| Revision as of 15:55, 26 November 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Japan/Archive/October 2024) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:55, 1 January 2025 edit undoAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers636,723 edits + | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | |||
| {{WikiProject banner shell| | {{WikiProject banner shell| | ||
| {{WikiProject Japan}} | {{WikiProject Japan}} | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Does anyone speak Japanese? == | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| I'm trying to eventually get ] to FA and I'd appreciate a second set of eyes from an experienced editor who can understand the sources cited in the Japan section. Is anything missing? Are the sources being misinterpreted? If it is, don't blame me (I didn't add the content in question). I just want to make sure everything is on the up and up. ] ] 11:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --] (]) 16:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. '''''Warm Regards''''', ] (]) (]) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion on the reliability of Japanese sources == | |||
| :I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469 | |||
| :The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons". | |||
| :The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization. | |||
| :I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists). | |||
| :Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. ] (]) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed split of ] == | |||
| There is a discussion about some Japanese musical theatre sources on RSN, any editor who can help please see ]. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 22:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I have proposed a split of the ] article which may be of interest to this project. I would appreciate your thoughts in the discussion on the ]. ] (]) 11:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 16:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I am trying to clean up and update the Samurai article, and would like some feedback. I have removed a lot of text and started to shift the focus to the development and evolution of samurai as a class. I think that the article before focused too much on famous samurai and major battles. I have some research, and I find the work of historians such as Karl Friday, Thomas Conlan and William Farris are mostly neglected by the article in favour of sources like museum articles without bylines, Japanese dictionaries, and dated pop history books. However, removing some of these sources has become controversial, so some extra eyes on the page would be helpful. ] (]) 07:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Kaoli Isshiki == | |||
| A discussion is going on for ], a soprano from Japan based in France. -- ] (]) 17:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 22:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| Can someone please source this stub? ] (]) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requesting merger of ] == | |||
| I would like to merge ] into the village article of ]. ] (]) 00:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:55, 1 January 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Japan and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | WikiProject Japan was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 11 April 2011. |
 |
| Talk & archives for WP Japan |
|---|
Project talk
|
Task force talk/archives
↔ = joint task force |
| Old notice board |
| Related talk/archives |
| Search the archives: |
| V·T·E |
Does anyone speak Japanese?
I'm trying to eventually get Jehovah's Witnesses to FA and I'd appreciate a second set of eyes from an experienced editor who can understand the sources cited in the Japan section. Is anything missing? Are the sources being misinterpreted? If it is, don't blame me (I didn't add the content in question). I just want to make sure everything is on the up and up. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469
- The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons".
- The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization.
- I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists).
- Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. Erynamrod (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Proposed split of Landlord deity
I have proposed a split of the Landlord deity article which may be of interest to this project. I would appreciate your thoughts in the discussion on the talk page. Erynamrod (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Samurai
I am trying to clean up and update the Samurai article, and would like some feedback. I have removed a lot of text and started to shift the focus to the development and evolution of samurai as a class. I think that the article before focused too much on famous samurai and major battles. I have some research, and I find the work of historians such as Karl Friday, Thomas Conlan and William Farris are mostly neglected by the article in favour of sources like museum articles without bylines, Japanese dictionaries, and dated pop history books. However, removing some of these sources has become controversial, so some extra eyes on the page would be helpful. Tinynanorobots (talk) 07:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Honda Super Cub
Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: