Revision as of 16:38, 12 April 2007 editCyde (talk | contribs)28,155 edits →On endorsements← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:00, 10 September 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,330 edits →duck or goose: Explanation of edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|date=27 November 2022}} | |||
{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-3 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Cyde/Archive015 --> | |||
{{User talk:Cyde/header}} | {{User talk:Cyde/header}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{User talk:Cyde/header}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
|counter = 38 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(7d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Cyde/Archive%(counter)03d | |||
}} | |||
{{-}}{{cent}} | |||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
== Thanks == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
Thanks for dealing with the whole PatPeter thing. I also have no clue what his (is agenda the right word?) agenda is. I was about to write something on his talk but removed it after taking another look; that's probably not the most constructive thing to do at this point. ] (]) 21:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Unsubstantiated death information == | |||
An editor has posted that state senator of South Carolina ] died, but I checked google and found nothing about his alleged death. I'm afraid another ] would happen, so can you please take a look at it and revert if needed? Thanks! ]<sup>], ]</sup> 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
: This one appears legit. ] 22:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Assistance needed == | |||
Hello, I am asking for your assistance in regard to an individual named ] who continues to censor information listed as 'criticism' in the article about ]. He has broken the three revert rule , and has extended his reign. He has experienced temporary bans before - he'll just come back to continue under other registered names like . If that weren't enough, he has now deemed fit to invade my . Aside from on his personal website, I believe his aggression on Misplaced Pages will not end unless he is dealt with accordingly. As evidenced by reporting me, he is a typical example of those seeking to use technological savvy to oppress opposing opinions. It is the nature of "redefined Church" followers (like ]) to be heavy computer users, so an example must be made of Virgil to set example of what will happen to other members of 'modern Church' who use their tech-knowhow to silence criticism. One additional note - he has , claiming I have threatened him by noting on-the-job bandwidth waste while appealing for upholding the censorship of criticism on the ] article. where another user noted his antics. Please help! Thank you so much. | |||
:I find it interesting that you find time to research my personal life or call me "unbalanced" but you don't find time to discuss contributions to an article in a constructive manner in the discussion section of the article, which is meant for that purpose. I trust that Cyde can judge the situation for himself and see past your ad-hominem attacks. --] 16:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Portal:Creationism == | |||
You're an administrator, and I think is not what is expected of you. <span style="font-size:95%">—], your friendly neighborhood ''']'''.</span> 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Aw c'mon, that's from seven months ago, and was reverted almost immediately. Why is this being brought up now? --] 13:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Well, it's not just vandalism, it's also egregious POV-pushing. ]<sup>], ]</sup> 04:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I don't consider science to be a "point of view"; rather, the way the world ''is''. --] 13:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
== ] == | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 02:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Yes indeed, mighty thanks for all that you and your mighty bot have contributed here. – ] ] 10:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ] on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ‍—‍]<sub>]]</sub> 22:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== A kitten for you! == | ||
] | |||
Cydebot seems to have stopped running, as the list is two hours out of date. --]] 04:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
a kitten for you! | |||
:It is a week out of date and Cyde's ] about it has already been archived. ] 04:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 23:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
== On endorsements == | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
== duck or goose == | |||
Hi. While I appreciate your concern, I've got to wonder why you haven't left similarly outraged messages on the talk pages of everyone who has labeled Kelly's suggestion as "simply ridiculous", "a joke", "shrubbery", etc. Now you've been here long enough to know that to propose a change to the RfA process such as requiring WikiProject endorsement, the usual way to do things is not to post a "Neutral" on every possible RfA until someone notices but rather to engage discussions on the Village Pump or something of that form. RfAs should stick to the evaluation of a candidate and Kelly is transforming them into soapboxes for her proposed endorsement system. ] 13:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
re ], that looks like a greylag goose, not a duck. —] (]) 20:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Not responding to the merits of any of the points you have bring up, ''you have still not shown how Kelly is purposefully disrupting Misplaced Pages to prove a ]''. She isn't. So don't accuse people of things they aren't guilty of. If you don't agree with her methods of trying to modify the procedure then you can say so, but it's unaccpetable to accuse her of violating some policy that she hasn't. It's like accusing someone of vandalism when their intent wasn't to vandalize (e.g. they just messed up); you simply don't do it. --] 16:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Cyde, I've commented out the tests on this test page due to Misza13's random number generator creating negative values when it should not be. These negative values for image sizes are causing invalid image parameter errors (tracked ] errors that have otherwise been cleaned up here on en.wiki). If you, Cyde, still want these tests, consider using a different randomizer. Thanks, ] (]) 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:00, 10 September 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Cyde has not edited Misplaced Pages since 27 November 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Cyde's talk page Leave a new message
Archives
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
10
11
12
Centralized discussion
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Allowing page movers to enable two-factor authentication
- Rewriting the guideline Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers
- Should comments made using LLMs or chatbots be discounted or even removed?
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 02:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, mighty thanks for all that you and your mighty bot have contributed here. – Fayenatic London 10:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Mop
Template:Mop has been nominated for merging with Template:Icon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —a smart kitten 22:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
a kitten for you!
Alex pizzagalli1990 (talk) 23:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
duck or goose
re User:Cyde/test, that looks like a greylag goose, not a duck. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cyde, I've commented out the tests on this test page due to Misza13's random number generator creating negative values when it should not be. These negative values for image sizes are causing invalid image parameter errors (tracked WP:LINT errors that have otherwise been cleaned up here on en.wiki). If you, Cyde, still want these tests, consider using a different randomizer. Thanks, Zinnober9 (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)