Revision as of 04:28, 15 November 2024 editHackerKnownAs (talk | contribs)478 edits →15.ai: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:53, 25 December 2024 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,946 edits →Hazara genocide (19th century): Declined – not enough recent disruptive activity (using responseHelper) | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<noinclude>{{/Header}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{/Header}}</noinclude> | ||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|1=Hazara genocide (19th century)}} | ||
'''Reason:''' I've previously asked for protection for this page here and was told to come back if more issues occured. Even though it's ] it is still being contantly ]. I'm asking for ] not indefinite but at least for a month, maybe a bit after just in case they disrupt the article after the event has concluded. ] If you need any more evidence to confirm anything please let me know in the reply. ] (]) 15:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – CTOP violations. ''']]''' 17:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Some of the other users you've reverted recently are also extended-confirmed; they wouldn't be affected. Are their edits the ones that you are referring to? ] (]) 04:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to ] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|Fursuit}} | ||
'''Reason:''' Semi: Nothing good has ever come out from IPs editing this controversial page ] (]) 19:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Reason:''' High level of edit warring on semi-protected article. In addition, there seems to be a high level of COI edits from users who previously engaged in a pattern of disruptive edits. Despite previous discussions about notability, the same issues continue to resurface, creating an unproductive cycle of content removal and restoration. The editors' actions appear to be ] behavior rather than constructive editing. (see ]). | |||
:] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to ] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 19:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | === ] === | ||
I plan to clean up the article after it has been protected, as per ]. ] (]) 23:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | * {{pagelinks|1=President of Russia}} | ||
'''Indefinite extended confirmed protection:''' Persistent ] – Lots of dynamic IP vandalism which isn't letting up. ] (]) 21:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, that would be good, especially if the protection can be added indefinitely (since this article has been extended-confirmed protected multiple times and it still sees a large amount of vandalism and edit warring to this day). Out of curiosity, is it also possible to add a protection against specific users that have been participating in ] behavior rather than constructive editing? ] (]) 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::No, but we have ] which, imho, are somewhat less used than they should be. ] (]) 14:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I see, thanks. Specifically, I've noticed a disproportionately large amount of nonconstructive edits (some blatantly violating ] and accusing editors of violating ] with no evidence) from ], a relatively new Misplaced Pages editor who seems to be more concerned with arguing the legitimacy of previous editors than constructively editing the article (see: the lengthy discussion at ]). I suggest a partial block over the participants of this edit war on this article, but an extended-confirmed protection should do the trick as well. ] (]) 17:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::I don't like issuing partial blocks without any warning, though, especially to a user who seems in general to be contributing constructively. If we're going to discuss that, perhaps AN/I is a better forum than this. ] (]) 22:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::That is a rather curious characterization of my activity. I pointed out numerous flaws with the article, and corrected many of them. I noted extensive ] activity from yourself and others centered on 15.ai, including several accounts that appeared at the AfD for the purpose of voting to keep the page and nothing else while also noting the unusual circumstances in which the article was elevated to "Good" status. As for "evidence" of COI editing, as I pointed out in my post on the talkpage, there are clear edits that can be linked to the so-called Pony Preservation Project which engaged in considerable off-site coordination to edit the article and which is itself linked to 15.ai and listed as "invaluable" on an archived version of 15.ai. <b>]</b> 00:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Yes, because edits like that blatantly violate ] are totally constructive, yes? And again, '''I am not involved with the PPP''', and you have neither pointed out who you suspect are involved in COI nor have you given any evidence of said editing. You say there are "clear edits" and yet you have not given examples of any of them - you are making baseless accusations and grasping at straws, and are actively discouraging Wikipedeans who only want to help. | |||
::::::To accuse me of others of COI and SPA activity (which, by the way, is blatantly untrue, if you'd seen my history of helping out with articles relevant to 4chan) because of your extremely strange obsession over the article along with this kind of dishonest conduct and projection is appalling. ] (]) 04:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::If this article is granted extended-confirmed protection, I am requesting extended confirmed access to help with cleanup. I previously held this right and used it for similar maintenance work on this article when I asked for the article to be extended-confirmed protected a year ago. ] (]) 17:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Should that happen, you are referred to ]. That request is outside the scope of this noticeboard. ] (]) 22:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Understood, thank you. If the extended-confirmed protection is granted, I'll make a request there. ] (]) 22:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I am not sure - the article has been semi-protected since 2020, and there is no IP vandalism, at least not since 2020. I do not currently see any need for extended confirmed protection. ] (]) 22:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | === ] === | ||
:] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to ] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> I agree with {{u|Ymblanter}}. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | * {{pagelinks|1= |
||
⚫ | === ] === | ||
'''Temporary extended confirmed protection:''' Persistent ] – Changing the budget and box office without providing reliable sources. ] (]) 13:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | * {{pagelinks|Donald Tusk}} | ||
'''Reason:''' Repeated recent vandalism on a BLP article by IP/non-autoconfirmed users. ] (]) 22:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:] ''']''' for a period of '''10 days''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#semi --> ] (]) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
:If we upgrade to ECP, either that stays till May or we shorten the protection term, due to the limitations of MediaWiki which don't allow us to layer protection beyond PC, so once protection expires we'd have to reprotect it. Which are you comfortable with? ] (]) 22:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
* {{pagelinks|Nirvana (Buddhism)}} | |||
'''Reason:''' Same unsourced/PoV content being added by multiple IPV6 addresses - ] (]) 23:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:] '''User(s) ]''': {{user|2409:4073::/33}}.<!-- Template:RFPP#bloc --> One-week partial block from the article in question. ] (]) 23:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|1=Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C.}} | ||
'''Reason:''' Vandalism ] (]) 20:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Indefinite extended confirmed protection:''' ]. ] (]) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to ] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> |
||
:] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to ] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks|1= |
* {{pagelinks|1=Yaldā Night}} | ||
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent ]. |
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent addition of ] – Unsourced additions as soon as the protection expired. ] (]) 23:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:] ''']''' for a period of '''1 week''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#semi --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | === ] === | ||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|Jensen Huang}} | ||
⚫ | '''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism, with multiple ]s removing content from the article for no reason ] (]) 00:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:] ''']''' for a period of '''1 week''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#semi --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – Perhaps best we suspend IP edits until the gentleman is comfortably in his new job. Vast majority of these contributions have nothing to do with helping the article... Simply just criticisms without recommendation or sources. Simply a time sink for our editors that seems to be a coordinated attempt to change the article from outside sources. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 02:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | === ] === | ||
⚫ | * {{pagelinks| |
||
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' Persistent ] – Looking at the article's history shows that IPs have been been removing the same content for a while. Semi-protecting it like all the article about countries will prevent the disruption. ] (]) 02:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|List of active rebel groups}} | |||
⚫ | '''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism ](]) |
||
=== ] === | |||
* {{pagelinks|List of NHL players with 1,000 points}} | |||
'''Semi-protection:''' IPs and new users scrambling to update the page for Connor McDavid's 1,000th, despite clear directives on the page to wait until the end of the season to comprehensively update. ] ] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>(])</sup></small></span> 03:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:53, 25 December 2024
ShortcutsPlace requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". |
Hazara genocide (19th century)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – CTOP violations. JayCubby 17:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Fursuit
Reason: Semi: Nothing good has ever come out from IPs editing this controversial page Heyaaaaalol (talk) 19:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 19:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
President of Russia
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of dynamic IP vandalism which isn't letting up. Robenceic (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure - the article has been semi-protected since 2020, and there is no IP vandalism, at least not since 2020. I do not currently see any need for extended confirmed protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I agree with Ymblanter. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Donald Tusk
Reason: Repeated recent vandalism on a BLP article by IP/non-autoconfirmed users. Sigma440 (talk) 22:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Nirvana (Buddhism)
Reason: Same unsourced/PoV content being added by multiple IPV6 addresses - Arjayay (talk) 23:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2409:4073::/33 (talk · contribs). One-week partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 23:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Yaldā Night
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced additions as soon as the protection expired. Aintabli (talk) 23:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Jensen Huang
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, with multiple WP:SPIs removing content from the article for no reason GuardianH (talk) 00:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)