| Revision as of 06:43, 28 October 2024 editChristieBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors100,711 edits Your GA nomination of Hotline Miami← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:10, 27 December 2024 edit undoLeafy46 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,512 edits →Helena (My Chemical Romance song): ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| (45 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1258243765 --> | |||
| == Welcome to the club == | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 23:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Wake Me Up When September Ends == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Featured Article Medal''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". ] (]) 14:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Where would it fit better then? An appearance on a "best of" list from a major publication such as Loudwire is not a "random ranking" in my opinion. Are the mentions of appearances on various lists to be removed from ] as well? ] (]) 00:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Congrats, and a question == | |||
| :Hi, I'd say that the ranking would be better fit in Reception where similar lists are. As for Holiday (or Basket Case, I guess), I'm gonna get around to cleaning up that article eventually but for now it's probably fine. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 00:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, congrats on your promotion. This is a big accomplishment and well deserved. | |||
| ::cool, thank you for talking. ] (]) 00:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 07:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of maintenance tag == | |||
| I wanted to ask if you could look over the current state of ] to see if it's on the right track. This is obviously a bit of a tough one to chew and I know it's not your usual topic area. Compare to the structure of ] to see what I'm trying to go for. I think the current one is not really up to snuff at all. The model article I'm using is ], as it's a featured one and similar enough. | |||
| Hi. I'd suggest at least pinging me if the conversation has reached a conclusion that is satisfactory. As stated, because 5 editors say "Well I don't think it is" or make arguments similar to ], it has not addressed my concerns with the list which is key in addressing the situation. At least ping me before removing a maintenance tag. ] (]) 20:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Basically I'm wondering if you think it is 1) on it's way to doing well, 2) what sections you think are missing (still not done outlining everything) | |||
| :Those editors going against what your saying is still a consensus, though. And I figured that you seeing me removing it in your watchlist would've been enough, sorry. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 20:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks, ] (]) 20:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Takes a second to ask. The watchlist removal was a misclick. ] (]) 21:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| :As you stated, this is a subject that is well beyond what I have ever written about, or ever will write about. But for feedback I can provide, I find your current rewrite more informative, clear, and better sourced than the one currently in mainspace. This is a very tough topic to chew, but I think so far you're doing a good job. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 20:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks and of course if you ever need something read over drop me a ping. ] (]) 03:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Promotion of ]== | |||
| Thank you so much for your in-depth reviews of two of my good article nominations in just one week (!). I hope that we have an opportunity to work together again in the future :) | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| |imagesize=60px | |||
| |extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia; | |||
| |text = Congratulations, NegativeMP1! The article you nominated, ''']''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Misplaced Pages. The ''']''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may ] to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Gog the Mild}} via ] (]) 00:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }}<!-- Template:FC pass talk message --> | |||
| ] (]) 18:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Congrats again Negative! Hotline Miami 1 will come around someday, I'm sure of it. I'm on standby if you're willing to assist with ]. ] ] 17:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == Muffet == | |||
| == Regarding Minecraft's composer issue == | |||
| Muffet is a character in undertale, so why do you keep removing my edit of the characters of undertale and deltarune? Yes, I know it is unsourced, that is because I wrote it all myself based on the character in the actual game. ] (]) 00:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Why do you not think that Lena Raine, Kumi Tanioka, and Aaron Cherof are not the lead composers for ''Minecraft'' for the page ]? Their composition takes a significant chunk in ''Minecraft'''s OST by the release of Tricky Trials so I have no idea why you'd remove their names when they did have significant work in the ''Minecraft''. -- ] (] • ]) 08:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, |
:Hi, you need ] to back up your claims regarding the character and demonstrate why the character is significant in any regard. Most unsourced content falls under ]. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 01:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Ok, that is helpful. Thank you. I might try to find a credible source to use. ] (]) 15:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 12:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] and ] for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 14:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 10:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive == | ||
| {| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: #F6FAFF; padding: 10px; color: #000;" | |||
| Hello - I hope you are doing well. | |||
| | style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | | |||
| ] | |||
| I am writing this as a first-time editor. I am confused why, after removing speculative sentences (despite having citations), my purely fact-based points have been removed by you. I am not sure if you are the same person who previously removed the text, but I understand if you did regarding the speculation. That part has been removed. | |||
| | rowspan=3 | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| However, your comment included a note that it is rarely appropriate for Misplaced Pages articles to include player sentiment. I am linking two of the largest competitors to Halo, Battlefield and Call of Duty, below to demonstrate that this is false. | |||
| | | |||
| * On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. | |||
| Call of Duty: https://en.wikipedia.org/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_(2019_video_game). | |||
| * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. | |||
| * Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. | |||
| "Criticism focused on the handling of the campaign's subject matter, including the depiction of the Russian military, as well as balancing issues in the multiplayer." | |||
| * Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
| |- | |||
| Battlefield 2042: https://en.wikipedia.org/Battlefield_2042 | |||
| |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from ] or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add ] to your user talk page. | |||
| |} | |||
| "The game received mixed reviews from critics and a more negative reception from players for its technical issues, lack of features, and certain changes to the gameplay. The game failed to meet the sales expectations of Electronic Arts." | |||
| Both articles mention criticism and not just praise of the games, with Battlefield 2042 specifically mentioning player sentiment. | |||
| I would love to understand why these two articles document player sentiment, but Halo is above such criticism. ] (]) 02:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, sorry if my initial revert reason was a bit harsh or confused you. Misplaced Pages very rarely takes into account fan reception per ], and we go by whatever ] say. So basically, for video games, reliable sources are where we get our reception, and fan reception usually isn't included on its own unless its very, very well documented (ex. a review bomb). Battlefield 2042 is a special case like that, since it was extremely well covered by reliable sources, and MW2019 doesn't fall under that since its purely the opinions of critics. I'm not saying that fan reception for the Halo Infinite article isn't warranted, but to go into that level of detail in the article lead (greater than that of the critics opinions) generally isn't warranted. Note how Battlefield 2042 only goes "the game received mixed reviews from critics and a more negative reception from players" before listing why they didn't like it. | |||
| :Now, a sub-section of the reception section (similarly to Battlefield 2042) could probably be doable and I'd personally allow it to stay (though I'm not sure what others could think). I did manage to find a few sources that discuss how players reacted to Halo Infinite, such as , , , , and . <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 07:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for the reply as well as sharing the links, both of Wiki procedure and Halo articles. | |||
| ::The feedback you shared recommends adding this player sentiment lower on the page; I disagree with this. While I acknowledge Call of Duty does not explicitly list player sentiment in the 'leads' section, Battlefield 2042 does. More specifically, the page includes both critic and player sentiment in the 'leads' section, not below the fold of the page. | |||
| ::Further, while you argue Battlefield is an exception, I am directly challenging your qualifications for deciding which titles are or are not an exception to include player sentiment. Halo and Battlefield 2042 are arguably the largest culprits of negative player backlash in the past few years, with both of us now presenting articles supporting this data. | |||
| ::To your later point, I am aligned with rephrasing the structure of the passage as well as reducing length to match player sentiment in the aforementioned competitors. However, I am not aligned with a) removing player sentiment from the 'leads' section when Battlefield includes it and b) your qualifications to conclude that Battlefield 2042 meets an exception 'threshold' when both of us have now provided articles showcasing strong negative player sentiment and related player statistics. | |||
| ::With regards to reliable sources, I am confused as your shared articles include GameRant, the same reliable source I originally listed when speaking to player sentiment. I have IGN and Polygon articles that also speak to this negative player sentiment. | |||
| ::What are the available next steps? Currently, I see: | |||
| ::- Edit passage in Halo Infinite leads page to align with length and structure of Battlefield 2042's negative player sentiment, with reliable sources cited | |||
| ::- Triage what qualifies as a exception for overwhelmingly negative player sentiment via dispute resolution ] (]) 18:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 23:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Why did you revert my edit? (Furina) == | |||
| I added a note on one of her in game features that you quickly removed, and I'm requesting more explaination than what you included in the edit reversion. | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 23:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :HI, I reverted the edit because the detail of Furina being able to walk on water isn't sourced anywhere in the article body , and adding that detail would've failed ]. I'm sure that somewhere there's a ] that says she can walk on water. I'll check for myself when I can. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 23:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Is this a reliable source? https://www.eurogamer.net/genshin-impact-furina-ascension-talent-materials-best-build-team-weapon-artifact-constellations-9326 | |||
| ::I'm not sure exactly what sources count as reliable or not, but this article does mention that Furina's skill lets her walk on water. ] (]) 23:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yeah, Eurogamer is a reliable source. As for what sources count as reliable or not, a list of reliable sources for video games can be found at ]. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 00:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == American Idiot singles == | |||
| If you decide to pursue GA for any other songs from this album, please reach out. I might review them. Wish you luck on September. ] <sup> ] </sup> 19:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Will do. I plan on pursuing GA for every other song in the album and seeing if there's enough material to make an article for Homecoming, the former of which would allow for the creation of a good topic. On the topic of American Idiot, were you still planning on getting the article to FA? <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 05:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've lost a lot of my editing motivation since making that statement due to career changes I've experienced which have left me with less energy to edit, so I may not make it ''on time'' with the statement I made regretfully, but it still remains my plan. On the other hand, my involvement with most if not all the notable songs from American Idiot is minimal enough that I could still qualify to review them. At least I think. ] <sup> ] </sup> 22:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Even if you did have any involvement in the singles, I don't see your name in any of the recent changes over the past few years. It should be fine. I appreciate your offer to review the future GANs, the order I plan on taking it is WMUWSE (at GAN right now), the titular track, Jesus of Suburbia, Holiday, and Boulevard of Broken Dreams. I'm split on whether or not Homecoming is notable, but if it is it'll come in-between the GANs for the titular track and Jesus of Suburbia. | |||
| :::Anyways, I was asking about a possible American Idiot FA in the event there was potential for a featured topic over simply a good topic. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 05:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Update: I'm probably a quarter of the way through the rewrite for Boulevard of Broken Dreams (I've already given up on the order I proposed above) and will hopefully be at GAN by mid-October, and Wake Me Up When September Ends is now at FAC. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 07:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] and ] for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 17:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Concern regarding ]== | |||
| ] Hello, NegativeMP1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again or ] that it be moved to your userspace. | |||
| If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it. | |||
| Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 18:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:American Idiot 20th Anniversery Cover.png== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| ] (]) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Queen of Hearts@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/January_2025/Mass_message_list&oldid=1263928765 --> | |||
| == Top-M.O.O.N shooter == | |||
| == WikiCup 2024 August newsletter == | |||
| Hi, wanted you to ping about your recent edit on ] today, which might’ve been a mistake. {{user|NegativeMP1}} ] (]) 08:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points: | |||
| :Thank you for alerting me of that mistake. Honest to god, I have no idea how that edit ended up happening. I think my editor glitched. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 08:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant15|Generalissima}} with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 ]s, 2 ], 7 ], and 13 ] nominations; | |||
| * {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant15|Arconning}} with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews; | |||
| * {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant15|AirshipJungleman29}} with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on ] and 2 good articles; and | |||
| * {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant15|BennyOnTheLoose}} with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on ], 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles. | |||
| == Merry Christmas! == | |||
| Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen ]. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 ] credits, and at least 333 ] credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to ] and ]. | |||
| <div style="border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);; float: left; margin-top: 3px; background-color: #CD0412; border: 1px solid #0F6E02; padding: 10px; width: 425px; clear: both;"> | |||
| Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October. | |||
| <div style="border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);; border-style:solid; border-color:#0C8703; background-color:#CD0412; border-width:5px; text-align:left; padding:18px;" class="plainlinks" valign="top" width: 300px;> ]<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:white"> ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> ] ] ] ] ] ] (] ] ]).</span><br /><br /> | |||
| '''<span style="color: white; margin-bottom: 0.3em; font-size: 116%; border-bottom: medium none; font-weight: bold; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent; margin: 0px; overflow: hidden; padding-top: 0.5em; padding-bottom: 0.17em;">Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year</span>''' | |||
| <p><span style="color:white">This greeting (and season) promotes ] </span></p></div> <br /> | |||
| <span style="color:white">Spread the ] by adding '''<nowiki>{{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}}</nowiki>''' to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding ] in this message!</span></div></div> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| — 17:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 17:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, and Merry Christmas! <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 22:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see ]. Further questions are welcome on ] and the judges ({{User|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User|Epicgenius}}, and {{User|Frostly}}) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from ].</small> ] (]) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1241501495 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==DYK for Wake Me Up When September Ends== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ]'s "''']'''" became closely associated with the aftermath of ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I just saw that the nominated the article for GA, and wanted to tell you what a great job you've done with the article. I'll help you take care of the sample you've uploaded given that it needs a little bit of fixing up, but I also wanted to give a few quick pointers on the article before it gets picked up for an actual review (maybe I'll take it on myself if it isn't already by the time the GA backlog drive begins?): | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I've left comments for the FAC linked above. ] (] / ]) 03:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| 1) There needs to be a release history section on the article if you can find any info on it, detailing its radio history and physical releases; see ] for a fairly in-depth example of one | |||
| :I appreciate the comments you've left, and I'll attempt to implement them over the next few months. But I think what I want to do with the article based on the feedback so far will require some restructuring outside of the scope of an FAC, and therefore I've posted a request to withdraw the nomination. Thank you for taking the time to read the article. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 03:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Minecraft game logo.svg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| 2) You might want to double-check if some of those "rankings" in the reception section are actually rankings --- the Billboard one for instance only seems to be a listing of songs, and doesn't actually say that it is ranking the songs anywhere | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| 3) I also found a source via the Misplaced Pages library you may find useful, more as an FYI if you want to try and incorporate it in: | |||
| == ] == | |||
| https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=d262ed61-ed65-4b2b-afe8-c408845fd300%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=16508073&db=bth | |||
| Good luck with the GA reviews! Are you planning on bringing ] up to a good topic, by chance? ] (]) 19:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hey there, I saw that you recently created a page for "]", which is one of my favorite songs off the album! I'm not totally convinced of its ] though: when I proposed "]", it seems like the consensus was that the article was kept because of both coverage in various listicle and certifications. However, while "Disenchanted" certainly has a few spots in rankings, it has no certification to speak of; and because the song isn't the primary subject of any of the article cited (nor that I could find), I don't know if it would survive the AfD process. I thought I'd just pass that information along, especially since I've become very, *very* disillusioned with the whole AfD process. Thanks for your work on the article regardless :) ] (]) 21:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, thanks for fixing up the audio sample and the quick comments regarding the article, I've added the source you provided (I think it's the same one? For some reason, I can't open that link). As for the release history, it was already a pain in the first place trying to find a source that said it released on March 8. Seriously, I'm pretty sure most if not all of its release information is easily accessible is already lost media or dead links. Either that or I didn't look hard enough. And regarding rankings, I've cut the Billboard one, but I think the others are good. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 19:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, thanks for the compliments regarding the article itself, helps out a lot due to how I'm feeling about my current work right now. As for the notability concern, I definitely agree it has some flimsy coverage, but I think it technically meets the standards of what some modern song articles are built off of, and might even have a stronger case for a standalone article in comparison to "Dead!" (certification aside). I'm not trying to pull the "]" card here, but in terms of available content about its role in the narrative of ''The Black Parade'' and its composition, I believe "Disenchanted" simply has more to work with. But if it does get sent to AfD or if someone (like you) chooses to merge it into the main '']'' article, then I don't mind as long as the gist of the article content is properly summarized. | |||
| : |
:Forgot to comment on the good topic related bit: I'm not really sure how that would work, or if it would pass nomination, since it's a greatest hits album. The only good topic that I could see as feasible for my work on these articles would maybe be a "My Chemical Romance singles discography" topic, but that would require me to rewrite 14 more articles + get the discography article to FL, and many of those singles would probably be a pain to find sourcing for and write, especially the ''Bullets'' singles. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 19:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yep, that's the correct source as far as I can see and I totally get it regarding the release history. In regards to the good topic nomination, I actually think that it stands a decent shot, and is something I've been seeing as a long-term goal as opposed to focusing on any specific album. For one, there is a bit of precedent with Greatest Hits albums being good topics, with Madonna being the big one: ], for instance. It also would not require an article for an album's tour to be created, something which I've been struggling to find good information on for ''The Black Parade'' and prior. ] (]) 21:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm with you. I don't think that the article for ''The Black Parade'' would really stand up to a GAR, but I'm not going to be the one to call it out. I do plan on going through the article's songs at some point, though, similar to your foray through ''American Idiot'' --- I already got "]" to GA and have "]" on my radar. ] (]) 23:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've |
:::Hmm, in that case then maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea. ], and... yeah I'm still not sure how much of this is even feasible. Maybe it wouldn't be as bad as I expect, but I can't imagine writing about the ''Bullets'' singles would be fun or easy whatsoever, and it doesn't help that every album article and existing article is so bad that I'd effectively be working from scratch on all of them. I also wonder if a theoretical GTN would have people requesting that articles be made for "You Know What They Do To Guys Like Us In Prison" and "The Kids from Yesterday". <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 21:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No idea. I'll definitely be working towards the goal of a ''May Death Never Stop You'' GT as a long-term kind of thing, especially since I listened to Danger Days for the first time yesterday and feel particularly inspired (though I'm taking a bit of a break from MCR as a whole due to over-exposure to their stuff). However, as you've said, the ''Bullets'' songs do seem rather tedious to work through, even if they would be easier to fix up than the articles of each individual album. It'd also be rather difficult to patch together some of the bigger articles (looking directly at "Welcome to the Black Parade" and "I'm Not Okay"), though those would be prerequisite anyways for any album-whole GT. In any case, thanks for letting me bounce the idea off of you, and good luck once again with your open GANs :) ] (]) ] (]) 23:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Update: ], and I'm starting to put the sources together. It might not end up being the best rewrite, since this is one of the most important albums of the 2000s and my experience writing on music is fairly limited, but I'm almost certain I can make it at least acceptable as most of the sources are already there. I invite you to help out if you would like to, especially with your work and research on "]". <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' ]]</span> 07:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:10, 27 December 2024
| This is NegativeMP1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
Your GA nomination of The Foundations of Decay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Foundations of Decay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 23:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Wake Me Up When September Ends
Where would it fit better then? An appearance on a "best of" list from a major publication such as Loudwire is not a "random ranking" in my opinion. Are the mentions of appearances on various lists to be removed from the Basket Case article as well? Lofi Gurl (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I'd say that the ranking would be better fit in Reception where similar lists are. As for Holiday (or Basket Case, I guess), I'm gonna get around to cleaning up that article eventually but for now it's probably fine. λ NegativeMP1 00:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- cool, thank you for talking. Lofi Gurl (talk) 00:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Foundations of Decay
The article The Foundations of Decay you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:The Foundations of Decay for comments about the article, and Talk:The Foundations of Decay/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 07:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Removal of maintenance tag
Hi. I'd suggest at least pinging me if the conversation has reached a conclusion that is satisfactory. As stated, because 5 editors say "Well I don't think it is" or make arguments similar to WP:OTHERSTUFF, it has not addressed my concerns with the list which is key in addressing the situation. At least ping me before removing a maintenance tag. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Those editors going against what your saying is still a consensus, though. And I figured that you seeing me removing it in your watchlist would've been enough, sorry. λ NegativeMP1 20:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Takes a second to ask. The watchlist removal was a misclick. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you so much for your in-depth reviews of two of my good article nominations in just one week (!). I hope that we have an opportunity to work together again in the future :)
Leafy46 (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Muffet
Muffet is a character in undertale, so why do you keep removing my edit of the characters of undertale and deltarune? Yes, I know it is unsourced, that is because I wrote it all myself based on the character in the actual game. GibleGamingYT (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, you need reliable, secondary sources to back up your claims regarding the character and demonstrate why the character is significant in any regard. Most unsourced content falls under original research. λ NegativeMP1 01:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, that is helpful. Thank you. I might try to find a credible source to use. GibleGamingYT (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
 | |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Top-M.O.O.N shooter
Hi, wanted you to ping about your recent edit on Hotline Miami today, which might’ve been a mistake. NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) RFNirmala (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for alerting me of that mistake. Honest to god, I have no idea how that edit ended up happening. I think my editor glitched. λ NegativeMP1 08:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 17:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC) TWOrantula (enter the web) 17:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, and Merry Christmas! λ NegativeMP1 22:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Helena (My Chemical Romance song)
I just saw that the nominated the article for GA, and wanted to tell you what a great job you've done with the article. I'll help you take care of the sample you've uploaded given that it needs a little bit of fixing up, but I also wanted to give a few quick pointers on the article before it gets picked up for an actual review (maybe I'll take it on myself if it isn't already by the time the GA backlog drive begins?):
1) There needs to be a release history section on the article if you can find any info on it, detailing its radio history and physical releases; see Diamonds (Rihanna song) for a fairly in-depth example of one
2) You might want to double-check if some of those "rankings" in the reception section are actually rankings --- the Billboard one for instance only seems to be a listing of songs, and doesn't actually say that it is ranking the songs anywhere
3) I also found a source via the Misplaced Pages library you may find useful, more as an FYI if you want to try and incorporate it in: https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=d262ed61-ed65-4b2b-afe8-c408845fd300%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=16508073&db=bth
Good luck with the GA reviews! Are you planning on bringing May Death Never Stop You up to a good topic, by chance? Leafy46 (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for fixing up the audio sample and the quick comments regarding the article, I've added the source you provided (I think it's the same one? For some reason, I can't open that link). As for the release history, it was already a pain in the first place trying to find a source that said it released on March 8. Seriously, I'm pretty sure most if not all of its release information is easily accessible is already lost media or dead links. Either that or I didn't look hard enough. And regarding rankings, I've cut the Billboard one, but I think the others are good. λ NegativeMP1 19:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to comment on the good topic related bit: I'm not really sure how that would work, or if it would pass nomination, since it's a greatest hits album. The only good topic that I could see as feasible for my work on these articles would maybe be a "My Chemical Romance singles discography" topic, but that would require me to rewrite 14 more articles + get the discography article to FL, and many of those singles would probably be a pain to find sourcing for and write, especially the Bullets singles. λ NegativeMP1 19:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, that's the correct source as far as I can see and I totally get it regarding the release history. In regards to the good topic nomination, I actually think that it stands a decent shot, and is something I've been seeing as a long-term goal as opposed to focusing on any specific album. For one, there is a bit of precedent with Greatest Hits albums being good topics, with Madonna being the big one: The Immaculate Collection, for instance. It also would not require an article for an album's tour to be created, something which I've been struggling to find good information on for The Black Parade and prior. Leafy46 (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, in that case then maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea. I've went ahead and made a visualization of what work would be required out of curiosity, and... yeah I'm still not sure how much of this is even feasible. Maybe it wouldn't be as bad as I expect, but I can't imagine writing about the Bullets singles would be fun or easy whatsoever, and it doesn't help that every album article and existing article is so bad that I'd effectively be working from scratch on all of them. I also wonder if a theoretical GTN would have people requesting that articles be made for "You Know What They Do To Guys Like Us In Prison" and "The Kids from Yesterday". λ NegativeMP1 21:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- No idea. I'll definitely be working towards the goal of a May Death Never Stop You GT as a long-term kind of thing, especially since I listened to Danger Days for the first time yesterday and feel particularly inspired (though I'm taking a bit of a break from MCR as a whole due to over-exposure to their stuff). However, as you've said, the Bullets songs do seem rather tedious to work through, even if they would be easier to fix up than the articles of each individual album. It'd also be rather difficult to patch together some of the bigger articles (looking directly at "Welcome to the Black Parade" and "I'm Not Okay"), though those would be prerequisite anyways for any album-whole GT. In any case, thanks for letting me bounce the idea off of you, and good luck once again with your open GANs :) Leafy46 (talk) Leafy46 (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, in that case then maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea. I've went ahead and made a visualization of what work would be required out of curiosity, and... yeah I'm still not sure how much of this is even feasible. Maybe it wouldn't be as bad as I expect, but I can't imagine writing about the Bullets singles would be fun or easy whatsoever, and it doesn't help that every album article and existing article is so bad that I'd effectively be working from scratch on all of them. I also wonder if a theoretical GTN would have people requesting that articles be made for "You Know What They Do To Guys Like Us In Prison" and "The Kids from Yesterday". λ NegativeMP1 21:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, that's the correct source as far as I can see and I totally get it regarding the release history. In regards to the good topic nomination, I actually think that it stands a decent shot, and is something I've been seeing as a long-term goal as opposed to focusing on any specific album. For one, there is a bit of precedent with Greatest Hits albums being good topics, with Madonna being the big one: The Immaculate Collection, for instance. It also would not require an article for an album's tour to be created, something which I've been struggling to find good information on for The Black Parade and prior. Leafy46 (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)