01 | url=https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/race-to-lok-sabha-if-bjp-wins-these-match-fixed-polls-country-will-be-on-fire/articleshow/108923732.cms | access-date=2024-04-10}}</ref><ref name="The Economic Times 2024 n319">{{cite web | title=INDIA Bloc Rally | website=The Economic Times | date=2024-03-31 | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-bloc-rally-rahul-gandhi-if-bjp-wins-by-fixing-elections-country-will-be-on-fire/videoshow/108921183.cms?from=mdr | access-date=2024-04-10}}</ref>}} Will it be a ] violation?-] (]) 19:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 19:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I have the rater and auto-ed scripts installed but they don't show up in my more tab. I use Vector Legacy. Does anyone know how to fix this. ] (]) 01:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:BLP violation or not, I wouldn't advise adding that to an article because the meaning is unclear. If he used the words "the whole of India will be on fire" then perhaps they could be reported in quote marks, but without further explanation it's unclear what those words mean and they shouldn't be stated in Misplaced Pages's voice. ] (]) 19:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{re|Cordless Larry}} What he said was in ]. I have provided 4 citations for it, the 4th of which has an embedded video. When translated it means, "the whole country will be on fire if the BJP wins the ]s and changes the Constitution". When there are 4 sources, can it not be stated that he (Rahul Gandhi) said so in Misplaced Pages's voice?-] (]) 19:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::If you're quoting someone, then it should be in quote marks rather than Misplaced Pages's voice, and especially when the meaning is not obvious or the language employs metaphor. ] (]) 20:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{re|Cordless Larry}} There are 4 reliable sources, one of which (the 4th) even has an embedded video, so maybe I can type, {{Talkquote|According to Rahul Gandhi, he will set the whole of India on fire if the BJP wins the ]s and changes the Constitution.}}-] (]) 20:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::..... or maybe, {{Talkquote|Rahul Gandhi has said, "(we) will set the whole of India on fire if the BJP wins the 2024 Indian parliamentary elections and changes the Constitution."}}-] (]) 20:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::As explained above, ideas expressed in Misplaced Pages's voice shouldn't include metaphors. Quote marks are necessary here. ] (]) 20:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} |
Latest revision as of 01:37, 24 December 2024
Community Q&A hub for new editorsShortcuts
jmcgnh, a Teahouse host
Welcome to the Teahouse!Your go-to place for friendly help with using and editing Misplaced Pages. Ask a question Question forumMeet your hostsArticles to improveBecome a host New to Misplaced Pages? See our tutorial for new editors or introduction to contributing page.
Note: Newer questions appear at the bottom of the Teahouse. Completed questions are archived within 2–3 days.
- To read the newest questions, skip to bottom
- About the Teahouse
Most recent archives
1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230, 1231, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244
Cyprus military ranks
I need help with the NCO ranks, i already made the png files how the ranks look but i dont know how to modify the code so i make it look like the greek one, cypriot army have 2 nco ranks for every rank, one for permanent NCOs that completed military academy and the other for SYP-EPY (in Greece EPOP-EMTh) for contracted NCOs that cannot become Warrant Officers, example bellow.
NCO and other ranks
NCO ranks (excl. OR-9 and conscript ranks) have undergone some changes through the years, the latest being in 2004.
NATO code | OR-9 | OR-8 | OR-7 | OR-6 | OR-5 | OR-4 | OR-3 | OR-2 | OR-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hellenic Army |
Arm/corps insignia only | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ανθυπασπιστής Anthypaspistis |
Αρχιλοχίας Archilochias |
Επιλοχίας Epilochias |
Λοχίας Lochias |
Δεκανέας Dekaneas |
Υποδεκανέας Ypodekaneas |
Στρατιώτης Stratiotis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greece (Conscripts) |
No equivalent |
No insignia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Δόκιμος Έφεδρος Αξιωματικός Dokimos Efedros Axiomatikos |
Λοχίας Lochias |
Δεκανέας Dekaneas |
Υποδεκανέας Ypodekaneas |
Υποψήφιος Έφεδρος Βαθμοφόρος Ypopsifios Efedros Bathmoforos |
Στρατιώτης Stratiotis |
- tanea.gr (2004-10-11). "Aλλάζουν το εθνόσημο και οι «σαρδέλες»". ΤΑ ΝΕΑ (in Greek). Retrieved 2024-06-10.
- "Διακριτικά Φ/Π Στολών Υπαξιωματικών Αποφοίτων ΣΜΥ" . army.gr (in Greek). Hellenic Army. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
References
Notes
- ^ Greece has only one level of Warrant Officer. According to the current issue (2021) of STANAG 2116, the Greek Warrant Officers are included in OR-9, however they are afforded the privileges of an officer. See STANAG 2116 note 29, page D-9
Userpage question
I know I've already asked about my userpage before but I've done a lot of work on it since then. Does my userpage go a bit overboard, especially with the inline links? I joined the welcoming committee and I am expecting at least a few new users to come to my userpage from my signature on my welcome messages so I tried to leave a lot of inline links for them to click on and get a feel for the scope of the encyclopedia. ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 15:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @User:ApteryxRainWing Compared to User:EEng (takes awhile to load, and I don't recommend it as a role model), or myself, for that matter, I find your page quite respectable. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I feel I do the most good by being a warning lesson parents can point out to their children. EEng 15:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- if i learned one thing from you, it's that puns are the scourge of all things good cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, no, they've got a point. The reason we exist on this world is to get as many rules added to the book as possible. No one ever told me I couldn't add an inline link containing some sarcastic joke for every single word on my userpage, but I'm sure they wouldn't like it if I did so why don't we make it official? ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 16:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- if i learned one thing from you, it's that puns are the scourge of all things good cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I feel I do the most good by being a warning lesson parents can point out to their children. EEng 15:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- oh my that isn't a userpage that's a whole-ass userbook. I guess mine is better than I thought ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 15:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- 406,519 bytes, that's a lot. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- To put it into context, the largest article on Misplaced Pages has 975,504 bytes. CommissarDoggo 15:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, we have an article that's almost an entire gigabyte? Does it just have a lot of text or are images, GIFs, code spaghetti, and videos taking up some of that space? ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 16:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @User:ApteryxRainWing That's not a Gigabyte, only just below a Megabyte. The whole encycopedia can be downloaded at about 24 GB. See WP:SIZEWP. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- oh yeah sorry I forgot the ratios. I'm surprised Misplaced Pages is only 24 gigs, I thought 6 million articles would be closer to a terabyte ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 16:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
As of February 2013, the XML file containing current pages only, no user or talk pages, was 42,987,293,445 bytes uncompressed (43 GB). The XML file with current pages, including user and talk pages, was 93,754,003,797 bytes uncompressed (94 GB). The full history dumps, all 174 files of them, took 10,005,676,791,734 bytes (10 TB).
As of August 2023, Wikimedia Commons, which includes the images, videos and other media used across all the language-specific Wikipedias contained 96,519,778 files, totalling 470,991,810,222,099 bytes (428.36 TB).
CommissarDoggo 16:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)- Text is very small, especially ASCII characters in UTF-8 (the majority of characters used on the English Misplaced Pages), which are one byte each. – dudhhrcontribsher 19:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- oh yeah sorry I forgot the ratios. I'm surprised Misplaced Pages is only 24 gigs, I thought 6 million articles would be closer to a terabyte ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 16:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @User:ApteryxRainWing That's not a Gigabyte, only just below a Megabyte. The whole encycopedia can be downloaded at about 24 GB. See WP:SIZEWP. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, per that article has 2 words. And 1,541 unique references. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, we have an article that's almost an entire gigabyte? Does it just have a lot of text or are images, GIFs, code spaghetti, and videos taking up some of that space? ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 16:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- To put it into context, the largest article on Misplaced Pages has 975,504 bytes. CommissarDoggo 15:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- 406,519 bytes, that's a lot. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Looks great, especially the storm chaser part. :) EF 15:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- what can I say, I just have zero sense of self preservation and I want to see the silly wind cones up close :D ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 15:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I liked your userpage. Quite interesting username too. Girlwithgoldenheart (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! The "apteryx" in my name is the scientific name of my favorite bird, the kiwi, and "RainWing" is a reference to my favorite tribe from the book series Wings of Fire Apteryx!🐉 | Roar with me!!! 🗨🐲 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for taking your time to let me know the real meaning about your username. You're a creative guy. Wishing you good luck. Girlwithgoldenheart (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! The "apteryx" in my name is the scientific name of my favorite bird, the kiwi, and "RainWing" is a reference to my favorite tribe from the book series Wings of Fire Apteryx!🐉 | Roar with me!!! 🗨🐲 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Rules of recommendations to add links in an article
Hello ! I'd like to know if there are rules or recommendations to add links in an article.
I'm talking about internal links to Misplaced Pages in English.
As an example. We can choose the article "Bashar Al-Assad".
If there are a section or a sub-section citing "Moscow" (This is an example but I could take another subject mentionned on this article).
If Moscow is linked one time in the article. Can I do it for others sections or sub-sections if this is not the same sub-section or section ?
If you don't understand what I means with words "section" and "sub-section".
You can see the example below.
Suggestions for Monte Zovetto page
Good morning, everyone, My team and I recently finished our Monte Zovetto wiki page (a mountain in northern Italy) for a school project. It was approved, and we received a grade C.
We already made some improvements (also thanks to other editors), but do you have any suggestions on how we can improve it to achieve a grade B? Thank you!
LIUCsmarties (talk) 07:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC) LIUCsmarties (talk) 07:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I saw there are the pronunciation in "British English" indicated in "IPA".
- Maybe someone can add it in "Italian" ? It is not a great improvement but it is a good one.
- Why not add the pronunciation with IPA transcription in "Venetian language" ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 07:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Please see our response to your fellow student and to how poorly your instructor has designed the assignment and how that's putting you and your classmates in an unfair position and lots of unneeded stress. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 10:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- LIUCsmarties, you say "It was approved, and we received a grade C." I "accepted" the draft, promoting it to article status. I didn't give it a "C", and nobody else did either. I don't see anyone calling it "Start", "C", or "B". Do you mean that your teacher approved it and gave it a C, for university rather than Misplaced Pages purposes? If so, we people here who aren't affiliated with LIUC don't know either how grading is supposed to work in LIUC or what particular criteria your teacher uses in order to grade. -- Hoary (talk) 11:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Hoary Actually you did. However, @LIUCsmarties probably doesn't realise that these assessments are somewhat arbitrary and only good articles and featured articles go through a formal process here. I suggest that LIUCsmarties and colleagues relax after doing a good job of creating the article and focus now on the rest of their schoolwork. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, Mike Turnbull, so I did. Duh. (I plead senility!) Anyone (other than the author or their classmates) who thinks it merits a B is welcome to give it a B. And I have to say that though I'm usually unimpressed by class-assigned article creation, this set does impress me (in a good way). -- Hoary (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Hoary I recently reviewed the Assessments for many articles at WikiProject Mountains of the Alps. I would say this is a pretty complete article, easily meriting a B-class (which I have just given it). With some further careful work on sourcing and on WP:MOS formatting, it could well be put forward for a GA Assessment, though seeking more detailed feedback at WP:PEER REVIEW could be worthwhile. However, these further steps would need the commitment to see this through beyond the unfair deadline set by their tutor (Limelightangel), as discussed in recent threads from their other students. I think @LIUCsmarties and colleagues should be extremely proud of their work. It's impressive. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, Mike Turnbull, so I did. Duh. (I plead senility!) Anyone (other than the author or their classmates) who thinks it merits a B is welcome to give it a B. And I have to say that though I'm usually unimpressed by class-assigned article creation, this set does impress me (in a good way). -- Hoary (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Hoary Actually you did. However, @LIUCsmarties probably doesn't realise that these assessments are somewhat arbitrary and only good articles and featured articles go through a formal process here. I suggest that LIUCsmarties and colleagues relax after doing a good job of creating the article and focus now on the rest of their schoolwork. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
LIUCsmarties Consider deleting the Legends section, as not clear it is specific to Zovetto (and perhaps adding it to Roana instead). David notMD (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Can I draft an article about myself and get it published on this site?
Hi Everyone,
I am new here and I want to contribute a page of my own life story, but it may not work with the management since they prefer to have someone else to write about it. That's my understanding, but what if a person wants to do what I want with integrity and facts? I am trying to establish just one short page on the topic to start later edits by other editors. Thank you, Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor. I suggest you take a look at Misplaced Pages:Autobiography, Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not and Misplaced Pages:The answer to life, the universe, and everything because it sounds like you might be misunderstanding some things about Misplaced Pages and how it works. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- To succeed, a draft submitted to AfC for review must have content verified by references to succeed. You are prohibited from creating a draft about yourself based on what you know to be true with the hope that other editors will provide the references (if there are any). David notMD (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, David notMD. Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 20:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Marchjuly, thank you for your suggestion. I've checked the contents you suggested me to look into and I gathered that there would be no chance for anyone to contribute their biography on Misplaced Pages. The only way apparent to me now is that other people who are willing to cover someone who are noted write a piece about that individual. Am I not misunderstanding now? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- In addition @Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor
- I feel there is need for you to understand basic editing, See WP:Editing before creating articles as this can be very difficult for beginners who just joined the project. Tesleemah (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- You're not quite understanding. People who are truly notable can write biographies about themselves and have them published, and some have. But this is hard to do when you have a conflict of interest, as we all do about ourselves.
- See WP:Golden Rule. That is what's required, in a nutsheell. Are there published reliable sources that are independent of you, providing significant coverage of you? If there are multiple such sources, then yes, you can write a biography citing them. The biography cannot use any information other than what is published, so you cannot write what you know, you must write what has been covered. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments and clarification. I do multiple have published reliable sources in English and Chinese that are independent of myself. I think I will tive i.rLetyme know if you have any more comments. I'd appreciate that. now? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I get it. Thank you. Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 20:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor: As posted above, even though creating an article about yourself isn't expressly prohibited, it can be quite hard and those who try often end up feeling quite frustrated when they start running into problems while trying to do so. My suggestion to you would be to use the Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation process to first work on a draft for an article and then submit that draft for review when you think it's ready. If the draft is declined (even multiple times), the reviewer will explain why and otherwise leave feedback on what further is needed for the draft to someday be accepted as an article. There's no real deadline when it comes to drafts, and you can work at your own pace on it. The only thing you need to do is continue working on improving it and avoid submitting the same declined version over and over again; you also need to make sure you don't "abandon" the draft by not making any meaningful edits to it for six months because such drafts are eligible for speedy deletion. You're not required to start a draft per se, but once something gets added to the Misplaced Pages article namespace, pretty much anything goes and the page can be edited by anyone at anytime; this could mean improvements, but it could just as easily mean being nominated, proposed or tagged for WP:DELETION. Before pressing ahead, you might want to take a look at Misplaced Pages:Notability (people), Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons, Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest editing (particularly the WP:COISELF and WP:LUC sections), Misplaced Pages:Ownership of content and Misplaced Pages:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing because you'll have pretty much zero final editorial control over any article you create about yourself, and all of it's content will be expected to be in accordance with relevant Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, which in some cases might not be the same as what you want it to be. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Again, thanks for the thorough explanations. I have gained a lot more understanding now. So, it's the best for other people to write about someone else. I get it, but how about people have someone other than themselves write their biography, for example, people who know the topic person well, or hired writers? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 21:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's best to avoid COI editing, especially paid editing. It tends to attract hostile scrutiny.
- Depending on who you are, there may be someone who would be interested in writing an article about you. Many editors specialize in certain types of biography: sports figures, academicians, scientists; the bios I write are often about chefs. But that would require you to disclose your identity, which you may not want to do. Valereee (talk) 21:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor: Any type of "paid" editing needs to be done in accordance with WP:PAID; it's not expressly prohibited to have an article created by paying someone to do it for you, but basically that's a contract between you and the other party that has nothing to do with Misplaced Pages. It's your money and you're free to spend it as you please, but there are lots of WP:SCAMs out there that promise all kinds of things that simply are impossible to deliver; so, if you do decide to take that path, you should make sure to ask lots of questions before giving someone your money because Misplaced Pages won't help you get it back if things go wrong. Other options to consider might be trying WP:RA (which seems to be more miss than hit) or asking on the talk page of a WikiProject that might be related to whatever you think makes you Misplaced Pages notable. Whatever you do, you're going to most likely find it hard to remain anonymous because Misplaced Pages operates in the WP:REALWORLD, and the way it's set up can make it easy for others to connect the dots and figure out who you really are.Personally, I still find it a bit odd when people seek to either create Misplaced Pages articles about themselves or try to find/pay someone to create such an article on their behalf. That sort of indicates to me that said person might be mistaking Misplaced Pages for some type of social media site or other kind of online profile site, which it's most definitely not. The most natural way for someone to have a Misplaced Pages article created about them is for them to do enough Misplaced Pages notable things so that reliable sources start covering them to the point that someone completely unconnected to them wants to create such an article. Of course, since this tends to work better for really famous people like movie stars. musicians, pro athletes, etc. than it does for other types of people who tend to be ignored by main stream media sources, I can somewhat understand feeling "I've got to do this myself because nobody is going to do it for me". Still it comes down to someone wanting to have a Misplaced Pages article written about them despite the fact that they're pretty much going to have zero control over what that article becomes over time. There seem to be much better WP:ALTERNATIVEs these days for someone to establish an online presence that they'll have total editorial control over and be able to use to let the world know about all about themselves. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again. Did you mean that the persons (such as celebrities, known politicians) who have a page written by unconnected people is not able to edit that page which is about the very themselves? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- They can edit it, but anyone else is free to edit, too. Article subjects have no control over the articles about them. Other editors can add stuff you'd prefer not to include and can remove stuff you'd like to include. Valereee (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor: The subjects of articles can edit said articles, but they're going to be expected to do so in accordance with relevant Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines just like any other editor; the subjects of articles don't "own" the articles in the sense that they've got total control over what's written in the article, and they can't stop others from editing the article. When the subject of an article has a problem with what's written about them, Misplaced Pages has processes in place to try and help them sort things out as explained here; Misplaced Pages, however, doesn't do what the subject wants just because the subject wants it done. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The general guidance is that the subject of an article can make minor corrections to grammar, spelling, numers, names, etc, can add citations to reliable independent sources, and can revert obvious vandalism. Anything more substantive than that should be proposed on the article talk page.
- That's after the article has been published. While it's still a draft, the subject is free to make any edits to it, and a reviewer would either accept the draft for publicaiton or decline it. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again. Did you mean that the persons (such as celebrities, known politicians) who have a page written by unconnected people is not able to edit that page which is about the very themselves? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Again, thanks for the thorough explanations. I have gained a lot more understanding now. So, it's the best for other people to write about someone else. I get it, but how about people have someone other than themselves write their biography, for example, people who know the topic person well, or hired writers? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 21:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor: As posted above, even though creating an article about yourself isn't expressly prohibited, it can be quite hard and those who try often end up feeling quite frustrated when they start running into problems while trying to do so. My suggestion to you would be to use the Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation process to first work on a draft for an article and then submit that draft for review when you think it's ready. If the draft is declined (even multiple times), the reviewer will explain why and otherwise leave feedback on what further is needed for the draft to someday be accepted as an article. There's no real deadline when it comes to drafts, and you can work at your own pace on it. The only thing you need to do is continue working on improving it and avoid submitting the same declined version over and over again; you also need to make sure you don't "abandon" the draft by not making any meaningful edits to it for six months because such drafts are eligible for speedy deletion. You're not required to start a draft per se, but once something gets added to the Misplaced Pages article namespace, pretty much anything goes and the page can be edited by anyone at anytime; this could mean improvements, but it could just as easily mean being nominated, proposed or tagged for WP:DELETION. Before pressing ahead, you might want to take a look at Misplaced Pages:Notability (people), Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons, Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest editing (particularly the WP:COISELF and WP:LUC sections), Misplaced Pages:Ownership of content and Misplaced Pages:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing because you'll have pretty much zero final editorial control over any article you create about yourself, and all of it's content will be expected to be in accordance with relevant Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, which in some cases might not be the same as what you want it to be. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- To succeed, a draft submitted to AfC for review must have content verified by references to succeed. You are prohibited from creating a draft about yourself based on what you know to be true with the hope that other editors will provide the references (if there are any). David notMD (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
How do I request a move on Misplaced Pages?
WP:RM gives you a guide on requesting a move, but it isn’t clear enough for me to request. How do I request it? 143.179.74.165 (talk) 12:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which page do you want moved to which title? PrimeHunter (talk) 13:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sj-sound to Voiceless palatal-velar fricative. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 06:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- On a side note, always check for double redirects if the target page already exists. If not, check for broken redirects. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article is 19 years old, it has been moved before, and its title has been discussed on the talk page, so it should be treated as a potentially controversial move with the procedure at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves#Requesting a single page move. The talk page is Talk:Sj-sound. Note Misplaced Pages:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names which may be mentioned by opponents. Is that sufficient help? PrimeHunter (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- On a side note, always check for double redirects if the target page already exists. If not, check for broken redirects. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sj-sound to Voiceless palatal-velar fricative. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 06:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Weird message on my talk page from IP user
an IP (2003:DE:E714:EA46:83D:9568:35AD:7CE8) left a weird string of gibberish on my Talk page. what should I do about it? I'm going to delete it, of course, but should this go to ANI or something? Apteryx!🐉 | Roar with me!!! 🗨🐲 14:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ApteryxRainWing Seasons Greetings from the Teahouse! I see you've already removed it, but, no, ANI would not be appropriate. This user made just two random edits - for what reason, we've no idea. Test edit? Error? Vandalism? You've reverted it. Great. That's all you need to do. I always check a user's contributions to see if they're doing it to others. tThis one isnt'. Nor is their IPv6 address doing it on the /64 range, which is always worth checking. So, just walk away and ignore it, unless it happens again. It's never worth feeding the trolls.
- But, even then, this would be a case of disruption or vandalism, were the pattern to be repeated elsewhere. So, then you warn the user (Twinkle is a very easy tool for automating that process). Having warned them, check if they continue their behaviour. If they do so, warn them again, but with a higher level template and, if they still continue, report them at WP:AIV, not ANI, as that's the place for vandals to be assessed and blocked if they're continuing to be disruptive. I hope this helps. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- thank you Apteryx!🐉 | Roar with me!!! 🗨🐲 14:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- could it be that the user tried to literally "roar with you"? If you make a clever...(a good word for it escapes me right now)(your signature makes me smile everytime I see it) you must be aware of some unusual repercussions. 176.0.139.10 (talk) 11:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- sorry to say, but AGF doesn't apply here. After looking at it, it was most probably an attempt on Tagging (graffiti). 176.0.139.10 (talk) 12:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback on Draft?
Hoping this might be a place where someone might offer a bit of feedback on a draft to see if there are any issues, formatting or content related - or anything else that seems problematic.
If not please advise any alternative. Thanks in advance!
KoKo91361 (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- To get feedback you need to submit Draft:KarynO for review but I can tell you now that IMDb and Discogs are NOT reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for this quick note. Will have to eliminate/replace IMDb and Discogs links and citations then. A bit challenging since about 1/2 of our references come from them. Good to know this would be a problem though (in advance!) KoKo91361 (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @KoKo91361, I am not seeing evidence from the sources you've provided that Karyn meets our criteria for inclusion for musicians, unfortunately. If these are the best sources you have, then it doesn't look like Karyn merits an article on Misplaced Pages at this time. qcne (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- A LOT of unreferenced name-dropping that all has to be deleted. For example: "She became a technical consultant and friend to many - including Christopher Cross, Stewart Copeland, Timothy B. Schmidt, Elton John (band), Jon Anderson, Ray Charles, Billy Corgan, Eric Carmen, Butch Vig, Al Schmitt. Bruce Swedien, Oscar Peterson, Stevie Wonder, and countless others." David notMD (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @KoKo91361, I am not seeing evidence from the sources you've provided that Karyn meets our criteria for inclusion for musicians, unfortunately. If these are the best sources you have, then it doesn't look like Karyn merits an article on Misplaced Pages at this time. qcne (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for this quick note. Will have to eliminate/replace IMDb and Discogs links and citations then. A bit challenging since about 1/2 of our references come from them. Good to know this would be a problem though (in advance!) KoKo91361 (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
DRAFT PAGE UNIVERSITY PROJECT
Hello, i'm actually working on the draft page "Villa Fraccaroli" for a university project, i need the page to be accepted before the 31 of december, i was wondering if you could look at it, and if there's something to improve, i can work on it. Thank you in advance! Micol Liucmicol01 (talk) 16:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Liucmicol01 We cannot guarantee acceptance before a certain date- we have no deadlines on this volunteer project. and your professor has put you in a difficult position by making you do this. Your professor should review the Misplaced Pages Education Program materials to design lessons that don't depend on review by volunteers. Please show your professor this message. 331dot (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- This has been reported on the Education Noticeboard: Misplaced Pages:Education noticeboard#Teahouse query from Italian university class as a few other class members have posted queries.
- @Liucmicol01 please tell your instructor they have set you an unfair task: new drafts are reviewed by volunteers in their own time, and the current wait time is eight weeks or longer. qcne (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Qcue's answer is not true. The system is not a queue. Any draft can be reviewed in days, weeks, or (sadly) months. Each reviewer decides what they want to review next. David notMD (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the curious, it has been accepted and is now at Villa Fraccaroli. David notMD (talk) 20:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Obviously good submissions can be accepted fast, and problem ones can be declined fast. But those in between that are difficult to evaluate may be left for someone else to check. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Qcue's answer is not true. The system is not a queue. Any draft can be reviewed in days, weeks, or (sadly) months. Each reviewer decides what they want to review next. David notMD (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories
The article about Robert P.Black who died recently still has the category "Living person" at the bottom of his Misplaced Pages page. He died recently and that category should be removed from his page. How does one accomplish that? MadamArtz (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to the Teahouse, @MadamArtz. Looking at the article, it doesn't look like it has been updated yet to account for his death, if he did die. Can you provide a reliable source (per WP:VERIFY) about his death so that we can add this information? Tarlby 19:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article has already been updated to indicate his death. My question relates to removing the category "living person". MadamArtz (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- While it does say that Robert P. Black died (my bad), it still isn't sourced and a quick Google search didn't find anything. Can you find a reliable source? Tarlby 19:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is an obituary for this economist here. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @MadamArtz The category has been removed and Black's death is added with a source. To remove categories in the future, you can click "Edit" at the top right of a page (assuming you're using a computer), click on the box of categories at the bottom of the page, and remove the respective category. Tarlby 20:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- While it does say that Robert P. Black died (my bad), it still isn't sourced and a quick Google search didn't find anything. Can you find a reliable source? Tarlby 19:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article has already been updated to indicate his death. My question relates to removing the category "living person". MadamArtz (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
What do I do with this article
I found this article called Kitakagaya Station and it doesn’t provide any citations and the only references are two Japanese websites that I can’t read. I really need help on whether I should draftify it or leave it be. I know absolutely nothing about Osaka or the train station, so for me I have no idea how to expand it. Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hm...marked as unrefrenced since 2011. @Yuanmongolempiredynasty, any chance you'd be willing to do a google search to see if there are references? If there are, you can add them. If there aren't, or if you just don't feel like doing that work, you could redirect to Osaka Metro. An attempt to fix is always best, but a unsourced article that's been tagged for that long, a redirect is a reasonable choice. Valereee (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, @Yuanmongolempiredynasty, be sure to study WP:DRAFTIFY thoroughly before moving any articles to draftspace. An article that is older than 90 days should not be moved to draftspace. Schazjmd (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Valeree, if I were to leave a redirect, where would I redirect it to? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say to Yotsubashi Line? That article was also largely unreferenced, too, and both references were dead; I fixed them with the 'fix dead links' in the history.
- Just FTR, we don't require references to be in English, and if you open them in your browser, you may be able to see the translation. Valereee (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Preference on editing style
I was wondering if it is prefered if, for consecutive edits/contributions for an article all written in the same edit period, that the edits be merged into a single large edit when publishing or if smaller but multiple edits are prefered. Thought 1915 (talk) on 22:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Thought 1915 It very much depends e.g. whether the topic is controversial and whether there are lots of other editors watching the article. We work according to a standard bold, revert, discuss process and if you add one large edit, another editor may dislike just one part (e.g. because it is not sourced) and decide to revert the whole edit. If, instead, you add short sections then another editor will be unlikely to revert all your work and can focus on just the edit(s) they object to. If you are making a new article as a draft or in your sandbox, then large edits would be fine. Mike Turnbull (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @Thought 1915 Welcome to the Teahouse. I would suggest making relatively small edits and saving each one with a short, helpful EDIT SUMMARY. At the largest, I would write one paragraph based upon one citation, though usually much smaller. Should you lose power or forget to save your edits, you could lose them. If an article is likely to be edited by other people at the same time, then saving in shorter packets helps you avoid WP:EDIT CONFLICTS. If you describe each 'save' clearly, it also lets you go back through the 'View History' tab to find a particular edit that you had previously made - possibly to revert or review it easily. That also applies when working in your sandbox, where nobody else is going to be editing. Hope this helps and Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Nick Moyes (talk) 22:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- There's a bit of variation available. As Mike Turnbull says, ff you're writing an article from scratch, large bulk edits are probably fine, while for controversial topics smaller edits are preferred. However, I'd advise not to go too far in either direction. Many small edits clog the edit history and might obscure significant changes you make in with minor copyediting or the like, which makes it harder for other editors to review and process the changes. For article-writing, I find trying to cram everything into one big edit clogs up my thinking; I prefer to start with a stub and build it up over a few days. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 01:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- For large existing articles at which I intend to make lots of changes, sometimes as preparing for a Good Article nomination (see Vitamin D) I am always doing multiple edits. At most, I copy a section into my Sandbox, work there, then replace the original with my revised. David notMD (talk) 11:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to correct a page William John Swainson
- Courtesy link: William John Swainson
This name is incorrect it should be William Swainson. He did not have a middle name of John. I have a copy of his death certificate which clearly has his full name as William Swainson, as does his grave stone and the memorial plaque of his first wife Mary Parkes. I have not sighted any books that he illustrated or wrote that had John as a middle name I have sighted newspaper articles and letters as well as places were he is referenced in the committees, Societies, and groups he was in. I have never seen any of his sketches signed William John Swainson or WJ Swainson or William J Swainson. Remember that there are also sketches done by his sons, including William John Swainson (Willie), and his daughters. Even the sources have him as WIlliam Swainson. Can anyone help me as this is the first time I have tried to do this. Thanks SwainsonTimbo (talk) 01:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- The formal place to propose a rename is on Talk:William John Swainson. Present your evidence. Various reliable sources do include the name "John", so you will ahve to counteract them. Also the page William Swainson is already a disambiguation page, so you would have to go to a different name such as William Swainson (botanist). Once a decision is made the page can be "moved" to the appropriate title. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't looked through all the sources cited, but none of the ones I have looked at say "John" anywhere, including the DNB, and the obituary in The Gentleman's Magazine which is titled "William Swainson", despite it being cited as "William John Swainson". ColinFine (talk) 10:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- User "Judge Nutmeg" seems to have introduced the name John in this edit in 2007, with no citation to support it. The article was moved to the present title in August 2008. Which are the sources which support "John" @Graeme Bartlett? (These replies should be on the Talk page, but I haven't the time to create a discussion there now). ColinFine (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Some sources include . They are just input for a decision of the name and need to be compared with other sources that don't use "John". William Swainson (naturalist) could be a better name for our article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- The first source points to William's son William John. The others point to say William John Swainson then talk about William Swainson. The last source is a newer one and probably got for Misplaced Pages? Any old source refers to William Swainson. I think that since the name was changed in 2007 - 2008 without any sources the new sources after that date may be invalid. How could I load a picture of his death certificate? I am really new to this so am struggling. I appreciate any help. I agree with the new name for our article SwainsonTimbo (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably a birth certificate is more relevant, but it was so long ago, they probably did not exist. There might be a christening record though. Anyway you don't have to prove via a death certificate, just a preponderance of sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- The first source points to William's son William John. The others point to say William John Swainson then talk about William Swainson. The last source is a newer one and probably got for Misplaced Pages? Any old source refers to William Swainson. I think that since the name was changed in 2007 - 2008 without any sources the new sources after that date may be invalid. How could I load a picture of his death certificate? I am really new to this so am struggling. I appreciate any help. I agree with the new name for our article SwainsonTimbo (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Some sources include . They are just input for a decision of the name and need to be compared with other sources that don't use "John". William Swainson (naturalist) could be a better name for our article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Article Making
I am the grandson of Joseph A. Burgundy and I thought his life was interesting so I tried to make an article on him I don't have any other resources I can find except my father and he died in 2011 so I don't know what to do Doodledoo4 (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Doodledoo4:. On Misplaced Pages, articles are based off information that is already published. So you can search online, books, and newspaper indexes. But if the only information is from relatives, then it is not a suitable topic for Misplaced Pages. So if it is like that then you can choose to do something else instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you cannot find newspaper articles about your grandfather (for example, an obituary), then there is no path to your draft being accepted as an article. You can either ask that it be deleted or just abandon it, leaving it to be auto-deleted six months from now. David notMD (talk) 11:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
" " tag appearing in some edits I make
I am curious as to why some of my edits lately include adding " " tags when I am not intentionally adding them. Examples include , , and . I corrected them with , , and , respectively. I wonder if pages that are prone to having the " " tag appear when I intend to make a different change have some script or formatting issue that I do not know about until I make the edit. If anyone can help identify this issue, I would appreciate it. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Z. Patterson. That is just the code for a Non-breaking space. It prevents an unwanted line break. Cullen328 (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cullen328: I understand now. Thank you. Z. Patterson (talk) 04:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Sandbox
Is there any way to use existing articles as template sorta things for the sandbox? Any help is appreciated! Willzdawgh (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Willzdawgh. Yes. you can copy an existing article into your sandbox, but for attribution purposes, you should use an edit summary of something like "Copying (article title) into my sandbox for article development purposes". Wikilink the article in question where I said (article title). Cullen328 (talk) 04:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Copying Donald Trump into my sandbox for article development purposes
- Like that? Willzdawgh (talk) 04:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is a massive and highly controversial article, Willzdawgh. Why on earth would you select that article? Cullen328 (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- srry if I did something wrong bro. I'm new and I also forgot to mention that I was wanting to do this merely bc I was bored. I'm sorry if that's a problem. More specifically I wanted to mess around with hypertranslate and replace the article's text with the result on hypertranslate. I'm sorry if I'm unknowingly planning on doing something I'm not allowed to. I'll refrain from doing this if that's the case. Once again, very sorry. Willzdawgh (talk) 04:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize. If you're here to experiment, I recommend scouting scouting out stub articles via Special:RandomPage, pasting the wikitext into your sandbox, and messing around with the source there. If you need any help, you can refer to the tutorial at Help:Wikitext, the cheatsheet at Help:Cheatsheet, or an experienced editor (not me.) Thanks for asking, Sparkle and Fade edits 04:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- srry if I did something wrong bro. I'm new and I also forgot to mention that I was wanting to do this merely bc I was bored. I'm sorry if that's a problem. More specifically I wanted to mess around with hypertranslate and replace the article's text with the result on hypertranslate. I'm sorry if I'm unknowingly planning on doing something I'm not allowed to. I'll refrain from doing this if that's the case. Once again, very sorry. Willzdawgh (talk) 04:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is a massive and highly controversial article, Willzdawgh. Why on earth would you select that article? Cullen328 (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Willzdawgh Applying the Hypertranslate software to the text of an existing article and then replacing the original text would be considered vandalism and would result in your account being indefinitely blocked. If all you are is curious about what repeated Google Translate would do to any Misplaced Pages text, do that on your own computer and do not bring it back to Misplaced Pages. David notMD (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to ask for help if it is possible to edit the title of my draft article?
Hello. I would like to ask for help if it is possible to edit the title of my draft article? Batoenonghistoryador (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Batoenonghistoryador You would have to WP:Move an article via the toolbar on the right side of the screen to do it, but only confirmed/autoconfirmed users can do it. If you would like, I can move it for you, as long as you can specify the desired title. Sparkle and Fade edits 04:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! Thank you so muchc much appreciated if you can edit the title and make it like "Atty. Howard Calleja et, al. vs. Executive Secretary et, al." Batoenonghistoryador (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note that the specific title of a draft is not particularly relevant to the draft process. If accepted, the draft will be placed at the proper title. 331dot (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Passive voice in articles
Courtesy link: Sacred Reich (sandbox)
I'm working on a draft for the Sacred Reich article (at my sandbox) for a major edit, and I ran my text through numerous grammar/spellcheckers like EasyBib and Grammarly. The most common—and most confusing—is on the use of passive voice. For context, passive voice is "the ball was kicked by Jeremy", while active voice is "Jeremy kicked the ball". I don't know whether or not I should be using passive voice in my prose (i.e. "Greg Hall was fired from the band and was replaced by drummer Tim Radziwill). I have attempted to use featured articles as examples, but usually doesn't seem to happen because of the abundance of information on the subject (i.e The Beatles or Alice in Chains) compared to a band like Sacred Reich. In my opinion, I'm not sure whether or not to use passive voice because it sounds rough when introducing a new member.
For example, "Greg Hall ... was replaced by Dave McClain ... later that year." vs. "Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall later that year." usually justifies using passive voice, but in context, this his first mention in the article and it disrupts the flow of the prose. In context:
Sacred Reich toured for nearly two years in support of The American Way, headlining major tours with Atrophy, Obituary, and Forced Entry. They also supported Venom in Europe and for Sepultura on their Arise tour in both Europe and North America. In 1991, the band released an EP, titled A Question. Former S.A. Slayer member Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall, who found their extensive touring to be difficult, later that year.
I'm still not sure if it justifies using active voice or not. If it does, please let me know. On a side note, I've noticed an abundance of the phrase "later that year" in my writing, and I don't know how to rewrite it properly because of vague dates in the source material. If anyone can help me with that as well, please let me know so I can get rid of the repetition. Thanks for reading. —Sparkle and Fade edits 04:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's clunky because of where you put 'later that year'. It reads much better if you put it first - Later that year former S.A. Slayer member Dave McClain replaced Greg Hall, who found the extensive touring difficult. I don't think you should worry too much about active vs passive voice. Despite what grammar checkers might tell you, there's no one right way to write. Blackballnz (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip, Blackballnz. I appreciate the advice, it does actually seem more about the word placement than the voice construction, and I'll make sure to refactor the article to read better. Thanks, Sparkle and Fade edits 06:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- In my view, Sparkle & Fade, the active voice is almost always best for writing encyclopedia articles. We favor a direct, clear and concise style of writing. Here is a good explanation from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. Misplaced Pages:Writing better articles also offers a lot of good advice. Cullen328 (talk) 07:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- passive voice is best used when you have to avoid to ascribe an action to someone. Example: somebody was fired from the band. The reference uses passive voice, thereby avoiding to say who did it. Now you have a choice. Either search for a reference, that says who was firing or use passive voice too to avoid to say who did the firing. What you can't do is to figure out who could do the firings in general and then ascribe that firing to him in active voice! 176.0.139.10 (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- When it matters (and you know) who took the action, use the active. When it's not important who was the actor, by all means use the passive. Grammarly and its friends express a prejudice against the passive which appeared in the early 20th C, often by writers who failed to follow their own injunction, and sometimes appeared unable to detect a passive accurately. See http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/003380.html. ColinFine (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip, Blackballnz. I appreciate the advice, it does actually seem more about the word placement than the voice construction, and I'll make sure to refactor the article to read better. Thanks, Sparkle and Fade edits 06:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
New editor needs some help.
Hi there, I'm new. I wrote 2 drafts: 1 about an Internship Program which I found interested in, 1 is a course in social science field. I submitted 2 drafts and all rejected.
After editing few more things. I still don't know how to make references more reliable, or which content is the promoting material?
Here is my 2 drafts: MIP and Vietnamese writing practice Miyano25 (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Miyano25 Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Note that "rejected" has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Your drafts were "declined", meaning that they may be resubmitted.
- Misplaced Pages is not a place to just tell about something. A Misplaced Pages article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Misplaced Pages definition of notability- such as a notable organization. Regarding MIP, you did a great job telling about the structure of the program and its offerings- but that's not what we're looking for(alone, at least). We're looking for a summary of what others say about the program. The same goes for the Vietnamese course. You can't "make references more reliable"- they either are, or they're not. Reliable sources are those which have a reputation of fact checking and editorial control- like reputable news outlets(just one example). 331dot (talk) 08:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh I see, thanks for explaining. Is it okay if I can summarize what other people say about the program but don't have a source to back it up, or have a source but it's not reliable to make it as a source? Miyano25 (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Article not visible on google
i created this article Vanskere 7 months ago, moved it to mainspace but still not showing on google, what could be wrong ?, please reply with either of the two editor Iamtoxima (talk) 13:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Iamtoxima The article was marked as reviewed on 31 August, so search engines could index thereafter. However, Misplaced Pages has no control over when they actually do so. There have been no edits to the article since that date. In my experience, if you make even a minor edit now, Google will pick it up very quickly. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you! This really helped, and I feel like I understand it much better now. we learn everyday. Iamtoxima (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Iamtoxima, please note that Misplaced Pages is not for promotion. The articles you created are written in a promotional tone, and I have tagged them as such. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- oh thanks for your contribution, i will check through again and fix it. Iamtoxima (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Removing four words from the short description does not magically make the article neutral. You'll need to rewrite most of the article, which contains promotional terms like
significantly influenced
,difficult to fit in due to his elaborate style
, and more. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC) - Further, @Iamtoxima, Who says that it "quickly emerged as a leading force"? Evaluative statements like that never belong in any Misplaced Pages article, unless they are directly cited to a reliable published source, wholly unconnected with the subject of the article. (And that is just one more example of the promotional language). Misplaced Pages has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Misplaced Pages is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. This page happens to be one of my first articles on Misplaced Pages, which is why I take particular interest in it. I would like to clarify that I am not affiliated with the individual or the company; I am simply contributing to the platform as others do.
- The article was initially reviewed and approved. However, I have revisited, re-edited, and thoroughly checked the content based on your feedback. If there is a better approach to further improve it, I would genuinely appreciate your suggestions. After all, the purpose of this community is to collaborate and learn from one another.
- I have implemented all the changes you highlighted, yet it seems you remain unsatisfied. I am open to constructive feedback, as learning and growing are integral parts of this journey.
- Thank you again for your time and input. Iamtoxima (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Removing four words from the short description does not magically make the article neutral. You'll need to rewrite most of the article, which contains promotional terms like
- oh thanks for your contribution, i will check through again and fix it. Iamtoxima (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
HELP
Kindly help me how best I can use this reservation system Dewclawsafaris (talk) 14:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Dewclawsafaris could you clarify what you mean by
reservation system
? ''']''' (talk • contribs) 14:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)- Your account is blocked for name problems. Either stop using this account and start a new one with a name that does not imply a business, or else use the name change process described on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I added "not" to the above sentence, since that's clearly what was intended. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your account is blocked for name problems. Either stop using this account and start a new one with a name that does not imply a business, or else use the name change process described on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Enquiry
this article Funmi Martins is about a deceased person, but its without image, i tried to find the image i could add for a proper recognition, but this is the only image of her i found online https://independent.ng/wp-content/uploads/Funmi-Martins.jpg, can i add it regardless ? Iamtoxima (talk) 14:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, @Iamtoxima, you probably cannot. When adding images to Misplaced Pages (or Commons), you need to make sure they are free of copyright. This file from the Independent is likely non-free, and therefore you cannot use it here on Misplaced Pages. win8x (talk) 14:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- hi, thanks for your response, this image in question is all over the internet, how do i know who to contact for license and how do i know if it has a free license or not? Iamtoxima (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Something being on the internet does not mean it has a copyright compatible with Misplaced Pages’s. I think that the media outlet that owns the copyright would be unlikely to release the image for use on Misplaced Pages, but you could ask them. 331dot (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- If the person is dead, you can upload a fair-use image locally here on Misplaced Pages (which for me shows up as an 'upload file' button under contributions in the left side of the page.) Valereee (talk) 15:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Iamtoxima, the policy language regarding use of a non-free photo of a deceased person when no freely licensed or public domain photo is available can be found at the policy Non-free images point #10. You need to carefully follow every step in the policy, because there are legal implications. With all due respect, Win8x, you are incorrect on the general point, as some non-free images are permitted on Misplaced Pages in narrow circumstances. Careful evaluation is needed regarding this specific image. Cullen328 (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies. I genuinely did not know about NFCI #10, I guess you learn something every day. win8x (talk) 14:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Iamtoxima, the policy language regarding use of a non-free photo of a deceased person when no freely licensed or public domain photo is available can be found at the policy Non-free images point #10. You need to carefully follow every step in the policy, because there are legal implications. With all due respect, Win8x, you are incorrect on the general point, as some non-free images are permitted on Misplaced Pages in narrow circumstances. Careful evaluation is needed regarding this specific image. Cullen328 (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If the person is dead, you can upload a fair-use image locally here on Misplaced Pages (which for me shows up as an 'upload file' button under contributions in the left side of the page.) Valereee (talk) 15:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Something being on the internet does not mean it has a copyright compatible with Misplaced Pages’s. I think that the media outlet that owns the copyright would be unlikely to release the image for use on Misplaced Pages, but you could ask them. 331dot (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- hi, thanks for your response, this image in question is all over the internet, how do i know who to contact for license and how do i know if it has a free license or not? Iamtoxima (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Autoconfirmed
I wanted to know how to become a autoconfirmed user, like, is there a test you have to pass or a certain amount of edits or certain amount of years. I also ask this question about extended confirmed and those other ones. Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your account has to be more than four days old and have a certain amount of edits (how many, I can't remember, I think, like, 10-ish) Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- This link should help. Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, is there like a notification that you get because I have 513 edits and have been on for almost a month Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are autoconfirmed. You can check here: Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 16:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, that link was cool and definitely helpful. Thanks! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- How do you put the autoconfirmed sign at the top of your user page, like the tiny Misplaced Pages globe that says your autoconfirmed? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is called a topicon (top icon)! That one is here Template:Autoconfirmed topicon but there are plenty of topicon templates out there. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Am I able to edit the page that you showed me Cmrc23? In case it needs updating, like, the statistics page? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- My statistics page Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Xtools updates automatically, and I do not think you can edit it. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, but there is one thing wrong about one part of it Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can you tell me what that is? You might simply be reading the page wrong Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- It says I got 0 thanks, even though I got 1 from someone some 10 days ago Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Under "basic information", it states that you have been thanked one time. Under "actions" it states that you have thanked 0 users. They are in two different sections so it can be a bit tricky to notice! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, ok Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, thanking in this context refers to the specific action of clicking the "thank" button on the relevant entry on a page's edit history. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, ok Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Under "basic information", it states that you have been thanked one time. Under "actions" it states that you have thanked 0 users. They are in two different sections so it can be a bit tricky to notice! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, but there is one thing wrong about one part of it Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Xtools updates automatically, and I do not think you can edit it. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- My statistics page Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Am I able to edit the page that you showed me Cmrc23? In case it needs updating, like, the statistics page? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is called a topicon (top icon)! That one is here Template:Autoconfirmed topicon but there are plenty of topicon templates out there. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- How do you put the autoconfirmed sign at the top of your user page, like the tiny Misplaced Pages globe that says your autoconfirmed? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, that link was cool and definitely helpful. Thanks! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are autoconfirmed. You can check here: Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 16:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Subject: Request for Guidance on Improving Draft Article
Dear Misplaced Pages Editors,
I hope this message finds you well. I recently submitted a draft article on Dr. Toula Gordillo and received feedback indicating that the references provided do not sufficiently establish the subject’s notability. I am eager to improve the article and ensure it meets Misplaced Pages’s notability criteria. Could you please guide me on the following: What types of references would be considered more appropriate or substantial to establish notability? Are there specific sources or types of coverage (such as academic publications or in-depth media articles) that would strengthen the article? How can I best demonstrate the subject’s significance using independent, reliable secondary sources? Here is the draft link for your reference: Draft:Toula_Gordillo I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions you may have to help improve this draft and make it suitable for full publication. Thank you for your time and assistance. Best regards, SyedTayyab560 (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- You need the independent, reliable, secondary sources that you mention above. (I clicked on a few of the links currently provided: not one of them was independent of the subject.) 60.65.102.66 (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. I understand the importance of including independent, reliable, secondary sources to establish notability. I am currently in the process of identifying and incorporating such sources to ensure the article meets Misplaced Pages's guidelines. I appreciate your time and guidance. SyedTayyab560 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @SyedTayyab560. As the IP says, independence is the main issue. Misplaced Pages has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Misplaced Pages is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources.
- Check each of your sources against the triple criteria in WP:42. If they're not reliable, (eg Shadowwork Solutions), don't use the at all. If they don't have significant coverage of Gordillo, what are they even doing in the article? If they are not independent, then it is possible that they could be used to verify uncontroversial factual data such as locations and dates, but they will not contribute to notability.
- Get rid of the media section - if the sources are valid to verify some information about Gordillo, then cite them, otherwise including them is pure promotion, which is forbidden. Ditto appearances at conferences: why does a reader of an encyclopaedia article care waht conferences she has spoken at? ColinFine (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your detailed feedback. I now better understand the need for independent, reliable, secondary sources to establish notability and avoid promotional content. I will carefully review all existing references and only retain those that meet the criteria outlined in WP:42. Moving forward, I will also remove sections that could be seen as promotional or irrelevant to an encyclopedic article. Your guidance is greatly appreciated and will help me refine the draft accordingly. SyedTayyab560 (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but please don't use a LLM ("AI") here. Thanks! 60.65.102.66 (talk) 23:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your detailed feedback. I now better understand the need for independent, reliable, secondary sources to establish notability and avoid promotional content. I will carefully review all existing references and only retain those that meet the criteria outlined in WP:42. Moving forward, I will also remove sections that could be seen as promotional or irrelevant to an encyclopedic article. Your guidance is greatly appreciated and will help me refine the draft accordingly. SyedTayyab560 (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
how can citations be removed completely from a submitted article?
Hi,
I have citations in my submitted article that need to be deleted entirely. I fail to see the process for doing this edit. Kindly advise. Thank you! PixelAlchemy (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which article (or draft) are you talking about? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Appears to be Draft:Michael Garlington. David notMD (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Click on Edit at top. This opens the entire article for editing. Go to where those pesky citations are and delete. That will remove the citation from the list of references. David notMD (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- And it will update the numbering of refs that are used later in the article. David notMD (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Click on Edit at top. This opens the entire article for editing. Go to where those pesky citations are and delete. That will remove the citation from the list of references. David notMD (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Appears to be Draft:Michael Garlington. David notMD (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit to template by blocked user
Hi, I'm not sure whether to be concerned, but a blocked editor has been using an IP range to edit & was on ANI recently. I saw that someone in the blocked range has removed hidden text from a template here. Is it something that needs fixing? I experimented with undoing it myself, but there are subsequent edits & I'm woefully inexperienced with templates. Can someone more experienced please cast their eye on the edit? Blue-Sonnet (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Blue-Sonnet. The hidden text that was removed is just boilerplate instructions for adding episode descriptions. Once a description has been added for an episode, there's no need to retain the instructions, so this edit is okay. Always good to check though, thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Schazjmd That's really useful to know, thank you! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 14:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Watchlist preferences and settings
My watchlist continues to show categorization edits, despite checking <Hide categorization of pages> in my preferences. I've tried both the javascript and the non-javascript watchlists. The unwanted watchlist edits that do appear seem to all be made via either HotCat or Cat-a-lot. They aren't marked as minor edits, but I actually don't want to hide all minor edits. I have also selected the watchlist filter <Human (not bot)>, without luck; perhaps because they're merely semi-automated edits (as opposed to actual bots?). I have checked the tag to exclude all AWB edits, which does work for those. Does anyone have any thoughts? Scottyoak2 (talk) 02:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you speaking about the Watchlist for Misplaced Pages in English language ?
