| Revision as of 07:20, 16 August 2024 view sourceMusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,279 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (2 open requests remaining)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:50, 4 January 2025 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,279 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (2 open requests remaining) | ||
| (595 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}} | <noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}} | ||
| {{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog |
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude> | ||
| ===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback=== | ===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> | <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> | ||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1= |
*{{rfplinks|1=NXcrypto}} | ||
| I |
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :{{done}} '''] (])''' 16:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi {{u|NXcrypto}}, please undo ] and respond to {{u|Worldbruce}}'s concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but {{u|Worldbruce}} was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of ] indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and ] from the conflict. ] (]) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | |||
| ::Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Jiffles1}} | |||
| I have been patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism for a little over a month. I've been primarily using Twinkle and I would like to request rollback privileges to use other tools such as Huggle. I understand the importance of leaving users a notice whenever their edits are reverted. ] (]) 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1= |
*{{rfplinks|1=Patrick_Welsh}} | ||
| I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Misplaced Pages more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Misplaced Pages's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Misplaced Pages before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, ] (]) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| I had this as admin, I would still find it useful. <span style="color:#dbb5ff;font:bold 175% 'Brush Script MT',cursive;padding-left:.75em;padding-right:.5em">— ] ]</span> 03:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 4 January 2025
Place to request rollback rights| Requests for permissions | |
|---|---|
| Common | |
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old. |
Rollback
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:- At least 200 mainspace edits.
- At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
- No recent history of edit warring.
- A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
User:NXcrypto
- NXcrypto (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. Nxcrypto Message 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Patrick_Welsh
- Patrick_Welsh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Misplaced Pages more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Misplaced Pages's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Misplaced Pages before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Category: