| Revision as of 11:23, 21 October 2024 editNotAGenious (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers6,383 edits →ACC: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:28, 29 December 2024 edit undoZabezt (talk | contribs)555 editsm →User rights | ||
| (87 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| }}<!-- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. PLEASE START NEW DISCUSSIONS AT THE BOTTOM. THANKS! --> | }}<!-- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. PLEASE START NEW DISCUSSIONS AT THE BOTTOM. THANKS! --> | ||
| == The Santa Rosa image at ] == | |||
| == ACC == | |||
| Is it possible to use the image of the 1958 ''SS'' ''Santa Rosa'' based on Grace Shipping having owned the ''Santa Rosa'' and any copyrighted images of the ship? ] (]) 02:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I mailed the admin's list almost 3 weeks ago, asking about my request sent in January. The status is still not clear to me - from my point of view and I'd be a good fit to chip away at a few, considering previous experience on newcomer assistance on IRC and onwiki. If you've discussed a specific concern regarding my request , I'd like to hear it. Thanks, ] (]) 07:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : |
: Please see the notice at the top of this page. Non-free images are not permitted in drafts per ]. — ] 05:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :: |
::I understand now. Thanks. ] (]) 13:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :{{tpw}} Just going to add that it's going to pretty hard to establish a consensus at ] in favor of using that file or any non-free image of that ship on the page per ] (]) and ] (] and item 6 of ]) even if the draft someday becomes an article. -- ] (]) 06:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::I understand, thanks. ] (]) 13:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == |
== Please stop this bot!! == | ||
| It is making a series of bad and unauthorised edits. ] ] 17:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{u|ShivangiEdits}} requested an account to then spam? ] (]) 10:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : |
: You need to be more specific. I operate multiple bots doing a number of different tasks. — ] 17:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::{{u|JJMC89 bot III}}. It keeps moving ] to ], which is an error and unauthorised. I have asked for the bot to be blocked. ] ] 18:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, we can't take the account away from them. They can be blocked like any other user if they continue. — ] 21:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::: It is doing exactly what it is being is instructed (and authorized) to do. As stated at the top of the page, you should bring your issue up with the admin that the instructed the bot.{{hp|Timrollpickering}} Also, you should stop edit warring with it – it won't get you anywhere. — ] 18:21, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == User rights == | |||
| == Vanished user continues to edit as an IP == | |||
| Hello! A few weeks ago you removed my extended-confirmed protection for breaking ], I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. After looking and counting my edit history, I’ve done 50 dummy edits. And ever since, I’ve done 50+ non-rule breaking edits since. (So does that mean the dummy edits were canceled out?) That means in total i've done 500 cheat-free edits. ] (]) 05:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello JJMC89. Please see in which {{user|141.196.59.102}} leaves some comments on a talk page and admits he is ]. Are you the admin who helped with the vanishing of Necatorina on 5 October? If so how can we persuade the editor that vanishing means no more edits? Presumably there is no barrier to unvanishing in their case, they just have to make up their mind one way or the other. ] (]) 03:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi, Ed. I did vanish Necatorina at their request. I left a message on their talk page. Unvanishing them isn't ideal given their reason for requesting it, but I will if they continue editing. — ] 21:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Greetings, @]. Could you kindly advise about the topic raised in ]? Many thanks for your time & attention, & kind regards. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| : {{done}} — ] 21:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:28, 29 December 2024
This user has opted out of talkbacks
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89. |
 | Bot-related queries:
|  |
 Archives |
|
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The Santa Rosa image at Draft: Grace Shipping Company
Is it possible to use the image of the 1958 SS Santa Rosa based on Grace Shipping having owned the Santa Rosa and any copyrighted images of the ship? Starlighsky (talk) 02:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please see the notice at the top of this page. Non-free images are not permitted in drafts per WP:NFCC#9. — JJMC89 05:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I understand now. Thanks. Starlighsky (talk) 13:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Just going to add that it's going to pretty hard to establish a consensus at WP:FFD in favor of using that file or any non-free image of that ship on the page per WP:NFCC#1 (WP:FREER) and WP:NFCC#8 (WP:NFC#CS and item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI) even if the draft someday becomes an article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, thanks. Starlighsky (talk) 13:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Please stop this bot!!
It is making a series of bad and unauthorised edits. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- You need to be more specific. I operate multiple bots doing a number of different tasks. — JJMC89 17:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- JJMC89 bot III. It keeps moving Category:Australian military personnel of the International Force for East Timor to Category:Australian military personnel of the International Force for Timor-Leste, which is an error and unauthorised. I have asked for the bot to be blocked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is doing exactly what it is being is instructed (and authorized) to do. As stated at the top of the page, you should bring your issue up with the admin that the instructed the bot. Also, you should stop edit warring with it – it won't get you anywhere. — JJMC89 18:21, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- JJMC89 bot III. It keeps moving Category:Australian military personnel of the International Force for East Timor to Category:Australian military personnel of the International Force for Timor-Leste, which is an error and unauthorised. I have asked for the bot to be blocked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
User rights
Hello! A few weeks ago you removed my extended-confirmed protection for breaking WP:PGAME, I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. After looking and counting my edit history, I’ve done 50 dummy edits. And ever since, I’ve done 50+ non-rule breaking edits since. (So does that mean the dummy edits were canceled out?) That means in total i've done 500 cheat-free edits. Zabezt (talk) 05:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)