- Can you make screenshots ? I can possibly help you with some screenshots but I can't guarantee I can help you with efficiency. Anatole-berthe (talk) 04:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. The English Misplaced Pages, yes. I just was hoping that someone might already know how to filter out streams of edits made with HotCat or Cat-a-lot that sometimes flood my watchlist. If not, I can take a pair of pruning shears to my watchlist--an activity which might make a good New Year's resolution. Scottyoak2 (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you seeing edits to pages on you watchlist that happen to change the categories? Or is the category itself on your watchlist? Because I think the "Hide categorization of pages" setting only applies to categories you are watching. So if you uncheck that preference, and you add a category to your watchlist, you'll see any page that is added to or removed from that category show up in your watchlist. With the preference enabled, you won't see those changes, but you'd still see changes to the category itself, for example to the description.
- I'm not sure if there's an easy way to filter out category-change edits to pages you see watching, because those edits are fundamentally just regular edits. And they are usually not minor edits, because category changes can be quite controversial sometimes, especially around BLPs or other contentious topics. --rchard2scout (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I edited an article, but there is only problem...
I edited the article, "Code injection" but my contributions don't show up in the real article, I am very new and can't quite figure it out. How shall I proceed?
P.S. I am a beginner so expect I know nothing about Misplaced Pages, and how to navigate. Detailed tips are very appreciated. XirMarvin (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @XirMarvin welcome to Misplaced Pages. I'm assuming you're referring to this edit? It was unsourced, which is why it was reverted. If you need help, I'd recommend reading Help:Getting started. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 02:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @XirMarvin: Hi. Your edit was soon removed in this edit. I'm guessing it was done because the content you added didn't look "encyclopaedic". —usernamekiran (talk) 02:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to the Teahouse, @XirMarvin. To add onto CanonNi's comment, any editor can reverse another user's edit by reverting it. This is done when the edit was problematic, and in this case, it was because your edit was unsourced (please see WP:V. Source your content!). Please see our policies and guidelines for other rules we have around here. Remember that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia too. Thanks! Tarlby 02:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @XirMarvin. As well as the things others have pointed you at, I would also recommend looking at WP:BRD: you can see that your edit and its reversion by somebody else are a normal part of how Misplaced Pages works. ColinFine (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Melbourne Shuffle Inventor
This later article is by a journalist about a witness to the creation of the shuffle https://www.warnaplus.com/maurice-novoa-mengonfirmasi-sifu-joe-sayah-sebagai-saksi-terhadap-penemuan-melbourne-shuffle/ and this other one is also by a journalist and the site says they do not take money as tips for stories https://radarkaur.disway.id/read/651452/menyelami-gerakan-halus-wing-chun-kung-fu-sifu-maurice-novoa-maestro-di-balik-fenomena-melbourne-shuffle Interesting how the video of Maurice dancing is at falls festival on big screens that's the biggest music festival in Australia based in Melbourne. Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 04:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to the Teahouse, @Crazy pumpkin 123. This forum is used to ask questions about Misplaced Pages. Do you have a question specifically about Misplaced Pages? Tarlby 04:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes sorry I was not clear, the Melbourne Shuffle article is being prevented for being updated as Maurice Novoa as its inventor for no reason other than the sources not being English. Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's a content dispute, not Teahouse question. It should be, and is being, discussed on the article's talk page. You are one of the participants in that discussion, in fact you started it seven months ago, and just restarted it. No-one has recently removed those references. No-one has touched the article in six weeks, no-one has attempted to add those references in the last year, and no-one has said that they are unusable because they are not in English. The article was protected for six months because of repeated block evasion by user: Australianblackbelt, who was attempting to add similar claims about the supposed inventor of the Melbourne Shuffle, but I don't see any edits reverted for having non-English sources. I do see some claims reverted for having non-reliable sourcing, but reliability is not dependant on language,and sources do not have to be in English. The article has not been protected for the last six months.
- Your somewhat strange delayed claims and you picking up where Australianblackbelt left off suggests that you are the same user. Is this the case? Meters (talk) 08:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- User Novem Linguae's response is why I have not attempted to add the sources, I just wasn't sure Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 08:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- user:Novem Linguae said nothing about a problem with the sources not being in English. Neither did user: Canterbury Tail, who also replied to you.
- And again, are you the same user as Australianblackbelt? Meters (talk) 08:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No and if I was why not just edit the page like you said... I dont like where this is going so I am staying away from the Shuffle page. Good bye Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- User Novem Linguae's response is why I have not attempted to add the sources, I just wasn't sure Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 08:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes sorry I was not clear, the Melbourne Shuffle article is being prevented for being updated as Maurice Novoa as its inventor for no reason other than the sources not being English. Crazy pumpkin 123 (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Adding a photo
My great grandfather has a Misplaced Pages page about him but no photo. I have a photo of him. How can I add it to his page? Mojogeorge (talk) 10:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mojogeorge that's great. Since you own the photo, you can upload it at c:Special:UploadWizard and add it to the article by following the directions at Help:Pictures. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 10:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If I'm right. Photos have to be uploaded on "Misplaced Pages Commons".
- As I'm not sure about this information , I advise you to verify.
- Do you know next informations :
- 1.Who did photographed your great-grandfather ? We need year of death of the person who photographed you ancestor if you know who did it.
Without means to know who's the author , it could be considered as a photography with an unknown author. - 2.In which country the picture was taken ?
- 3.Year of the photo (When the subject was posing for this photography).
- The answers to these questions can help to determinate is there are a copyright on the image.
- You can own a thing without own the intellectual property. For example , you can own a DVD without own intellectual property on the content of this DVD.
- I suppose the individual who photographed your great-grandfather is certainly deceased since more than 70 years old.
- In the majority of countries in the world. There are no copyright in force if the person who photographed someone died since more than 70 years old.
- If the person who made this photography died since less than 70 years old.
- The heirs of the photogrpaher hold the copyright unless he/she did renounced to it during his/her lifetime with a legal document. Anatole-berthe (talk) 12:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mojogeorge As your great grandfather is dead, en:Misplaced Pages allows photos to be used in the infobox of the article about him even if you don't own the copyright. It should be uploaded to English Misplaced Pages and documented as explained at WP:NONFREE, especially the part WP:NFCI, item 10. For an example, see the image File:Coral Bell in 2008.jpg which I uploaded. In that case the image came from a website but the principle is the same. Thanks for wanting to improve his biography. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Article review
Normally, articles that are submitted by an editor to Misplaced Pages for main space undergo an article review immediately and the page is curated. About four days ago, the article Beautiful captive woman was created and posted, but it has yet to receive a review by a qualified Wikipedean. Is there a reason for the delay?Davidbena (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- For all: The article was created on 18 December as an article, so this is not about AfC review, but rather WP:New Pages Patrol. David notMD (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedians are volunteers , therefore there are no delay to hold.
- I don't know which duration it can take. Anatole-berthe (talk) 12:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Anywhere between a few minutes and a few years - currently the backlog is four years. They aren't reviewed in any particular order as such, but reviews of certain topics can happen quicker as their sources are easier to verify, there's some glaring issues or the question of notability is more clear cut. -- D'n'B-t -- 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I just assumed that new articles had to undergo an immediate review, and was worried that perhaps the language in this article was too strong and needed softening with "euphemisms". Again, thanks!Davidbena (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DandelionAndBurdock You wrote the backlog is currently four years.
- Have we to understand it can take average a duration of maximum four years ?
- I'm not certain I rightly understood therefore I prefer to ask to avoid misunderstanding. Anatole-berthe (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Anatole-berthe: currently the oldest article in the unreviewed pool is approx four years old. That does not mean that average review time is four years. (If articles were reviewed in the order they're submitted, you might estimate that the average would be around two years. But they're not.) There are nearly 15,000 unreviewed articles in the pool. Some get reviewed within minutes, others take months or indeed years. I don't know what the average (whether that's mean, median or mode) is, or whether you can easily get that information from anywhere, but I'm sure it's nowhere near four years, thankfully. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation. @DoubleGrazing when I'm talking about average.
- I wasn't talking about a median but about "Arithmetic mean" for the maximum time it can take.
- I had to admit a median would be better because we understand more easily when a median is involved. Anatole-berthe (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation. @DoubleGrazing when I'm talking about average.
- @Anatole-berthe: currently the oldest article in the unreviewed pool is approx four years old. That does not mean that average review time is four years. (If articles were reviewed in the order they're submitted, you might estimate that the average would be around two years. But they're not.) There are nearly 15,000 unreviewed articles in the pool. Some get reviewed within minutes, others take months or indeed years. I don't know what the average (whether that's mean, median or mode) is, or whether you can easily get that information from anywhere, but I'm sure it's nowhere near four years, thankfully. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Anywhere between a few minutes and a few years - currently the backlog is four years. They aren't reviewed in any particular order as such, but reviews of certain topics can happen quicker as their sources are easier to verify, there's some glaring issues or the question of notability is more clear cut. -- D'n'B-t -- 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
WP:New Pages Patrol reviewers review new articles. Articles considered suitable for inclusion are marked as 'reviewed', with a notification sent to the user that created it. There is a backlog numbering in the thousands. In theory, if a NPP reviewer does not get to an article within 90 days of creation it is auto-approved. David notMD (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Search engines such as Google can 'see' NPP-approved articles and thus identifiy those as responses to searches, but the timing of searchability is a function of the search engines, not Wikiepdia. David notMD (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
moving my draft page to mainspace
so previously when i created a draft, normally i submitted the draft for a review, then waited for other editors to approved it and moved it to mainspace. Recently i read that autoextended user can just moved it into mainspace themselves. does that mean i can move Draft:Angryginge myself without waiting for it to be reviewed first by other editors? or am i reading the rule incorrectly Http iosue (talk) 11:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Http iosue the Articles for Creation process is entirely optional for autoconfirmed users, so yes, feel free to move it into mainspace if you think it's ready. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 11:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
NOTE: Moved the following comment from where I think it was misplaced. David notMD (talk) 15:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- You can. But considering that a reviewer judged that it did not (yet) have adequate references, and you have made no further edits, it might not be a sensible thing to do. It might well get nominated for deletion. ColinFine (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
How do I experiment with my sandbox?
I was left some helpful advice to try and use my sandbox instead of editing in-line citations. How do I do that, and why should I do that? peeeeeee-yew! (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- First, as you are User:Skuncc, Skuncc should appear as your signature, not peeeeeee-yew!. David notMD (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your Sandbox (top right menu bar) is a place for you to practice and create content that you intend to later insert into articles. You can create a citation there, and only when sure the format is correct, paste it into an article. On a grander scale, you can copy a section of an article into your Sandbox, revise and re-reference it, then use your content to replace the section in the article. Doing this work in your Sandbox avoids having a large number of small edits and missteps appear in the edit history of the article. David notMD (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ohmy gosh thankyou! peeeeeee-yew! (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your Sandbox (top right menu bar) is a place for you to practice and create content that you intend to later insert into articles. You can create a citation there, and only when sure the format is correct, paste it into an article. On a grander scale, you can copy a section of an article into your Sandbox, revise and re-reference it, then use your content to replace the section in the article. Doing this work in your Sandbox avoids having a large number of small edits and missteps appear in the edit history of the article. David notMD (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Technical question about the long hyphen
Hi!
I've been editing the timeline of Polermo where the long hyphen dominates, but I can't seem to generate one.Typing a regular hyphen, gives me just that - a regular hyphen, typing two hyphens gives me two hyphens (--) and trying to make one through the keboard shortcut which I found on internet forums (Alt+0151), just gives me one that's too long (—). So far I've been copying and pasting existing long hyphens which is kind of annoying, does anyone have any better solutions?
Thanks! Moonshane1933 (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Moonshane1933. I think you're talking about an em-dash. See MOS:EMDASH ColinFine (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes! That's what I meant! Thank you! Moonshane1933 (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you could find a better character in "unicode table".
- This "article" is listing the most common characters.
- There are also the "Unicode block" entry on Misplaced Pages that can be maybe helpful. Anatole-berthe (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thank you too! Moonshane1933 (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think ressources I shared with you will help you but I hope it will. Anatole-berthe (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thank you too! Moonshane1933 (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ignoring the Minus sign, there are three 'horizontal line' characters most commonly used in text, the hyphen, the N-dash and the M-dash. There are various ways to insert the latter two; usually I do so with +0150 and +0151. Despite being a former professional book editor, I have not previously encountered a "long hyphen" (a term not found anywhere in Misplaced Pages). Note that the lengths of all these characters may look different in different typefaces: I suspect your "long hyphen" is an N-dash. {The poster formerly known as 897.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
How to thank a user
I had a friend who improved my article very much about a week ago, and I would like to thank him, how do you do that? Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think you figured it out Yuanmongolempiredynasty ;) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I did :) Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
This may be the wrong place to mention this
On the page Lowercase Sigmabot |||, there is a infobox; in that infobox lies an image of a supposed “plane” labeled “Lowercase sigmabot ||| archiving a discussion” or something like that. Is this a joke by the moderators of Misplaced Pages? Selectortopic (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is not an article but an Userpage. Humor is allowed on this kind of page.
- If you click on my nickname. You could read my page. Anatole-berthe (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, @Selectortopic, it's a joke by whoever edited that page (actually the user, @Lowercase sigmabot III). We don't have moderators, and admins have no role in the content of articles (though the users who are admins may have, but not in their admin role) ColinFine (talk) 16:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Selectortopic: It's a humorous remark added by the bot operator who is not an administrator. Many bot operators are normal users. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Someone know how to create a bot for a repetitive task ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Anatole-berthe See WP:BOTR page where you can make a request. There may already be a bot to do what you want and you need to explain in detail what you want and why. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks ! Anatole-berthe (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Anatole-berthe See WP:BOTR page where you can make a request. There may already be a bot to do what you want and you need to explain in detail what you want and why. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Someone know how to create a bot for a repetitive task ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
How to edit
I need to see a tutorial of how to edit an entry. It is my page; I'm the subject. My former assistant set up the page for me but I don't know how to update it. I tried to add references today. I wasn't successful. MGMKE (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you talking about an encyclopedic article ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @MGMKE I hope that the ressources we advise you to read will be sufficient.
- The community is there if there are something you don't understand.
- We are there to guide you. I hope we didn't seemed to be aggressive. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy link: Mari K. Eder. Deor (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If I understood rightly. You are '"Mari K. Eder" and you want to edit an article on yourself.
- I'm sorry to say you that but accorded to rules in force in Misplaced Pages. You are in "Conflict of interests".
- I know it can appear weird but rules are rules. In my knowledge , there are not possibility to get an exception.
- Even if I was an administrator on Misplaced Pages. I could not have this power in my knowledge. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @MGMKE To expand on what has just been said, article subjects are given advice at this guidance page about what they may and may not do to biographies about themselves. We expect that you will suggest additions on the article's Talk Page at Talk:Mari K. Eder, where you can start a new section with suggestions. There is an edit request wizard to make this relatively easy. What you added recently to the article was not formatted correctly and I will shortly revert it to its previous state. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for pages shared with us ! I didn't knew these. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- You can edit pages you do not have a conflict of interest with, and you should consider doing so! Make sure you read the guidance, I think you will find this can be a very enjoyable website to contribute to. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23 I liked your answer explaining the stuffs in a simple way. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the above is from other users, signed by their username. I would be happy to explain more wikipedia policies if you have any questions (though I'm nowhere near as experienced as some people here!), do know that you can always ask on the teahouse (here!) or on my talk page here, though I'm on and off - or you can even put the Template:Help me (listed on the page]] on your own user talk page to request help. Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I might be responding to the wrong person. Oops! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the above is from other users, signed by their username. I would be happy to explain more wikipedia policies if you have any questions (though I'm nowhere near as experienced as some people here!), do know that you can always ask on the teahouse (here!) or on my talk page here, though I'm on and off - or you can even put the Template:Help me (listed on the page]] on your own user talk page to request help. Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23 I liked your answer explaining the stuffs in a simple way. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- You can edit pages you do not have a conflict of interest with, and you should consider doing so! Make sure you read the guidance, I think you will find this can be a very enjoyable website to contribute to. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for pages shared with us ! I didn't knew these. Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If I understood rightly. You are '"Mari K. Eder" and you want to edit an article on yourself.
- Hi MGMKE, You can request edits to the article about you using an edit request (Misplaced Pages:Edit Request Wizard). You will need to include text that you want to change or add. You may need a reference for any changes you want to make. I will post a message on your talk page. Knitsey (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, MGKME. Please note that if you are, as I suspect, the subject of the article Mari K. Eder, you yourself should not normally* be editing it because of your obvious Conflict of Interest. Rather you should place proposed changes (with any relevant references to sources) on that article's Talk page together with an Edit request template, so that a disinterested editor will be alerted to review the proposal and implement it if it complies with Misplaced Pages's principles, policies and procedures. (I'm afraid there are rather a lot of these.) This also applies to any of your work colleagues, relatives or friends.
- * The main exception is that you (like anyone else) may remove additions by others that are not supported by cited references to Reliable sources. (Reading those linked Project pages should answer your question.) If something in the article is factually incorrect, but correctly summarises a cited source deemed reliable, you may not remove it, but may add contradicting information cited to other reliable sources. (For your interest, read the policy Misplaced Pages:Verifiability and the essay Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, not truth.)
- Please also note that it is Misplaced Pages's article about you, not 'your entry', and you cannot stipulate (though you can make requests about) what does or doesn't appear in it, provided that what does is correctly cited. Remember that this is an encyclopedia – see the essay Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not social media and the rather more voluminous Project page Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not.
- Finally, please carefully read Misplaced Pages:Ownership of content, and also Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons (since you are one!). Hope this helps! {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Anything I should make?
I don’t know if this is the right place to ask this question, but does anyone have any suggestions on an article I should make that isn’t already on Misplaced Pages. I just finished the article The Horde: How the Mongols Changed the World and want to make another. Please consider that I am good in history in the 1200s and 1300s in Mongolia and that I would gladly make a article in those subjects. Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- You could check out WP:Requests for articles, particularly Misplaced Pages:Requested_articles/Social_sciences/History#Asia, although you're forewarned that the list is not curated for quality and the article prompts listed there are not guaranteed to be viable. You could also check out relevant WikiProjects, such as WP:WikiProject Asia and check out whether they manage their own requested articles lists, or alternatively see if there are existing articles in the low-quality categories to see if you can expand them. signed, Rosguill 17:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- In addition to what the other commenter wrote, you can also work on improving existing articles under that topic area, for example expanding start-class articles, adding citations, and copyediting articles. The folks over at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Mongols might have some interesting pages for you to edit. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Yuanmongolempiredynasty. Please, please, please, please, please, don't think that the only way to contribute to Misplaced Pages is by creating new articles! We have thousands, maybe millions, of articles that are really not very good, and need somebody to take the time and trouble to improve them (in most cases the main thing wrong with them is that they haven't got adequate references - by coincidence, this is often the most difficult and time-consuming part of working on any article).
- I remember when I started editing Misplaced Pages, nearly twenty years ago, I so much wanted to find a new topic to add. But in that time I have only created a handful of articles. ColinFine (talk) 18:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I could add many tasks. I think for example about the task consisting to add internal links to Misplaced Pages in English in articles.
There are words that aren't in red that could need a link. Anatole-berthe (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) - WP:TASK is a good place to find a wide range of "things to do" on Misplaced Pages. signed, Rosguill 18:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I could add many tasks. I think for example about the task consisting to add internal links to Misplaced Pages in English in articles.
- Thank you! Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
How can i improve my page?
I'm actually working on the wikipedia page Villa Fraccaroli for a university project, i need to improve the page to be categorized as B before the 31 of december to get a good mark (it's actually start class), it is really difficult to find some good and reliable sources. Thank you in advance! Liucmicol01 (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think it is not realistic to expect this page be categorized B before the 31 of december.
Anatole-berthe (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Liucmicol01, the lead (opening section) of an article should summarise the body of the article. As faar as I can tell, the second paragraph of Villa Fraccaroli does not relate to anything in the body of the article. Maproom (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- That seems like an unreasonable expectation, as the assessment depends on someone else doing the assessing, and Misplaced Pages has no deadlines. If your prof -- Limelightangel, it looks like? -- wants to do the assessments, they can, but it's not really reasonable to expect assessments to be done by others. Valereee (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Liucmicol01. As you were told two days ago, there is no way to guarantee that the article will get any particular rating by a particlar date, and few editors are much concerned with ratings anyway. But since you are concerned with ratings, you would do best to ask at the talk page of one of the Wikiprojects related to the article. ColinFine (talk) 18:15, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Liucmicol01 .... or just assign a "B" yourself and hope that your instructor doesn't notice who did that edit ;-) Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Although as MDT pointed out, you could yourself change the rating from C-class to B-class, don't. The article does not qualify. From just a quick look at some of the content and references, the refs do not always verify the content. David notMD (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Liucmicol01 .... or just assign a "B" yourself and hope that your instructor doesn't notice who did that edit ;-) Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Search suggestions have changed for the worse
I have always been able to count on Misplaced Pages's search function to provide me with a list of articles connected with the term entered in the search field. Today, however, I'm not getting these, but rather only short and apparently arbitrary lists of articles that I've viewed or edited. When I type "A", for example, I get:
ajedrez
Angelou
Alvin Bragg
Abbot and Costello
Athena
Ari
When I add a "b" to this, the list becomes:
Abbot and Costello
Abe Fortas
When I add an "r", I get nothing, no Abrahams or anything else.
And so on. This is a purely arbitrary example, but I hope it serves to illustrate. What I would always get before would be a list of a dozen or so articles, which was limited but very often helpful. I checked my preferences but all I saw was "Disable the suggestions dropdown-lists of the search fields", which was unchecked as always. Any info or advice on this would be very welcome, thanks. Bret Sterling (talk) 17:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I personally always use advanced search, but you can try google with the modifier site:en.wikipedia.org to force it to only search wikipedia (or just type "wikipedia" before your search query) Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bret Sterling Are you using the current default WP:VECTOR22 skin? I find that its search box is better than for other, older, skins and the results for "Abr" are perfectly sensible, with the first suggestion being Abr. Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for these suggestions, Cmrc23 and Michael D. Turnbull. The Advanced search option does provide me with many good finds and I should have been using it previously, but Content pages gives me results like I used to get directly under the search text field only more of them. I checked my WP skin and saw I was using the current default but still not getting the suggestions, so then I could figure it was something on my end and checked to see if I had "Block scripts" activated in Brave Shields. I saw that I did, deactivated it and now I'm getting the suggestions as before. Sorry, false alarm, this wasn't a Misplaced Pages change as I wrongly suspected. It's interesting that I could get suggestions on pages I've frequented by turning "Block scripts" back on, and I'm curious as to how that works – I mean the apparently default behavior without whatever the script is. Bret Sterling (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- But wait a minute. Now I'm not getting the alternative search options (Content pages, Multimedia, Everything, Advanced). Claude AI tells me to type "Special:Search" in the search box to access these and this works, but I had them there just now today without doing this. (I couldn't have done it because I was unaware of the possibility.) So how did I have those options for a while but then didn't have them afterwards? And (what may be the same question) how do I get them without having to type "Special:Search" in the search box? I can do that, but it seems clunky and I have to remember the text to type it. Bret Sterling (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- There a variety of userscripts to enhance the search function: Misplaced Pages:User_scripts/List#Search_form Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 10:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bret Sterling I assume that by turning on "Block scripts" Brave Shields is preventing Javascript from running in your browser. The problem is that, as WP:JAVASCRIPT explains, Java is a core part of how much of Misplaced Pages works, both the standard Mediawiki software and many optional extras like gadgets and userscripts. So, if you are prevernting that running, you are sacrificing functionality for security. Is there an option in Brave Shields to exempt the Misplaced Pages domain from the block? Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- There a variety of userscripts to enhance the search function: Misplaced Pages:User_scripts/List#Search_form Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 10:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Timezone
Out of sheer curiosity, what Time zone does Misplaced Pages operate under? I'm in the Pacific Standard time zone, and the Did You Know... and On This Day... update at around 4:00pm every day. Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 18:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Shovel Shenanigans WP operates under UTC but you can change the defaults you see in your preferences. Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Shovel Shenanigans If you need help to change this in your preference. I can help. Anatole-berthe (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Anatole-berthe That's okay, thank you! Honestly, the daily change at 4:00 helps me stick to my schedule. Since I almost always have Misplaced Pages open, I know it's time to take a break from my other computer-related work when the DYK and OTD changes.
- @Michael D. Turnbull Thanks for the quick reply, and my curiosity has been sated :) Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's wonderful ! Anatole-berthe (talk) 20:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Shovel Shenanigans If you need help to change this in your preference. I can help. Anatole-berthe (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Papiermark and other money from Weimar Germany
Hi, I inherited some German banknotes from between 1908 and 1923 and I was wondering wether I could upload scans of them to Wikimedia. I scanned them in out of personal interest and then thought they might be useful.
My main question is about copyright, as in, do I have to ask someone for permission and if so who? But also whether I should digitally sharpen them and how do I properly sort them in? I'm quite new to this and any help is appreciated! The scans are at 1200dpi and saved as 98% JPEGs, with filesizes between 5 and 20MB. I already skimmed over WP:IUP but couldn't find anything related to money or bank notes and I read the copyright data of this scan but I'm unsure if this also applies to my case. Skylar Mlem (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, do you know who made the designs for the original banknotes? You might want to review the copyright information for this file: File:Banknote - Sächsische Bank zu Dresden - 100 Mark - 1911.jpg Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Skylar Mlem. The best place to ask about this sort of question is WP:MCQ. ColinFine (talk) 19:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Skylar Mlem Another place, possibly better?, is at Misplaced Pages Commons where you will upload your images, and ultimately will have to defend copyright status. The help center for copyright issues at Commons is at c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. You might find this old, archived Commons discussion on the copyright status of § German currency interesting as well. Mathglot (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
How do I welcome a new user?
I noticed a new user that hasn't been welcomed yet. I've seen the templates used on other talk pages; should I just copy paste the source and adapt, or is there a welcome button I can use instead? guninvalid (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Guninvalid. There are a number of welcome templates to choose from. Also, if you enable WP:TWINKLE, it has a dropdown menu that lets you select the welcome message that you want to leave on a user talk page, much easier that way. (Twinkle has a bunch of other really useful functions as well.) Hope that helps. Schazjmd (talk) 22:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Guninvalid this might be of use to you, Misplaced Pages:Welcoming committee Knitsey (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter anymore, the user I wanted to welcome got blocked by the checkuser. I only wanted to welcome them because I posted them on WP:AN and I noticed they had never been welcomed. guninvalid (talk) 22:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Mystery Dungeon additional info
Hey I just noticed that the mystery dungeon series is missing an entry and I wasnt sure where to ask to add it, this just seemed like the closest thing to an editor contact place. The entry in question is "Chocobo's Mystery Dungeon Every Buddy!" , released back in 2019 176.6.56.156 (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article "Chocobo (series)" is not at all long; adequately referenced material about individual items in the series could be added to this article. -- Hoary (talk) 04:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I have a edited page when I was not logged in,now I am logged in,how do I get it back?
How,how do I get it back? 219.78.249.54 (talk) 04:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You were not logged in when you made this post. When you are correctly logged in, you can edit your userpage to reflect articles that you have worked on as an IP editor. Cullen328 (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- And to find the pages you edited, look for your contributions: Special:Contributions/--Your-username--. eg Special:Contributions/219.78.249.54 shows editing Residence Oasis, but Sumanuil reverted all the edits. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Moving my English Misplaced Pages user page to media wiki for a global user page
I can move my English user page to media wiki to have a global page for all sister projects? I know I can just ask to delete my English page and make a media wiki one but I kinda wanna move it for the edit history. If I can't move it to media wiki ill just move it to User:Anthony2106/old user page Anthony2106 (talk) 04:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- What you are asking for @Anthony2106: is an import. You would have to find an administrator on meta, but even so may not be actionable. Instead I would advise you just to create a new page yourself on meta, as you will find that many templates are unavailable there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You saying they will only import important things -- not user pages? Also i'm not worried about the templates as I can use {{:w to get wikipedia templates. Anthony2106 (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- On this topic, I was wondering if making an account on english wikipedia counts as a global account for wikipedia purposes Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 10:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23 Did you created your account on "Misplaced Pages in English language" as first account for projects of Wikimedia ?
- If you go on any Misplaced Pages language version or another Wikimedia project. If you click on "login" you can log into it.
- I created my account on "French Misplaced Pages" as first account for projects of Wikimedia.
- I can create accounts with the stuff I explained. Anatole-berthe (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23 Did you created your account on "Misplaced Pages in English language" as first account for projects of Wikimedia ?
Problematic BLP and stubifying
I've come across a BLP, Clifford M. Sobel, which seems to be highly problematic. There is a high amount of unsourced information and likely original research, and also substantial edits from a user named "SOBEL1" who I'm 90% sure has a conflict of interest or is a UPE. Digging through the revision history, there doesn't seem to be much salvageable revisions/info to revert to, and I'm considering stubifying it. However, I have concerns regarding if I should do it or not. Should I try and seek consensus to do it, if so where? Should I contact VRT? If anyone can give me an answer on this, it'd be appreciated. —Sparkle and Fade edits 06:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the question, @Sparkle & Fade. Per WP:BLPRS (specifically:
contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion
emphasis not mine), you should be free to remove such poorly sourced content since you're challenging it. Unless you're successful in finding good sources of course. Tarlby 06:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
2024 events
What local incidents around the world, like the 2024 Magdeburg car attack are allowed to be mentioned in the events section of the 2024 year article. Marksaeed2024 (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Marksaeed2024. In my view, this tragic attack which has been the subject of significant coverage worldwide, ought to qualify. But potentially gigantic list articles such as year articles need to be restricted somewhat by consensus among editors interested in year articles, especially the current year. So, feel free to make a bold edit, but if you are reverted, Talk:2024 is the place to make your thoughtful case. Cullen328 (talk) 07:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
wtf?
since the fuck when is "black people" a "radical" term????? so is "white people" also considered radical? i am very curious to know.. seems pretty fucking retarded..... 68.142.49.124 (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Where did you see it being called radical? ''']''' (talk • contribs) 08:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can we watch the vulgar language here? We try to be friendly and civil on this page. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at Black people it says "racialized classification", not "radical" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
New page for author
Hello
i am a published author quoted on two Misplaced Pages pages . I would like to create a page about myself. It looks complicated and I need some help. This is my basic text:
Sarah Bax Horton is a British author of true crime and historical biography. Her first two books, One-armed Jack: Uncovering the Real Jack the Ripper (Michael O’Mara Books, 2023) and Arm of Eve: investigating the Thames Torso Murders were inspired by her great-great grandfather who worked on those original investigations.
Bax Horton proposed new prime suspects in each of her published works, putting forward East End cigar maker Hyam Hyams as Jack the Ripper and Thames waterman James Crick as the Thames Torso Killer. SCC68 (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Read this : Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest. Write about yourself isn't a thing to do.
- Do you want more informations ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 09:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- SCC68 Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Writing about yourself is highly discouraged, please see the autobiography policy. Misplaced Pages is not a place for people to tell about themselves. Misplaced Pages articles summarize what independent reliable sources say about topics that meet our special Misplaced Pages definition of notability- like a notable author. Also note that a Misplaced Pages article is not necessarily desirable. There are good reasons to not want one. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- and please don't promote your book on the Thames Torso Murders. Theroadislong (talk) 10:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am an expert on this subject wishing to update an out of date and misleading page. I am also an author of books on this subject. SCC68 (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- and please don't promote your book on the Thames Torso Murders. Theroadislong (talk) 10:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SCC68, not an article, but Sarah Bax Horton is now a redirect. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you SCC68 (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- SCC68, you write: I would like to create a page about myself. It looks complicated and I need some help. People in a number of dodgy little companies are likely to read this, think "Maybe she'll pay" and may then solicit your business. (Perhaps individual Misplaced Pages editors will do the same.) But if you're wise, you'll ignore such offers. Please read and digest what's said in "Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation/Scam warning". -- Hoary (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Messed up title when reverting a non-discussed page move. Not sure how to proceed.
Hi. I don't know whether it's appropriate to ask but I messed up reverting a page move on the Man vs. Bee article. (renamed it to the upcoming sequel show, not the original by mistake), and I cannot fix it as another redirect article already exists. I'm unsure how to fix it and I have royally messed up. Thanks. Cheezknight (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Cheezknight, I've moved the page back to Man vs. Bee for you. Let me know if everything looks good now! If a similar issue happens again, feel free to submit a request at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Technical requests. That page is watched by a lot of page movers, who have more extensive permissions relating to moving and renaming articles than most users. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help! I really appreciate it as I was stumped on what to do. I don't usually move/ merge articles so thanks for fixing it and for pointing me in the right direction if future issues occur. Cheezknight (talk) 16:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Citations
How to present a citation? 2600:1700:60F8:B010:5113:50DB:F873:638B (talk) 12:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- See "Referencing" at WP:TUTORIAL. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Im trying to make a page for Jessica Christine Ritchie
Proposed article content |
---|
Jessica Christine Ritchie, is an American entrepreneur, artist, and educator Who is of Apache and Blackfoot heritage. She is the founder of DeerWomen, a luxury tea and beauty brand that merges herbal remedies with esoteric traditions. Early Life and EducationJessica Christine was born in California and raised in Spokane, Washington. Her upbringing amidst the natural landscapes of the Pacific Northwest nurtured a deep appreciation for nature, mythology, and esoteric sciences. She pursued her education at prestigious institutions such as the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp, Belgium. Along her journey, she was mentored by notable figures, including author Francesca Lia Block and scholar Maja D'Aoust, further shaping her interdisciplinary approach to creativity and learning. CareerDeerWomenIn 2016, Jessica founded DeerWomen, a luxury tea and beauty brand. The brand reflects her passion for blending herbal remedies and ritualistic recipes with symbolic narratives drawn from folklore. DeerWomen offers a curated collection of products designed to enhance vitality and natural beauty, emphasizing the connection between self-care and authenticity. Relaunched in Antwerp, Belgium, in 2022, the brand’s offerings are now available in select stockists across the USA and Europe. Creative Direction and STEM EducationJessica’s career extends beyond entrepreneurship. She has worked as a Creative Director, organizing international events that catered to high-profile dignitaries, including Belgian royalty. As a STEM educator, Jessica has taught coding and 3D printing using innovative methods involving gaming and robotics, showcasing her dedication to integrating technology with creative expression. Personal PhilosophyJessica’s work is profoundly influenced by her Apache and Blackfoot heritage and a deep connection to nature. She advocates for personal rituals and self-care as essential elements of beauty, encouraging individuals to define beauty on their own terms. According to Jessica, true beauty arises when people engage passionately with activities they love. Legacy and InfluenceJessica’s work bridges art, science, and cultural heritage, inspiring others to pursue their unique paths with intention and creativity. Her ability to harmonize traditional wisdom with modern practices makes her a significant figure in the realms of beauty, education, and entrepreneurship. See Also |
This article is a summary of Jessica Christine Ritchie Magdaleno’s professional and personal journey. Qualek (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- This looks largely promotional - which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Furthermore this text does not contain any independent secondary sources. Simply put - this text is inappropriate for Misplaced Pages as it stands. Simonm223 (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Qualek, and welcome to the Teahouse. My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Misplaced Pages works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft.
- Misplaced Pages has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Misplaced Pages is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. So writing an article starts with finding reliable independent sources (see 42). What you know about the subject is irrelevant, except where it can be verified from a published source. --ColinFine (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
How I can improve my page?
Hi, I write here a few days ago, to ask if you all can help me to get my page approved (name page: Bove Path), and you all help me but also all my colleagues to get our draft page approved (we really appreciate your help).
I found myself here again to ask you what I can improve to possibly increase the score of the page. I already add the sources that were missing, as one of you recommended, any more suggestion? thank you in advance. LIUCChia.05 (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You can add pronunciation in "Italian language" indicated in "IPA". Anatole-berthe (talk) 14:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bove Path is rated C-class. See Misplaced Pages:Content assessment to understand the differences between C-class and B-class. Although any editor, including you, can change the rating, I personally perfer to not upgrade ratings on articles I have been editing. David notMD (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Where can we see class of an article ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Top of Talk pages usually has ratings: Stub, Start, C-Class, B-class. For GA and FA there is additional detail as to when approved.
- Back to article - in my opinion Biodiversity should be limited to what is near the trail, not the entire park. David notMD (talk) 15:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the path cross the park itself? it is not a dispersive area you can find and encounter, with a bit of luck, all those species during the trekking itself. LIUCChia.05 (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have reassessed the article as "B". Cullen328 (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Top of Talk pages usually has ratings: Stub, Start, C-Class, B-class. For GA and FA there is additional detail as to when approved.
- Where can we see class of an article ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bove Path is rated C-class. See Misplaced Pages:Content assessment to understand the differences between C-class and B-class. Although any editor, including you, can change the rating, I personally perfer to not upgrade ratings on articles I have been editing. David notMD (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Diffs
I always forget the best way to show a "diff" in a post. Can someone explain to me how I'd show this edit, in a diff? Did I do it right? Just link the URL? I feel as if some editors do it so seamlessly and easily. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the question, @Iljhgtn. Yes, you linked the diff perfectly. There are also other ways to link diffs which you may or may not find easier. You can see Help:Diff#Linking to a diff for more examples. Here's one form I really like to use:
- Typing this--->
- Would create this--->
- I hope this all helps! Tarlby 16:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I use visual editor except on talk pages where sometimes it is not possible or other pages where it might not be possible for some reason. I really wish they would enable visual editor everywhere too by the way! It is SO much better than source editor! Iljhgtn (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- But thanks, I am glad that my copying and pasting of the "diff" URL is essentially all that you need to do. I did not think it was that simple. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- What about finding a specific diff in the page history? Some people in talk page discussions seem to find tons of perfectly relevant diffs nearly instantly and it routinely blows my mind. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- For articles, the Who Wrote That? browser extension makes it really easy to locate when something was added. Schazjmd (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I use Microsoft Edge as my browser. Is that supported for this tool? Seems like such an interesting tool that it would almost make it worth to switch the browser that I use, though I'd rather not do that if I can avoid it. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- It does. Schazjmd (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I use Microsoft Edge as my browser. Is that supported for this tool? Seems like such an interesting tool that it would almost make it worth to switch the browser that I use, though I'd rather not do that if I can avoid it. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Iljhgtn Assuming you're using a PC to edit, clicking "page history" at the top right will show you the list of revisions the page has went through. Each revision has "prev" and "cur" next to them. Clicking prev will show you the difference (diff!) with that revision and the previous one. Cur will show the difference between that revision and the current one. Tarlby 16:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I edit using a PC. Thanks for this information. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have never quite figured out how to edit from a phone, plus I am worried that it would be from an IP then and might cause me problems somehow. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Iljhgtn, please read my essay User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing. If you are logged in on your phone, your IP address will not be disclosed and you will not have any unusual problems. I have made about 100,000 phone edits going back many years. Cullen328 (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are "phone edits" logged any differently in your contribution history than PC-based edits? 100,000 on the phone is an impressive achievement! Iljhgtn (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I was a bit discouraged to try phone editing too after the incident where there was a recent admin that seemed to really assault someone for trying to use phone editing and then it became a real ordeal for them to come back into editing. Though it looks like that admin has lost their adminship, rightfully so, so maybe I will look into it again. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are "phone edits" logged any differently in your contribution history than PC-based edits? 100,000 on the phone is an impressive achievement! Iljhgtn (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Iljhgtn, please read my essay User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing. If you are logged in on your phone, your IP address will not be disclosed and you will not have any unusual problems. I have made about 100,000 phone edits going back many years. Cullen328 (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have never quite figured out how to edit from a phone, plus I am worried that it would be from an IP then and might cause me problems somehow. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I edit using a PC. Thanks for this information. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- For articles, the Who Wrote That? browser extension makes it really easy to locate when something was added. Schazjmd (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- What about finding a specific diff in the page history? Some people in talk page discussions seem to find tons of perfectly relevant diffs nearly instantly and it routinely blows my mind. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You can force the visual editor in any namespace by adding ?veaction=edit to the end of the URL (for example, en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Skarmory?veaction=edit would let me access my user talk page in VE). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 20:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- But thanks, I am glad that my copying and pasting of the "diff" URL is essentially all that you need to do. I did not think it was that simple. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I use visual editor except on talk pages where sometimes it is not possible or other pages where it might not be possible for some reason. I really wish they would enable visual editor everywhere too by the way! It is SO much better than source editor! Iljhgtn (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm really not sure why my article was declined.
It is a biography of a living person who created a global food chain and is now writing poetry and songs. His journey to Canada was significant. CLWwrites (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- You will need to show how he could pass the criteria at WP:GNG, your draft gives no indication of that so far. Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Presumed - there is coverage in the Toronto Star Business section and in multiple newspapers globally. Many of the smaller papers have not archived all of their papers. Andy has a poem in the Kennedy Accessions Library (accessible online).
- Significant coverage - no additional research is needed to extract the content. The history of his coming to Canada and how he grew his business here are clearly laid out.
- Reliable - as mentioned above, I used verifiable sources and for a few instances, the smaller papers have not archived all of their earlier articles.
- Sources - I have used secondary sources.
- Independent of the subject - there are many messages of congratuations and thanks for participating in events. I was having difficulty uploading their private photos.
- If you can tell me what is wrong I can fix it. Right now I don't know what is wrong. CLWwrites (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @CLWwrites You appear to have written that article WP:BACKWARDS. Please read that essay and if and when you have found appropriate sources start again. Shantavira| 17:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? I wrote the article in the time sequence it occured... CLWwrites (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am feeling frustrated right now. CLWwrites (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @CLWwrites, and welcome to the Teahouse.
- I'm afraid that that frustration is a common experience for editors who start editing Misplaced Pages and immediately plunge into the challenging task of creating an article without spending time learning how Misplaced Pages works first. Would you enter a major competation in a sport you have only just taken up? Would you expect to understand the feedback you got if you did?
- My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Misplaced Pages works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft.
- When Shantavira says you have written your draft backwards, that is a link to a page that explains; but in short: you appear to have written what you know and then looked for sources. Baldly, Misplaced Pages doesn't care what you know (or what I know, or what any random person on the internet knows). Misplaced Pages only cares about material that is verified by reliable published sources, so writing an article starts by finding such sources. Then, if you have found several sources which each meet the criteria in WP:42, you can start writing a summary of what those sources say (not what you know). ColinFine (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @CLWwrites, its not about time sequence. First, find the multiple reliable independent sources that describe the topic. Each such source must be in-depth, reliably published, and independent of the subject, all three at the same time. Next, write the article using only those sources. That is writing an article in the proper direction. Backward is writing what you know and looking for sources to support it later. That is almost never successful. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you StarryGrandma...at least this helps me know what to do. CLWwrites (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- To expand on this, we are asking you to show that he is already well-known by providing material that people independent of him have written in-depth about him and published in places with editorial oversight. If he is not already well-known then he can still be a significant person, but we don't include him in this encyclopedia. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am feeling frustrated right now. CLWwrites (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? I wrote the article in the time sequence it occured... CLWwrites (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Race condition on talk page?
It seems like two people welcomed me to Misplaced Pages at the same time (thank you to User:Clovermoss and User:Masterhatch by the way), which has led to two different revisions where the current revision doesn't have the past revision's message and vice versa. What is the proper thing to do here? Should I "merge" the two revisions so both messages are visible? YAQUBROLI 18:38, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Yaqubroli, and welcome to the Teahouse! Yes, you can "merge" the two revisions, make both messages visible, and say so in the edit summary. Please see also Help:Edit conflict#Resolving an edit conflict. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tangentially, I prefer to link revisions like so: Special:Permalink/cur, replacing
cur
with the revision ID (the number after&oldid=
). Doing something similar with Special:Diff shows what was changed from the previous version. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)- Awesome, that is way less clunky. Thanks! YAQUBROLI 19:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tangentially, I prefer to link revisions like so: Special:Permalink/cur, replacing
Question
If an editor makes several blatantly RGW arguments for removing sections of content, refuses to read sources contradicting his arguments on the grounds that I have been editing in this area for years and am very confident that no source exists
and then states that what he really wants is for this article to redirect to a completely different article but that since he can’t do that he’s instead grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty.
but also that he doesn’t want to, and would much rather save ourselves some time and just do the redirect
,
Does that become a conduct issue? Snokalok (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Snokalok, the ongoing discussion is about a contentious topic. I don't see any conduct issues in the discussion, just very strong opinions on both sides. It does seem as though you've cherry-picked quotes out of context; for example, the full sentence was
But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty.
I recommend that you all continue to work through the issue via discussion. You can see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution for other options. Schazjmd (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)- @Schazjmd The fuller quote was
But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty. We could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect.
, operative phrase being “we could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect”, implying that is still the course of - action being pursued and that, one way or another, the result is the same.
- Regardless, my assessments have been wrong before, hence why I ask here instead of at ANI Snokalok (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The even fuller quote is
The bold move would be to redirect this article to Gender-critical feminism on WP:POVFORK grounds. Since I expect that would be immediately reverted, I am attempting to gain consensus first. It's good if you now agree that the passage in question is inappropriate and can be removed. But I've got very little interest in grinding out this same debate one passage at a time until the article is empty. We could save ourselves some time and just do the redirect. What do you think?
I would not recommending going to ANI with this, @Snokalok. Schazjmd (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The even fuller quote is
- @Schazjmd The fuller quote was
Would like some feedback
I have just, well you could say, abusing the recent changes page for things i need to revert. I've done my first few and it's going very quickly reverting all these users. Thoughts? 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see anything wrong with that and I have no knowledge of any Misplaced Pages guideline articles discouraging/forbidding those actions. I, myself, have done the same before multiple times and I know a couple of Users doing the same thing as well. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺. What you're doing is actually encouraged and quite the noble act. Patrolling recent changes is a very efficient strategy to fighting vandalism. If you wish, you can download some tools like WP:Twinkle or WP:Ultraviolet to make this process even quicker. Those scripts also give you options to warn problematic editors in the hopes of preventing future disruptive editing.If you continue this process for a month, successfully reverting and warning vandals with those tools, you can request to get Wp:Rollback permissions at WP:RFP/R. Just keep in mind, the goal of reverting vandalism is not a race against other patrollers. Be slow and cautious if need be. Thank you for joining the fight against vandalism! Tarlby 20:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- WE STAND UNITED AGAINST VANDALISM! 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lol. Tarlby 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I can be a bit chaotic sometimes xD 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I put the humorous userbox on my user page 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I can be a bit chaotic sometimes xD 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lol. Tarlby 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- WE STAND UNITED AGAINST VANDALISM! 千乇丨丂ㄒㄚ尺ㄖㄖ丂ㄒ乇尺 (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Maintenance template removal?
Hello, I've made an edit and I was wondering if the sources that I added justify removal of the “This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources” template at the top of the article? Also, are my sources good? I read Help:Maintenance template removal. Samolukadjo (talk) 21:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since you have cited sources, the template has done its job and now it should be removed. (Or it could be replaced by this template). Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 21:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Username question
Hi there! I've bumped into a user whose name includes "42069". I checked through the username policy, and I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing that ought to be reported anyplace? Would it be considered "inappropriate" enough?
The user showed up about a week ago, tried to upload and insert a couple of copyrighted images (deleted and reverted, respectively), and hasn't done anything since, so it's not really an immediate need - this is mostly for my own curiosity if a situation like this pops up in the future. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 21:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @NekoKatsun: I don't thing strings of numbers are prohibited from being used in usernames, unless perhaps when read aloud they're something really vulgar that pretty much most people would clearly understand and find offensive. Even if this particular string of numbers means what Google says it can mean, I don't think that it meets such a standard. You can, however, ask for administrator input at WP:AN or WP:UAA if you want, but it's probably better to just ignore it. If the account resumes editing and starts creating problems unreleated to its name, then you can seek administrator action because of that. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure they do indeed mean what Google says they do, and I can recall at least one instance where someone faced a lot of heat for having, ostensibly, the last two digits of their birth year in their username, which just so happened to be 88 (a white supremacist thing). I wanted to err on the side of caution.
- Since they're not doing anything I'll ignore, although that username sure won't do them any favors if they start back up with their copyright problems. Thanks for the reply! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
How do I get enough credible sources when interviews go beyond webpages but videos, podcasts, etc?
Hi,
I'm trying to write a biography about an important contemporary muralist. His work has been in two Asian Art Museums in addition to murals all over the world and for corporations. He has many interviews; I included some in the citations but they were not accepted. Would love any guidance. Thank you Rnza45 (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The AFC reviewer has left a comment saying that, "Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines". Some faults noted by me was the way the sections were displayed and most of the citations were unreliable and not properly generated. There's also no hyperlinks and no infobox. Fixing those faults would probably help your chance for the biography to be accepted. Hope this helps. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Rnza45, and welcome to the Teahouse.
- You have made several common beginners' errors: you have created your draft on your user page, which is not the right place for it. You have written your draft BACKWARDS (writing from what you know, and then looking for sources) - Misplaced Pages doesn't care what you know: it only cares what independent reliable sources say about the subject. And Misplaced Pages has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Misplaced Pages is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. So interviews don't count towards establishing notability.
- There's nothing wrong with making mistakes: that's how we all learn. But newcomers who plunge straight into the challenging task of crating a new article often get frustrated and disillusioned. And it's even harder when you have a conflict of interest (thank you for declaring that).
- My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Misplaced Pages works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft. ColinFine (talk) 23:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thorough reply. Where is the correct place to write a draft?
- I don’t know why you think I cited sources backwards; I didn’t start that way. I did go back after I thought I needed more outside sources. I did look up what Misplaced Pages considers reliable sources, but I need to understand this better. I thought I went back and added, but they still dont seem to meet the criteria. I pulled from LA Times, ABC News, NPR, art websites and a local wiki.
- I did not write the article about myself. 2603:8000:7300:CB21:AC86:1F37:7217:3A5D (talk) 00:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The correct place to write a draft is WP:Article Wizard. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 00:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
"Content not properly deflated" sign
I have gotten this sign several times during editing, idk why or how it came to be. Please help Wentwort12 (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've never seen such a message, @Wentwort12. Could you describe (step by step) what you did, on what page(s), and how the message displayed? Schazjmd (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- first I edit like I always do, I prefer to edit visually, so I want to put an image and caption into the article, that's it and then I clicked publish and this sign popped up "Content provided is not properly deflated" so I was unable to make such edit.
- this page and several others
- John Campbell, 5th Duke of Argyll Wentwort12 (talk) 00:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Britannica books Pre 2012
How would a person attain copy's of all Encyclopaedia sets printed since 1768? Jarrod Samuel Burchett (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Jarrod Samuel Burchett! The Teahouse is a place to ask about editing Misplaced Pages specifically. If you have other general knowledge questions, try asking at the Reference Desk, where editors who work in that area can help you. Happy editing, Perfect4th (talk) 01:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Tools
I have the rater and auto-ed scripts installed but they don't show up in my more tab. I use Vector Legacy. Does anyone know how to fix this. History6042 (talk) 01:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: