Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 20:57, 25 November 2024

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Titoxd

FINAL (75/1/1) ending 20:09 October 24, 2005 (UTC)
Titoxd (talk · contribs) –Titoxd is a great guy and a great user. He scored a 609 on the Wikiholic test, is active both in the English and Spanish Wikipedias, just missed making the Advisory Committee in the recent Esperanza Election, and has just over 2,000 edits. Time to give him the mop. Karmafist 21:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I'm honored to accept this nomination and I appreciate any and all constructive criticism comming from it. Please help me get better in helping Misplaced Pages. Titoxd 21:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

1. Agree, he is a good editor. Martin 21:42, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
2. Support per everything above, obviously. Karmafist 21:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
3. Strong Support I was thinking of nominating him after the nomination of Greg Asche was done --JAranda | watz sup 21:49, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
4. Support - Titoxd is a great foe of vandals; he will wield a mighty mop. - jredmond 21:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
5. Strong support - all of my experience of this user has been highly positive and I have no reason to doubt either is contribution to Misplaced Pages or his future usefulness as an administrator. An all-round very nice person. --Celestianpower 22:09, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
6. Support - plays a good game of whack-a-vandal.  BD2412 22:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
7. SupportIf I had known that he wasn't already an admin I would have probably nominated him. Jtkiefer ----- 22:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
8. Support, per nom. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
9. Support Ryan Norton 22:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
10. Support Private Butcher 22:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
11. Ab-so-lute-ly. -- Essjay · Talk 22:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
12. Support no doubt in my mind he will be a great admin. -Greg Asche (talk) 22:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
13. Support Titoxd removes vandalism a lot and as an admin they could help a lot by banning users that keep vandalising --☺Adam1213☺ Talk+|WWW 23:05, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
14. Ja. ~~ N (t/c) 23:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
15. Support --HappyCamper 00:43, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
16. Support. Definitely ;-). I've been in edit conflicts with Titoxd 'cause he is faster at clicking save during RC Patrol than I am ;-). >: Roby Wayne 00:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    And I've been beaten to reverts by admins so many times, I'm sure you know the feeling. :) Titoxd 00:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    Big AMEN on that!! >: Roby Wayne 02:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

17. Chea! Acetic' 01:05, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
18. Support. Ral315 W_S 01:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
19. Support a fellow vandalbuster ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 02:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
20. Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 02:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    Yes, Oui, Si, Ja, כן ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 02:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC) You voted twice. Titoxd 02:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    Ooops, sorry..! ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 21:01, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

21. Support. Hesitation have I none. -Splash 02:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
22. Support like I've never supported before. Great guy, even greater contributor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysekurity (talk • contribs) 03:43, 18 October 2005.
23. Strong Support. Thought Titoxd was one. Oran e (t) (c) (@) 03:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
24. yep yep yep -- (drini's page|☎) 04:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
25. Strong Support For sure! Banes 05:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
26. Support. Valuable contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:11, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
27. Support, certainly. --JoanneB 07:30, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
28. Oh good, finally I won't be the only admin in Arizona. (And I agree with everyone else's reasons for supporting :) Dmcdevit·t 07:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
29. Good stuff. brenneman 08:01, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
30. Big Style Furry Alien Support thought he was already... Alf 10:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
31. Absolutely. Am thoroughly miffed I'm so far down the line, but very pleased it's a long one. :) encephalon 12:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
32. Support. He's not an admin yet? Huh. --Ashenai (talk) 14:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
33. Support. Always good to have more vandal hunters.--Scimitar 14:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
34. Support. Thought he already was one. the wub "?!" 15:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
35. Support- ditto. --Bhadani 16:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
36. Support without hesitation. Hall Monitor 17:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
37. Support pgk 17:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
38. Support looks like a good person to give a mop to.  ALKIVAR™ 18:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
39. Support Dlyons493 Talk 19:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
40. Support Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
41. Well, I wanted to be evil and be the one oppose vote, but I just can't find anything wrong with Tito. Support. --Lord Voldemort 21:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    Well, i'm sure Boothy will come around eventually ;-) Karmafist 22:32, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

    I dunno, He didn't peg me (I was sad) and I didn't see him in any of the ones last week. Ëvilphoenix 02:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

    Speak of the devil... :-) the wub "?!" 23:14, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

42. First time I've heard of him, but seems a solid editor. freestylefrappe 00:39, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
43. Support Very active doing RC patrol, VFU, et al. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
44. Support. Very quick with the vandal reverting. Carbonite | Talk 02:09, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
45. Support. Of course. Ëvilphoenix 02:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
46. Support --MONGO 02:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

    Support --JoanneB 10:16, 19 October 2005 (UTC) (One support'll be enough, I reckon. ;) --Ashenai (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC))

47. Good editor, this person seems to be. His nomination, support I do. — JIP | Talk 11:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

    Support — JIP | Talk 11:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

    Voted twice, you have. — JIP | Talk 11:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

48. Support --GraemeL 13:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
49. Support {{subst:AdminCliché}} --RobertG ♬ talk 15:10, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
50. Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
51. FireFox 18:12, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
52. Support. Robert 21:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
53. Support --fvw* 02:10, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
54. Support—Gaff 02:12, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
55. Support Redwolf24 (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
56. Support. Seems to be only a formality, but still. The Minister of War 10:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
57. Support. Wow. Sebastian Kessel 20:12, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
58. Support. Very knowledgable of Misplaced Pages. Courtious, and always asks users on the discussion page if they agree to any major changes before making them. I really appreciate and respect that. Very mature. -- E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - my dropsonde 21:54, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
59. Support. This guy is good. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 22:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
60. Support 172 | Talk 22:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
61. Support Molotov (talk)
    23:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

    Extreme Lesbian Voter Fraud I'll vote twice just because it's already a foregone conclusion and i'd like to have the honor of having my vote stricken out by this soon to be über-administrator. I was thinking of leaving the umlauts off to see if he replaced them on there before he struck them, but I figured that'd be overboard. FYI, Titoxd, please make sure you invite me to any celebration parties you may have in your fabulous new barn, now horse feces free! ;-) Karmafist 00:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC) Vote dutifully stricken, and sure, you're all invited. :) Titoxd 01:51, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

62. Support. Excellent editor, who should become admin much earlier. Can we speedy approve this? We need him with the rollback for Hurricane Wilma, yes now! --Vsion 20:12, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
63. Support, good active editor. K1Bond007 22:39, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
64. Support You're not an admin? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:06, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
65. Hrm. I thought I already voted here.. Oh well, 1.1 votes is better than none. «»Who?¿? 07:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
66. S'port Doc (?) 18:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
67. Support You betcha'! Thatdog 21:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
68. Support. --tomf688 21:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
69. Support Ann Heneghan 02:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
70. I'm surprised I never noticed this. Very helpful, and to add to my vote, helped me out recently in a dispute. He definitely deserves it. Support. (Good grief, in my haste to vote, I actually voted in the wrong RfA!) -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} 07:31, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
71. Support I though I had already, but guess not! Bratsche 18:09, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
72. He's not an admin? Support! - Mailer Diablo 13:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
73. Support Another extremely competent user who should be in, great guy. Titoxd! Titoxd! Titoxd! Titoxd...!-) Gryffindor 18:15, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
74. Overwhelming support -- Francs2000 21:33, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
75. Support. El_C 21:41, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

1. --Boothy443 | comhrá 21:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

   I Oppose you, Pikachu!! File:Pikachu2.gif. Ëvilphoenix 20:03, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I find it very hard to assume good faith with Boothy's oppositions. Opposing nearly all potential admins. without explanation is essentially incivil, and without such explanation, in fact, he is not abiding by WikiGuidelines. Furthermore, I believe that these oppositions are a result of simple malice. I noticed that Boothy has 16,000 edits, but is not an adm - perhaps he is trying to hold others back. His contributions reflect a tendency of anger when people have only asked a simple question or he is excessivley sarcastic . I request that medition or arbitration be considered against this user. Him abusing the rights of RfA is harmful to the Wiki in my opinion - trolls, vandals and spammers are not allowed to continue in bad faith - so this user should also comport himself in a civil manner on these RfAs. He is abusing his rights here - and he is apparently making no attempts to stop. He has the right to vote, sure, but all the other Wikipedians have the right to a fair RfA. Something needs to happen! Molotov (talk) 03:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Calm down, people! You're taking his oppose vote harder than I am, and I'm the one being opposed. :) Boothy does have standards for adminship, in fact, he described them to Acetic Acid not too long ago. I can't and I won't blame Boothy for having such high standards—if I don't meet them, then I don't meet them, and that's the end of the story. Everyone, have a cup of coffee on my behalf, ok? Titoxd 04:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

1. I added this here because this section seemed kind of empty and surely, one more support's not gonna make a hell of a difference--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 05:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. I've been very active in the Counter Vandalism Unit the last few days, and before that, I used to do manual RC Patrol to revert vandalism, so that's one thing I'll keep doing. Also, I'm very active at Votes for Undeletion, where being an admin is very helpful. I also plan to help with the backlogs at Templates for deletion, Miscellaneous deletion and of course, the one no one wants to do.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Most of my article namespace edits have come through Spanish Translation of the Week, and my two favorite articles are Geology of Venus and Geology of the Moon, the current SPATRA. Keeping with SPATRA, but this time on the Misplaced Pages namespace, I was the one who came up with the idea of commenting untranslated text, as a compromise to a conflict that occured while editing Glacier.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. Mostly, I've been able to avoid Wikistress altogether, so I've been lucky. However, I know that adminship would result in being involved in more conflicts, so I'll say that my personal philosophy is to assume good faith before everything, ignore all personal attacks done on me, and not to attack anyone. Basically, to remember that we're trying to build an encyclopedia here before anything else.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

• Successful requests for adminship