Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 18:14, 18 December 2024

The rare-earth elements (REE), also called the rare-earth metals or rare earths, and sometimes the lanthanides or lanthanoids (although scandium and yttrium, which do not belong to this series, are usually included as rare earths), are a set of 17 nearly indistinguishable lustrous silvery-white soft heavy metals. Compounds containing rare earths have diverse applications in electrical and electronic components, lasers, glass, magnetic materials, and industrial processes.

Scandium and yttrium are considered rare-earth elements because they tend to occur in the same ore deposits as the lanthanides and exhibit similar chemical properties, but have different electrical and magnetic properties. The term 'rare-earth' is a misnomer because they are not actually scarce, although historically it took a long time to isolate these elements.

These metals tarnish slowly in air at room temperature and react slowly with cold water to form hydroxides, liberating hydrogen. They react with steam to form oxides and ignite spontaneously at a temperature of 400 °C (752 °F). These elements and their compounds have no biological function other than in several specialized enzymes, such as in lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenases in bacteria. The water-soluble compounds are mildly to moderately toxic, but the insoluble ones are not. All isotopes of promethium are radioactive, and it does not occur naturally in the earth's crust, except for a trace amount generated by spontaneous fission of uranium-238. They are often found in minerals with thorium, and less commonly uranium.

Though rare-earth elements are technically relatively plentiful in the entire Earth's crust (cerium being the 25th-most-abundant element at 68 parts per million, more abundant than copper), in practice this is spread thin across trace impurities, so to obtain rare earths at usable purity requires processing enormous amounts of raw ore at great expense, thus the name "rare" earths.

Because of their geochemical properties, rare-earth elements are typically dispersed and not often found concentrated in rare-earth minerals. Consequently, economically exploitable ore deposits are sparse. The first rare-earth mineral discovered (1787) was gadolinite, a black mineral composed of cerium, yttrium, iron, silicon, and other elements. This mineral was extracted from a mine in the village of Ytterby in Sweden; four of the rare-earth elements bear names derived from this single location.

Elements

A table listing the 17 rare-earth elements, their atomic number and symbol, the etymology of their names, and their main uses (see also Applications of lanthanides) is provided here. Some of the rare-earth elements are named after the scientists who discovered them, or elucidated their elemental properties, and some after the geographical locations where discovered.

1. Parts per million in Earth's crust, e.g. Pb=13 ppm
2. Promethium has no stable isotopes or primordial radioisotopes; trace quantities occur in nature as fission products.

A mnemonic for the names of the sixth-row elements in order is "Lately college parties never produce sexy European girls that drink heavily even though you look".

Discovery and early history

Rare earths were mainly discovered as components of minerals. Ytterbium was found in the "ytterbite" (renamed to gadolinite in 1800) discovered by Lieutenant Carl Axel Arrhenius in 1787 at a quarry in the village of Ytterby, Sweden and termed "rare" because it had never yet been seen. Arrhenius's "ytterbite" reached Johan Gadolin, a Royal Academy of Turku professor, and his analysis yielded an unknown oxide ("earth" in the geological parlance of the day), which he called yttria. Anders Gustav Ekeberg isolated beryllium from the gadolinite but failed to recognize other elements in the ore. After this discovery in 1794, a mineral from Bastnäs near Riddarhyttan, Sweden, which was believed to be an iron–tungsten mineral, was re-examined by Jöns Jacob Berzelius and Wilhelm Hisinger. In 1803 they obtained a white oxide and called it ceria. Martin Heinrich Klaproth independently discovered the same oxide and called it ochroia. It took another 30 years for researchers to determine that other elements were contained in the two ores ceria and yttria (the similarity of the rare-earth metals' chemical properties made their separation difficult).

In 1839 Carl Gustav Mosander, an assistant of Berzelius, separated ceria by heating the nitrate and dissolving the product in nitric acid. He called the oxide of the soluble salt lanthana. It took him three more years to separate the lanthana further into didymia and pure lanthana. Didymia, although not further separable by Mosander's techniques, was in fact still a mixture of oxides.

In 1842 Mosander also separated the yttria into three oxides: pure yttria, terbia, and erbia (all the names are derived from the town name "Ytterby"). The earth giving pink salts he called terbium; the one that yielded yellow peroxide he called erbium.

In 1842 the number of known rare-earth elements had reached six: yttrium, cerium, lanthanum, didymium, erbium, and terbium.

Nils Johan Berlin and Marc Delafontaine tried also to separate the crude yttria and found the same substances that Mosander obtained, but Berlin named (1860) the substance giving pink salts erbium, and Delafontaine named the substance with the yellow peroxide terbium. This confusion led to several false claims of new elements, such as the mosandrium of J. Lawrence Smith, or the philippium and decipium of Delafontaine. Due to the difficulty in separating the metals (and determining the separation is complete), the total number of false discoveries was dozens, with some putting the total number of discoveries at over a hundred.

Spectroscopic identification

There were no further discoveries for 30 years, and the element didymium was listed in the periodic table of elements with a molecular mass of 138. In 1879, Delafontaine used the new physical process of optical flame spectroscopy and found several new spectral lines in didymia. Also in 1879, Paul Émile Lecoq de Boisbaudran isolated the new element samarium from the mineral samarskite.

The samaria earth was further separated by Lecoq de Boisbaudran in 1886, and a similar result was obtained by Jean Charles Galissard de Marignac by direct isolation from samarskite. They named the element gadolinium after Johan Gadolin, and its oxide was named "gadolinia".

Further spectroscopic analysis between 1886 and 1901 of samaria, yttria, and samarskite by William Crookes, Lecoq de Boisbaudran and Eugène-Anatole Demarçay yielded several new spectral lines that indicated the existence of an unknown element. The fractional crystallization of the oxides then yielded europium in 1901.

In 1839 the third source for rare earths became available. This is a mineral similar to gadolinite called uranotantalum (now called "samarskite") an oxide of a mixture of elements such as yttrium, ytterbium, iron, uranium, thorium, calcium, niobium, and tantalum. This mineral from Miass in the southern Ural Mountains was documented by Gustav Rose. The Russian chemist R. Harmann proposed that a new element he called "ilmenium" should be present in this mineral, but later, Christian Wilhelm Blomstrand, Galissard de Marignac, and Heinrich Rose found only tantalum and niobium (columbium) in it.

The exact number of rare-earth elements that existed was highly unclear, and a maximum number of 25 was estimated. The use of X-ray spectra (obtained by X-ray crystallography) by Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley made it possible to assign atomic numbers to the elements. Moseley found that the exact number of lanthanides had to be 15, but that element 61 had not yet been discovered. (This is promethium, a radioactive element whose most stable isotope has a half-life of just 18 years.)

Using these facts about atomic numbers from X-ray crystallography, Moseley also showed that hafnium (element 72) would not be a rare-earth element. Moseley was killed in World War I in 1915, years before hafnium was discovered. Hence, the claim of Georges Urbain that he had discovered element 72 was untrue. Hafnium is an element that lies in the periodic table immediately below zirconium, and hafnium and zirconium have very similar chemical and physical properties.

Sources and purification

During the 1940s, Frank Spedding and others in the United States (during the Manhattan Project) developed chemical ion-exchange procedures for separating and purifying rare-earth elements. This method was first applied to the actinides for separating plutonium-239 and neptunium from uranium, thorium, actinium, and the other actinides in the materials produced in nuclear reactors. Plutonium-239 was very desirable because it is a fissile material.

The principal sources of rare-earth elements are the minerals bastnäsite (RCO₃F, where R is a mixture of rare-earth elements), monazite (XPO₄, where X is a mixture of rare-earth elements and sometimes thorium), and loparite ((Ce,Na,Ca)(Ti,Nb)O₃), and the lateritic ion-adsorption clays. Despite their high relative abundance, rare-earth minerals are more difficult to mine and extract than equivalent sources of transition metals (due in part to their similar chemical properties), making the rare-earth elements relatively expensive. Their industrial use was very limited until efficient separation techniques were developed, such as ion exchange, fractional crystallization, and liquid–liquid extraction during the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Some ilmenite concentrates contain small amounts of scandium and other rare-earth elements, which could be analysed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF).

Classification

Before the time that ion exchange methods and elution were available, the separation of the rare earths was primarily achieved by repeated precipitation or crystallization. In those days, the first separation was into two main groups, the cerium earths (lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, and samarium) and the yttrium earths (scandium, yttrium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium). Europium, gadolinium, and terbium were either considered as a separate group of rare-earth elements (the terbium group), or europium was included in the cerium group, and gadolinium and terbium were included in the yttrium group. In the latter case, the f-block elements are split into half: the first half (La–Eu) form the cerium group, and the second half (Gd–Yb) together with group 3 (Sc, Y, Lu) form the yttrium group. The reason for this division arose from the difference in solubility of rare-earth double sulfates with sodium and potassium. The sodium double sulfates of the cerium group are poorly soluble, those of the terbium group slightly, and those of the yttrium group are very soluble. Sometimes, the yttrium group was further split into the erbium group (dysprosium, holmium, erbium, and thulium) and the ytterbium group (ytterbium and lutetium), but today the main grouping is between the cerium and the yttrium groups. Today, the rare-earth elements are classified as light or heavy rare-earth elements, rather than in cerium and yttrium groups.

Light versus heavy classification

The classification of rare-earth elements is inconsistent between authors. The most common distinction between rare-earth elements is made by atomic numbers; those with low atomic numbers are referred to as light rare-earth elements (LREE), those with high atomic numbers are the heavy rare-earth elements (HREE), and those that fall in between are typically referred to as the middle rare-earth elements (MREE). Commonly, rare-earth elements with atomic numbers 57 to 61 (lanthanum to promethium) are classified as light and those with atomic numbers 62 and greater are classified as heavy rare-earth elements. Increasing atomic numbers between light and heavy rare-earth elements and decreasing atomic radii throughout the series causes chemical variations. Europium is exempt of this classification as it has two valence states: Eu and Eu. Yttrium is grouped as heavy rare-earth element due to chemical similarities. The break between the two groups is sometimes put elsewhere, such as between elements 63 (europium) and 64 (gadolinium). The actual metallic densities of these two groups overlap, with the "light" group having densities from 6.145 (lanthanum) to 7.26 (promethium) or 7.52 (samarium) g/cc, and the "heavy" group from 6.965 (ytterbium) to 9.32 (thulium), as well as including yttrium at 4.47. Europium has a density of 5.24.

Origin

Rare-earth elements, except scandium, are heavier than iron and thus are produced by supernova nucleosynthesis or by the s-process in asymptotic giant branch stars. In nature, spontaneous fission of uranium-238 produces trace amounts of radioactive promethium, but most promethium is synthetically produced in nuclear reactors.

Due to their chemical similarity, the concentrations of rare earths in rocks are only slowly changed by geochemical processes, making their proportions useful for geochronology and dating fossils.

Compounds

Rare-earth elements occur in nature in combination with phosphate (monazite), carbonate-fluoride (bastnäsite), and oxygen anions.

In their oxides, most rare-earth elements only have a valence of 3 and form sesquioxides (cerium forms CeO₂). Five different crystal structures are known, depending on the element and the temperature. The X-phase and the H-phase are only stable above 2000 K. At lower temperatures, there are the hexagonal A-phase, the monoclinic B-phase, and the cubic C-phase, which is the stable form at room temperature for most of the elements. The C-phase was once thought to be in space group I2₁3 (no. 199), but is now known to be in space group Ia3 (no. 206). The structure is similar to that of fluorite or cerium dioxide (in which the cations form a face-centred cubic lattice and the anions sit inside the tetrahedra of cations), except that one-quarter of the anions (oxygen) are missing. The unit cell of these sesquioxides corresponds to eight unit cells of fluorite or cerium dioxide, with 32 cations instead of 4. This is called the bixbyite structure, as it occurs in a mineral of that name ((Mn,Fe)₂O₃).

Geological distribution

As seen in the chart, rare-earth elements are found on Earth at similar concentrations to many common transition metals. The most abundant rare-earth element is cerium, which is actually the 25th most abundant element in Earth's crust, having 68 parts per million (about as common as copper). The exception is the highly unstable and radioactive promethium "rare earth" is quite scarce. The longest-lived isotope of promethium has a half-life of 17.7 years, so the element exists in nature in only negligible amounts (approximately 572 g in the entire Earth's crust). Promethium is one of the two elements that do not have stable (non-radioactive) isotopes and are followed by (i.e. with higher atomic number) stable elements (the other being technetium).

The rare-earth elements are often found together. During the sequential accretion of the Earth, the dense rare-earth elements were incorporated into the deeper portions of the planet. Early differentiation of molten material largely incorporated the rare earths into mantle rocks. The high field strength and large ionic radii of rare earths make them incompatible with the crystal lattices of most rock-forming minerals, so REE will undergo strong partitioning into a melt phase if one is present. REE are chemically very similar and have always been difficult to separate, but the gradual decrease in ionic radius from light REE (LREE) to heavy REE (HREE), called the lanthanide contraction, can produce a broad separation between light and heavy REE. The larger ionic radii of LREE make them generally more incompatible than HREE in rock-forming minerals, and will partition more strongly into a melt phase, while HREE may prefer to remain in the crystalline residue, particularly if it contains HREE-compatible minerals like garnet. The result is that all magma formed from partial melting will always have greater concentrations of LREE than HREE, and individual minerals may be dominated by either HREE or LREE, depending on which range of ionic radii best fits the crystal lattice.

Among the anhydrous rare-earth phosphates, it is the tetragonal mineral xenotime that incorporates yttrium and the HREE, whereas the monoclinic monazite phase incorporates cerium and the LREE preferentially. The smaller size of the HREE allows greater solid solubility in the rock-forming minerals that make up Earth's mantle, and thus yttrium and the HREE show less enrichment in Earth's crust relative to chondritic abundance than does cerium and the LREE. This has economic consequences: large ore bodies of LREE are known around the world and are being exploited. Ore bodies for HREE are more rare, smaller, and less concentrated. Most of the current supply of HREE originates in the "ion-absorption clay" ores of Southern China. Some versions provide concentrates containing about 65% yttrium oxide, with the HREE being present in ratios reflecting the Oddo–Harkins rule: even-numbered REE at abundances of about 5% each, and odd-numbered REE at abundances of about 1% each. Similar compositions are found in xenotime or gadolinite.

Well-known minerals containing yttrium, and other HREE, include gadolinite, xenotime, samarskite, euxenite, fergusonite, yttrotantalite, yttrotungstite, yttrofluorite (a variety of fluorite), thalenite, and yttrialite. Small amounts occur in zircon, which derives its typical yellow fluorescence from some of the accompanying HREE. The zirconium mineral eudialyte, such as is found in southern Greenland, contains small but potentially useful amounts of yttrium. Of the above yttrium minerals, most played a part in providing research quantities of lanthanides during the discovery days. Xenotime is occasionally recovered as a byproduct of heavy-sand processing, but is not as abundant as the similarly recovered monazite (which typically contains a few percent of yttrium). Uranium ores from Ontario have occasionally yielded yttrium as a byproduct.

Well-known minerals containing cerium, and other LREE, include bastnäsite, monazite, allanite, loparite, ancylite, parisite, lanthanite, chevkinite, cerite, stillwellite, britholite, fluocerite, and cerianite. Monazite (marine sands from Brazil, India, or Australia; rock from South Africa), bastnäsite (from Mountain Pass rare earth mine, or several localities in China), and loparite (Kola Peninsula, Russia) have been the principal ores of cerium and the light lanthanides.

Enriched deposits of rare-earth elements at the surface of the Earth, carbonatites and pegmatites, are related to alkaline plutonism, an uncommon kind of magmatism that occurs in tectonic settings where there is rifting or that are near subduction zones. In a rift setting, the alkaline magma is produced by very small degrees of partial melting (<1%) of garnet peridotite in the upper mantle (200 to 600 km depth). This melt becomes enriched in incompatible elements, like the rare-earth elements, by leaching them out of the crystalline residue. The resultant magma rises as a diapir, or diatreme, along pre-existing fractures, and can be emplaced deep in the crust, or erupted at the surface. Typical REE enriched deposits types forming in rift settings are carbonatites, and A- and M-Type granitoids. Near subduction zones, partial melting of the subducting plate within the asthenosphere (80 to 200 km depth) produces a volatile-rich magma (high concentrations of CO₂ and water), with high concentrations of alkaline elements, and high element mobility that the rare earths are strongly partitioned into. This melt may also rise along pre-existing fractures, and be emplaced in the crust above the subducting slab or erupted at the surface. REE-enriched deposits forming from these melts are typically S-Type granitoids.

Alkaline magmas enriched with rare-earth elements include carbonatites, peralkaline granites (pegmatites), and nepheline syenite. Carbonatites crystallize from CO₂-rich fluids, which can be produced by partial melting of hydrous-carbonated lherzolite to produce a CO₂-rich primary magma, by fractional crystallization of an alkaline primary magma, or by separation of a CO₂-rich immiscible liquid from. These liquids are most commonly forming in association with very deep Precambrian cratons, like the ones found in Africa and the Canadian Shield. Ferrocarbonatites are the most common type of carbonatite to be enriched in REE, and are often emplaced as late-stage, brecciated pipes at the core of igneous complexes; they consist of fine-grained calcite and hematite, sometimes with significant concentrations of ankerite and minor concentrations of siderite. Large carbonatite deposits enriched in rare-earth elements include Mount Weld in Australia, Thor Lake in Canada, Zandkopsdrift in South Africa, and Mountain Pass in the USA. Peralkaline granites (A-Type granitoids) have very high concentrations of alkaline elements and very low concentrations of phosphorus; they are deposited at moderate depths in extensional zones, often as igneous ring complexes, or as pipes, massive bodies, and lenses. These fluids have very low viscosities and high element mobility, which allows for the crystallization of large grains, despite a relatively short crystallization time upon emplacement; their large grain size is why these deposits are commonly referred to as pegmatites. Economically viable pegmatites are divided into Lithium-Cesium-Tantalum (LCT) and Niobium-Yttrium-Fluorine (NYF) types; NYF types are enriched in rare-earth minerals. Examples of rare-earth pegmatite deposits include Strange Lake in Canada and Khaladean-Buregtey in Mongolia. Nepheline syenite (M-Type granitoids) deposits are 90% feldspar and feldspathoid minerals. They are deposited in small, circular massifs and contain high concentrations of rare-earth-bearing accessory minerals. For the most part, these deposits are small but important examples include Illimaussaq-Kvanefeld in Greenland, and Lovozera in Russia.

Rare-earth elements can also be enriched in deposits by secondary alteration either by interactions with hydrothermal fluids or meteoric water or by erosion and transport of resistate REE-bearing minerals. Argillization of primary minerals enriches insoluble elements by leaching out silica and other soluble elements, recrystallizing feldspar into clay minerals such kaolinite, halloysite, and montmorillonite. In tropical regions where precipitation is high, weathering forms a thick argillized regolith, this process is called supergene enrichment and produces laterite deposits; heavy rare-earth elements are incorporated into the residual clay by absorption. This kind of deposit is only mined for REE in Southern China, where the majority of global heavy rare-earth element production occurs. REE-laterites do form elsewhere, including over the carbonatite at Mount Weld in Australia. REE may also be extracted from placer deposits if the sedimentary parent lithology contains REE-bearing, heavy resistate minerals.

In 2011, Yasuhiro Kato, a geologist at the University of Tokyo who led a study of Pacific Ocean seabed mud, published results indicating the mud could hold rich concentrations of rare-earth minerals. The deposits, studied at 78 sites, came from "ot plumes from hydrothermal vents pull these materials out of seawater and deposit them on the seafloor, bit by bit, over tens of millions of years. One square patch of metal-rich mud 2.3 kilometers wide might contain enough rare earths to meet most of the global demand for a year, Japanese geologists report in Nature Geoscience." "I believe that rareearth resources undersea are much more promising than on-land resources," said Kato. "oncentrations of rare earths were comparable to those found in clays mined in China. Some deposits contained twice as much heavy rare earths such as dysprosium, a component of magnets in hybrid car motors."

The global demand for rare-earth elements (REEs) is expected to increase more than fivefold by 2030.

Geochemistry

The REE geochemical classification is usually done on the basis of their atomic weight. One of the most common classifications divides REE into 3 groups: light rare earths (LREE - from ₅₇La to ₆₀Nd), intermediate (MREE - from ₆₂Sm to ₆₇Ho) and heavy (HREE - from ₆₈Er to ₇₁Lu). REE usually appear as trivalent ions, except for Ce and Eu which can take the form of Ce and Eu depending on the redox conditions of the system. Consequentially, REE are characterized by a substantial identity in their chemical reactivity, which results in a serial behaviour during geochemical processes rather than being characteristic of a single element of the series. Sc, Y, and Lu can be electronically distinguished from the other rare earths because they do not have f valence electrons, whereas the others do, but the chemical behaviour is almost the same.

A distinguishing factor in the geochemical behaviour of the REE is linked to the so-called "lanthanide contraction" which represents a higher-than-expected decrease in the atomic/ionic radius of the elements along the series. This is determined by the variation of the shielding effect towards the nuclear charge due to the progressive filling of the 4f orbital which acts against the electrons of the 6s and 5d orbitals. The lanthanide contraction has a direct effect on the geochemistry of the lanthanides, which show a different behaviour depending on the systems and processes in which they are involved. The effect of the lanthanide contraction can be observed in the REE behaviour both in a CHARAC-type geochemical system (CHArge-and-RAdius-Controlled) where elements with similar charge and radius should show coherent geochemical behaviour, and in non-CHARAC systems, such as aqueous solutions, where the electron structure is also an important parameter to consider as the lanthanide contraction affects the ionic potential. A direct consequence is that, during the formation of coordination bonds, the REE behaviour gradually changes along the series. Furthermore, the lanthanide contraction causes the ionic radius of Ho (0.901 Å) to be almost identical to that of Y (0.9 Å), justifying the inclusion of the latter among the REE.

Applications

The application of rare-earth elements to geology is important to understanding the petrological processes of igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rock formation. In geochemistry, rare-earth elements can be used to infer the petrological mechanisms that have affected a rock due to the subtle atomic size differences between the elements, which causes preferential fractionation of some rare earths relative to others depending on the processes at work.

The geochemical study of the REE is not carried out on absolute concentrations – as it is usually done with other chemical elements – but on normalized concentrations in order to observe their serial behaviour. In geochemistry, rare-earth elements are typically presented in normalized "spider" diagrams, in which concentration of rare-earth elements are normalized to a reference standard and are then expressed as the logarithm to the base 10 of the value.

Commonly, the rare-earth elements are normalized to chondritic meteorites, as these are believed to be the closest representation of unfractionated Solar System material. However, other normalizing standards can be applied depending on the purpose of the study. Normalization to a standard reference value, especially of a material believed to be unfractionated, allows the observed abundances to be compared to the initial abundances of the element. Normalization also removes the pronounced 'zig-zag' pattern caused by the differences in abundance between even and odd atomic numbers. Normalization is carried out by dividing the analytical concentrations of each element of the series by the concentration of the same element in a given standard, according to the equation:

${\displaystyle _{n}={\frac {_{\text{sam}}}{_{\text{std}}}}}$

where n indicates the normalized concentration, ${\displaystyle {_{\text{sam}}}}$ the analytical concentration of the element measured in the sample, and ${\displaystyle {_{\text{ref}}}}$ the concentration of the same element in the reference material.

It is possible to observe the serial trend of the REE by reporting their normalized concentrations against the atomic number. The trends that are observed in "spider" diagrams are typically referred to as "patterns", which may be diagnostic of petrological processes that have affected the material of interest.

According to the general shape of the patterns or thanks to the presence (or absence) of so-called "anomalies", information regarding the system under examination and the occurring geochemical processes can be obtained. The anomalies represent enrichment (positive anomalies) or depletion (negative anomalies) of specific elements along the series and are graphically recognizable as positive or negative "peaks" along the REE patterns. The anomalies can be numerically quantified as the ratio between the normalized concentration of the element showing the anomaly and the predictable one based on the average of the normalized concentrations of the two elements in the previous and next position in the series, according to the equation:

${\displaystyle {\frac {{\text{REE}}_{i}}{{\text{REE}}_{i}^{*}}}={\frac {_{n}\times 2}{_{n}+_{n}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle _{n}}$ is the normalized concentration of the element whose anomaly has to be calculated, ${\displaystyle _{n}}$ and ${\displaystyle _{n}}$ the normalized concentrations of the respectively previous and next elements along the series.

The rare-earth elements patterns observed in igneous rocks are primarily a function of the chemistry of the source where the rock came from, as well as the fractionation history the rock has undergone. Fractionation is in turn a function of the partition coefficients of each element. Partition coefficients are responsible for the fractionation of trace elements (including rare-earth elements) into the liquid phase (the melt/magma) into the solid phase (the mineral). If an element preferentially remains in the solid phase it is termed 'compatible', and if it preferentially partitions into the melt phase it is described as 'incompatible'. Each element has a different partition coefficient, and therefore fractionates into solid and liquid phases distinctly. These concepts are also applicable to metamorphic and sedimentary petrology.

In igneous rocks, particularly in felsic melts, the following observations apply: anomalies in europium are dominated by the crystallization of feldspars. Hornblende, controls the enrichment of MREE compared to LREE and HREE. Depletion of LREE relative to HREE may be due to the crystallization of olivine, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene. On the other hand, the depletion of HREE relative to LREE may be due to the presence of garnet, as garnet preferentially incorporates HREE into its crystal structure. The presence of zircon may also cause a similar effect.

In sedimentary rocks, rare-earth elements in clastic sediments are a representation of provenance. The rare-earth element concentrations are not typically affected by sea and river waters, as rare-earth elements are insoluble and thus have very low concentrations in these fluids. As a result, when sediment is transported, rare-earth element concentrations are unaffected by the fluid and instead the rock retains the rare-earth element concentration from its source.

Sea and river waters typically have low rare-earth element concentrations. However, aqueous geochemistry is still very important. In oceans, rare-earth elements reflect input from rivers, hydrothermal vents, and aeolian sources; this is important in the investigation of ocean mixing and circulation.

Rare-earth elements are also useful for dating rocks, as some radioactive isotopes display long half-lives. Of particular interest are the La-Ce, Sm-Nd, and Lu-Hf systems.

Production

Until 1948, most of the world's rare earths were sourced from placer sand deposits in India and Brazil. Through the 1950s, South Africa was the world's rare earth source, from a monazite-rich reef at the Steenkampskraal mine in Western Cape province. Through the 1960s until the 1980s, the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in California made the United States the leading producer. Today, the Indian and South African deposits still produce some rare-earth concentrates, but they were dwarfed by the scale of Chinese production. In 2017, China produced 81% of the world's rare-earth supply, mostly in Inner Mongolia, although it had only 36.7% of reserves. Australia was the second and only other major producer with 15% of world production. All of the world's heavy rare earths (such as dysprosium) come from Chinese rare-earth sources such as the polymetallic Bayan Obo deposit. The Browns Range mine, located 160 km south east of Halls Creek in northern Western Australia, was under development in 2018 and is positioned to become the first significant dysprosium producer outside of China.

REE is increasing in demand due to the fact that they are essential for new and innovative technology that is being created. These new products that need REEs to be produced are high-technology equipment such as smart phones, digital cameras, computer parts, semiconductors, etc. In addition, these elements are more prevalent in the following industries: renewable energy technology, military equipment, glass making, and metallurgy. Increased demand has strained supply, and there is growing concern that the world may soon face a shortage of the rare earths. In several years from 2009 worldwide demand for rare-earth elements is expected to exceed supply by 40,000 tonnes annually unless major new sources are developed. In 2013, it was stated that the demand for REEs would increase due to the dependence of the EU on these elements, the fact that rare-earth elements cannot be substituted by other elements and that REEs have a low recycling rate. Furthermore, due to the increased demand and low supply, future prices are expected to increase and there is a chance that countries other than China will open REE mines. In addition there are over a hundred ongoing mining projects with many options outside of China.

China

These concerns have intensified due to the actions of China, the predominant supplier. Specifically, China has announced regulations on exports and a crackdown on smuggling. On September 1, 2009, China announced plans to reduce its export quota to 35,000 tons per year in 2010–2015 to conserve scarce resources and protect the environment. On October 19, 2010, China Daily, citing an unnamed Ministry of Commerce official, reported that China will "further reduce quotas for rare-earth exports by 30 percent at most next year to protect the precious metals from over-exploitation." The government in Beijing further increased its control by forcing smaller, independent miners to merge into state-owned corporations or face closure. At the end of 2010, China announced that the first round of export quotas in 2011 for rare earths would be 14,446 tons, which was a 35% decrease from the previous first round of quotas in 2010. China announced further export quotas on 14 July 2011 for the second half of the year with total allocation at 30,184 tons with total production capped at 93,800 tonnes. In September 2011, China announced the halt in production of three of its eight major rare-earth mines, responsible for almost 40% of China's total rare-earth production. In March 2012, the US, EU, and Japan confronted China at WTO about these export and production restrictions. China responded with claims that the restrictions had environmental protection in mind. In August 2012, China announced a further 20% reduction in production. The United States, Japan, and the European Union filed a joint lawsuit with the World Trade Organization in 2012 against China, arguing that China should not be able to deny such important exports.

In response to the opening of new mines in other countries (Lynas in Australia and Molycorp in the United States), prices of rare earths dropped. The price of dysprosium oxide was US$994/kg in 2011, but dropped to US$265/kg by 2014.

On August 29, 2014, the WTO ruled that China had broken free-trade agreements, and the WTO said in the summary of key findings that "the overall effect of the foreign and domestic restrictions is to encourage domestic extraction and secure preferential use of those materials by Chinese manufacturers." China declared that it would implement the ruling on September 26, 2014, but would need some time to do so. By January 5, 2015, China had lifted all quotas from the export of rare earths, but export licenses will still be required.

In 2019, China supplied between 85% and 95% of the global demand for the 17 rare-earth powders, half of them sourced from Myanmar. After the 2021 military coup in that country, future supplies of critical ores were possibly constrained. Additionally, it was speculated that the PRC could again reduce rare-earth exports to counter-act economic sanctions imposed by the US and EU countries. Rare-earth metals serve as crucial materials for electric vehicle manufacturing and high-tech military applications.

Myanmar (Burma)

Kachin State in Myanmar is the world's largest source of rare earths. In 2021, China imported US$200 million of rare earths from Myanmar in December 2021, exceeding 20,000 tonnes. Rare earths were discovered near Pang War in Chipwi Township along the China–Myanmar border in the late 2010s. As China has shut down domestic mines due to the detrimental environmental impact, it has largely outsourced rare-earth mining to Kachin State. Chinese companies and miners illegally set up operations in Kachin State without government permits, and instead circumvent the central government by working with a Border Guard Force militia under the Tatmadaw, formerly known as the New Democratic Army – Kachin, which has profited from this extractive industry. As of March 2022, 2,700 mining collection pools scattered across 300 separate locations were found in Kachin State, encompassing the area of Singapore, and an exponential increase from 2016. Land has also been seized from locals to conduct mining operations.

Other countries

As a result of the increased demand and tightening restrictions on exports of the metals from China, some countries are stockpiling rare-earth resources. Searches for alternative sources in Australia, Brazil, Canada, South Africa, Tanzania, Greenland, and the United States are ongoing. Mines in these countries were closed when China undercut world prices in the 1990s, and it will take a few years to restart production as there are many barriers to entry. Significant sites under development outside China include Steenkampskraal in South Africa, the world's highest grade rare earths and thorium mine, closed in 1963, but has been gearing to go back into production. Over 80% of the infrastructure is already complete. Other mines include the Nolans Project in Central Australia, the Bokan Mountain project in Alaska, the remote Hoidas Lake project in northern Canada, and the Mount Weld project in Australia. The Hoidas Lake project has the potential to supply about 10% of the $1 billion of REE consumption that occurs in North America every year. Vietnam signed an agreement in October 2010 to supply Japan with rare earths from its northwestern Lai Châu Province, however the deal was never realized due to disagreements.

The largest rare-earth deposit in the U.S. is at Mountain Pass, California, sixty miles south of Las Vegas. Originally opened by Molycorp, the deposit has been mined, off and on, since 1951. A second large deposit of REEs at Elk Creek in southeast Nebraska is under consideration by NioCorp Development Ltd who hopes to open a niobium, scandium, and titanium mine there. That mine may be able to produce as much as 7200 tonnes of ferro niobium and 95 tonnes of scandium trioxide annually, although, as of 2022, financing is still in the works.

In the UK, Pensana has begun construction of their US$195 million rare-earth processing plant which secured funding from the UK government's Automotive Transformation Fund. The plant will process ore from the Longonjo mine in Angola and other sources as they become available. The company are targeting production in late 2023, before ramping up to full capacity in 2024. Pensana aim to produce 12,500 metric tons of separated rare earths, including 4,500 tons of magnet metal rare earths.

Also under consideration for mining are sites such as Thor Lake in the Northwest Territories, and various locations in Vietnam. Additionally, in 2010, a large deposit of rare-earth minerals was discovered in Kvanefjeld in southern Greenland. Pre-feasibility drilling at this site has confirmed significant quantities of black lujavrite, which contains about 1% rare-earth oxides (REO). The European Union has urged Greenland to restrict Chinese development of rare-earth projects there, but as of early 2013, the government of Greenland has said that it has no plans to impose such restrictions. Many Danish politicians have expressed concerns that other nations, including China, could gain influence in thinly populated Greenland, given the number of foreign workers and investment that could come from Chinese companies in the near future because of the law passed December 2012.

In central Spain, Ciudad Real Province, the proposed rare-earth mining project 'Matamulas' may provide, according to its developers, up to 2,100 Tn/year (33% of the annual UE demand). However, this project has been suspended by regional authorities due to social and environmental concerns.

Adding to potential mine sites, ASX listed Peak Resources announced in February 2012, that their Tanzanian-based Ngualla project contained not only the 6th largest deposit by tonnage outside of China but also the highest grade of rare-earth elements of the 6.

North Korea has been reported to have exported rare-earth ore to China, about US$1.88 million worth during May and June 2014.

In May 2012, researchers from two universities in Japan announced that they had discovered rare earths in Ehime Prefecture, Japan.

On 12 January 2023, Swedish state-owned mining company LKAB announced that it had discovered a deposit of over 1 million tonnes of rare earths in the country's Kiruna area, which would make it the largest such deposit in Europe.

China processes about 90% of the world's REEs and 60% of the world's lithium. As a result, the European Union imports practically all of its rare earth elements from China. The EU Critical Raw Materials Act of 2023 has set in action the required policy adjustments for Europe to start producing two-thirds of the lithium-ion batteries required for electric vehicles and energy storage. In 2024, an EU backed lithium mining project created large scale protests in Serbia.

In 2024 American Rare Earths Inc. disclosed that its reserves near Wheatland Wyoming totaled 2.34 billion metric tons, possibly the world's largest and larger than a separate 1.2 million metric ton deposit in northeastern Wyoming.

In June 2024, Rare Earths Norway found a rare-earth oxide deposit of 8.8 million metric tons in Telemark, Norway, making it Europe's largest known rare-earth element deposit. The mining firm predicted that it would finish developing the first stage of mining in 2030.

Malaysian refining plans

In early 2011, Australian mining company Lynas was reported to be "hurrying to finish" a US$230 million rare-earth refinery on the eastern coast of Peninsular Malaysia's industrial port of Kuantan. The plant would refine ore — lanthanides concentrate from the Mount Weld mine in Australia. The ore would be trucked to Fremantle and transported by container ship to Kuantan. Within two years, Lynas was said to expect the refinery to be able to meet nearly a third of the world's demand for rare-earth materials, not counting China. The Kuantan development brought renewed attention to the Malaysian town of Bukit Merah in Perak, where a rare-earth mine operated by a Mitsubishi Chemical subsidiary, Asian Rare Earth, closed in 1994 and left continuing environmental and health concerns. In mid-2011, after protests, Malaysian government restrictions on the Lynas plant were announced. At that time, citing subscription-only Dow Jones Newswire reports, a Barrons report said the Lynas investment was $730 million, and the projected share of the global market it would fill put at "about a sixth." An independent review initiated by the Malaysian Government, and conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2011 to address concerns of radioactive hazards, found no non-compliance with international radiation safety standards.

However, the Malaysian authorities confirmed that as of October 2011, Lynas was not given any permit to import any rare-earth ore into Malaysia. On February 2, 2012, the Malaysian AELB (Atomic Energy Licensing Board) recommended that Lynas be issued a temporary operating license subject to meeting a number of conditions. On 2 September 2014, Lynas was issued a 2-year full operating stage license by the AELB.

On November 17 2024, economy minister Rafizi Ramli said he hoped Malaysia is able to produce rare-earth elements within three years, through discussions with China to provide technology. In the past, plans to mine rare-earth elements at Kedah caused concerns of destroying forest reserves and harming water catchment areas.

Other sources

Mine tailings

Significant quantities of rare-earth oxides are found in tailings accumulated from 50 years of uranium ore, shale, and loparite mining at Sillamäe, Estonia. Due to the rising prices of rare earths, extraction of these oxides has become economically viable. The country currently exports around 3,000 tonnes per year, representing around 2% of world production. Similar resources are suspected in the western United States, where gold rush-era mines are believed to have discarded large amounts of rare earths, because they had no value at the time.

Ocean mining

In January 2013 a Japanese deep-sea research vessel obtained seven deep-sea mud core samples from the Pacific Ocean seafloor at 5,600 to 5,800 meters depth, approximately 250 kilometres (160 mi) south of the island of Minami-Tori-Shima. The research team found a mud layer 2 to 4 meters beneath the seabed with concentrations of up to 0.66% rare-earth oxides. A potential deposit might compare in grade with the ion-absorption-type deposits in southern China that provide the bulk of Chinese REO mine production, which grade in the range of 0.05% to 0.5% REO.

Waste and recycling

Another recently developed source of rare earths is electronic waste and other wastes that have significant rare-earth components. Advances in recycling technology have made the extraction of rare earths from these materials less expensive. Recycling plants operate in Japan, where an estimated 300,000 tons of rare earths are found in unused electronics. In France, the Rhodia group is setting up two factories, in La Rochelle and Saint-Fons, that will produce 200 tons of rare earths a year from used fluorescent lamps, magnets, and batteries. Coal and coal by-products, such as ash and sludge, are a potential source of critical elements including rare-earth elements (REE) with estimated amounts in the range of 50 million metric tons.

Methods

One study mixed fly ash with carbon black and then sent a 1-second current pulse through the mixture, heating it to 3,000 °C (5,430 °F). The fly ash contains microscopic bits of glass that encapsulate the metals. The heat shatters the glass, exposing the rare earths. Flash heating also converts phosphates into oxides, which are more soluble and extractable. Using hydrochloric acid at concentrations less than 1% of conventional methods, the process extracted twice as much material.

Properties

According to chemistry professor Andrea Sella, rare-earth elements differ from other elements, in that when looked at analytically, they are virtually inseparable, having almost the same chemical properties. However, in terms of their electronic and magnetic properties, each one occupies a unique technological niche that nothing else can. For example, "the rare-earth elements praseodymium (Pr) and neodymium (Nd) can both be embedded inside glass and they completely cut out the glare from the flame when one is doing glass-blowing."

Uses

Global REE consumption, 2015

US consumption of REE, 2018

The uses, applications, and demand for rare-earth elements have expanded over the years. Globally, most REEs are used for catalysts and magnets. In the US, more than half of REEs are used for catalysts; ceramics, glass, and polishing are also main uses.

Other important uses of rare-earth elements are applicable to the production of high-performance magnets, alloys, glasses, and electronics. Ce and La are important as catalysts, and are used for petroleum refining and as diesel additives. Nd is important in magnet production in traditional and low-carbon technologies. Rare-earth elements in this category are used in the electric motors of hybrid and electric vehicles, generators in some wind turbines, hard disc drives, portable electronics, microphones, and speakers.

Ce, La, and Nd are important in alloy making, and in the production of fuel cells and nickel-metal hydride batteries. Ce, Ga, and Nd are important in electronics and are used in the production of LCD and plasma screens, fiber optics, and lasers, and in medical imaging. Additional uses for rare-earth elements are as tracers in medical applications, fertilizers, and in water treatment.

REEs have been used in agriculture to increase plant growth, productivity, and stress resistance seemingly without negative effects for human and animal consumption. REEs are used in agriculture through REE-enriched fertilizers which is a widely used practice in China. In addition, REEs are feed additives for livestock which has resulted in increased production such as larger animals and a higher production of eggs and dairy products. However, this practice has resulted in REE bioaccumulation within livestock and has impacted vegetation and algae growth in these agricultural areas. Additionally while no ill effects have been observed at current low concentrations the effects over the long term and with accumulation over time are unknown prompting some calls for more research into their possible effects.

Environmental considerations

REEs are naturally found in very low concentrations in the environment. Mines are often in countries where environmental and social standards are very low, leading to human rights violations, deforestation, and contamination of land and water. Generally, it is estimated that extracting 1 tonne of rare earth element creates around 2,000 tonnes of waste, partly toxic, including 1 ton of radioactive waste. The largest mining site of REEs, Bayan Obo in China produced more than 70,000 tons of radioactive waste, that contaminated ground water.

Near mining and industrial sites, the concentrations of REEs can rise to many times the normal background levels. Once in the environment, REEs can leach into the soil where their transport is determined by numerous factors such as erosion, weathering, pH, precipitation, groundwater, etc. Acting much like metals, they can speciate depending on the soil condition being either motile or adsorbed to soil particles. Depending on their bio-availability, REEs can be absorbed into plants and later consumed by humans and animals. The mining of REEs, use of REE-enriched fertilizers, and the production of phosphorus fertilizers all contribute to REE contamination. Furthermore, strong acids are used during the extraction process of REEs, which can then leach out into the environment and be transported through water bodies and result in the acidification of aquatic environments. Another additive of REE mining that contributes to REE environmental contamination is cerium oxide (CeO
₂), which is produced during the combustion of diesel and released as exhaust, contributing heavily to soil and water contamination.

Mining, refining, and recycling of rare earths have serious environmental consequences if not properly managed. Low-level radioactive tailings resulting from the occurrence of thorium and uranium in rare-earth ores present a potential hazard and improper handling of these substances can result in extensive environmental damage. In May 2010, China announced a major, five-month crackdown on illegal mining in order to protect the environment and its resources. This campaign is expected to be concentrated in the South, where mines – commonly small, rural, and illegal operations – are particularly prone to releasing toxic waste into the general water supply. However, even the major operation in Baotou, in Inner Mongolia, where much of the world's rare-earth supply is refined, has caused major environmental damage. China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology estimated that cleanup costs in Jiangxi province at $5.5 billion.

It is, however, possible to filter out and recover any rare-earth elements that flow out with the wastewater from mining facilities. However, such filtering and recovery equipment may not always be present on the outlets carrying the wastewater.

Recycling and reusing REEs

The rare-earth elements (REEs) are vital to modern technologies and society and are amongst the most critical elements. Despite this, typically only around 1% of REEs are recycled from end-products. Recycling and reusing REEs is not easy: these elements are mostly present in tiny amounts in small electronic parts and they are difficult to separate chemically. For example, recovery of neodymium requires manual disassembly of hard disk drives because shredding the drives only recovers 10% of the REE.

REE recycling and reuse have been increasingly focused on in recent years. The main concerns include environmental pollution during REE recycling and increasing recycling efficiency. Literature published in 2004 suggests that, along with previously established pollution mitigation, a more circular supply chain would help mitigate some of the pollution at the extraction point. This means recycling and reusing REEs that are already in use or reaching the end of their life cycle. A study published in 2014 suggests a method to recycle REEs from waste nickel-metal hydride batteries, demonstrating a recovery rate of 95.16%. Rare-earth elements could also be recovered from industrial wastes with practical potential to reduce environmental and health impacts from mining, waste generation, and imports if known and experimental processes are scaled up. A study suggests that "fulfillment of the circular economy approach could reduce up to 200 times the impact in the climate change category and up to 70 times the cost due to the REE mining." In most of the reported studies reviewed by a scientific review, "secondary waste is subjected to chemical and or bioleaching followed by solvent extraction processes for clean separation of REEs."

Currently, people take two essential resources into consideration for the secure supply of REEs: one is to extract REEs from primary resources like mines harboring REE-bearing ores, regolith-hosted clay deposits, ocean bed sediments, coal fly ash, etc. A work developed a green system for recovery of REEs from coal fly ash by using citrate and oxalate who are strong organic ligand and capable of complexing or precipItating with REE. The other one is from secondary resources such as electronic, industrial waste and municipal waste. E-waste contains a significant concentration of REEs, and thus is the primary option for REE recycling now. According to a study, approximately 50 million metric tons of electronic waste are dumped in landfills worldwide each year. Despite the fact that e-waste contains a significant amount of rare-earth elements (REE), only 12.5% of e-waste is currently being recycled for all metals.

Impact of REE contamination

On vegetation

The mining of REEs has caused the contamination of soil and water around production areas, which has impacted vegetation in these areas by decreasing chlorophyll production, which affects photosynthesis and inhibits the growth of the plants. However, the impact of REE contamination on vegetation is dependent on the plants present in the contaminated environment: not all plants retain and absorb REEs. Also, the ability of the vegetation to intake the REE is dependent on the type of REE present in the soil, hence there are a multitude of factors that influence this process. Agricultural plants are the main type of vegetation affected by REE contamination in the environment, the two plants with a higher chance of absorbing and storing REEs being apples and beets. Furthermore, there is a possibility that REEs can leach out into aquatic environments and be absorbed by aquatic vegetation, which can then bio-accumulate and potentially enter the human food chain if livestock or humans choose to eat the vegetation. An example of this situation was the case of the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in China, where the water was contaminated due to a REE-enriched fertilizer being used in a nearby agricultural area. The aquatic environment became contaminated with cerium and resulted in the water hyacinth becoming three times more concentrated in cerium than its surrounding water.

On human health

The chemical properties of the REEs are so similar that they are expected to show similar toxicity in humans. Mortality studies show REEs are not highly toxic. Long term (18 months) inhalation of dust containing high levels (60%) of REEs has been shown to cause pneumoconiosis but the mechanism is unknown.

While REEs are not major pollutants, the increase application of REEs in new technologies has increased the need to understand their safe levels of exposure for humans. One side effect of mining REEs can be exposure to harmful radioactive Thorium as has been demonstrated at large mine in Batou (Mongolia). The rare-earth mining and smelting process can release airborne fluoride which will associate with total suspended particles (TSP) to form aerosols that can enter human respiratory systems. Research from Baotou, China shows that the fluoride concentration in the air near REE mines is higher than the limit value from WHO, but the health effects of this exposure are unknown.

Analysis of people living near mines in China had many times the levels of REEs in their blood, urine, bone, and hair compared to controls far from mining sites, suggesting possible bioaccumulation of REEs. This higher level was related to the high levels of REEs present in the vegetables they cultivated, the soil, and the water from the wells, indicating that the high levels were caused by the nearby mine. However the levels found were not high enough to cause health effects. Analysis of REEs in street dust in China suggest "no augmented health hazard". Similarly, analysis of cereal crops in mining areas in China found levels too low for health risks.

On animal health

Experiments exposing rats to various cerium compounds have found accumulation primarily in the lungs and liver. This resulted in various negative health outcomes associated with those organs. REEs have been added to feed in livestock to increase their body mass and increase milk production. They are most commonly used to increase the body mass of pigs, and it was discovered that REEs increase the digestibility and nutrient use of pigs' digestive systems. Studies point to a dose-response when considering toxicity versus positive effects. While small doses from the environment or with proper administration seem to have no ill effects, larger doses have been shown to have negative effects specifically in the organs where they accumulate. The process of mining REEs in China has resulted in soil and water contamination in certain areas, which when transported into aquatic bodies could potentially bio-accumulate within aquatic biota. Furthermore, in some cases, animals that live in REE-contaminated areas have been diagnosed with organ or system problems. REEs have been used in freshwater fish farming because it protects the fish from possible diseases. One main reason why they have been avidly used in animal livestock feeding is that they have had better results than inorganic livestock feed enhancers.

Remediation after pollution

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (May 2019)

After the 1982 Bukit Merah radioactive pollution, the mine in Malaysia has been the focus of a US$100 million cleanup that is proceeding in 2011. After having accomplished the hilltop entombment of 11,000 truckloads of radioactively contaminated material, the project is expected to entail in summer, 2011, the removal of "more than 80,000 steel barrels of radioactive waste to the hilltop repository."

In May 2011, after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, widespread protests took place in Kuantan over the Lynas refinery and radioactive waste from it. The ore to be processed has very low levels of thorium, and Lynas founder and chief executive Nicholas Curtis said "There is absolutely no risk to public health." T. Jayabalan, a doctor who says he has been monitoring and treating patients affected by the Mitsubishi plant, "is wary of Lynas's assurances. The argument that low levels of thorium in the ore make it safer doesn't make sense, he says, because radiation exposure is cumulative." Construction of the facility has been halted until an independent United Nations IAEA panel investigation is completed, which is expected by the end of June 2011. New restrictions were announced by the Malaysian government in late June.

An IAEA panel investigation was completed and no construction has been halted. Lynas is on budget and on schedule to start producing in 2011. The IAEA concluded in a report issued in June 2011 that it did not find any instance of "any non-compliance with international radiation safety standards" in the project.

If the proper safety standards are followed, REE mining is relatively low impact. Molycorp (before going bankrupt) often exceeded environmental regulations to improve its public image.

In Greenland, there is a significant dispute on whether to start a new rare-earth mine in Kvanefjeld due to environmental concerns.

Geopolitical considerations

China has officially cited resource depletion and environmental concerns as the reasons for a nationwide crackdown on its rare-earth mineral production sector. However, non-environmental motives have also been imputed to China's rare-earth policy. According to The Economist, "Slashing their exports of rare-earth metals ... is all about moving Chinese manufacturers up the supply chain, so they can sell valuable finished goods to the world rather than lowly raw materials." Furthermore, China currently has an effective monopoly on the world's REE Value Chain. (All of the refineries and processing plants that transform the raw ore into valuable elements.) In the words of Deng Xiaoping, a Chinese politician from the late 1970s to the late 1980s, "The Middle East has oil; we have rare earths ... it is of extremely important strategic significance; we must be sure to handle the rare earth issue properly and make the fullest use of our country's advantage in rare-earth resources."

One possible example of market control is the division of General Motors that deals with miniaturized magnet research, which shut down its US office and moved its entire staff to China in 2006 (China's export quota only applies to the metal but not products made from these metals such as magnets).

It was reported, but officially denied, that China instituted an export ban on shipments of rare-earth oxides (but not alloys) to Japan on 22 September 2010, in response to the detainment of a Chinese fishing boat captain by the Japanese Coast Guard. On September 2, 2010, a few days before the fishing boat incident, The Economist reported that "China ... in July announced the latest in a series of annual export reductions, this time by 40% to precisely 30,258 tonnes."

The United States Department of Energy in its 2010 Critical Materials Strategy report identified dysprosium as the element that was most critical in terms of import reliance.

A 2011 report "China's Rare-Earth Industry", issued by the US Geological Survey and US Department of the Interior, outlines industry trends within China and examines national policies that may guide the future of the country's production. The report notes that China's lead in the production of rare-earth minerals has accelerated over the past two decades. In 1990, China accounted for only 27% of such minerals. In 2009, world production was 132,000 metric tons; China produced 129,000 of those tons. According to the report, recent patterns suggest that China will slow the export of such materials to the world: "Owing to the increase in domestic demand, the Government has gradually reduced the export quota during the past several years." In 2006, China allowed 47 domestic rare-earth producers and traders and 12 Sino-foreign rare-earth producers to export. Controls have since tightened annually; by 2011, only 22 domestic rare-earth producers and traders and 9 Sino-foreign rare-earth producers were authorized. The government's future policies will likely keep in place strict controls: "According to China's draft rare-earth development plan, annual rare-earth production may be limited to between 130,000 and 140,000 during the period from 2009 to 2015. The export quota for rare-earth products may be about 35,000 and the Government may allow 20 domestic rare-earth producers and traders to export rare earths."

The United States Geological Survey is actively surveying southern Afghanistan for rare-earth deposits under the protection of United States military forces. Since 2009 the USGS has conducted remote sensing surveys as well as fieldwork to verify Soviet claims that volcanic rocks containing rare-earth metals exist in Helmand Province near the village of Khanashin. The USGS study team has located a sizable area of rocks in the center of an extinct volcano containing light rare-earth elements including cerium and neodymium. It has mapped 1.3 million metric tons of desirable rock, or about ten years of supply at current demand levels. The Pentagon has estimated its value at about $7.4 billion.

It has been argued that the geopolitical importance of rare earths has been exaggerated in the literature on the geopolitics of renewable energy, underestimating the power of economic incentives for expanded production. This especially concerns neodymium. Due to its role in permanent magnets used for wind turbines, it has been argued that neodymium will be one of the main objects of geopolitical competition in a world running on renewable energy. But this perspective has been criticized for failing to recognize that most wind turbines have gears and do not use permanent magnets.

In popular culture

The plot of Eric Ambler's now-classic 1967 international crime-thriller Dirty Story (aka This Gun for Hire, but not to be confused with the movie This Gun for Hire (1942)) features a struggle between two rival mining cartels to control a plot of land in a fictional African country, which contains rich minable rare-earth ore deposits.

See also

• List of elements facing shortage
• Material passport: lists used materials in products
• Pensana Salt End
• Precious metal
• Rare-earth magnet
• Rare-earth mineral

References

1. The 1985 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry "Red Book" (p. 45) recommends that lanthanoid is used rather than lanthanide. The ending "-ide" normally indicates a negative ion. However, owing to wide current usage, "lanthanide" is still allowed and is roughly analogous to rare-earth element.
   International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2005). Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2005). Cambridge (UK): RSC–IUPAC. ISBN 0-85404-438-8. p. 51. Electronic version.
2. ^ Professor of Chemistry at University College London, Andrea Sella, Andrea Sella: "Insight: Rare-earth metals" on YouTube, Interview on TRT World / Oct 2016, minutes 4:40 - ff.
3. T Gray (2007). "Lanthanum and Cerium". The Elements. Black Dog & Leventhal. pp. 118–122.
4. "Rare earths: Neither rare, nor earths". BBC News. March 23, 2014. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
5. Lee, Jordy. "Rare Earths Explained". Milken Institute Review. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
6. Huang, Jing; Yu, Zheng; Chistoserdova, Ludmila (June 26, 2018). "Lanthanide-Dependent Methanol Dehydrogenases of XoxF4 and XoxF5 Clades Are Differentially Distributed Among Methylotrophic Bacteria and They Reveal Different Biochemical Properties". Frontiers in Microbiology. 9: 1366. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01366. PMC 6028718. PMID 29997591.
7. Malhotra, Nemi; Hsu, Hua-Shu; Liang, Sung-Tzu; Roldan, Marri Jmelou M.; Lee, Jiann-Shing; Ger, Tzong-Rong; Hsiao, Chung-Der (September 16, 2020). "An Updated Review of Toxicity Effect of the Rare Earth Elements (REEs) on Aquatic Organisms". Animals. 10 (9): 1663. doi:10.3390/ani10091663. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 552131. PMID 32947815.
8. ^ Haxel G.; Hedrick J.; Orris J. (2002). Peter H. Stauffer; James W. Hendley II (eds.). "Rare Earth Elements—Critical Resources for High Technology" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. USGS Fact Sheet: 087-02. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 14, 2010. Retrieved March 13, 2012. However, in contrast to ordinary base and precious metals, REE have very little tendency to become concentrated in exploitable ore deposits. Consequently, most of the world's supply of REE comes from only a handful of sources, almost entirely as a byproduct of mining other elements in commercially exploitable concentrations they occur alongside.
9. Keith R. Long; Bradley S. Van Gosen; Nora K. Foley; Daniel Cordier. "The Geology of Rare Earth Elements". Geology.com. Archived from the original on October 26, 2021. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
10. Lide, David R., ed. (1996–1997). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (77th ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 10–12. ISBN 0-8493-0477-6.
11. ^ C. R. Hammond. "Section 4; The Elements". In David R. Lide (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. (Internet Version 2009) (89th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
12. "Rare-earth metals". Think GlobalGreen. Archived from the original on November 4, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
13. Fronzi, M (2019). "Theoretical insights into the hydrophobicity of low index CeO₂ surfaces". Applied Surface Science. 478: 68–74. arXiv:1902.02662. Bibcode:2019ApSS..478...68F. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.208. S2CID 118895100. Archived from the original on April 10, 2022. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
14. Fritz Ullmann, ed. (2003). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Vol. 31. Contributor: Matthias Bohnet (6th ed.). Wiley-VCH. p. 24. ISBN 978-3-527-30385-4.
15. Mentioned by Prof. Andrea Sella on a BBC Business Daily programme, March 19, 2014 . Unfortunately this mnemonic doesn't distinguish very well between terbium and thulium.
16. Gschneidner K. A., Cappellen, ed. (1987). "1787–1987 Two hundred Years of Rare Earths". Rare Earth Information Center, IPRT, North-Holland. IS-RIC 10.
17. ^ "The History and Future of Rare Earth Elements". Science History Institute. October 18, 2019. Retrieved January 31, 2023.
18. History of the Origin of the Chemical Elements and Their Discoverers
19. Stephen David Barrett; Sarnjeet S. Dhesi (2001). The Structure of Rare-earth Metal Surfaces. World Scientific. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-86094-165-8.
20. On Rare And Scattered Metals: Tales About Metals, Sergei Venetsky
21. Spedding F., Daane A. H.: "The Rare Earths", John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1961.
22. Qi, Dezhi (2018). Hydrometallurgy of Rare Earths. Elsevier. pp. 162–165. ISBN 978-0-12-813920-2.
23. "Популярная библиотека химических элементов. Гадолиний" [Popular library of chemical elements. Gadolinium]. n-t.ru (in Russian). Retrieved January 7, 2020. Reprinted from "Гадолиний" [Gadolinium]. Популярная библиотека химических элементов. Серебро — Нильсборий и далее [Popular library of chemical elements. Silver through nielsbohrium and beyond] (in Russian). Nauka. 1977. Но с гадолиния начинается иттриевая подгруппа редкоземельных элементов, а это значит, что на электронных оболочках его атомов должны быть электроны с антипараллельными спинами.
24. B. Smith Hopkins: "Chemistry of the rarer elements", D. C. Heath & Company, 1923.
25. McGill, Ian. "Rare Earth Elements". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Vol. 31. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. p. 184. doi:10.1002/14356007.a22_607. ISBN 978-3527306732.
26. Zepf, Volker (2013). Rare earth elements: a new approach to the nexus of supply, demand and use: exemplified along the use of neodymium in permanent magnets. Berlin; London: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-35458-8.
27. ^ Rollinson, Hugh R. (1993). Using geochemical data: evaluation, presentation, interpretation. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical. ISBN 978-0-582-06701-1. OCLC 27937350.
28. ^ Brownlow, Arthur H (1996). Geochemistry. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-398272-5. OCLC 33044175.
29. ^ Working Group (December 2011). "Rare Earth Elements" (PDF). Geological Society of London. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 9, 2022. Retrieved May 18, 2018.
30. "Seltene Erden – Daten & Fakten" (PDF). Öko-Institut e.V. January 2011.
31. William Zachariasen (January 11, 1927). "The Crystal Structure of the Modification C of the Sesquioxides of the Rare Earth Metals, and of Indium and Thallium" (PDF). Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift. 9: 310–316.
32. M. V. Abrashev; N. D. Todorov; J. Geshev (September 9, 2014). "Raman spectra of R 2O3 (R—rare earth) sesquioxides with C-type bixbyite crystal structure: A comparative study". Journal of Applied Physics. 116 (10): 103508. Bibcode:2014JAP...116j3508A. doi:10.1063/1.4894775. hdl:10183/107858. S2CID 55024339.
33. P. Belli; R. Bernabei; F. Cappella; R. Cerulli; C. J. Dai; F. A. Danevich; A. d'Angelo; A. Incicchitti; V. V. Kobychev; S. S. Nagorny; S. Nisi; F. Nozzoli; D. Prosperi; V. I. Tretyak; S. S. Yurchenko (2007). "Search for α decay of natural Europium". Nuclear Physics A. 789 (1–4): 15–29. Bibcode:2007NuPhA.789...15B. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.001.
34. ^ Winter, John D. (2010). Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-321-59257-6. OCLC 262694332.
35. ^ Jébrak, Michel; Marcoux, Eric; Laithier, Michelle; Skipwith, Patrick (2014). Geology of mineral resources (2nd ed.). St. John's, NL: Geological Association of Canada. ISBN 978-1-897095-73-7. OCLC 933724718.
36. ^ Powell, Devin, "Rare earth elements plentiful in ocean sediments", ScienceNews, 3 July 2011. Via Kurt Brouwer's Fundmastery Blog Archived July 10, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, MarketWatch, 2011-07-05. Retrieved 2011-07-05.
37. Kato, Yasuhiro; Fujinaga, Koichiro; Nakamura, Kentaro; Takaya, Yutaro; Kitamura, Kenichi; Ohta, Junichiro; Toda, Ryuichi; Nakashima, Takuya; Iwamori, Hikaru (2011). "Deep-sea mud in the Pacific Ocean as a potential resource for rare-earth elements". Nature Geoscience. 4 (8): 535–539. Bibcode:2011NatGe...4..535K. doi:10.1038/ngeo1185. ISSN 1752-0908.
38. "Press corner". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
39. ^ "Europe Must Get Serious About Critical Minerals". European Investment Bank. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
40. Bau, Michael (April 1, 1996). "Controls on the fractionation of isovalent trace elements in magmatic and aqueous systems: evidence from Y/Ho, Zr/Hf, and lanthanide tetrad effect". Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 123 (3): 323–333. Bibcode:1996CoMP..123..323B. doi:10.1007/s004100050159. ISSN 1432-0967. S2CID 97399702.
41. Alibo, Dia Sotto; Nozaki, Yoshiyuki (February 1, 1999). "Rare earth elements in seawater: particle association, shale-normalization, and Ce oxidation". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 63 (3): 363–372. Bibcode:1999GeCoA..63..363S. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00279-8. ISSN 0016-7037.
42. Rose, Edward Roderick (February 4, 1960). "Rare Earths of the Grenville Sub-Province, Ontario and Quebec" (PDF). Ottawa: Geological Survey of Canada. Retrieved May 18, 2018.
43. ^ China's Rare Earth Dominance, Wikinvest. Retrieved on 11 Aug 2010.
44. Gambogi, Joseph (January 2018). "Rare Earths" (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries. U.S. Geological Survey. pp. 132–133. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 25, 2019. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
45. Chao E. C. T., Back J. M., Minkin J., Tatsumoto M., Junwen W., Conrad J. E., McKee E. H., Zonglin H., Qingrun M. "Sedimentary carbonate‐hosted giant Bayan Obo REE‐Fe‐Nb ore deposit of Inner Mongolia, China; a cornerstone example for giant polymetallic ore deposits of hydrothermal origin" Archived January 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. 1997. United States Geological Survey. 29 February 2008. Bulletin 2143.
46. "Overview". Northern Minerals Limited. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
47. "The Rare-Earth Elements—Vital to Modern Technologies and Lifestyles" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. November 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 19, 2022. Retrieved March 13, 2018.
48. "Cox C. 2008. Rare earth innovation. Herndon (VA): The Anchor House Inc;". Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved April 19, 2008.
49. ^ "As hybrid cars gobble rare metals, shortage looms" Archived June 5, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. Reuters. August 31, 2009. Retrieved Aug 31, 2009.
50. Massari, Stefania; Ruberti, Marcello (March 1, 2013). "Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies". Resources Policy. 38 (1): 36–43. Bibcode:2013RePol..38...36M. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.07.001. ISSN 0301-4207.
51. Liu, Shuang-Liang; Fan, Hong-Rui; Liu, Xuan; Meng, Jianyin; Butcher, Alan R.; Yann, Lahaye; Yang, Kui-Feng; Li, Xiao-Chun (June 1, 2023). "Global rare earth elements projects: New developments and supply chains". Ore Geology Reviews. 157: 105428. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105428. ISSN 0169-1368.
52. Ma, Damien (April 25, 2012). "China Digs It". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on April 10, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
53. ^ Livergood, R. (October 5, 2010). "Rare Earth Elements: A Wrench in the Supply Chain" (PDF). Center for Strategic and International Studies. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 12, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
54. "China To Limit Rare Earths Exports". Manufacturing.net, 1 September 2009. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2010.
55. Ben Geman (October 19, 2009). "China to cut exports of 'rare earth' minerals vital to energy tech". The Hill's E Wire. Archived from the original on October 21, 2010. Retrieved October 19, 2010.
56. Tony Jin (January 18, 2011). "China's Rare Earth Exports Surge in Value". The China Perspective. Archived from the original on February 13, 2011. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
57. Zhang Qi; Ding Qingfen; Fu Jing (July 15, 2011). "Rare earths export quota unchanged". China Daily. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011.
58. ^ "China halts rare earth production at three mines". Reuters. September 6, 2011. Archived from the original on April 10, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2011.
59. "WRAPUP 4-US, EU, Japan take on China at WTO over rare earths". Reuters. March 13, 2017. Archived from the original on June 26, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
60. ^ "Rare Earths: The Hidden Cost to Their Magic", Distillations Podcast and transcript, Episode 242". Science History Institute. June 25, 2019. Archived from the original on August 3, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
61. Kevin Voigt (August 8, 2012). "China cuts mines vital to tech industry". CNN. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved August 8, 2012.
62. Tim Worstall (December 23, 2012). "El Reg man: Too bad, China – I was RIGHT about hoarding rare earths". The Register. Archived from the original on February 1, 2020. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
63. "China scraps quotas on rare earths after WTO complaint". The Guardian. January 5, 2015. Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
64. "DS431: China — Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum". World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on June 30, 2022. Retrieved May 1, 2014.
65. R. Castellano (Jun. 02, 2019). "China Trade - Invest Based On Rare Earth Price Hikes" Archived June 26, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. seekingalpha.com. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
66. S. Burns (Feb. 16, 2021). "Rare earths are the next geopolitical chess game" Archived June 15, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. MetalMiner.com. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
67. "New evidence shows massive and rapid expansion of illicit rare earths industry in Myanmar, fuelling human rights abuses, environmental destruction and funding military-linked militias". Global Witness. August 9, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
68. ^ "Myanmar's poisoned mountains". Global Witness. August 9, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
69. "Illegal rare earth mining harms environment in Myanmar's Kachin state". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
70. Makichuk, Dave (May 3, 2021). "Is Myanmar's junta benefiting from rare-earth boom?". Asia Times. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
71. "EU stockpiles rare earths as tensions with China rise". Financial Post. Reuters. September 6, 2011. Archived from the original on July 19, 2014. Retrieved September 7, 2011.
72. "Canadian Firms Step Up Search for Rare-Earth Metals". The New York Times. Reuters. September 9, 2009. Archived from the original on April 10, 2022. Retrieved September 15, 2009.
73. ^ Leifert, H. (June 2010). "Restarting US rare earth production?". Earth. pp. 20–21.
74. Casey, Jessica, ed. (February 5, 2022). "Monoceros Mineral Resources invests in Steenkampskraal Rare Earths". Global Mining Review.
75. "About The Mine". Steenkampskraal Rare Earths Mine. May 3, 2016. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2019.
76. Lunn, J. (2006). "Great western minerals" (PDF). London: Insigner Beaufort Equity Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 9, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2008.
77. Gorman, Steve (August 30, 2009). "California mine digs in for 'green' gold rush". Reuters. Archived from the original on April 10, 2022. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
78. "Hoidas Lake, Saskatchewan". Great Western Mineral Group Ltd. Archived from the original on March 31, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
79. "Rare earths supply deal between Japan and Vietnam". BBC News. October 31, 2010. Archived from the original on July 3, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
80. "Vietnam signs major nuclear pacts". AlJazeera. October 31, 2010. Retrieved October 31, 2010.
81. VnExpress. "Gần 10 năm chưa khai thác được đất hiếm". vnexpress.net (in Vietnamese). Retrieved December 24, 2022.
82. "Mountain Pass Mine". Mindat. Archived from the original on September 9, 2022.
83. ^ Lasley, Shane (September 6, 2022). "Elk Creek deposit proves to be rare earth". Metal Tech News. Archived from the original on September 9, 2022.
84. "Mining Venture Draws $200 Million in Tax Incentives and Red Flags (1)". news.bloombergtax.com. Archived from the original on June 18, 2022. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
85. "Long-discussed niobium mine in southeast Nebraska is ready to move forward, if it gathers $1 billion in financing". Archived from the original on May 11, 2020. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
86. "NioCorp Superalloy Materials The Elk Creek Superalloy Materials Project" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2021. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
87. "Building an independent and sustainable supply of magnet metal rare earths for the Electric Vehicle and Offshore Wind OEMs" (PDF). Pensana Plc. August 18, 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 9, 2022.
88. Arnoldi, Marleny (May 25, 2022). "Pensana confirms $494m capital cost for its Saltend, Longonjo operations". Mining Weekly. Archived from the original on July 12, 2022.
89. "Pensana breaks ground at Saltend and secures ATF funding" (PDF). Pensana PLC. July 22, 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 22, 2022.
90. "UK's first magnet refinery given huge financial boost as first ever strategy for supply of critical minerals published". GOV.UK. July 22, 2022.
91. "Federal minister approves N.W.T. rare earth mine". CBC News. November 4, 2013. Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2013. It follows the recommendation from the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Review Board in July, and marks a major milestone in the company's effort to turn the project into an operating mine. Avalon claims Nechalacho is "the most advanced large heavy rare earth development project in the world".
92. "Rare Earth Elements at Kvanefjeld". Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd. Archived from the original on September 18, 2010. Retrieved November 10, 2010.
93. "New Multi-Element Targets and Overall Resource Potential". Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd. Archived from the original on November 18, 2010. Retrieved November 10, 2010.
94. Carol Matlack (February 10, 2013). "Chinese Workers—in Greenland?". Business Week. Archived from the original on February 13, 2013. Retrieved March 9, 2013.
95. Bomsdorf, Clemens (March 13, 2013). "Greenland Votes to Get Tough on Investors". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
96. "Hay tierras raras aquí y están... en un lugar de La Mancha". ELMUNDO (in Spanish). May 24, 2019. Archived from the original on June 23, 2022. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
97. "Maiden Resource, Ngualla Rare Earth Project" (PDF). ASX Release. Peak Resources. February 29, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 16, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
98. Petrov, Leonid (August 8, 2012). "Rare earths bankroll North Korea's future". Asia Times. Archived from the original on August 8, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2018.
99. "북한, 올 5~6월 희토류 중국 수출 크게 늘어" [North Korea Rare Earth exports to China increased significantly from May to June]. voakorea.com (in Korean). July 28, 2014. Archived from the original on March 30, 2019. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
100. "Japan Discovers Domestic Rare Earths Reserve". BrightWire. Archived from the original on July 23, 2012.
101. "Sweden's LKAB finds Europe's biggest deposit of rare-earth metals". Reuters. January 13, 2023.
102. Chee, Foo Yun; Blenkinsop, Philip; Chee, Foo Yun (November 13, 2023). "EU agrees mineral supply targets to cut reliance on China". Reuters. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
103. "Securing the EU's supply of critical raw materials" (PDF).
104. Ferreira Santos, Sofia (August 10, 2024). "Thousands protest against lithium mining in Serbia". BBC. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
105. Maio, Pat (February 7, 2024). "Rare Earths Discovery Near Wheatland So Big It Could Be World Leader". cowboystatedaily.com. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
106. Meredith, Sam (June 11, 2024). "Norway discovers Europe's largest deposit of rare earth metals". CNBC. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
107. Bradsher, Keith (March 8, 2011). "Taking a Risk for Rare Earths". The New York Times. (March 9, 2011 p. B1 NY ed.). Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved March 9, 2011.
108. "Kronologi Peristiwa di Kilang Nadir Bumi, Bukit Merah" [Chronology of Events at the Rare Earth Factory, Red Hill] (in Malay). Penang Consumer Association. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
109. ^ Bradsher, Keith (March 8, 2011). "Mitsubishi Quietly Cleans Up Its Former Refinery". The New York Times. (March 9, 2011 p. B4 NY ed.). Archived from the original on December 29, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2011.
110. ^ Coleman, Murray (June 30, 2011). "Rare Earth ETF Jumps As Plans To Break China's Hold Suffer Setback". Barron's. Archived from the original on July 3, 2011. Retrieved June 30, 2011.
111. Report of the International Review Mission on the Radiation Safety Aspects of a Proposed Rare Earths Processing Facility (Lynas Project) (PDF). (29 May – 3 June 2011). International Atomic Energy Agency. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2011. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
112. Ng, Eileen (September 2, 2014). "Lynas gets full operating licence before TOL expiry date". The Malaysian Insider. Archived from the original on September 4, 2014. Retrieved September 3, 2014.
113. Reporters, F. M. T. (November 17, 2024). "Govt targets domestic REE processing within 3 years". Free Malaysia Today | FMT. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
114. Reporters, F. M. T. (December 3, 2020). "Ministry pours cold water on Kedah's rare earth mining plans". Free Malaysia Today | FMT. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
115. Rahman, Noorazura Abdul (October 17, 2024). "NGO claims logging activities behind Kedah's worsening floods | New Straits Times". NST Online. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
116. Rofer, Cheryl K.; Tõnis Kaasik (2000). Turning a Problem Into a Resource: Remediation and Waste Management at the Sillamäe Site, Estonia. Volume 28 of NATO science series: Disarmament technologies. Springer. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-7923-6187-9.
117. Anneli Reigas (November 30, 2010). "Estonia's rare earth break China's market grip". AFP. Archived from the original on May 13, 2012. Retrieved December 1, 2010.
118. Cone, Tracie (July 21, 2013). "Gold Rush Trash is Information Age Treasure". USA Today. Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
119. "Seabed offers brighter hope in rare-earth hunt". Nikkei Asian Review. Nikkei Inc. November 25, 2014. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
120. "Discovery of rare earths around Minami-Torishima". UTokyo Research. University of Tokyo. May 2, 2013. Archived from the original on June 20, 2018. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
121. Zhi Li, Ling; Yang, Xiaosheng (September 4, 2014). China's rare earth ore deposits and beneficiation techniques (PDF). 1st European Rare Earth Resources Conference. Milos, Greece: European Commission for the 'Development of a sustainable exploitation scheme for Europe's Rare Earth ore deposits'. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 19, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
122. Um, Namil (July 2017). Hydrometallurgical recovery process of rare-earth elements from waste: main application of acid leaching with devised diagram. INTECH. pp. 41–60. ISBN 978-953-51-3401-5.
123. "New liquid extraction frontier for rare earths?". Recycling International. March 26, 2013. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
124. Tabuchi, Hiroko (October 5, 2010). "Japan Recycles Minerals From Used Electronics". New York Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
125. "Rhodia to recycle rare earths from magnets". Solvay — Rhodia. October 3, 2011. Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
126. "Rhodia expands rare earth recycling reach". Recycling International. October 11, 2011. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
127. Sorokin, Anatoliy P; Konyushok, Andrey A; Ageev, Oleg A; Zarubina, Natalia V; Ivanov, Vladimir V; Wang, Jinxi (2019). "Distribution of rare earth and selected trace elements in combustion products of Yerkovetskoe brown coal deposit (Amur Region, Russia)". Energy Exploration & Exploitation. 37 (6): 1721–1736. doi:10.1177/0144598719862416. ISSN 0144-5987. JSTOR 26785615.
128. Wencai Zhang; Mohammad Rezaee; Abhijit Bhagavatula; Yonggai Li; John Groppo; Rick Honaker (2015). "A Review of the Occurrence and Promising Recovery Methods of Rare Earth Elements from Coal and Coal By-Products". International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. 35 (6): 295–330. Bibcode:2015IJCPU..35..295Z. doi:10.1080/19392699.2015.1033097. S2CID 128509001.
129. Kean, Sam (February 9, 2022). "An electric jolt salvages valuable metals from waste". www.science.org. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
130. ^ Zhou, Baolu; Li, Zhongxue; Chen, Congcong (October 25, 2017). "Global Potential of Rare Earth Resources and Rare Earth Demand from Clean Technologies". Minerals. 7 (11): 203. Bibcode:2017Mine....7..203Z. doi:10.3390/min7110203. See production in Figure 1 on page 2
131. ^ "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019". Mineral Commodity Summaries. 2019. p. 132. doi:10.3133/70202434. S2CID 239335855. Archived from the original on June 29, 2018. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
132. F. J. Duarte (Ed.), Tunable Lasers Handbook (Academic, New York, 1995).
133. ^ Pang, Xin; Li, Decheng; Peng, An (March 1, 2002). "Application of rare-earth elements in the agriculture of China and its environmental behavior in soil". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 9 (2): 143–8. Bibcode:2002ESPR....9..143P. doi:10.1007/BF02987462. ISSN 0944-1344. PMID 12008295. S2CID 11359274. Archived from the original on June 23, 2022. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
134. ^ Rim, Kyung-Taek (September 1, 2016). "Effects of rare earth elements on the environment and human health: A literature review". Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences. 8 (3): 189–200. Bibcode:2016TxEHS...8..189R. doi:10.1007/s13530-016-0276-y. ISSN 2005-9752. S2CID 17407586.
135. ^ Ali, Saleem H. (February 13, 2014). "Social and Environmental Impact of the Rare Earth Industries". Resources. 3 (1): 123–134. doi:10.3390/resources3010123.
136. Rizk, Shirley (June 21, 2019). "What colour is the cloud?". European Investment Bank. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
137. ^ Standaert, Michael (July 2, 2019). "China Wrestles with the Toxic Aftermath of Rare Earth Mining". Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on July 9, 2022. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
138. CHO, RENEE (April 5, 2023). "The Energy Transition Will Need More Rare Earth Elements. Can We Secure Them Sustainably?". State of the planet. Columbia Climate School. Retrieved September 27, 2023.
139. ^ Volokh, A. A.; Gorbunov, A. V.; Gundorina, S. F.; Revich, B. A.; Frontasyeva, M. V.; Chen Sen Pal (June 1, 1990). "Phosphorus fertilizer production as a source of rare-earth elements pollution of the environment". Science of the Total Environment. 95: 141–148. Bibcode:1990ScTEn..95..141V. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(90)90059-4. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 2169646.
140. Bourzac, Katherine. "Can the US Rare-Earth Industry Rebound?" Archived May 14, 2012, at the Wayback Machine Technology Review. October 29, 2010.
141. "Thorium - Cancer-Causing Substances - NCI". www.cancer.gov. March 20, 2015. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
142. "Govt cracks whip on rare earth mining". China Mining Association. May 21, 2010. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2010.
143. Lee Yong-tim (February 22, 2008). "South China Villagers Slam Pollution From Rare Earth Mine". Radio Free Asia. Archived from the original on April 20, 2022. Retrieved March 16, 2008.
144. ^ Bradsher, Keith (October 29, 2010). "After China's Rare Earth Embargo, a New Calculus". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2010.
145. Pereao, Omoniyi; Bode-Aluko, Chris; Fatoba, Olanrewaju; Laatikaine, Katri; Petrik, Leslie (2018). "Rare earth elements removal techniques from water/wastewater: a review". Desalination and Water Treatment. 130: 71–86. Bibcode:2018DWatT.130...71P. doi:10.5004/dwt.2018.22844. ISSN 1944-3994.
146. Barros, Óscar; Costa, Lara; Costa, Filomena; Lago, Ana; Rocha, Verónica; Vipotnik, Ziva; Silva, Bruna; Tavares, Teresa (March 13, 2019). "Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Wastewater Towards a Circular Economy". Molecules. 24 (6): 1005. doi:10.3390/molecules24061005. PMC 6471397. PMID 30871164.
147. "Towards zero-waste valorization of rare earth elements". Archived from the original on June 7, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
148. Jowitt, Simon M.; Werner, Timothy T.; Weng, Zhehan; Mudd, Gavin M. (October 1, 2018). "Recycling of the rare earth elements". Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Reuse and Recycling / UN SGDs: How can Sustainable Chemistry Contribute? / Green Chemistry in Education. 13: 1–7. Bibcode:2018COGSC..13....1J. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.008. ISSN 2452-2236. S2CID 135249554.
149. ^ Balaram, V. (July 1, 2019). "Rare earth elements: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, analysis, recycling, and environmental impact". Geoscience Frontiers. 10 (4): 1285–1303. Bibcode:2019GeoFr..10.1285B. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.005. ISSN 1674-9871.
150. Sprecher, Benjamin; Xiao, Yanping; Walton, Allan; Speight, John; Harris, Rex; Kleijn, Rene; Visser, Geert; Kramer, Gert Jan (April 1, 2014). "Life Cycle Inventory of the Production of Rare Earths and the Subsequent Production of NdFeB Rare Earth Permanent Magnets". Environmental Science & Technology. 48 (7): 3951–3958. Bibcode:2014EnST...48.3951S. doi:10.1021/es404596q. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 24576005.
151. Yang, Xiuli; Zhang, Junwei; Fang, Xihui (August 30, 2014). "Rare earth element recycling from waste nickel-metal hydride batteries". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 279: 384–388. Bibcode:2014JHzM..279..384Y. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.027. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 25089667.
152. "Rare earth elements for smartphones can be extracted from coal waste". New Scientist.
153. Deng, Bing; Wang, Xin; Luong, Duy Xuan; Carter, Robert A.; Wang, Zhe; Tomson, Mason B.; Tour, James M. (2022). "Rare earth elements from waste". Science Advances. 8 (6): eabm3132. Bibcode:2022SciA....8M3132D. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm3132. PMC 8827657. PMID 35138886.
154. Amato, A.; Becci, A.; Birloaga, I.; De Michelis, I.; Ferella, F.; Innocenzi, V.; Ippolito, N. M.; Pillar Jimenez Gomez, C.; Vegliò, F.; Beolchini, F. (May 1, 2019). "Sustainability analysis of innovative technologies for the rare earth elements recovery". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 106: 41–53. Bibcode:2019RSERv.106...41A. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.029. hdl:11566/264482. ISSN 1364-0321. S2CID 115810707.
155. Jyothi, Rajesh Kumar; Thenepalli, Thriveni; Ahn, Ji Whan; Parhi, Pankaj Kumar; Chung, Kyeong Woo; Lee, Jin-Young (September 10, 2020). "Review of rare earth elements recovery from secondary resources for clean energy technologies: Grand opportunities to create wealth from waste". Journal of Cleaner Production. 267: 122048. Bibcode:2020JCPro.26722048J. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122048. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 219469381.
156. Borst, Anouk M.; Smith, Martin P.; Finch, Adrian A.; Estrade, Guillaume; Villanova-de-Benavent, Cristina; Nason, Peter; Marquis, Eva; Horsburgh, Nicola J.; Goodenough, Kathryn M.; Xu, Cheng; Kynický, Jindřich; Geraki, Kalotina (September 1, 2020). "Adsorption of rare earth elements in regolith-hosted clay deposits". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 4386. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.4386B. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17801-5. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7463018. PMID 32873784.
157. Liu, Pan; Huang, Rixiang; Tang, Yuanzhi (May 7, 2019). "Comprehensive Understandings of Rare Earth Element (REE) Speciation in Coal Fly Ashes and Implication for REE Extractability". Environmental Science & Technology. 53 (9): 5369–5377. Bibcode:2019EnST...53.5369L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00005. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 30912650. S2CID 85517653.
158. Liu, Pan; Zhao, Simin; Xie, Nan; Yang, Lufeng; Wang, Qian; Wen, Yinghao; Chen, Hailong; Tang, Yuanzhi (April 4, 2023). "Green Approach for Rare Earth Element (REE) Recovery from Coal Fly Ash". Environmental Science & Technology. 57 (13): 5414–5423. Bibcode:2023EnST...57.5414L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c09273. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 10077585. PMID 36942728.
159. ^ Chua, H (June 18, 1998). "Bio-accumulation of environmental residues of rare earth elements in aquatic flora Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms in Guangdong Province of China". Science of the Total Environment. 214 (1–3): 79–85. Bibcode:1998ScTEn.214...79C. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00055-2. ISSN 0048-9697.
160. ^ Hirano, S; Suzuki, K T (March 1996). "Exposure, metabolism, and toxicity of rare earths and related compounds". Environmental Health Perspectives. 104 (suppl 1): 85–95. doi:10.1289/ehp.96104s185. ISSN 0091-6765. PMC 1469566. PMID 8722113.
161. Rim, Kyung Taek; Koo, Kwon Ho; Park, Jung Sun (2013). "Toxicological Evaluations of Rare Earths and Their Health Impacts to Workers: A Literature Review". Safety and Health at Work. 4 (1): 12–26. doi:10.5491/shaw.2013.4.1.12. PMC 3601293. PMID 23516020.
162. Chen, X. A., et al. "A twenty-year follow-up study on health effects-following long-term exposure to thorium dusts." HEIR 2004 (2005): 139.
163. Zhong, Buqing; Wang, Lingqing; Liang, Tao; Xing, Baoshan (October 2017). "Pollution level and inhalation exposure of ambient aerosol fluoride as affected by polymetallic rare earth mining and smelting in Baotou, north China". Atmospheric Environment. 167: 40–48. Bibcode:2017AtmEn.167...40Z. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.014.
164. Li, Xiaofei; Chen, Zhibiao; Chen, Zhiqiang; Zhang, Yonghe (October 1, 2013). "A human health risk assessment of rare earth elements in soil and vegetables from a mining area in Fujian Province, Southeast China". Chemosphere. 93 (6): 1240–1246. Bibcode:2013Chmsp..93.1240L. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.085. ISSN 0045-6535. PMID 23891580.
165. Sun, Guangyi; Li, Zhonggen; Liu, Ting; Chen, Ji; Wu, Tingting; Feng, Xinbin (December 1, 2017). "Rare earth elements in street dust and associated health risk in a municipal industrial base of central China". Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 39 (6): 1469–1486. Bibcode:2017EnvGH..39.1469S. doi:10.1007/s10653-017-9982-x. ISSN 0269-4042. PMID 28550599. S2CID 31655372. Archived from the original on February 25, 2021. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
166. Zhuang, Maoqiang; Wang, Liansen; Wu, Guangjian; Wang, Kebo; Jiang, Xiaofeng; Liu, Taibin; Xiao, Peirui; Yu, Lianlong; Jiang, Ying (August 29, 2017). "Health risk assessment of rare earth elements in cereals from mining area in Shandong, China". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 9772. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.9772Z. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10256-7. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5575011. PMID 28852170.
167. ^ Pagano, Giovanni; Aliberti, Francesco; Guida, Marco; Oral, Rahime; Siciliano, Antonietta; Trifuoggi, Marco; Tommasi, Franca (2015). "Rare earth elements in human and animal health: State of art and research priorities". Environmental Research. 142: 215–220. Bibcode:2015ER....142..215P. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.039. hdl:11586/148470. PMID 26164116.
168. Redling, Kerstin (2006). Rare Earth Elements in Agriculture with Emphasis on Animal Husbandry (Dissertation). LMU München: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved April 5, 2018.
169. Lee, Yoolim, "Malaysia Rare Earths in Largest Would-Be Refinery Incite Protest" Archived September 11, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Bloomberg Markets Magazine, May 31, 2011 5:00 PM ET.
170. "UN investigation into Malaysia rare-earth plant safety" Archived June 22, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, BBC, 30 May 2011 05:52 ET.
171. IAEA Submits Lynas Report to Malaysian Government Archived October 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Iaea.org (2011-06-29). Retrieved on 2011-09-27.
172. Tim Heffernan (June 16, 2015). "Why rare-earth mining in the West is a bust". High Country News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2021. Retrieved September 26, 2017.
173. "Greenland votes, split on rare earth metals mining". Deutsche Welle. June 4, 2021. Archived from the original on June 21, 2022. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
174. "The Difference Engine: More precious than gold" Archived April 23, 2018, at the Wayback Machine. The Economist September 17, 2010.
175. Barakos, G; Gutzmer, J; Mischo, H (2016). "Strategic evaluations and mining process optimization towards a strong global REE supply chain". Journal of Sustainable Mining. 15 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jsm.2016.05.002.
176. "Value Chain". Investopedia. Archived from the original on June 10, 2022. Retrieved September 26, 2017.
177. Dian L. Chu (November 11, 2010). "Seventeen Metals: 'The Middle East has oil, China has rare earth'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022. Retrieved September 27, 2017.
178. Cox, C. (November 16, 2006). "Rare earth innovation: the silent shift to China". The Anchor House, Inc. Archived from the original on April 21, 2008. Retrieved February 29, 2008.
179. Bradsher, Keith (September 22, 2010). "Amid Tension, China Blocks Vital Exports to Japan". The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
180. James T. Areddy, David Fickling And Norihiko Shirouzu (September 23, 2010). "China Denies Halting Rare-Earth Exports to Japan". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
181. Backlash over the alleged China curb on metal exports Archived April 15, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, Daily Telegraph, London, 29 Aug 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-30.
182. "Rare earths: Digging in" The Economist September 2, 2010.
183. Mills, Mark P. "Tech's Mineral Infrastructure – Time to Emulate China's Rare Earth Policies." Archived May 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine Forbes, 1 January 2010.
184. "US Geological Survey: China's Rare-Earth Industry". Journalist's Resource.org. July 18, 2011.
185. Simpson, S. (October 2011). "Afghanistan's Buried Riches". Scientific American.
186. Trakimavicius, Lukas (February 25, 2021). "EU, U.S. exploring new sources of Rare Earth Minerals, should China limit exports". Energy Post. Archived from the original on February 15, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
187. ^ Overland, Indra (March 1, 2019). "The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths". Energy Research & Social Science. 49: 36–40. Bibcode:2019ERSS...49...36O. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018. hdl:11250/2579292. ISSN 2214-6296.
188. "Book Reviews, Sites, Romance, Fantasy, Fiction". Kirkus Reviews.

External links

External media
Audio
"Rare Earths: The Hidden Cost to Their Magic", Distillations Podcast and transcript, Episode 242, June 25, 2019, Science History Institute
Video
"10 ways rare earth elements make life better", animation, Science History Institute
"Rare-Earth Elements: The Intersection of Science and Society", presentation and discussion led by Ira Flatow, Science History Institute, September 24, 2019

• Media related to Rare earth elements at Wikimedia Commons
• Rare-earth element at the Encyclopædia Britannica

• Rare earth elements
• Metallic elements
• Sets of chemical elements