Misplaced Pages

Talk:Myanmar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:20, 23 September 2024 edit2409:40e0:1b:35b7:454a:6791:f570:89d6 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:49, 19 November 2024 edit undoUnsungHistory (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users542 edits Kingdom of Ava missing under 'Formation': ReplyTag: Reply 
(12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 49: Line 49:
}} }}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}}

== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-05-07T17:25:53.929942 | Myint Swe on 30 March 2016.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 17:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

== Lead section readability and relevance ==

The lead section currently has four paragraphs, none of which are short. However, approximately one-third to one-half of the material in those four paragraphs is detailed explanations of relatively distant history.

I propose to modify the lead section in the following way:

1. Keep the current first paragraph as is.

2. Move the current fourth paragraph to be directly after the first one.

3. Transfer the current second paragraph, along with approximately the first half of the current third paragraph, into the History section.

4. ... which leaves the second half of the current third paragraph as the ending of the lead section.


It's not ideal, but I think it would be an improvement. In my opinion, the current amount of detail about old history doesn't belong in the lead section. ] (]) 15:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

:The history is certainly excessive and should be collapsed into one shorter paragraph, and the lead in general is a bit lengthy. Generally history is the second paragraph, and the last paragraph contains the details on the foreign relations. Perhaps the fourth paragraph can be split rather than being completely shifted. ] (]) 01:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma == == Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma ==
Line 95: Line 71:


The Kingdom of Ava is missing in the history section between Pagan and Taungoo Era. https://en.wikipedia.org/Kingdom_of_Ava ] (]) 02:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC) The Kingdom of Ava is missing in the history section between Pagan and Taungoo Era. https://en.wikipedia.org/Kingdom_of_Ava ] (]) 02:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

:{{not done}},Please provide a source ] (]) (]) 20:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

== Rhoticity of English pronunciation of "Myanmar"/"Burma" ==

{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}}

The "Etymology" section would benefit from a reference to the article ]

Please change "non-rhotic variety of English" to "]" ] (]) 22:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (] / ] / ]) 05:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
::I appreciate it! ] (]) 20:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

== Rohingya genocide ==

I noticed that the history section largely jumps from 2016 to 2020 without mentioning the Rohingya persecution in 2017, which seems a notable event that got a lot of international attention, at a minimum resulted in mass migration, etc. Is there a reason it wouldn't be appropriate to mention here? -] (]) 08:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

:Further comment: I do see that the topic is presented within Government and politics> Human rights and internal conflicts> Genocide allegations and crimes against Rohingya people.
:Given the international attention, demographic changes to the country, refugee crisis, etc., I am not sure it doesn't belong in "history" too.
:However, even within the aforementioned section, the "2013 onwards" seems to have minimal commentary on the 2016-2017 period. At the beginning of the genocide allegations section, there is a "see also" link to "2016–17 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar" (which is not the current name of the linked article - I'd think we should link to the current name regardless rather than engaging in a separate debate) but those events aren't really mentioned much in the "2013 onwards" section of this article.
:I think there could be some improvement here. -] (]) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
::@] I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing ], and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. ] (]) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:49, 19 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Myanmar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former featured article candidateMyanmar is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 7, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 16, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 24, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 4, 2008, January 4, 2009, January 4, 2010, January 4, 2011, March 27, 2011, January 4, 2012, and January 4, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article candidate
This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconCountries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMyanmar Top‑importance
WikiProject icon Myanmar is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Misplaced Pages. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Misplaced Pages aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconAsia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoutheast Asia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBuddhism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
          Other talk page banners
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

There is more than one name for this country. Strong arguments exist for the use of both names as an article title; however, the most recent requested move discussion found that the article title should be at Myanmar. Burma redirects there.

  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, No consensus, 12 October 2011, discussion
  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, Not moved, 8 August 2012, discussion
    • MRV, Burma → Myanmar, Endorsed, 26 August 2012, discussion
  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, Moved, 7 August 2015, discussion
Older discussions:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14


This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
121.121.169.99 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --AntiDionysius (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023

This edit request to Burma has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Yeminthein2023 (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Myanmar /en.wikipedia.org/Myanmar

Global edit find Pagan replace Bagan. WaTaAng (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Both terms exist and have their own Wikipages: Bagan and Pagan Kingdom. Can be done only on a case-by-case basis after a careful read. Rasnaboy (talk) 05:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Kingdom of Ava missing under 'Formation'

The Kingdom of Ava is missing in the history section between Pagan and Taungoo Era. https://en.wikipedia.org/Kingdom_of_Ava 77.187.165.0 (talk) 02:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done,Please provide a source UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 20:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Rhoticity of English pronunciation of "Myanmar"/"Burma"

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The "Etymology" section would benefit from a reference to the article Rhoticity in English

Please change "non-rhotic variety of English" to "non-rhotic variety of English" Troglodv (talk) 22:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate it! Troglodv (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Rohingya genocide

I noticed that the history section largely jumps from 2016 to 2020 without mentioning the Rohingya persecution in 2017, which seems a notable event that got a lot of international attention, at a minimum resulted in mass migration, etc. Is there a reason it wouldn't be appropriate to mention here? -KaJunl (talk) 08:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Further comment: I do see that the topic is presented within Government and politics> Human rights and internal conflicts> Genocide allegations and crimes against Rohingya people.
Given the international attention, demographic changes to the country, refugee crisis, etc., I am not sure it doesn't belong in "history" too.
However, even within the aforementioned section, the "2013 onwards" seems to have minimal commentary on the 2016-2017 period. At the beginning of the genocide allegations section, there is a "see also" link to "2016–17 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar" (which is not the current name of the linked article - I'd think we should link to the current name regardless rather than engaging in a separate debate) but those events aren't really mentioned much in the "2013 onwards" section of this article.
I think there could be some improvement here. -KaJunl (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
@KaJunl I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing Rohingya genocide, and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. Iamextremelygayokay (talk) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: