Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Orange Lantern Corps: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:31, 30 April 2024 editOlifanofmrTennant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,814 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Orange Lantern Corps.Tag: Twinkle  Latest revision as of 23:14, 7 May 2024 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators760,645 edits →Orange Lantern Corps: Closed as merge (XFDcloser) 
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫ ===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''merge'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to ]. This appears to be the consensus view. If you wish to Merge some content to another article, feel free to do so, providing attribution. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 23:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
⚫ ===]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Orange Lantern Corps}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) :{{la|1=Orange Lantern Corps}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ])
Line 7: Line 12:
Fails ], sources provided include two valnet sources (not great for notability), an io9 listicle (okay ish), and meaww which i have no clue about. <b>] ] ]</b> 22:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Fails ], sources provided include two valnet sources (not great for notability), an io9 listicle (okay ish), and meaww which i have no clue about. <b>] ] ]</b> 22:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], and ]. <b>] ] ]</b> 22:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], and ]. <b>] ] ]</b> 22:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''Keep'''. Even though the article currently relies substantially on just one major source, the subject itself seems to be quite notable in the DC comic world. It has several good and reliable sources that could be added to the article. I think it's the article's referencing that needs some work. ] (]) 23:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
*:Not voting yet, but stating that there ] isn't a valid argument. In-universe importance also has no bearing on an article's real world notability. ] (]) 23:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
*:And are those sources are in the room with us? What can you dig up source wise? <b>] ] ]</b> 04:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Draftify'''. This article relies mainly on one source and until its referencing is improved, it should probably be draftified and worked on. ] (]) 23:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ]. That character seems to be notable rather clearly, and there are a number of secondary sources discussing the Orange Lantern Corps with reference to him (an exception being the Glomulus entry of ''''). So as long as not more secondary sources are put forward, that would be my preferred solution. ] (]) 19:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per the claims of {{ping|ZyphorianNexus}} or '''merge''' with ] in the spirit of ]. Part of this page was also developed by {{ping|Jhenderson777}}. --] (]) 01:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
*:The claims of Zyphorian dont hold any wait as there has been no provided prof of such. <b>] ] ]</b> 12:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ] - Larfleeze is notable, but the "Orange Lantern Corp" is not. Unless things have changed recently, there ''is'' no "Orange Lantern Corps" as an actual organization separate from Larfleeze - its just constructs controlled by Larfleeze, or people who have temporarily briefly gained similar powers to him. All sources regarding the Orange Lanterns, including those present in the article currently, are pretty much actually about Larfleeze himself, so it does not make much sense covering this as two separate articles. ] (]) 01:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Redirect or merge''' per Rorschacma. The sources appear to be about the parent topic, with not enough ] to support a separate page. Even so, this is probably a ] circumstance for how much the two topics retread each other. ] (]) 18:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ] for obvious sensible reasons. I don't really edit and rarely even bother voting anymore, partly due to nonsense like this. While my Lantern Corps knowledge isn't super-detailed it makes perfect sense as IIRC by definition Larfleeze and the Orange Corps are basically the same thing, so merge. What ''is'' dumb is that the term clearly has some use as a redirect and this topic never should have been nominated for deletion. The nominator should instead have constructed their case on the article's talk page as a first point of call, working on how the Larfleeze article could be worked to also cover the oxymoron of the Orange Lantern Corps, instead of just going "BALEET" as a push-button exercise, likely informed by their own disinterest in a topic. ] (]) 10:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ] per above. <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b>&nbsp;/&nbsp;]&nbsp;::&nbsp;]&nbsp;</b></span> 18:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:14, 7 May 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Larfleeze. This appears to be the consensus view. If you wish to Merge some content to another article, feel free to do so, providing attribution. Liz 23:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Orange Lantern Corps

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Orange Lantern Corps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, sources provided include two valnet sources (not great for notability), an io9 listicle (okay ish), and meaww which i have no clue about. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.