Revision as of 04:11, 7 June 2024 editWikiPediaAid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions14,460 edits Added ref idea.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 10:59, 18 November 2024 edit undoOXYLYPSE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,688 edits Rm nonsenseTag: 2017 wikitext editor |
(19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject California|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject California|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Apple Inc. |
|
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=low}} |
|
|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Typography|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Typography|importance=low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Line 15: |
Line 14: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Lawsuit == |
|
== Change Adobe Logo in InfoBox == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe Inc. is currently getting sued by the United States Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-against-adobe-and-two-adobe-executives-alleged-violations ) Shouldn't this be added? ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hi there Wikipedians, |
|
|
I wanted to say that I would like to change the Adobe Logo in InfoBox to this new logo : |
|
|
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Adobe_Systems_logo_and_wordmark.svg ] (]) 16:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Should "incorporated in Delaware" be added in the first sentence? == |
|
I withdraw this proposal as the proposed logo is old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed it has been reverted after I made a similar edit on Roblox Corporation. I'd like to open up discussion here to gather opinions, as this sentence is still in articles such as ] and ]. ] (]) 00:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
Thank you, |
|
|
Ananjanphotoshopcreations ] (]) 16:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Tagging ] for relevant discussion. ] (]) 00:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Infobox : the number of employees is quite outdated == |
|
|
|
::According to , "more than 60% of ] companies" and "more than 90% of U.S.-based companies that went public in 2021" are incorporated in Delaware. The article also points out why this is this is such an attractive choice. Furthermore, is almost double that of its population. |
|
|
::Because "big corporation incorporated in Delaware" is such a ubiquitous concept, while also being quite inconsequential for anything not law- or tax-related, this is hardly ever relevant to mention, especially in the lead or first sentence. I can see a "Litigation" section á la "Big Corp. was sued at the Court of Delaware, its place of incorporation, for ...", but not much else. |
|
|
::In both examples mentioned above, the source is either a financial document or an investor FAQ. I've also seen cases that link straight to the incorporation papers. None of these is a reliable, secondary source that somehow highlights why this is relevant to mention. |
|
|
::Thereby, I stand by my prior opinion that this kind of info should be excluded unless it is highlighted by secondary sources. In fact, if mentioned without the appropriate context why so many companies are Delawarian, this might even be confusing to the reader and should therefore be actively avoided. ] []] 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks for your response. I also support the option of omitting it from the first sentence after thinking. This is definititely a stylistic consistency issue and it concerns a fair amount of articles (just search for "incorporated in Delaware"). |
|
|
:::I am also interested in a ] if this talk page does not garner enough discussion, given how many articles it concerns. ] (]) 08:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Sorry for inconvenience and delay to joint the clips of adobe systems... == |
|
It says |
|
|
:11,847 (2013) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
okay and thanks enough ] (]) 13:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
I understand that this figure comes from Wikidata (https://www.wikidata.org/Q11463?uselang=en#P1128), where, incidently the most recent and correct figure of 25,988 (3 December 2021) is available, but I cannot figure how to connect those dots. ] (]) 12:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== The year 2019 is misaligned in the table under the 'Finances' tab == |
|
|
|
|
|
The year 2019 is misaligned compared to the other years in the table under the 'Finances' tab. This makes the table look unprofessional in my opinion. ] (]) 09:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
|