Misplaced Pages

Localist camp: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:58, 3 May 2024 editGuotaian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,531 edits If it is big tent it implies that it is both left and rightTag: Visual edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:25, 7 August 2024 edit undoGuotaian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,531 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2018}} {{Use dmy dates|date=December 2018}}
{{Infobox political party {{Infobox political party
| name = Localist groups | name = Localist camp
| native_name_lang = zh-hk | native_name_lang = zh-hk
| native_name = {{nobold|本土派}} | native_name = {{nobold|本土派}}
| position = ]
| colorcode = #002366 | colorcode = #002366
| party_logo = | party_logo =
| foundation = {{circa|2010s}} | foundation = {{circa|2010s}}
| headquarters = | headquarters =
| ideology = {{Nowrap|'''Majority:'''<br/>] (])<br/>]<br/>]<ref>{{cite book |author1=Andrew J. Nathan |author2=Brian C. H. Fong |author3=Jieh-min Wu |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DOcJEAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Localist+camp%22+%22Hong+Kong+nationalism%22&pg=PT56 |title=China's Influence and the Center-periphery Tug of War in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Indo-Pacific |date=December 30, 2020 |publisher=]|isbn=978-1-000-28426-3 }}</ref><br>'''Factions:'''<br/>] (])<br>]<ref>{{cite news|script-title=zh:筆陣:香港新左翼的崛起 /文:袁彌昌|newspaper=Ming Pao|language=zh|author=袁彌昌|date=10 September 2016|url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160910/s00012/1473443495745|access-date=15 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180815200949/https://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160910/s00012/1473443495745|archive-date=15 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><br/>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} | ideology = {{Nowrap|] (])<br/>]<ref>{{cite book |author1=Andrew J. Nathan |author2=Brian C. H. Fong |author3=Jieh-min Wu |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DOcJEAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Localist+camp%22+%22Hong+Kong+nationalism%22&pg=PT56 |title=China's Influence and the Center-periphery Tug of War in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Indo-Pacific |date=December 30, 2020 |publisher=]|isbn=978-1-000-28426-3 }}</ref><br/>] (])<br>'''Factions:'''<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}
| seats1_title = {{nowrap|]}} | seats1_title = {{nowrap|]}}
| seats1 = {{Composition bar|0|90|hex=#002366|per=1}} | seats1 = {{Composition bar|0|90|hex=#002366|per=1}}
Line 30: Line 29:
}} }}
{{Politics of Hong Kong}} {{Politics of Hong Kong}}
{{Liberalism in China|Alliances}}
'''Localist camp''' or '''localist and self-determination groups''' refers to the various groups with ] in ]. It emerged from ] social movements in the late ] which centred on the preservation of the ] and local lifestyles and opposed the perceived growing encroachment of the ] on the city's management of its own political, economic, and social affairs.<ref>{{cite news|title=Hong Kong suffers identity crisis as China's influence grows|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/23/china-hong-kong-identity-crisis|newspaper=The Guardian|date=18 April 2016|access-date=15 December 2016|archive-date=23 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200223200321/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/23/china-hong-kong-identity-crisis|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="timeout">{{cite news|title=Localism: Why is support for the political perspective growing - and who's behind it?|url=http://www.timeout.com.hk/big-smog/features/73236/localism-why-is-support-for-the-political-perspective-growing-and-whos-behind-it.html|date=1 July 2015|access-date=22 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190314/http://www.timeout.com.hk/big-smog/features/73236/localism-why-is-support-for-the-political-perspective-growing-and-whos-behind-it.html|archive-date=4 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Although grouped together with the ], they have a distinct view<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160707/s00012/1467827517628|title=從不滿政治到不滿社會:本土派和民主派支持者的差異|last=李|first=立峯|date=2016-07-07|work=Ming Pao|access-date=2016-10-04|archive-date=1 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161001043308/http://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160707/s00012/1467827517628|url-status=live}}</ref> as they advocate for ]’ ]. While milder elements advocates for ] while remaining part of ], the more radical elements call for the return to ] or ] as a ]. Some also advocate for a more aggressive and militant stance against the mainland government in defending local interests.<ref name="clashes">{{cite news|title=Hong Kong's Clashes Over Mainland Shoppers Show Rising Cultural Tensions With China|url=http://www.ibtimes.com/hong-kongs-clashes-over-mainland-shoppers-show-rising-cultural-tensions-china-1874541|date=8 April 2015|first=Duncan|last=Hewitt|work=International Business Times|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=13 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413012733/https://www.ibtimes.com/hong-kongs-clashes-over-mainland-shoppers-show-rising-cultural-tensions-china-1874541|url-status=live}}</ref> For that reason, they are labelled as "radicals" and "]" by the ].<ref>{{cite news|title=旺角騷亂 京定性本土激進分離組織策動 議員:為23條立法鋪路|newspaper=Apple Daily|date=13 February 2016|url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160213/19489666|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=15 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170715115807/http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160213/19489666|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Wong |first=Alan |date=2016-02-21 |title=China Labels Protesters 'Radical Separatists,' and They Agree |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/world/asia/hong-kong-indigenous-separatism.html |access-date=2024-01-04 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
'''Localist groups''',<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hk01.com/立法會選舉/41285/-立會選戰-數據-二營對立變三分天下-本土和自決派奪兩成票|title=二營對立變三分天下 本土和自決派奪兩成票|last=梁|first=逸風|date=2016-09-05|work=香港01|access-date=2016-09-28|language=zh-HK|archive-date=5 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305003229/http://www.hk01.com/%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E6%9C%83%E9%81%B8%E8%88%89/41285/-%E7%AB%8B%E6%9C%83%E9%81%B8%E6%88%B0-%E6%95%B8%E6%93%9A-%E4%BA%8C%E7%87%9F%E5%B0%8D%E7%AB%8B%E8%AE%8A%E4%B8%89%E5%88%86%E5%A4%A9%E4%B8%8B-%E6%9C%AC%E5%9C%9F%E5%92%8C%E8%87%AA%E6%B1%BA%E6%B4%BE%E5%A5%AA%E5%85%A9%E6%88%90%E7%A5%A8|url-status=live}}</ref> or '''localist and self-determination groups''', are the various groups with ] in ]. It emerged from ] social movements in the late ] which centred on the preservation of the ] and local lifestyles and opposed the perceived growing encroachment of the ] on the city's management of its own political, economic, and social affairs.<ref>{{cite news|title=Hong Kong suffers identity crisis as China's influence grows|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/23/china-hong-kong-identity-crisis|newspaper=The Guardian|date=18 April 2016|access-date=15 December 2016|archive-date=23 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200223200321/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/23/china-hong-kong-identity-crisis|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="timeout">{{cite news|title=Localism: Why is support for the political perspective growing - and who's behind it?|url=http://www.timeout.com.hk/big-smog/features/73236/localism-why-is-support-for-the-political-perspective-growing-and-whos-behind-it.html|date=1 July 2015|access-date=22 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190314/http://www.timeout.com.hk/big-smog/features/73236/localism-why-is-support-for-the-political-perspective-growing-and-whos-behind-it.html|archive-date=4 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>

Many of them have distinct point of view from ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160707/s00012/1467827517628|title=從不滿政治到不滿社會:本土派和民主派支持者的差異|last=李|first=立峯|date=2016-07-07|work=Ming Pao|access-date=2016-10-04|archive-date=1 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161001043308/http://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20160707/s00012/1467827517628|url-status=live}}</ref> and advocate for ]’ ], while milder elements advocate for ] while remaining part of China, and the most radical call for the return to ] or ] as a sovereign state. Certain right-wing localists also advocate for a more aggressive and militant stance against the mainland government in defending indigenous interests.<ref name="clashes">{{cite news|title=Hong Kong's Clashes Over Mainland Shoppers Show Rising Cultural Tensions With China|url=http://www.ibtimes.com/hong-kongs-clashes-over-mainland-shoppers-show-rising-cultural-tensions-china-1874541|date=8 April 2015|first=Duncan|last=Hewitt|work=International Business Times|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=13 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413012733/https://www.ibtimes.com/hong-kongs-clashes-over-mainland-shoppers-show-rising-cultural-tensions-china-1874541|url-status=live}}</ref> For that reason, they are labelled as "radicals" and "]" by the Beijing government.<ref>{{cite news|title=旺角騷亂 京定性本土激進分離組織策動 議員:為23條立法鋪路|newspaper=Apple Daily|date=13 February 2016|url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160213/19489666|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=15 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170715115807/http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160213/19489666|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Wong |first=Alan |date=2016-02-21 |title=China Labels Protesters 'Radical Separatists,' and They Agree |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/world/asia/hong-kong-indigenous-separatism.html |access-date=2024-01-04 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>


The localists gained significant traction following ] against the ] to pre-screen Chief Executive candidates before allowing them to be chosen by the general public in the ]. Following these protests, a number of localist political parties were formed, organising protests and participated in ] elections. They won a total numbers of six seats (excluding ]) with 19 per cent of vote share (excluding ] and ]) in the ]. The localists gained significant traction following ] against the ] to pre-screen Chief Executive candidates before allowing them to be chosen by the general public in the ]. Following these protests, a number of localist political parties were formed, organising protests and participated in ] elections. They won a total numbers of six seats (excluding ]) with 19 per cent of vote share (excluding ] and ]) in the ].


After the election, the left-wing localists ] and ], as well as the right-wing localists ] and ] of ], were unseated from the Legislative Council over the ]. Since ], localists were largely absorbed into the broader spectrum of the pro-democracy camp, with the notable exception of ], ], ] and other fringe activists. After the ], localists such as ], ], ] and ] were unseated from the ] over the ]. In the aftermath of the ], localists were largely absorbed into the broader spectrum of the ]. As a result of the 2020 ], many localist parties dissolved and many notable localist figures were arrested or went into exile.


==History== ==History==
Line 45: Line 44:
The localist camp emerged from the ] generation born in the 1980s, (] in western terminology) social movements in the late 2000s. Many were inspired by the ] in 2003. ] was one of the groups that came to exist after the demonstration. They were upset by rapid urban development which was sweeping away old neighbourhoods and communities. They were strongly opposed to the political and economic monopoly of vested interests, collusion between business and government and questioned the nature of the capitalist system in Hong Kong.<ref name="Law"/> Coinciding with the widespread Chinese patriotism at the time was several emerging conservation movements led by young activists, such as ] and ], protesting against demolition of the ], ], and the buildings on ] (known as "Wedding Card Street") in 2006 and 2007. ] against the construction of the Hong Kong section of the ] (XRL) escalated in 2009 and 2010 and established a new high point of the localist movement.<ref name="Law">{{cite journal|title=香港本土意識的前世今生|author=羅永生|journal=思想}}</ref> The localist camp emerged from the ] generation born in the 1980s, (] in western terminology) social movements in the late 2000s. Many were inspired by the ] in 2003. ] was one of the groups that came to exist after the demonstration. They were upset by rapid urban development which was sweeping away old neighbourhoods and communities. They were strongly opposed to the political and economic monopoly of vested interests, collusion between business and government and questioned the nature of the capitalist system in Hong Kong.<ref name="Law"/> Coinciding with the widespread Chinese patriotism at the time was several emerging conservation movements led by young activists, such as ] and ], protesting against demolition of the ], ], and the buildings on ] (known as "Wedding Card Street") in 2006 and 2007. ] against the construction of the Hong Kong section of the ] (XRL) escalated in 2009 and 2010 and established a new high point of the localist movement.<ref name="Law">{{cite journal|title=香港本土意識的前世今生|author=羅永生|journal=思想}}</ref>


===Right shift of localism=== ===Radical localism===
The failure of the peaceful anti-XRL protests damaged the reputation of the left-leaning moderate activists. Some turned to a more radical approach. Scholar ] published the book, ''On the Hong Kong City-State'' in 2011 which triggered fierce public debate and was popular among the young generation.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Three Views of Local Consciousness in Hong Kong 香港 地元の意識、三つの視点|date=3 November 2014|journal=The Asia-Pacific Journal|volume=12|issue=44|url=http://www.japanfocus.org/-Ho_fung-Hung/4207|first=Ho Fung|last=Hung|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=16 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316110757/http://japanfocus.org/-Ho_fung-Hung/4207|url-status=live}}</ref> In the book, Chin suggests abandoning the hope for a democratic China and positions the democracy movement in a "localist" perspective, in order to counter Beijing's "]" policies toward Hong Kong. It analysed the potential threat of the influx of ] and ] to the established institutions and social customs of Hong Kong, which he considered likely to be part of a colonisation scheme by Beijing, including the increasing use of ] and ] in daily use and schools. Since then, it has created a paradigm shift on Hong Kong local consciousness from the left-wing discourse of reinterpreting colonial history, cherishing the inclusive and diverse nature of the Hong Kong culture to the right-wing discourse of ] and nostalgia for British rule.<ref name="Law"/> Chin also tells his ] followers to use violent action as the means for defending Hong Kong's autonomy. The failure of the peaceful anti-XRL protests damaged the reputation of the moderate activists. Some turned to a more radical approach. Scholar ] published the book, ''On the Hong Kong City-State'' in 2011 which triggered fierce public debate and was popular among the young generation.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Three Views of Local Consciousness in Hong Kong 香港 地元の意識、三つの視点|date=3 November 2014|journal=The Asia-Pacific Journal|volume=12|issue=44|url=http://www.japanfocus.org/-Ho_fung-Hung/4207|first=Ho Fung|last=Hung|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=16 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316110757/http://japanfocus.org/-Ho_fung-Hung/4207|url-status=live}}</ref> In the book, Chin suggests abandoning the hope for a democratic China and positions the democracy movement in a "localist" perspective, in order to counter Beijing's "]" policies toward Hong Kong. It analysed the potential threat of the influx of ] and ] to the established institutions and social customs of Hong Kong, which he considered likely to be part of a colonisation scheme by Beijing, including the increasing use of ] and ] in daily use and schools. Since then, it has created a paradigm shift on Hong Kong local consciousness from the moderate discourse of reinterpreting colonial history, cherishing the inclusive and diverse nature of the Hong Kong culture to the radical discourse of ] and nostalgia for British rule.<ref name="Law"/> Chin also tells his ] followers to use violent action as the means for defending Hong Kong's autonomy.


At the same time, the localists are hostile toward the ], as they perceived the ]' ] as unrealistic and their wish for a democratic China at Hong Kong's expense, which they disagreed with the "Chinese patriotic" theme in the annual candlelight vigil for the ] organised by the pro-democracy ]. They are also dissatisfied with the perceived ineffectiveness of the pan-democrats as the opposition party for the past 20 years. On the other hand, the ] tendency of the localist movements was condemned as "xenophobic" and "nativist" by mainstream left-wing activists and the government.<ref name="Lau">{{cite news|title=Independent thinker Horace Chin treads bold path|first=Stuart|last=Lau|date=10 June 2013|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1257295/independent-thinker-horace-chin-treads-bold-path|newspaper=South China Morning Post|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=15 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170915174355/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1257295/independent-thinker-horace-chin-treads-bold-path|url-status=live}}</ref> He suggested building Hong Kong into an autonomous city-state, merging the British culture with a restored Chinese culture. The conflict between the left and the right wings of the movement resulted in great disunity of the whole democratic cause.<ref>{{cite news|title=Will a democratic China harm Hong Kong?|first=Ping|last=Chang|date=9 June 2013|url=http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1256939/will-democratic-china-harm-hong-kong|newspaper=South China Morning Post|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=20 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820081656/http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1256939/will-democratic-china-harm-hong-kong|url-status=live}}</ref> At the same time, the localists are hostile toward the ], as they perceived the ]' ] as unrealistic and their wish for a democratic China at Hong Kong's expense, which they disagreed with the "Chinese patriotic" theme in the annual candlelight vigil for the ] organised by the pro-democracy ]. They are also dissatisfied with the perceived ineffectiveness of the pan-democrats as the opposition party for the past 20 years. On the other hand, the ] tendency of the localist movements was condemned as "xenophobic" by mainstream activists and the government.<ref name="Lau">{{cite news|title=Independent thinker Horace Chin treads bold path|first=Stuart|last=Lau|date=10 June 2013|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1257295/independent-thinker-horace-chin-treads-bold-path|newspaper=South China Morning Post|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=15 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170915174355/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1257295/independent-thinker-horace-chin-treads-bold-path|url-status=live}}</ref> He suggested building Hong Kong into an autonomous city-state, merging the British culture with a restored Chinese culture. The conflict between the moderate and the radical of the movement resulted in great disunity of the whole democratic cause.<ref>{{cite news|title=Will a democratic China harm Hong Kong?|first=Ping|last=Chang|date=9 June 2013|url=http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1256939/will-democratic-china-harm-hong-kong|newspaper=South China Morning Post|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=20 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820081656/http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1256939/will-democratic-china-harm-hong-kong|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Umbrella Revolution and aftermath=== ===Umbrella Revolution and aftermath===
Line 77: Line 76:
* '''Against Mainlandisation''' – rejects influx of mainland culture, immigrants and Communist oppression on Hong Kong people's civil liberties and ways of life. * '''Against Mainlandisation''' – rejects influx of mainland culture, immigrants and Communist oppression on Hong Kong people's civil liberties and ways of life.
** Represented party and MPs – ] (], ]), a moderate parliamentary faction,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2013-02-01 |title=「香港本土」成立 拒絕大陸化 |pages=12 |work=Metro Daily}}</ref> categorised into the pan-democracy camp due to their background although carrying a localist agenda. ** Represented party and MPs – ] (], ]), a moderate parliamentary faction,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2013-02-01 |title=「香港本土」成立 拒絕大陸化 |pages=12 |work=Metro Daily}}</ref> categorised into the pan-democracy camp due to their background although carrying a localist agenda.
* '''Democratic self-determination''' – rooted from the left-wing social activism and student movements within the ]. They formed the Local Action during the ] conservation movements in the late 2000s which rose to its peak in the ]. They generally hold left-wing agenda, supporting universal retirement protection scheme and sympathising with the ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-04-10 |title=香港新政黨「香港眾志」成立 黃之鋒任秘書長 |url=https://tw.appledaily.com/international/20160410/74CAWYVTIHEFDGRAZP76EEWOUA/ |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=蘋果新聞網 |language=zh-tw}}</ref> On the autonomy of Hong Kong, they advocate for "democratic self-determination", contrasting the right-wing localists' notion of "national self-determination".<ref>{{cite news |date=7 September 2016 |title=立會票王朱凱廸:他們要民族自決,我要民主自決 |work=The Initium |url=https://theinitium.com/article/20160907-hongkong-eddiechu/ |url-status=live |access-date=4 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917200016/https://theinitium.com/article/20160907-hongkong-eddiechu/ |archive-date=17 September 2016}}</ref> They usually have warmer relationship with the pan-democrats. * '''Democratic self-determination''' – rooted from the social activism and student movements within the ]. They formed the Local Action during the ] conservation movements in the late 2000s which rose to its peak in the ]. They generally hold a more ] agenda, supporting universal retirement protection scheme and sympathising with the ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-04-10 |title=香港新政黨「香港眾志」成立 黃之鋒任秘書長 |url=https://tw.appledaily.com/international/20160410/74CAWYVTIHEFDGRAZP76EEWOUA/ |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=蘋果新聞網 |language=zh-tw}}</ref> On the autonomy of Hong Kong, they advocate for "democratic self-determination", contrasting the radical localists' notion of "national self-determination".<ref>{{cite news |date=7 September 2016 |title=立會票王朱凱廸:他們要民族自決,我要民主自決 |work=The Initium |url=https://theinitium.com/article/20160907-hongkong-eddiechu/ |url-status=live |access-date=4 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917200016/https://theinitium.com/article/20160907-hongkong-eddiechu/ |archive-date=17 September 2016}}</ref> They usually have warmer relationship with the pan-democrats.
** Represented party and MPs – ] (]), positioned as the progressive wing of the pro-democracy camp after the oath-taking controversy; ] (]), formed in 2016, was led by the student leaders from the two leading groups in the ], the ] (HKFS) and ]; ] (]). ** Represented party and MPs – ] (]), positioned as the progressive wing of the pro-democracy camp after the oath-taking controversy; ] (]), formed in 2016, was led by the student leaders from the two leading groups in the ], the ] (HKFS) and ]; ] (]).
** Advocating members – ], ], ], ], ], ] ** Advocating members – ], ], ], ], ], ]
Line 89: Line 88:
** Represented party – ]; ], second political group to advocate a breakaway from China established on 26 June 2016, aims to gain independence as the ultimate goal, but seeks to return to British rule as a transitional phase<ref>{{cite news |date=23 June 2015 |title=HK activists seek return to British rule as first step to independence |newspaper=The Straits Times |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hk-activists-seek-return-to-british-rule-as-first-step-to-independence |url-status=live |access-date=4 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160828181512/http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hk-activists-seek-return-to-british-rule-as-first-step-to-independence |archive-date=28 August 2016}}</ref> ** Represented party – ]; ], second political group to advocate a breakaway from China established on 26 June 2016, aims to gain independence as the ultimate goal, but seeks to return to British rule as a transitional phase<ref>{{cite news |date=23 June 2015 |title=HK activists seek return to British rule as first step to independence |newspaper=The Straits Times |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hk-activists-seek-return-to-british-rule-as-first-step-to-independence |url-status=live |access-date=4 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160828181512/http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hk-activists-seek-return-to-british-rule-as-first-step-to-independence |archive-date=28 August 2016}}</ref>
** Advocating members – ] and others ** Advocating members – ] and others
* '''Sustaining of the Basic Law''' – takes "City-state theory" by Chin Wan which calls for a city-state status of Hong Kong through the amendment of the ] mandated by all citizens through a ''de facto'' referendum. After the amendment was accepted by the ], the autonomy of Hong Kong would be guaranteed even after the original deadline of 2047. They advocated for a "militant" protest style and are hostile toward the pan-democrats and the left-wing localists, opposed the leadership of the pan-democrat-friendly ] trio and left-wing activist groups Scholarism and HKFS. After the electoral defeat of the ] alliance, the platform was announced to be dropped. * '''Sustaining of the Basic Law''' – takes "City-state theory" by Chin Wan which calls for a city-state status of Hong Kong through the amendment of the ] mandated by all citizens through a ''de facto'' referendum. After the amendment was accepted by the ], the autonomy of Hong Kong would be guaranteed even after the original deadline of 2047. They advocated for a "militant" protest style and are hostile toward the pan-democrats and the moderate localists, opposed the leadership of the pan-democrat-friendly ] trio and moderate activist groups Scholarism and HKFS. After the electoral defeat of the ] alliance, the platform was announced to be dropped.
** Represented party and MPs – ] (]); ] (]) ** Represented party and MPs – ] (]); ] (])
** Ideological leader – ] (], author of ''On the Hong Kong City-State'' and "] theory") ** Ideological leader – ] (], author of ''On the Hong Kong City-State'' and "] theory")
Line 161: Line 160:


