Misplaced Pages

Talk:2024 Men's T20 World Cup/GA1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:2024 Men's T20 World Cup Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:44, 1 September 2024 editVkwiki100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,177 edits ←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' ] (] '''·''' ]) ~~~~~ <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) be...'  Latest revision as of 10:21, 27 December 2024 edit undoVestrian24Bio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,382 edits →GA Review: ReplyTag: Reply 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Good article tools}} {{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:2024 ICC Men&#39;s T20 World Cup/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> <noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:2024 ICC Men&#39;s T20 World Cup/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Nominator:''' {{User|Vestrian24Bio}} 01:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)


'''Reviewer:''' ]&nbsp;(] '''·''' ]) 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC) '''Reviewer:''' ]&nbsp;(] '''·''' ]) 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 12:


#It is '''reasonably well written'''. #It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''(] for ], ], ], ], and ])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|hold}} b ''(] for ], ], ], ], and ])'': {{GAList/check|hold}}
#:: The lead can be extended to include a brief summary of how teams qualified through group stage and super8. Additionally, there is no need for references in this section, as they are already provided in the sections below.
#::

:::*Grammatical mistakes in the first paragraph itself. {{tq|"It was co-hosted by the West Indies and the United States from 1 to 29 June 2024; the tournament being hosted by the West Indies for the second time, while this was also the first major ICC tournament to feature matches played in the United States."}} Why are "being" and "while" used here? It should be changed to {{!tq|"It was co-hosted by the West Indies and the United States from 1 to 29 June 2024; the tournament was hosted by the West Indies for the second time, and it was also the first major ICC tournament to feature matches played in the United States."}}

:::*In the second paragraph: remove {{tq|"field"}} as it is not necessary. Replace {{tq|"best placed two teams"}} by {{!tq|"two highest-ranked teams"}} and it would be appropriate to replace the word {{tq|"by"}} by {{!tq|"through"}} as the qualifiers are a tournament and not just a match.

:::*Add commas: {{!tq|"The last tournament, held in 2022 in Australia, was contested by 16 teams."}}

:::*Schedule: Turn this paragraph into past tense like {{!tq|"...tournament would be played.."}} and {{tq|"..teams would play…"}} to {{!tq|"teams played"}}. In the last line change {{!tq|"will"}} to {{tq|"would"}} and it'll be better if it comes before the {{tq|"teams played 55 matches"}} line.

:::*Prize money: same tense problem here. It should be in the past tense.

:::*Qualification: {{tq|"two hosts"}} could simply be {{!tq|"hosts"}} and add commas. The region wise list of teams with their ranking in parentheses is redundant as there are only two teams which qualified because of rankings and their regions are already mentioned in above paragraph. It’ll be better to remove it. Only keep the table below.

:::*Venue: add venue of final also in the prose in the third paragraph.

:::*Warmup matches: it should be {{!tq|"most of the teams"}}

:::*Group stage: No need to hide the summary. I'd suggest dividing it by groups rather than by weeks. I didn't read the summary as of now. I’ll read after you finish changing it.
:::*Super 8: change first line to {{!tq|"The top two teams from each group in the group stage advanced to the Super 8 stage, where they were divided into two groups of four teams each."}} it'll be better. Divide summary by groups and unhide it.

:::*The prose can be improved in various ways, but for the standard of GA, it will be good if you comply with the above-mentioned issues. <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">]&nbsp;]</span> 11:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
::I have made the changes except for the summaries which I have unhid now. One question: Should the group-wise summary be placed along with points table & fixtures or should it be kept in a separate section...? <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>) 15:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
:::@]?? <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>) 03:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

#It is '''factually accurate''' and ''']''', as shown by a ]. #It is '''factually accurate''' and ''']''', as shown by a ].
#:a ''(])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''(inline citations to ])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} c ''(])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} d ''(] and ])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:a ''(])'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(inline citations to ])'': {{GAList/check|}} c ''(])'': {{GAList/check|}} d ''(] and ])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: #::
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. #It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''(])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:a ''(])'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:: #::
#It follows the '''] policy'''. #It follows the '''] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:: #::
#It is '''stable'''. #It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:: #::
#It is illustrated by ''']''' and other media, where possible and appropriate. #It is illustrated by ''']''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have ])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''(] with ])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have ])'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(] with ])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:: #::
#'''Overall''': #'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|neu}} #:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> #:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

* '''Comments:''' {{ping|Vestrian24Bio|Vkwiki100}} Where are we regarding the status of this article? It's been a while since this review was updated and with the GANR backlog drive coming up I want to make sure all potential articles are able to be included. ]] <sup>(])</sup> 20:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
*:@]: The reviewer has been gone for nearly 4 months now, a new reviewer might have to take over (should be included in the backlog drive). <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 02:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
*::@] Could you bring this up over at ] so that an admin can reset the page? ]] <sup>(])</sup> 20:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::will do. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 10:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:21, 27 December 2024

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 01:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vkwiki100 (talk · contribs) 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio: I'll be reviewing this one. VK wiki100 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead can be extended to include a brief summary of how teams qualified through group stage and super8. Additionally, there is no need for references in this section, as they are already provided in the sections below.
  • Grammatical mistakes in the first paragraph itself. "It was co-hosted by the West Indies and the United States from 1 to 29 June 2024; the tournament being hosted by the West Indies for the second time, while this was also the first major ICC tournament to feature matches played in the United States." Why are "being" and "while" used here? It should be changed to "It was co-hosted by the West Indies and the United States from 1 to 29 June 2024; the tournament was hosted by the West Indies for the second time, and it was also the first major ICC tournament to feature matches played in the United States."
  • In the second paragraph: remove "field" as it is not necessary. Replace "best placed two teams" by "two highest-ranked teams" and it would be appropriate to replace the word "by" by "through" as the qualifiers are a tournament and not just a match.
  • Add commas: "The last tournament, held in 2022 in Australia, was contested by 16 teams."
  • Schedule: Turn this paragraph into past tense like "...tournament would be played.." and "..teams would play…" to "teams played". In the last line change "will" to "would" and it'll be better if it comes before the "teams played 55 matches" line.
  • Prize money: same tense problem here. It should be in the past tense.
  • Qualification: "two hosts" could simply be "hosts" and add commas. The region wise list of teams with their ranking in parentheses is redundant as there are only two teams which qualified because of rankings and their regions are already mentioned in above paragraph. It’ll be better to remove it. Only keep the table below.
  • Venue: add venue of final also in the prose in the third paragraph.
  • Warmup matches: it should be "most of the teams"
  • Group stage: No need to hide the summary. I'd suggest dividing it by groups rather than by weeks. I didn't read the summary as of now. I’ll read after you finish changing it.
  • Super 8: change first line to "The top two teams from each group in the group stage advanced to the Super 8 stage, where they were divided into two groups of four teams each." it'll be better. Divide summary by groups and unhide it.
I have made the changes except for the summaries which I have unhid now. One question: Should the group-wise summary be placed along with points table & fixtures or should it be kept in a separate section...? Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 15:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
@Vkwiki100?? Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: