| Revision as of 01:18, 14 April 2007 editNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 editsm Reverted edits by 84.64.67.135 (talk) to last version by Cyde← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:00, 10 September 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,330 edits →duck or goose: Explanation of edit | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|date=27 November 2022}} | |||
| {{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-3 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Cyde/Archive016 --> | |||
| {{User talk:Cyde/header}} | {{User talk:Cyde/header}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{User talk:Cyde/header}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 38 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Cyde/Archive%(counter)03d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{-}}{{cent}} | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Thanks for dealing with the whole PatPeter thing. I also have no clue what his (is agenda the right word?) agenda is. I was about to write something on his talk but removed it after taking another look; that's probably not the most constructive thing to do at this point. ] (]) 21:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Unsubstantiated death information == | |||
| An editor has posted that state senator of South Carolina ] died, but I checked google and found nothing about his alleged death. I'm afraid another ] would happen, so can you please take a look at it and revert if needed? Thanks! ]<sup>], ]</sup> 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : This one appears legit. ] 22:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Assistance needed == | |||
| Hello, I am asking for your assistance in regard to an individual named ] who continues to censor information listed as 'criticism' in the article about ]. He has broken the three revert rule , and has extended his reign. He has experienced temporary bans before - he'll just come back to continue under other registered names like . If that weren't enough, he has now deemed fit to invade my . Aside from on his personal website, I believe his aggression on Misplaced Pages will not end unless he is dealt with accordingly. As evidenced by reporting me, he is a typical example of those seeking to use technological savvy to oppress opposing opinions. It is the nature of "redefined Church" followers (like ]) to be heavy computer users, so an example must be made of Virgil to set example of what will happen to other members of 'modern Church' who use their tech-knowhow to silence criticism. One additional note - he has , claiming I have threatened him by noting on-the-job bandwidth waste while appealing for upholding the censorship of criticism on the ] article. where another user noted his antics. Please help! Thank you so much. | |||
| :I find it interesting that you find time to research my personal life or call me "unbalanced" but you don't find time to discuss contributions to an article in a constructive manner in the discussion section of the article, which is meant for that purpose. I trust that Cyde can judge the situation for himself and see past your ad-hominem attacks. --] 16:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Portal:Creationism == | |||
| You're an administrator, and I think is not what is expected of you. <span style="font-size:95%">—], your friendly neighborhood ''']'''.</span> 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Aw c'mon, that's from seven months ago, and was reverted almost immediately. Why is this being brought up now? --] 13:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, it's not just vandalism, it's also egregious POV-pushing. ]<sup>], ]</sup> 04:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't consider science to be a "point of view"; rather, the way the world ''is''. --] 13:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm sure nearly half of the Americans don't believe in Darwinism, and no one has proved Darwinian theories either. Let's face it, we all don't know where we come from, there is no need to be patronizing like this. ]<sup>], ]</sup> 21:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yeah, because reality is really affected by what stupid people believe in. And you have an incredibly warped perception of science. --] 13:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Alright, you know what, that's not fair. You're young and you simply haven't gotten the truth from whatever biased people are around you warping your education. So here's a chance to learn some real facts. Check out the as well as the . Get reading. It includes answers to the fallacious claims that "a lot of people don't believe it, thus it is false" as well as the claim about "we don't know" — because the fossils don't lie. --] 13:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello Cyde! I've replied your comment, please check and update. Thank you! ]<sup>], ]</sup> 22:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Cyde, can you specify which provision of Erik's former views are changed, and why they are wrong? Thanks. I personally do agree with that "]" page that a picture painted hundreds of years ago is not copyrighted, and the other views posted by him at that time, like the one sentence copyright, seem legit. I don't understand if there is any wrong in "avoiding copyright paranoia". In a reasonable sense, any ] isn't something good. ]<sup>], ]</sup> 22:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, generally paranoia may be "bad", but surely you see the logical flaw in calling something paranoia and then saying it is bad because it is paranoia, when the actual underlying behavior isn't paranoid. You've cherry-picked some of the good things from that essay. There are also many bad things. Misplaced Pages is first and foremost a freely redistributable free content encyclopedia. The WMF isn't going to be around forever, but thanks to the GFDL, the content always will be, and you will be guaranteed to always have the freedoms to modify it and redistribute it under the terms of the license. I wouldn't call worrying about these legitimate concerns "paranoia". We do have to watch about non free content slipping into the encyclopedia and basically corrupting it, making it less free and non-redistributable. --] 22:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree. What exactly constitute "paranoia" is vague and open to interpretation. In my view labeling ] or ]'s painting "copyrighted" is copyright paranoia while deleting a clearly copyrighted modern picture is not copyright paranoia. Of course, GFDL helps a lot in maintaining our encyclopedia free, we should thank ] for that. Cheers! ]<sup>], ]</sup> 22:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Cydebot seems to have stopped running, as the list is two hours out of date. --]] 04:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It is a week out of date and Cyde's ] about it has already been archived. ] 04:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Okay, I've brought the bot up and running again. Hopefully it should be fixed. If it stops running at this point, let me know. --] 22:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == On endorsements == | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| Hi. While I appreciate your concern, I've got to wonder why you haven't left similarly outraged messages on the talk pages of everyone who has labeled Kelly's suggestion as "simply ridiculous", "a joke", "shrubbery", etc. Now you've been here long enough to know that to propose a change to the RfA process such as requiring WikiProject endorsement, the usual way to do things is not to post a "Neutral" on every possible RfA until someone notices but rather to engage discussions on the Village Pump or something of that form. RfAs should stick to the evaluation of a candidate and Kelly is transforming them into soapboxes for her proposed endorsement system. ] 13:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 02:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Not responding to the merits of any of the points you have bring up, ''you have still not shown how Kelly is purposefully disrupting Misplaced Pages to prove a ]''. She isn't. So don't accuse people of things they aren't guilty of. If you don't agree with her methods of trying to modify the procedure then you can say so, but it's unaccpetable to accuse her of violating some policy that she hasn't. It's like accusing someone of vandalism when their intent wasn't to vandalize (e.g. they just messed up); you simply don't do it. --] 16:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes indeed, mighty thanks for all that you and your mighty bot have contributed here. – ] ] 10:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ] on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ‍—‍]<sub>]]</sub> 22:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| ::Mayybe, he is saying that because Kelly ''appears'' to have taken this stance so as to bring about a some kind of change, which she wants in the community as a whole, or the RFA process. A much better way of proceeding with this idea, she should have proposed some changes on the appropriate venues of discourse, like the Village Pump. But equally astounding is the fact that a ''neutral'' stance by another user, which is not really a cause of ''disruption'' would attract so much pettifoggery. A better response would have been, even if they presumed for once that Kelly's ideas were unworthy of consideration, they should have left her on her own, which might have forced her, somehow, to consider her stance. --] 16:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Johnny the Vandal sockpuppets == | |||
| a kitten for you! | |||
| ] (]) 23:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| We had some of these on wikibooks today, using a different IP than the one you identified... your bot created ], so are you "in charge" of this case? The IP in question has a history of vandalizing "according to pattern" here on wikipedia. --]|<sup>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub> 20:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == duck or goose == | |||
| I think you're really confusing something here. Cydebot modified over a hundred sockpuppet categories. It was the result of a huge blanket ]. I am in no way, shape, or form maintaining these things. If you'd like to do so, by my guest. --] 22:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| re ], that looks like a greylag goose, not a duck. —] (]) 20:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Heh, no thanks :). We just have another IP for him... I'll talk to one of the local CUs about it. --]|<sup>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub> 09:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Cyde, I've commented out the tests on this test page due to Misza13's random number generator creating negative values when it should not be. These negative values for image sizes are causing invalid image parameter errors (tracked ] errors that have otherwise been cleaned up here on en.wiki). If you, Cyde, still want these tests, consider using a different randomizer. Thanks, ] (]) 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:00, 10 September 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Cyde has not edited Misplaced Pages since 27 November 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Cyde's talk page Leave a new message
Archives
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
10
11
12
Centralized discussion
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Allowing page movers to enable two-factor authentication
- Rewriting the guideline Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers
- Should comments made using LLMs or chatbots be discounted or even removed?
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 02:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, mighty thanks for all that you and your mighty bot have contributed here. – Fayenatic London 10:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Mop
Template:Mop has been nominated for merging with Template:Icon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —a smart kitten 22:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
a kitten for you!
Alex pizzagalli1990 (talk) 23:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
duck or goose
re User:Cyde/test, that looks like a greylag goose, not a duck. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cyde, I've commented out the tests on this test page due to Misza13's random number generator creating negative values when it should not be. These negative values for image sizes are causing invalid image parameter errors (tracked WP:LINT errors that have otherwise been cleaned up here on en.wiki). If you, Cyde, still want these tests, consider using a different randomizer. Thanks, Zinnober9 (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)