| Revision as of 23:52, 25 November 2024 editExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators327,705 edits Replies.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:27, 17 January 2025 edit undoDavidgoodheart (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users153,386 edits →Deleted articles | ||
| (225 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 56 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Deleted articles== | ==Deleted articles== | ||
| Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::Can I please see the deleted ]. ] (]) |
::Can I please see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::: |
::::Can I please see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ] was just a redirect to ]. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::: |
::::::Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::: |
::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . It is a promotional mess, but perhaps the sources may be of value. ]] 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of ] on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! ] (]) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Please, the above category ain't empty, containing ] as of 02:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC). It isn't the most populous of categories, but should be left to stay and not deleted, in the light that future people from or associated with ] in ], ] might have their articles published on Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :{{Reply to|Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez}} It was empty when I tagged it. The deletion tag can be removed once it is populated. ]] 02:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Article for review == | |||
| When deleting files per ], please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced ] version. --] (]) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Please, as an administrator, I'd like you to check this article ] and review it. It doubt it has been reviewed. Thanks! ] •  (] ]) 02:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Stefan2}} I have uploaded the higher resolution. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg == | |||
| == Deleted draft == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- ] (]) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Regarding the just-deleted ], I don't need it refunded but could you tell me whether it is about VS the sportsman or VS the photographer? Thanks, ] (]) 21:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to| |
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{tl|npd}} works in this case. ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks |
::Thanks for checking. -- ] (]) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg == | |||
| == Categories of the ] == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like ). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail ] since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in ] most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- ] (]) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! Please explain to me why categories: ], ], ], ] (etc.) are allowed, but category ], ] is not allowed? ] (]) 15:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|DigitalSpace}} Hi, the categories were tagged for deletion simply for being empty. Whatever page(s) populated these categories have seemingly been deleted. ]] 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Jay Estiquita.jpg == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Could you also take a look at ]? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. ] looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about ]. -- ] (]) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hey there again. Is this file the same one as the ] per FFD? ] (]) 17:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|George Ho}} Hi, it's similar enough to the previous screenshot to qualify for ], so I've deleted it as such. ]] 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== A barnstar for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);" | |||
| Hello, I noticed that a page about Bobo Ajudua was deleted by you. I was unaware of the deletion, so I went ahead and created a new page about him and his controversial issue with Afrobeats singer Davido. ] (]) 21:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
| == User:Doomguy427 == | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Explicit. {{no ping|Doomguy427}} is a relatively new account that looks to be editing in good-faith; the problem is that they keep uploading images without any source information or any license. They haven't responded to any of the notifications about this on their user talk page and they don't seem to be slowing down. They're almost certainly getting the files from somewhere online and ] was cleaned up by another user. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? Would you mind posting something about this on their user talk? -- ] (]) 21:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I have left the user a warning. ]] 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for taking a look. -- ] (]) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Old AFD question == | |||
| Hello, you closed this AFD, ], as a delete in 2022 and deleted the article ] as a part of that. I have found the duplicate article ] still exists, as near as I can tell because ] was moved there in 2009 but then someone turned that redirect back into an article. I was wondering if you wanted to delete ] as a duplicate whose deletion was called for by the AFD, or if I should nominated it for a new AFD now. Obviously this was some time ago so I understand if you have no idea at this point. ] (]) 02:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Here2rewrite}} Hi, the history is a bit jumbled up, but the page actually survived ]. Basically, ] was renamed from ] in May 2009. Someone redirected it to ] in October 2009 in spite of the AFD, and a bot fixed the double redirect, so ] also pointed to ]. ] was written as an article in 2015, but ] was never fixed to point back to it, so ] deleted it along with ]. ] would need to go through AFD again if someone is seeking to delete it. ]] 05:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for untangling that, that was a very clear explanation. I will look into what to do with the article from here. ] (]) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Greenwich SM City Masinag (2024-11-16).jpg == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? It seems to have multiple problems, ], ] and maybe even ] or ]. I'm not sure what tag to place on it. There could also be problems per ]. -- ] (]) 05:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Starship Moments After Liftoff.jpeg == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at ]? All of this user's uploads so far have been screenshots from YouTube videos released under YT's standard licensing; so, I've tagged them for speedy deletion per F9. This particular file is also a screenshot but it's via {{url|https://spacenews.com/spacex-launches-sixth-starship-but-aborts-booster-landing/|this website}}, and unlike the others i'm wondering whether it might be possible to convert to a non-free license given the way it's being used in ]. I'm a bit hesitant though because ] seems to indicate that a free image of these SpaceX launches might be possible. SpaceX, itself, could even provide some acceptably licensed images if it wants. Is it then in your opinion even worth converting this to non-free per ]? -- ] (]) 06:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I've deleted all the video screenshots as copyright violations. Aside from the most recent flight test, ] is the only other in the series that does not contain freely licensed media. It's unlikely that an image for either article would qualify by Misplaced Pages's fair use standards, unless a particular image ''itself'' (and not the flight test in general) is subject to sourced critical commentary in accordance with ] or considered significant enough for {{tl|Non-free historic image}}. As flight test 6 is incredibly fresh, free media may became available in the coming days or weeks. ]] 06:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for checking on these. Do you suggest tagging the remaining file for speedy deletion per F9 or just letting it be deleted for not having a copyright license per F4? -- ] (]) 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} My rule of thumb is to just let these types of files meet their fate. Regardless of the process, the end result is usually the same. ]] 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, that's probably the best thing to do in this case. Thanks again. -- ] (]) 21:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Why was this deleted? == | |||
| Hello, I have noticed and a fair few others that I’ve spoken to in person that you deleted the page of “Aleksei Kulashko”? I was confused why as even to this day he has participating in events and even been invited to light the chess olympics torch in New Zealand. So my request is for this page to be undeleted as it’s still significant to this day and there has not been any issue with it up until now. ] (]) 07:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tpw}} ]. ] (]) 08:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::<!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' – as a contested ], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - soft --> ]] 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == You've got mail == | |||
| {{You've got mail|dashlesssig=<span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 09:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
| :@] I emailed you hours ago explaining the situation, and have just had to go to Oversight ''again'' to request suppression of the ANI thread where you and @] disclosed the supressed username. Utterly stupid behaviour. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 13:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Reply to|Qcne}} I'm pretty sure I did not mention the username in my followup response. In fact, I did everything to avoid mentioning or linking it again. I couldn't do much about the initial mention, as your email came in after that. I don't think I could have done much for that. ]] 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::You mentioned the username in your ''first'' ANI post. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 13:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{Reply to|Qcne}} ...Yes, that's why I just said. "I couldn't do much about the initial mention" because your email came afterwards. Like I stated at ANI, I was not aware of the distinction between account suppression and username suppression, given the original case I linked. ]] 13:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I just would have thought you'd have immediately requested oversight once my email had gone through, instead of waiting hours and continuing the ANI thread. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 14:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{tq|1=Utterly stupid behaviour}}<br>That's a nasty way to talk to somebody. Please be kinder! <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 06:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == You may want to go for ARB == | |||
| Hi, another way for solve this, if needed, is trying for an Arbcom case instead of being so angered on AN/I. Please calm down or just take a break for a few hours, which might be better. ] 13:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Lemonaka}} {{ec}} I honestly can not be bothered to tread through the politics of Misplaced Pages. I have enough work to do around here and mountains of page creations to do on Commons. I'd rather spend my time doing those things. ]] 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Since the thread has now been suppressed, just to let you know (if you didn't see it) that I removed your two personal attacks on Liz (the second one was so egregious, especially to a female editor, that I seriously considered blocking you). Please don't do that again. ] 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Black Kite}} Noted. For the record, I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not. Viewing the world with a different lens and all, but thanks for the context reminder. ]] 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Allow me to introduce you to the phrase, "get off my back." It means the same thing except no one has to think about your dick. Wins all around. ] (]) 16:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't understand how "get off my dick" means something different in a non-hetronormative context and indeed when I looked into this phrase I found examples of it being used against gay men by straight men. I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz. I seriously considered pressing the block button myself. I didn't become an admin to block people and since I respect Black Kite's assessmment that he would have done the same for any user with your editing/block history I didn't take him up on his permission for someone else to do it. But for what it's worth I actually think there is a ''better'' case to block an admin for it since there is a higher expectation in these regards. ] (]) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{tq|I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz.}} Why though? It's pretty obviously offensive and incredibly disrespectful. ] (]) 18:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::As I said I felt disgust upon seeing it and I left my message because I find {{tqq|I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not}} in adequate. However, when looking into it there do seem to be certain communities (at least online ones) which use it rather than far more reasonable and acceptable "get off my back" and it appears explicit is a part of them. ] (]) 19:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Not just online communities. It's a common phrase men say to each other, at least in the US (or at least in the parts where I've been), stemming from "stepping on my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stepping on my toes", and thus "get off my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stop stepping on my toes" or "get off my back" or "get off my ass". But a man should ''never'' say "get off my dick" to a woman, because it obviously has a very different connotation in that context. Even where the phrase is common, a man saying it to a woman would be a major faux pas. It was a dumb and offensive thing for Explicit to say to Liz. ] (]) 19:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I concur. Saying something like "hop off " is something commonly used as slang in the US to mean like "stop annoying me", but I will admit that there's times it shouldn't be used, especially in this context. Usually it's just a more innapropriate way of saying "leave me alone", but I can't speak on behalf of everyone. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 23:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{replyto|Barkeep49}} Fair enough. Not being heterosexual myself I found the "heteronormative train of thought" excuse pretty poor. ] (]) 19:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::It unfortunately shows the (general, I have no personal issue with Barkeep49) pisspoor way editors who identify as female are treated here. The insult, the report, and the timing from Explicit are an extremely poor showing from a long term admin. (And to head off any questions, no it's not recall worthy and I don't believe in forced apologies) ] ] 23:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::lol at much of this discussion. Several different universes here, but Explicit lived up to their name and should have thought a smidge more, especially during the next several minutes, and edited and spellchecked the thing. If I were an admin I'd give Explicit a justified 4 hours in the penalty box, although assume good faith seems to enter into all viewpoints of this. ] (]) 02:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Explicit, you're lucky other people got there first. If I had gotten there first, I can tell you with certainty that I would not have exhibited the hesitation that {{u|Black Kite}} and {{u|Barkeep49}} showed with the block button. ] ] 15:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Explicit, I agree with Roy Smith. I was asleep when this was reported. Had I been awake and watching ANI, you would be blocked and it would not have been for four hours. Keep your sexualized insults to yourself. ] (]) 18:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Tzamplakon family == | |||
| Hi User:Explicit, I think the article ] was deleted once, but is now renewed. May you explain this case to me. Thanks. ] (]) ] (]) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Jingiby}} Hi, the article was draftified in early October and the resulting redirect was deleted in accordance with the speedy deletion criterion regarding ]. The draft was submitted by the author and accepted by a reviewer a little over two weeks later, so it was moved back into mainspace. ]] 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg == | |||
| ==AlgoSec== | |||
| Can I please see the deleted article ]. This is a notable cybersecurity firm, with hundreds of global customers https://www.algosec.com/our-customers and should not be deleted. You can see some of the news coverage they have received https://www.algosec.com/news ] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 20:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :{{Reply to|Amechad}} Are you affiliated with the company? Would you like to disclose any ]? ]] 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{tlx|npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as ] uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==New message from DreamRimmer== | |||
| I bookmarked this a while ago with a note to myself (possibly PD). It's since been deleted, but could you take a look? I remember nothing of the file beyond the note I left to myself. <span style="color: #1a237e; background-color: #fff176; font-weight: bold;">]</span> <span style="color: #fff176; background-color: #1a237e; font-weight: bold;">]</span> 22:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts|ts=09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
| :{{Reply to|JayCubby}} The cover in question can be found . ] currently uses a different image. ]] 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| – ] <small>(])</small> 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:27, 17 January 2025
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Deleted articles
Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo
Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Dumbdora3729.jpg
When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Jay Estiquita.jpg
Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
New message from DreamRimmer
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.