| Revision as of 17:34, 7 November 2024 editValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,289 edits →A barnstar for you: Nope. WPO is not a safe haven for their bad behavior. Actions there that affect WP are sanctionable.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:23, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,661 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ==What, again?== | ==What, again?== | ||
| What, again? Sorry to see this, Andy. ] | ] 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC). | What, again? Sorry to see this, Andy. ] | ] 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC). | ||
| == A barnstar for you == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Wikibullying Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | We may not have seen eye to eye in the past, but I was pleasantly surprised when I saw . Whether you come back or not, good luck on your future endeavors! ] <sub>]</sub><span style="color:#6B8E23">\</span><sup>]</sup> 19:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : I second that emotion. Andy, thanks for taking a stand at WPO. You can be more effective here when there are clean lines and no questions of loyalty. -- ] (]) (PING me) 22:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thirded. ] (]) 11:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't disagree with the stand Andy has taken, but I'm absolutely sickened by Valjean's continued insistence that we must be "loyal" to en.wp and to voice criticism of it is some sort of treason. That's absolutely not what Andy is about, as anyone with even a passing familiarity with him would know perfectly well. ] ] 00:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::: That's not at all my position. Criticism of Misplaced Pages is one thing, but the rampant cowardice shown by WP editors who go to WPO and then attack fellow WP editors by engaging in egregious behaviors they would not dare to use at WP because they are sanctionable/blockable behaviors is a problem. They use WPO to create a chilling effect for those editors at WP. That's wrong and cowardly. If they have a complaint against a WP editor, they should do it at WP, under the PAG governing such complaints. They don't do it at WP because their complaints sometimes don't have any merit under WP's PAG. Such actions at WPO affect WP, and should result in sanctions against the offenders. For you, as has been mentioned by many, that could mean desysopping and other sanctions, and some other WP editors could also be sanctioned. | |||
| ::: We need to remember that it's the same cowardly asshole, sitting at the same keyboard, who edits at WP and then bellyaches at WPO against their fellow WP editors using methods not allowed at WP. That does not make them immune to repercussions at WP, and their expectation that WPO provides a safe haven for their bad behavior is quite hypocritical. If their bad actions at WPO can reach WP and affect it and its editors, then their access to WP should be affected. If a WP editor decides to use WPO as their sniper position targeting fellow WP editors, then WP has a right to shoot back at them and tell them they can't come home, or at least limit what they can do at home. -- ] (]) (PING me) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == In appreciation == | == In appreciation == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 18: | ||
| Hi AndyTheGrump. The '']'' case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC) | Hi AndyTheGrump. The '']'' case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:23, 19 November 2024
What, again?
What, again? Sorry to see this, Andy. Bishonen | tålk 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC).
In appreciation
|
The Surreal Barnstar | |
| Pure wildcard energy. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
Arbitration case request declined
Hi AndyTheGrump. The Wikipediocracy-related conduct case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)