Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Boardmasters Festival line-ups: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:41, 1 August 2024 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators761,222 edits Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:48, 15 August 2024 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators761,222 edits →Boardmasters Festival line-ups: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser) 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, #000); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);">
⚫ ===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I'm closing this as No consensus. While there have been improvements made to the article during the course of this discussion and editors voicing their opinion most recently are arguing to Keep, I'm not sure if changes made address the concerns of editors who proposed Deletion. Unfortunately, they have not returned to this discussion to weigh in on this point. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
⚫ ===]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Boardmasters Festival line-ups}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) :{{la|1=Boardmasters Festival line-ups}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Boardmasters Festival line-ups}}) :({{Find sources AFD|title=Boardmasters Festival line-ups}})
Contested ]. Article is a huge magnet for ] that currently cites only one source. Only verifiable source to back the information is a ]: the website itself. ] )</span>]] 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Contested ]. Article is a huge magnet for ] that currently cites only one source. Only verifiable source to back the information is a ]: the website itself. ] )</span>]] 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Line 11: Line 16:
*'''Delete''' Largely unsourced. ] (]) 22:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Largely unsourced. ] (]) 22:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Although largely unsourced at the moment, it is clear that enough sources do exist to sustain this page (I've already managed to reference the first two years, and it's obvious to me from a quick internet search that there will be sources for other years too). It being potential fancruft does not speak to whether it should be deleted - notability is established by the reliable sources which exist elsewhere. Overall, yes, this page is poorly written, but I think that's ]. I'll keep cleaning it up in the meantime, but I do think this one's worth keeping. ] (]) 13:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Although largely unsourced at the moment, it is clear that enough sources do exist to sustain this page (I've already managed to reference the first two years, and it's obvious to me from a quick internet search that there will be sources for other years too). It being potential fancruft does not speak to whether it should be deleted - notability is established by the reliable sources which exist elsewhere. Overall, yes, this page is poorly written, but I think that's ]. I'll keep cleaning it up in the meantime, but I do think this one's worth keeping. ] (]) 13:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Delete''' per nom. This isn't ] by a long shot. ] (]) 01:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment:''' Now that the self-published source has been removed and better sources are being added, I think this discussion should primarily focus on whether the subject is notable (i.e. by assessing the sources). ] itself is not a rationale for deletion. ] (]) 11:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
*:'''Keep''' Per the improvements by @], there are many ] discussing the line-ups of the notable ] - and the content may be due it's own page per ]. ''Resonant]'' 07:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': now that work has been done on adding improved sources I don't see it would be controversial for this article to stay. ] (]) 19:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Relisting after article changes. Please review current article after additions.<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 19:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Keep''', this list definitely ''can'' be verified, and ]. The question is whether this information should exist on the wiki at all, and IMO it should. It's no more crufty than e.g. comprehensive record label discographies, of which there are plenty. ] 18:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:48, 15 August 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. I'm closing this as No consensus. While there have been improvements made to the article during the course of this discussion and editors voicing their opinion most recently are arguing to Keep, I'm not sure if changes made address the concerns of editors who proposed Deletion. Unfortunately, they have not returned to this discussion to weigh in on this point. Liz 21:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Boardmasters Festival line-ups

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Boardmasters Festival line-ups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:BLAR. Article is a huge magnet for WP:FANCRUFT that currently cites only one source. Only verifiable source to back the information is a WP:SPS: the website itself. Jalen Folf (Bark) 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after article changes. Please review current article after additions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 19:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep, this list definitely can be verified, and deletion is not cleanup. The question is whether this information should exist on the wiki at all, and IMO it should. It's no more crufty than e.g. comprehensive record label discographies, of which there are plenty. Mach61 18:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.