Revision as of 19:04, 25 October 2024 editMarkH21 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,586 edits →Genocide: remark on oppositionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:46, 1 January 2025 edit undoRed-tailed hawk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators32,759 edits →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 December 2024: ReplyTag: Reply |
(34 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) |
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
|
| collapse = |
|
| collapse = |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject China|importance=High|politics=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject China|importance=High|politics=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Mass surveillance|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Mass surveillance|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups |importance=Low}} |
Line 67: |
Line 67: |
|
| algo = old(30d) |
|
| algo = old(30d) |
|
| archive = Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| archive = Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| counter = 17 |
|
| counter = 18 |
|
| maxarchivesize = 120K |
|
| maxarchivesize = 50K |
|
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
| minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
| minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
Line 77: |
Line 77: |
|
__TOC__ |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Ideas on Uyghur persecution == |
|
== Denial of abuses == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should Uyghur genocide denial have it's own article?, I've seen a fair amount of people on the internet who deny it's happening ] (]) 21:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
"Brainwashing" as a form of attack seems a bit ridiculous, and there should most definitely be an addition to this article about skepticism of the Uyghur persecution ] (]) 12:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:There is a subsection on brainwashing under the human rights abuses section. It has plenty of content, and sources are cited. Will see if that section needs to be expanded even more. I do not think it is for Misplaced Pages to decide whether this is ridiculous. ] (]) 13:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
The Uyghur genocide has been largely been debunked so no. It should not have its own article. ] (]) 15:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:The word "Brainwashing" should indeed be re-assessed. If meant literally, it is akin to arguing the earth is flat. "Brainwashing" is non-scientific, asserting "brainwashing" in some literal sense would raise the WP:FALSEBALANCE problem. However, in most instances, someone saying "brainwashing" means indoctrination. We should avoid colloquial or metaphorical language and simply say indoctrination. |
|
|
:Feel free to bring forward more sources on your broader point. Editors on this talk page will read them. ] (]) 16:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Agree that 'brainwashing' is a) a loaded word and b) un-encyclopaedic. ] 22:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 December 2024 == |
|
:I’m not sure there’s enough content on the denial itself to generate a separate article, but it should definitely be included in this one. ] (]) 23:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I concur with Butterdiplomat's doubts about the volume being enough to start a new article. Personally I only know of a handful of 'apologist' news sites. Bear in mind that you will need independent ] saying what person X/organisation Y/ group Z claim is/isn't happening and they would specifically need to say what kind of 'denial' ''(denial of mistreatment/ or acknowledging mistreatment, but arguing that it doesn't constitute 'genocide' for example)''. I'm aware of these pitfalls because of similar articles. ] (]) 05:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Those are straight up tankies and I suggest you sever all contact with them ] (]) 07:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit extended-protected|Persecution of Uyghurs in China|answered=yes}} |
|
::The photograph in the article certainly doesn't show any sign of physical abuse. All the men looked clean, well-fed, warmly clothed, and not a single scratch on any of them. ] (]) 22:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
There has been extensive discussion in the talk page and archive as to whether Adrian Zenz should be considered a reliable source or not. Generally, the consensus seems to be that he is at least not fit for direct citation. I would then suggest that these citations to Zenz be changed to citation needed, or removed if there is not a more reliable source to support the claim being made. This would bring the article in line with the reliable sources rule. ] (]) 23:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{not done}}:<!-- Template:EEp --> Per my understanding, it is a pretty blatant mischaracterization to say there is consensus among editors here that Zenz is unreliable. (Cards on the table, as someone who hasn't participated in those discussions to date, I do not think he is a reliable source.) <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 23:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Proposed merge of Xinjiang internment camps into Persecution of Uyghurs in China == |
|
|
|
:Zenz was most notable for his book about the end times when Jesus would return and burn most of the Jews. His writings about Uyghurs are not rs and should only be included to the extent they are discussed in reliable secondary sources. ] (]) 02:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::...What? — ] <sub>]</sub> 03:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
The two articles talk about the same events basically. ] (]) 16:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::See by Adrian Zenz Phd and Marlon L. Silas (WestBow press 2012). ] (]) 11:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
:You are free to suggest a merger of the articles, but I would argue that this persecution article is broader in scope than the article on the internment camps. ] (]) 07:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::From an unreliability perspective, it’s the way these eschatological writings intersect with geopolitical stances which is troubling. ] (]) 11:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::The {{tq|...What?}} was more with respect to {{tq|Zenz was most notable for his book about the end times when Jesus would return and burn most of the Jews}}. That... just isn't true, more or less at any point in Zenz's life. And his work is extremely well respected in academic circles; for example, his October 2018 journal article has been cited just under 300 times in 5 years. That he's been subjected to from the Chinese State doesn't make him any less reliable here. — ] <sub>]</sub> 22:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::::This bizarre text he and his father-in-law wrote is not disinformation. They wrote the thing. ] (]) 03:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Genocide == |
|
|
|
::::::{{my OR}} {{midsize|I reflexively avoid these discussions onwiki because our necessary policies can't help but reflect a fractured discourse. If there were any appetite on "either side" to cross-pollinate, our wiki's coverage of China could be so much more—instead for all the reasons you can think of, we're stuck relying on figures like Zenz when we would never need to in a healthy geopolitical and intellectual climate. Maybe that sounds weirdly flowery given the pathos involved in this particular topic, but I dunno—we're able to write articles about the persecution of Muslims in France, Myanmar, or the United States without the constant tinge of it being a proxy conflict in our clash of civilizations in that way.}} <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 04:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::That he holds a ]/] sort of Protestant eschatology is not contested. But it's also entirely a ''non-sequitur'' here, and it's <u>certainly</u> not the thing for which he is best known, nor is it the thing that his academic work focuses on. — ] <sub>]</sub> 19:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
It’s honestly super weird that this page isn’t called “Uyghur Genocide”. ] (]) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:There is a circular journalism problem with Zenz, where his factual claims became repeated by other political actors and in western media. It would be good to reduce this. |
|
|
|
|
:It was called "Uyghur Genocide", but time seems to have debunked that. Persecution is true, however. ] (]) 20:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
:From a reliability perspective, more troubling than his eschatological writing already mentioned in this section is his flawed IUD study. ] (]) 12:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Only a relatively small number of ] and states refer to this as the “Uyghur Genocide”, which is our principal naming criterion.] (]) 17:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::How is not a genocide? According to the causing bodily or mental harm to members of a group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within a group and deliberately inflicting conditions of life that bring about its destruction in whole or in part all count as genocide. Just because they aren't outright killing every single Uyhgur, doesn’t mean that it's not genocide. The word genocide is also mentioned in the article 252 times at the time of writing. ] (]) 16:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::There are academic sources that say that the label of genocide has not been substantiated yet for reasons such as the underlying data from Zenz being speculative (as the disclaimer in Zenz's report says) and other claims being exaggerated or unverified. The 2023 ] book is an example.{{pb}}It's not for Misplaced Pages editors to judge the genocide criteria - only to assess whether there is academic consensus. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 19:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 October 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|Persecution of Uyghurs in China|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Change "The Chinese government has engaged in a propaganda campaign to defend its actions in Xinjiang" to "The US government has engaged in a propaganda campaign to destabilize Xinjiang". Currently, there are no solid proof of Uyghur refugees migrating outside of China, especially to the United States. China has released a 144 day visa program for tourists to visit Xinjiang, as a result, many tourist have found out that Xinjiang is nothing like what the USA proclaims and is merely propaganda from western media ] (]) 17:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{Not done}}: please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] ] 17:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Dead link update == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I can't update the page but this link is dead: |
|
|
https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2020/07/commerce-department-adds-eleven-chinese-entities-implicated-human |
|
|
|
|
|
I found the current one here: |
|
|
https://2017-2021.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2020/07/commerce-department-adds-eleven-chinese-entities-implicated-human.html |
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone please update it? ] (]) 02:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
"Brainwashing" as a form of attack seems a bit ridiculous, and there should most definitely be an addition to this article about skepticism of the Uyghur persecution FrogOnGrog (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
There has been extensive discussion in the talk page and archive as to whether Adrian Zenz should be considered a reliable source or not. Generally, the consensus seems to be that he is at least not fit for direct citation. I would then suggest that these citations to Zenz be changed to citation needed, or removed if there is not a more reliable source to support the claim being made. This would bring the article in line with the reliable sources rule. 2600:100F:B122:7CA5:982E:6537:6A9B:BDB5 (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)