Revision as of 17:51, 3 October 2024 editWellington Bay (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,760 edits →His Jewish community or the Jewish community?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:14, 18 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Antisemitic trope/Archive 3) (bot |
(107 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{talk header}} |
|
{{talk header|search=no|archives=no}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell |collapsed=yes |class=List|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell |collapsed=yes |class=List|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=low}} |
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
|
{{trolling}} |
|
{{trolling}} |
|
{{Archive box|bot=MiszaBot I|age=1|units=month|auto=long|search=yes}} |
|
{{Archive box|bot=MiszaBot I|age=1|units=month|auto=long|search=yes}} |
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Jewish Life from Napoleon to Hitler== |
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Chapman_University/Jewish_Life_from_Napoleon_to_Hitler_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2023-01-29 | end_date = 2023-05-21 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Various "BOLD" changes. == |
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 18:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@] Re. changes, I made changes to improve the encyclopaedic tone of the page. The issues with the "Jewish deicide" section in particular are: |
|
==Extinct pagan antisemitic tropes?== |
|
|
|
# There is no reason to link to the definitions of ordinary English words like "tumult" or "multitude" or "ye". |
|
I wonder if it would be a good idea to include anti-Jewish tropes that were used in pre-Christian times. The reason they're not in the article now is because most of them fell dramatically out of favor after Christianity caught on. |
|
|
|
# Jewish deicide was not "legitimised" by Chrysostom, whatever that means, but as the sources quoted say, he was heavily antisemitic and popularised the claim, allegedly first using the term "deicide". |
|
|
# It is not encyclopaedic to term opponents as "radical traditionalists" as this is editorialising. The SPLC is not an unbiased source so directly adopting "radical" is inappropriate.<ref>https://jewishjournal.com/news/united-states/372532/wikipedia-editors-label-adl-only-reliable-for-antisemitism-when-israel-and-zionism-are-not-concerned/</ref> "Rad trads" is also inappropriate. |
|
|
# Claims of the Temple Menorah being hidden in the Vatican are irrelevant to claims of deicide. |
|
|
# Claiming subreddits are filled with "rad trads" is not encyclopaedic and is probably original research. |
|
|
# "Peddling" is editorialising. Furthermore, the things "peddled" (also citing SPLC) are mostly irrelevant to the claims of Jewish deicide. E.g. Adolf Hitler being the end-result of a Freemason plot? |
|
|
# Downplaying the effects of the Inquisition or denying its scale by the Vatican and Catholics is irrelevant to claims of Jewish deicide. |
|
|
# Exaggerating the role of Catholics in saving Jews during WWII is irrelevant to claims of Jewish deicide. |
|
|
# There is a failure to address any non-Roman Catholic perspectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please identify which edits I made you have concerns with. ''']''' ('']'') 07:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
E.g., at one point it was extremely common to attack Jews as disloyal for not engaging in ] like most other civilizations did. Since Christianity also rejects emperor worship, this line of attack mostly died out when paganism did. Similarly, circumcision was frequently invoked by Greeks and Romans to portray Jewish men as sexually abnormal; this trope lost most of its appeal with the rise of Christianity (which worships a circumcised savior) and even more so Islam (which actually adopted the practice for itself). Pagans also ridiculed the Jews for looking to messiah figures for salvation, which is ironic since Christians would later do the _exact_ opposite by attacking the Jews for rejecting Jesus as messiah. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Why not under Trope? == |
|
Since these archaic forms of antisemitism mostly went extinct, it might seem less relevant to include them in the article now. The only time they appear nowadays is in the rhetoric of some fringe-y neopagan types, particularly those with a Nietzschean bent like ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why isn’t this entry under Trope, Libel, Canard, or even Anti-semitism? Surely it is not the sole example of any of the above. ] (]) 19:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
However, including these early antisemitic tropes would certainly help illustrate just how very _different_ classical (pagan) society and its mores were from ours. In a lot of ways, secular modernity has more in common with Christendom than either of them do with your typical ancient pagan society. (This, incidentally, is one of the things that really irks guys like BAP). ] (]) 06:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:What does that mean? This article could not be usefully merged with any other. It's for narratives which keep on being revived again and again time after time, no matter how effectively they've been refuted, or how little basis in fact they have. (This was clearer under the article's previous name.) ] (]) 19:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:It seems within scope and reasonable to include material on this. Yes, prejudice and therefore tropes did not begin only with Christendom. ] (]) 09:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:This page is about improving the article ]. Just as AnonMoos, I do not know what you mean by "this entry" being "under Trope", but maybe you want to improve the articles ], ], ], or ] instead by linking to this article? It would be helpful if you learn the terms used by Misplaced Pages, such as "article", so people understand what you mean. --] (]) 07:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Some irrelevant information in main section. == |
|
:By the way, Romans attacked Christians just as much as Jews for not worshipping the emperor -- sometimes even more so, since such practices by Jews were sometimes tolerated if they were following their ancestral religion, while Christians would not receive the same benefit of the doubt if they were perceived as practicing a new or innovated religion (in Roman eyes, a new religion was much more suspect than an ancestral one). ] (]) 03:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last lines of the main section read: "The most recent example is the denial or trivialization of the October 7 massacres, with the victims overwhelmingly Jewish, including several Holocaust survivors." |
|
::P.S. Both Jews and Christians were sometimes called "atheists" by ancient Greco-Romans, in the sense of refusing to recognize the deities involved in various social and political rituals... ] (]) 14:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would change this to: "The most recent example is the denial or trivialization of the October 7 massacres, with the victims overwhelmingly Jewish." |
|
== "Well poisoning hoax" == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, the fact that many victims were Holocaust survivors is irrelevant to the denial or trivialisation of October 7th atrocities. |
|
someone should add a section here about Israeli poisoning of Palestinian wells and causing widespread sickness and death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, the cited source isn't of a good enough quality. Better sources should be found. ] (]) 18:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
page for reference = https://en.wikipedia.org/Well_poisoning#:~:text=Israel%20poisoned%20the%20wells%20and,that%20was%20foiled%20by%20the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Antisemitism did not cause WWII == |
|
Thank you ] (]) 19:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a bit disconcerting to read in the main section that "These tropes fatefully formed Adolf Hitler's worldview, caused WWII". Of course antisemitism was the base for the Holocaust but and instrumental for the rise of the Nazi party but nobody has ever argued that it ''caused'' WWII. ] (]) 00:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Having seen your message, it is clear that article has exactly served its purpose. ] (]) 23:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Doctrines of Lebensraum and Slavic Untermenschen, and a desire to get revenge on the French were most important in determining Hitler's aggressive policies which led to war. Once the war started, antisemitism had a big influence on how conquered territories were governed. ] (]) 13:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Changing source on well poisoning hoax == |
|
|
|
::What you said isn't expressed by the passage at all though and still, I don't think any historian ever claimed that "these tropes causes WWII". I'd say it's even hard to argue that they caused ''in part'' WWII. ] (]) 17:33, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to choose a different source for the summary on the well poisoning hoax (the 14th citation)? I believe the citation leads to a pro-Zionist website; another article published from them covering a university student rally used the word genocide in quotations (to deny its occurance). ] (]) 20:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{u|Throwaway200}}, reliable sources are allowed to have their own point of view, and favoring Zionism does not lead to the conclusion that the source is unreliable, any more than a published source opposing Zionism means that source is unreliable. Nor does calling into question the point of view that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza render a source unreliable. ] (]) 03:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:What do you mean by "pro-Zionist"? ] (]) 01:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Minor clarifications regarding Demonization in other religions or movements == |
|
|
|
|
|
The word "insecurity" is in quotes, but I'm having problems finding where in the 3 given sources it's specifically used. |
|
|
|
|
|
Secondly, can I remove the links in ] & ]? They read as clear ''].'' ] (]) 17:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== His Jewish community or the Jewish community? == |
|
|
|
|
|
The article currently reads: ''"The UC rejected AJC's criticisms as "distortion" and "obscurations", especially by Mose Durst, a convert from Judaism who became the president of the Unification Church of the United States, who accused his Jewish community of "insecurity" and being "hateful".'' |
|
|
|
|
|
I changed the possessive pronoun to "the" so the last sentence would read "who accused the Jewish community". Steven changed it back commenting "Mose Durst was Jewish: https://www.dialogueireland.ie/dicontent/resources/dciarchive/zinterviewdurst.html. A Jew is both a racial and religious identity". Well I would say it's both an ethnic and religious identity (and also cultural) rather than "racial" - but in any case it's irrelevant since regardless of whether or not they are part of the community one would more commonly use the article "the" rather than a possessive pronoun. ] (]) 17:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
Why isn’t this entry under Trope, Libel, Canard, or even Anti-semitism? Surely it is not the sole example of any of the above. GianniBGood (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
The last lines of the main section read: "The most recent example is the denial or trivialization of the October 7 massacres, with the victims overwhelmingly Jewish, including several Holocaust survivors."
I would change this to: "The most recent example is the denial or trivialization of the October 7 massacres, with the victims overwhelmingly Jewish."
Indeed, the fact that many victims were Holocaust survivors is irrelevant to the denial or trivialisation of October 7th atrocities.
It's a bit disconcerting to read in the main section that "These tropes fatefully formed Adolf Hitler's worldview, caused WWII". Of course antisemitism was the base for the Holocaust but and instrumental for the rise of the Nazi party but nobody has ever argued that it caused WWII. ContiNuziali (talk) 00:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)