] ]
] ]
]
] ]

Latest revision as of 03:25, 7 August 2024

Hong Kong political groups favoring autonomy

Localist camp 本土派
Foundedc. 2010s
IdeologyLocalism (HK)
Hong Kong nationalism
Liberalism (HK)
Factions:
Anti-authoritarianism
Cultural conservatism
Libertarianism
Populism
Progressivism
Anti-communism
Hong Kong independence
ColoursBlue, Yellow
Legislative Council0 / 90 (0%)
District Councils0 / 470 (0%)
Localist camp
Traditional Chinese本土派
Transcriptions
Yue: Cantonese
JyutpingBun tou paai
Localist and self-determination groups
Traditional Chinese本土自決派
Transcriptions
Yue: Cantonese
JyutpingBun tou zi kyut paai
Politics and government
of Hong Kong
Laws
Executive
  • University Grants Committee Secretariat
  • Working Family and Student Financial Assistance Agency
Legislature
  • Political camps:
JudiciaryCourt of Final Appeal

High Court

District Court

  • Chief District Judge: Justin Ko

Magistrates' Court

  • Chief Magistrate: So Wai-tak

Special courts and tribunals:

DistrictsDistrict Officers
ElectionsElectoral Affairs Commission

Chief Executive Elections

Legislative elections

District council elections

Foreign relationsDocuments

Consular missions in Hong Kong

Hong Kong–China relations

Hong Kong–Taiwan relations

Related topics flag Hong Kong portal
This article is part of a series on
Liberalism in China
Principles
History
People
Extant parties

Hong Kong (pro-democracy)


Hong Kong (centrist)


Hong Kong (pro-ROC)


Hong Kong (localist)


Macau


Republic of China (Taiwan)
(groups of pro-Chinese identity)

Historical parties

Hong Kong (pro-democracy)


Hong Kong (pro-ROC)


Hong Kong (localist)


Republic of China (Taiwan)
(groups of pro-Chinese identity)

Banned parties
Alliances
Organisations
Media

Current


Former

Related ideologies
Related topics

Localist camp or localist and self-determination groups refers to the various groups with localist ideologies in Hong Kong. It emerged from post-80s social movements in the late 2000s which centred on the preservation of the city's autonomy and local lifestyles and opposed the perceived growing encroachment of the Chinese government on the city's management of its own political, economic, and social affairs.

Although grouped together with the pro-democracy camp, they have a distinct view as they advocate for Hongkongersright to self-determination. While milder elements advocates for greater autonomy while remaining part of China, the more radical elements call for the return to British rule or full independence as a sovereign state. Some also advocate for a more aggressive and militant stance against the mainland government in defending local interests. For that reason, they are labelled as "radicals" and "separatists" by the Chinese government.

The localists gained significant traction following widespread protests in 2014 against the Chinese government's decision to pre-screen Chief Executive candidates before allowing them to be chosen by the general public in the 2017 election. Following these protests, a number of localist political parties were formed, organising protests and participated in Legislative Council elections. They won a total numbers of six seats (excluding Claudia Mo) with 19 per cent of vote share (excluding Claudia Mo and Gary Fan) in the 2016 Legislative Council election.

After the 2016 election, localists such as Nathan Law, Lau Siu-lai, Baggio Leung and Yau Wai-ching were unseated from the Legislative Council over the oath-taking controversy. In the aftermath of the 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests, localists were largely absorbed into the broader spectrum of the pro-democracy camp. As a result of the 2020 national security law, many localist parties dissolved and many notable localist figures were arrested or went into exile.

History

Main article: Localism in Hong Kong

Post-80s movements

The localist camp emerged from the post-80s generation born in the 1980s, (Millennials in western terminology) social movements in the late 2000s. Many were inspired by the large-scale mass demonstration in 2003. 7.1 People Pile was one of the groups that came to exist after the demonstration. They were upset by rapid urban development which was sweeping away old neighbourhoods and communities. They were strongly opposed to the political and economic monopoly of vested interests, collusion between business and government and questioned the nature of the capitalist system in Hong Kong. Coinciding with the widespread Chinese patriotism at the time was several emerging conservation movements led by young activists, such as Christina Chan and Land Justice League, protesting against demolition of the Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier, Queen's Pier, and the buildings on Lee Tung Street (known as "Wedding Card Street") in 2006 and 2007. Protests against the construction of the Hong Kong section of the high-speed rail link to Guangzhou (XRL) escalated in 2009 and 2010 and established a new high point of the localist movement.

Radical localism

The failure of the peaceful anti-XRL protests damaged the reputation of the moderate activists. Some turned to a more radical approach. Scholar Chin Wan published the book, On the Hong Kong City-State in 2011 which triggered fierce public debate and was popular among the young generation. In the book, Chin suggests abandoning the hope for a democratic China and positions the democracy movement in a "localist" perspective, in order to counter Beijing's "neo-imperialist" policies toward Hong Kong. It analysed the potential threat of the influx of mainland tourists and immigrants to the established institutions and social customs of Hong Kong, which he considered likely to be part of a colonisation scheme by Beijing, including the increasing use of Mandarin Chinese and Simplified Chinese in daily use and schools. Since then, it has created a paradigm shift on Hong Kong local consciousness from the moderate discourse of reinterpreting colonial history, cherishing the inclusive and diverse nature of the Hong Kong culture to the radical discourse of anti-Chinese sentiment and nostalgia for British rule. Chin also tells his Hong Kong Autonomy Movement followers to use violent action as the means for defending Hong Kong's autonomy.

At the same time, the localists are hostile toward the pan-democracy camp, as they perceived the pan-democrats' cosmopolitanism as unrealistic and their wish for a democratic China at Hong Kong's expense, which they disagreed with the "Chinese patriotic" theme in the annual candlelight vigil for the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre organised by the pro-democracy Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China. They are also dissatisfied with the perceived ineffectiveness of the pan-democrats as the opposition party for the past 20 years. On the other hand, the nativist tendency of the localist movements was condemned as "xenophobic" by mainstream activists and the government. He suggested building Hong Kong into an autonomous city-state, merging the British culture with a restored Chinese culture. The conflict between the moderate and the radical of the movement resulted in great disunity of the whole democratic cause.

Umbrella Revolution and aftermath

Further information: 2014 Hong Kong protests

The 79-day large-scale occupation protest was perceived to boost the local consciousness of the Hongkongers. Many new localist labelled "Umbrella groups" were formed after the protest. notably Youngspiration and Hong Kong Indigenous. Youngspiration took part in the 2015 District Council election with many other newcoming "Umbrella soldiers" and eventually won one seat out of nine candidates. Hong Kong Indigenous is notable for its protest style, in which it calls for a "militant" approach with "some kind of clash", as opposed to pan-democrats' "gentle approach" of non-violent civil disobedience.

There were also disaffection toward the Hong Kong Federation of Students (HKFS), the leading figure in the protests, resulted in a great split in the student federation. The localists launched a campaign quitting the HKFS. By the end of 2015, four of the eight student unions consisting the federation, the Hong Kong University Students' Union (HKUSU), the Hong Kong Polytechnic University Students' Union (HKPUSU), the Hong Kong Baptist University Students' Union (HKBUSU) and the City University of Hong Kong Students' Union (CityUSU), broke up with the HKFS.

The Legislative Council by-election in New Territories East on 28 February 2016 was a milestone of the localist movements, as it was the first attempt for them to contest for the Legislative Council under localist banner. Edward Leung of Hong Kong Indigenous received a better-than expected result in the New Territories East by-election in February 2016 by taking more than 66,000 votes and gaining about 15 percent of the total votes. After the election, Leung claimed localism had gained a foothold as the third most important power in local politics, standing side by side with the pan-democracy and pro-Beijing camps.

2016 Legislative Council election

Further information: 2016 Hong Kong legislative election See also: 2016 Hong Kong LegCo candidates' disqualification controversy

A day after the 2016 New Territories East by-election, three localist groups, Wong Yuk-man's Proletariat Political Institute, Wong Yeung-tat's Civic Passion and Chin Wan's Hong Kong Resurgence Order, announced to run in the September Legislative Council election under the alliance "CP–PPI–HKRO". On 10 April 2016. six localist groups Youngspiration, Kowloon East Community, Tin Shui Wai New Force, Cheung Sha Wan Community Establishment Power, Tsz Wan Shan Constructive Power and Tuen Mun Community, formed an electoral alliance under the name "ALLinHK" planned to field candidates in four of the five geographical constituencies with the agenda to put forward a referendum on Hong Kong's self-determination, while Hong Kong Indigenous and another new pro-independence Hong Kong National Party also stated that they will run in the upcoming election. Demosisto, a left-leaning political party formed by Umbrella Revolution leaders Joshua Wong, Oscar Lai of the Scholarism and Nathan Law of the Hong Kong Federation of Students was also formed on the same day. The political party aimed to field candidates in the upcoming election with the platform of "self-determination" of Hong Kong future. It allied with veteran activist Eddie Chu who rose to fame in the 2006 Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier protest and university lecturer Lau Siu-lai who held class in the occupation sites in the 2014 occupy protest.

On 14 July 2016, the Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC) announced its plan to require all candidates to sign an additional "confirmation form" in the nomination to declare their understanding of Hong Kong being an inalienable part of China as stipulated in the Basic Law, in response to many potential localist candidates advocating or promoting Hong Kong independence. After the end of the nomination period, six localist candidates received emails from the EAC which said their nominations were "invalidated". New Territories East constituency returning officer Cora Ho Lai-sheung rejected Leung's nomination on the basis that she did not trust Leung "genuinely changed his previous stance for independence."

The localists scored a great victory in the election, winning six seats (excluding Claudia Mo) and securing of 19 per cent of the vote share (excluding Claudia Mo and Gary Fan). Occupy student leader Nathan Law of the Demosisto became the youngest ever candidate to be elected, Polytechnic University lecturer Lau Siu-lai and Eddie Chu, were returned in the geographical constituencies.

Oath-taking controversy and disqualification

Main article: Hong Kong Legislative Council oath-taking controversy

On 12 October 2016 the inaugural meeting of the Legislative Council, two Youngspiration legislators Baggio Leung and Yau Wai-ching took the oaths of office as the opportunity to make their pro-independence statement. The two first claimed that "As a member of the Legislative Council, I shall pay earnest efforts in keeping guard over the interests of the Hong Kong nation," displayed a "Hong Kong is not China" banner, inserted their own words into the oaths and mispronounced "People's Republic of China" as "people's re-fucking of Chee-na". Their oaths were invalidated by the LegCo secretary-general Kenneth Chen and was subsequently challenged by the government in the court. On 7 November 2016, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) interpreted the Article 104 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong to "clarify" the provision of the legislators to swear allegiance to Hong Kong as part of China when they take office. The spokesman of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office stated that " will absolutely neither permit anyone advocating secession in Hong Kong nor allow any pro-independence activists to enter a government institution." As a consequence, the court disqualified the two legislators on 15 November.

Factions

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Despite the controversies over "who are localists?" due to the vague concept of localism and the vague platforms of the localist camp, the localist camp can be loosely categorised into the following factions:

Electoral performance

Legislative Council elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
GC
seats
FC
seats
EC
seats
Total seats +/−
2016 411,893 19.00 6 0 6 / 70 5Increase
2021 did not contest 0 0 0 0 / 90 6Decrease

District Council elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
Total seats +/−
2015 44,334 3.07 6 / 458 6Increase
2019 126 / 479 120Increase

See also

References

  1. Andrew J. Nathan; Brian C. H. Fong; Jieh-min Wu (30 December 2020). China's Influence and the Center-periphery Tug of War in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Indo-Pacific. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-28426-3.
  2. "Hong Kong suffers identity crisis as China's influence grows". The Guardian. 18 April 2016. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  3. "Localism: Why is support for the political perspective growing - and who's behind it?". 1 July 2015. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
  4. 李, 立峯 (7 July 2016). "從不滿政治到不滿社會:本土派和民主派支持者的差異". Ming Pao. Archived from the original on 1 October 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  5. ^ Hewitt, Duncan (8 April 2015). "Hong Kong's Clashes Over Mainland Shoppers Show Rising Cultural Tensions With China". International Business Times. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  6. "旺角騷亂 京定性本土激進分離組織策動 議員:為23條立法鋪路". Apple Daily. 13 February 2016. Archived from the original on 15 July 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  7. Wong, Alan (21 February 2016). "China Labels Protesters 'Radical Separatists,' and They Agree". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
  8. ^ 羅永生. "香港本土意識的前世今生". 思想.
  9. Hung, Ho Fung (3 November 2014). "Three Views of Local Consciousness in Hong Kong 香港 地元の意識、三つの視点". The Asia-Pacific Journal. 12 (44). Archived from the original on 16 March 2015. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  10. Lau, Stuart (10 June 2013). "Independent thinker Horace Chin treads bold path". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 15 September 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  11. Chang, Ping (9 June 2013). "Will a democratic China harm Hong Kong?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 20 August 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  12. "Out with the old: Two big-name pan-democrats ousted in tight district council election races". South China Morning Post. 23 November 2015. Archived from the original on 20 December 2015. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  13. "【馬嶽.評新東補選】66,524票從何而來?". HK01. 29 February 2016. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  14. Chung, Kang-chung (2 March 2016). "All Around Town: So which Hong Kong politician keeps gunning for losing candidate?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  15. "本土組織將派5人出選立會 陳雲或出戰新界東". Apple Daily. 29 February 2016. Archived from the original on 27 July 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  16. "青年新政等六組織 組聯盟戰立會 倡2021香港自決公投". Stand News. 10 April 2016. Archived from the original on 26 July 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  17. Ng, Joyce; Ng, Kang-chung (14 July 2016). "'Accept Hong Kong is part of China or you can't run in Legco elections'". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 16 July 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  18. Ng, Joyce (2 August 2016). "Hong Kong Indigenous' Edward Leung disqualified from Legco elections". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  19. Cheng, Kris (2 August 2016). "Edward Leung has not genuinely switched from pro-independence stance, says election official". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  20. "Rise of localists in Hong Kong polls set to bring headaches for Beijing, analysts say". South China Morning Post. 5 September 2016. Archived from the original on 9 October 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  21. "Declaration of war as Hong Kong's newly elected lawmakers plunge opening session into chaos". South China Morning Post. 12 October 2016. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
  22. "Hong Kong will move on controversial security law, CY Leung says, as Beijing bars independence activists from Legco". South China Morning Post. 7 November 2016. Archived from the original on 2 February 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
  23. "Hong Kong court rules localist lawmakers must vacate Legco seats". South China Morning Post. 15 November 2016.
  24. "「香港本土」成立 拒絕大陸化". Metro Daily. 1 February 2013. p. 12.
  25. "香港新政黨「香港眾志」成立 黃之鋒任秘書長". 蘋果新聞網 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 10 April 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  26. "立會票王朱凱廸:他們要民族自決,我要民主自決". The Initium. 7 September 2016. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  27. "旺角年初一爆警民衝突 警放催淚彈商販市民爭相走避". TMHK. 26 January 2020. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2021./
  28. "Why Beijing's headache over calls for Hong Kong's independence has only just begun". South China Morning Post. 26 August 2016. Archived from the original on 1 February 2020. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  29. "I support independence over autonomy". Stand News. 15 January 2015. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2021./
  30. "HK activists seek return to British rule as first step to independence". The Straits Times. 23 June 2015. Archived from the original on 28 August 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
Hong Kong Political parties in Hong Kong
Parties represented in the Legislative Council
Pro-Beijing (89)
Unaligned (1)
Parties represented in district councils
Pro-Beijing (174)
Categories: