| Revision as of 05:53, 15 November 2024 editRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,097 edits →Here's a barnstar!: comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:13, 12 December 2024 edit undoBrocadeRiverPoems (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,074 edits blankTag: Blanking | ||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{Monthly archive list | |||
| | startyear = 2024 | |||
| | monthformat = longname | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(30d) | |||
| | archive = User talk:BrocadeRiverPoems/%(year)d/(monthname)s | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| | archiveheader = {{Monthly archive list}} | |||
| }} | |||
| == Arbitration case opened == | |||
| You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by October 10, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 12:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| === Proposed decision posted === | |||
| In the open ] arbitration case (also called ''Yasuke''), the ] have been posted—though you are not mentioned in any of them (aside from your evidence). If you wish, you may review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the ]. For a guide to the proposed decision, see ]. ] ] 00:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] (October 3) == | |||
| <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: | |||
| {{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject ]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ], ] sources that are '']'' of the subject (see the ]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see ] and learn about ] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.|}}<!-- | |||
| -- | |||
| --> The comment the reviewer left was: | |||
| {{divbox|blue|3=Rewording a sentence isn't really going to help with notability.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''. | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to ] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. | |||
| * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and ]. | |||
| * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any ] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks"></span>, on the <span class="plainlinks"></span> or use ]. | |||
| ] <small> (]) </small> 05:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline--> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 09:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Dispute over on Hirohito == | |||
| In the past, you have pointed out that I have a tendency to get combative with other editors. How would you suggest who shows little signs of compromise ? ] (]) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :To be honest? I'd just ]. On a glance my instinct is that {{tq|a significant number of historians}} seems to qualify as ], though ] does say it's not automatically weasel to use those words. If you're adamant that some sort manner of contention should be demonstrated, you can try to locate a source that utilizes similar language that many historians believe Hirohito was culpable and attribute the claim. In short, per ], it's up to you to ''provide sources'' that verify {{tq|there are an equally large number who argue he was merely a passive figure}}, and thus the contention. Until you can provide sources to support the edit, they're perfectly within policy to remove the edit. | |||
| :Once you have located appropriate sources, simply create a Talk Page thread detailing your rationale and the sources you've found that support representing the claim was contested. <b>]</b> 22:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Here's a barnstar! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I thank you for continuing to have a presence in the editing of 15.ai. Your responses to many of claims in talk pages and when others were involved were very calm in spite of possible hostility. While I am not completely sure how Barnstars work, I feel quite sure you deserve one. ] (]) 16:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks, I have no idea, either! <b>]</b> 11:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::], ] - They work just as you did. Any editor can give one to any other editor. ] (]) 05:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] closed == | |||
| An arbitration case ] (formerly titled ]) has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: | |||
| * Yasuke is designated as a ]. Starting in 2026 and checked yearly afterwards, this designation expires on 1 January if no sanctions have been logged in the preceding 2 years. | |||
| * The article ] is subject to a ] restriction for a period of one year. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is warned that disruptive behavior will lead to increasing sanctions if they continue. | |||
| * ] is subject to a one-way interaction ban with Gitz6666, subject to the usual exceptions. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 23:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Yasuke closed}}''' | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you for notifying me of your report. As I have mentioned in my statement, there are both a content dispute and a conduct dispute. The content dispute should be resolved by the RFC. (Maybe more editors will take part in the RFC now that I have neutrally mentioned it at a conduct noticeboard.) ] (]) 05:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||