| Revision as of 14:40, 28 September 2024 editRotideypoc41352 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,748 edits →Kindly requesting you self-revert: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:13, 12 December 2024 edit undoBrocadeRiverPoems (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,074 edits blankTag: Blanking | ||
| (58 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{Archives|banner=yes|auto=short|collapsible=yes|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=30|minthreadsleft=5}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(5d) | |||
| | archive = User talk:BrocadeRiverPoems/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |||
| | archiveheader = {{Monthly archive list}} | |||
| }} | |||
| ==Welcome!== | |||
| ]]] | |||
| Hello, BrocadeRiverPoems, and ''''']'''''! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the ''']'''. | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * Feel free to ] | |||
| * and check out the ], for ideas about what to work on. | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on ] using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our ], and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on ] or place '''{{Tlc|Help me}}''' on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!<!-- Template:Welcome_cookie --> ] (]) 06:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you! <b>]</b> 06:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, welcome! I see you already found ]—it's always wonderful to see a new editor in this space. Cheers! ]] 20:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you! <b>]</b> 20:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I was browsing ] and saw this. It’s rare that I approve of a PROD as strongly as this one (in fact I think the procedure should be banned for abuse as CSD and ''en bloc'' AfD suffice), but this page is useless. | |||
| In fact, it looks more like a quasi-hoax to me due to the multiple factual inconsistencies. Obviously there have been people that name (like the 19th century portrait sitter depicted there; by the way, ], the artist, died in <s>1867 IIRC</s> 1873), but the article is pure fiction. Nice work spotting it. | |||
| Cheers, ] (]) 22:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :But also, as you’re a relatively new editor, please please please be circumspect about using PROD. It’s not a good way to deal with many of the pages that end up there and we have too many experienced editors already who like to bend the rules. Again, thank you. ] (]) 22:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought it was strange that I couldn't find any factual evidence about the person or what information I found simply did not match with what was on the article. The chief reason I used PROD was it seemed like it wouldn't be controversial to delete it as the notification about lacking sources had been present since 2009 and I myself was unable to find any verifiable sources, and the article had been more or less untouched for awhile. I am unlikely to use PROD in the future, I understand your concerns. <b>]</b> 22:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, regarding the portrait by ], that appears to be an Hr.Jadwiga Branicka z Potockich. Siostra Hr. Pelagii Potockiej. Portret autorstwa Franca Xawera Winterhaltera(1805-1873) per and . It also aligns with source that says he painted Jadwiga Branicka née Potocka. <b>]</b> 22:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == About Thomas Lockley's article == | |||
| Hello. | |||
| New information has been brought to us regarding Lockley's article. | |||
| I've sent the same information to a few people in case they haven't noticed. | |||
| Please check the contents if you wish. | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Thomas_Lockley ] (]) 02:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :I mean this with the utmost sincereity and respect I can muster -- I do not care. The only reason I participated in that talk page was trying to help narrow down when exactly he taught and at which institution. When I could not find anything conclusive, I moved on. <b>]</b> 04:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Gējì == | |||
| I don't feel competent to offer an "official" third opinion, but from reading through the debate, it's clear to me that you have the right of it. | |||
| Just thought I'd offer some encouragement, since it looks like two different users decided to take issue with the "prostitutes" descriptor, heh—hopefully, a more-qualified user than I will be able to convince 'em. | |||
| Cheers, | |||
| ] (]) 09:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The ironic part of this is that I am not advocating in any way for the inclusion of the word "Prostitute" on the article. The other editor keeps adding mentions of prostitutes. All I suggested is that the lead should represent what the reliable sources say, which is that geji sometimes had sex with their clients. At no point did I ever say that the word "prostitute" should be added. <b>]</b> 20:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> | |||
| Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br /> | |||
| The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its ]. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| <div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now ] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer.</div> | |||
| If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to ] without posting a request to ].</span> | |||
| If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| Thanks again, and happy editing! | |||
| ] (]) 20:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept--> | |||
| :Thanks! I chose to do Articles for Creation because I wasn't completely confident in just making an article myself. In theory, I figured others might be able to find some fault I might have overlooked during creation, and if so, that would be good for the encyclopedia. <b>]</b> 21:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| I just want to thank you for all the effort you put into the Yasuke article. I find it a scandal that your effort was used as evidence against you, and that you are assumed to be a gategamer because you are new and posted on the Yasuke thread. Your biggest mistake seems to have been being fair to people you disagree with. I found your translations helpful. ] (]) 12:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :People can say what they wish about me. It is what it is. In the end, it's not worth the headache dealing with everything involved with that article any longer. I suppose if both sides of the dispute hate me as belonging to the other camp, it must be a testament to my neutrality. My involvement began because a singular editor's translation work was being held up as the definitive article, and I knew sayamaki had multiple possible meanings. Had I been a smarter woman, I'd of ended my involvement there. Any future activity I engage in on Misplaced Pages will remain confined to that which I enjoy, nothing more, and nothing less, and hopefully there won't be so much in the way of drawing battlelines. <b>]</b> 08:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2024 == | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the ] and the ] may be of use. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 11:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration case opened == | |||
| You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by October 10, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 12:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] (September 27) == | |||
| <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by SafariScribe was: | |||
| {{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject ]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ], ] sources that are '']'' of the subject (see the ]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see ] and learn about ] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.|}}<!-- | |||
| -- | |||
| --> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''. | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to ] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. | |||
| * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and ]. | |||
| * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any ] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks"></span>, on the <span class="plainlinks"></span> or use ]. | |||
| <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline--> | |||
| {| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" | |||
| |- style="vertical-align: top;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''BrocadeRiverPoems'''! | |||
| Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the ''']'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the ''']''', a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)</div> | |||
| |}<!-- Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/AfC Invitation --> | |||
| ] | |||
| :Oh, I'm not disappointed at all. I didn't make the article, I just tried to fix it. I cannot, however, find anything substantial about the person the article is about. I was originally going to suggest the article be deleted, but it was moved to draftspace before I could propose it should be deleted. There is no real significant coverage of the person's life, worse yet is that the secondary sources that discuss the person indicate that they're either highly exaggerated at best or completely fictional at worst. <b>]</b> 21:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for all your efforts (and patience!) in cleaning up the article ]. ] (]) 22:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Kindly requesting you self-revert == | |||
| Hi, and hope you're doing well. May I kindly ask you please revert your tagging of socks at ] and ]? From the first bullet point under ]: {{tq|Do not place tags on their talk or user pages. There are a number of different tags that can be used, and often there are reasons why tags shouldn't be used}}. Thank you! ] (] '''·''' ]) 14:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC) | |||