| Revision as of 17:47, 23 April 2007 editTipPt (talk | contribs)2,048 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,319,932 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture | ||
| (110 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{shortcut|]}} | |||
| {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} | |||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
| *] Four editors work together to make Circumcision pro-circ for religious and personal reasons. It's a huge mess. Please consider an alternative (sandbox proposal).] 17:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]-Violation of NPOV, no promoting and no Academic boosterism. ] 17:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Does "Dulbecco's Law" merit mention on the article for scientific misconduct? Is it notable enough? Should notability even be considered, or is it only a factor in determining whether a separate article should be established? 18:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Is it appropriate to say the leaders of this organizations are not licensed mental health practitioners? Do the the citations support this claim? Does this information unbalance the neutrality of this article? 03:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Article on a (former?) ethnic/racial group in South Africa incorporating text from 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica includes some loaded and/or outdated terminology. Please help to update the article with non-offensive and current terminology. 02:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Should information about forced circumcisions be added to the article? 15:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Is it necessary to cite actual judicial decisions and precedent when citing topics in this article? 18:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Does the article have appropriate length, neutrality and attribution? 18:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Is concluding that discrimination based on ethnicity is a kind of racism original research? Are the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International and the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights reliable sources? There may be more ... 13:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009
Redirect to: