Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Operation Kahuta: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:30, 17 June 2024 editSaqib (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,574 edits Operation Kahuta: Editing comment ← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:39, 3 July 2024 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators760,290 edits Operation Kahuta: Closed as delete (XFDcloser
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I see a consensus to Delete. Any editor can create a redirect if they so choose. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 23:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
===]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Operation Kahuta}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) :{{la|1=Operation Kahuta}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Operation Kahuta}}) :({{Find sources AFD|title=Operation Kahuta}})
Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Line 14: Line 19:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], and ]. ] ] 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], and ]. ] ] 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''Comment''': I've concerns about articles created by {{u|M Waleed}}, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom. ] (] I ]) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) * '''Comment''': I've concerns about articles created by {{u|M Waleed}}, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom. ] (] I ]) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A non-notable one-sided claim does not need a separate article. ] (]) 23:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
*:@], the existing sources include indian and Israeli sources so how's this one sided ] (]) 05:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ]. Article on a non-event that is already mentioned at ]. A redirect per CHEAP and ATD is the only correct solution. ] (]) 22:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Delete''' per nom. Lacks coverage from third party sources. ] (]) 03:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' A thorough source analysis would be helpful here given the competing claims of one-sidedness.<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
* '''Delete''': It focuses on a single viewpoint and doesn't have any independent sources to back it up. Maybe this topic could be added to a bigger article, but right now it doesn't seem like it stands on its own. ]] 17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB Iwaqarhashmi-->
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:39, 3 July 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see a consensus to Delete. Any editor can create a redirect if they so choose. Liz 23:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Operation Kahuta

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Operation Kahuta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Indian, Israeli, American, British and Irish sources are included Waleed (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Cite them here. I don't see any which can establish WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
3,4,5,8,9,10,16,17 are non-Pakistani sources which include the aforementioned sources including Israeli and Indian but also third party sources including the American air university Waleed (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm not familiar with the subject but there does appear to be reliable sources covering it e.g. even if it's a fabricated plot it's still arguably notable. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 04:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A thorough source analysis would be helpful here given the competing claims of one-sidedness.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 04:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete: It focuses on a single viewpoint and doesn't have any independent sources to back it up. Maybe this topic could be added to a bigger article, but right now it doesn't seem like it stands on its own. Waqar💬 17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.