Revision as of 17:22, 5 December 2024 editRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,088 edits →15.ai: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 10:13, 12 December 2024 edit undoBrocadeRiverPoems (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,074 edits blankTag: Blanking |
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> |
|
|
{{Monthly archive list |
|
|
| startyear = 2024 |
|
|
| monthformat = longname |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| algo = old(30d) |
|
|
| archive = User talk:BrocadeRiverPoems/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{Monthly archive list}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Here's a barnstar! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I thank you for continuing to have a presence in the editing of 15.ai. Your responses to many of claims in talk pages and when others were involved were very calm in spite of possible hostility. While I am not completely sure how Barnstars work, I feel quite sure you deserve one. ] (]) 16:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks, I have no idea, either! <b>]</b> 11:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::], ] - They work just as you did. Any editor can give one to any other editor. ] (]) 05:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] closed == |
|
|
|
|
|
An arbitration case ] (formerly titled ]) has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: |
|
|
|
|
|
* Yasuke is designated as a ]. Starting in 2026 and checked yearly afterwards, this designation expires on 1 January if no sanctions have been logged in the preceding 2 years. |
|
|
* The article ] is subject to a ] restriction for a period of one year. |
|
|
* ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. |
|
|
* ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. |
|
|
* ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. |
|
|
* ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. |
|
|
* ] is warned that disruptive behavior will lead to increasing sanctions if they continue. |
|
|
* ] is subject to a one-way interaction ban with Gitz6666, subject to the usual exceptions. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 23:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Yasuke closed}}''' |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for notifying me of your report. As I have mentioned in my statement, there are both a content dispute and a conduct dispute. The content dispute should be resolved by the RFC. (Maybe more editors will take part in the RFC now that I have neutrally mentioned it at a conduct noticeboard.) ] (]) 05:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Not a problem. Hopefully more users participate in the RfC, getting a broader consensus is helpful in resolving these issues. <b>]</b> 11:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ANI notice. == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, BrocadeRiverPoems. Another user has filed a report about you at ] and failed to notify you, so I am giving you that courtesy. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 04:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== AN/I notice == |
|
|
|
|
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 05:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Funny how this guy ] trying to do rocket jumps. ]<sup>(])</sup> 15:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::It was an exhausting process which was a large waste of the time of myself and editors at large. It is baffling that people would think continuing to use the WPO thread '''''that I submitted as evidence to ARBCOM''''' against me is a good vehicle of attack, given that ARBCOM saw said thread of accusations and apparently did not find any merit to said accusations since I wasn't sanctioned. <b>]</b> 23:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|
|
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Xue Tao == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. The external link on ] is dead (It says "''This site does not exist within the LDAP database.''"). Should we replace it with ? Is there a better link? ] (]) 16:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Also the article says {{tq|About 100 of her poems are known nowadays}} but the tuxfamily site lists 76 so perhaps there is a more complete collection somewhere. ] (]) 16:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Hi, |
|
|
:I don't actually know a lot about the Xue Tao article. I glanced at it briefly and it seemed fleshed out enough that I didn't think it warranted my attention. Looking at an archive version of the external link, it doesn't seem to have ever been a substantial collection, even. Your suggested link appears to have a more substantial collection of poems, and I personally do not know of any other website to link. I've read Xue Tao's works in a translated collection in a book, so I've never really looked for a good source of them online. |
|
|
:As for the number of extant poems, I have found this {{tq|A Song-dynasty one-juan anthology of her poetry has come down to us and eighty-nine of her works are extant.}} in the ''Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women, Volume II: Tang Through Ming 618 - 1644'' on Page 523. It'd probably be better to cite the Biographical Dictionary and set the number as 89 extant unless another source can be located. |
|
|
:Cheers, <b>]</b> 01:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Looking at the article, I see now that there are a lot of issues with it, and I know the cause of a fair amount of them given what occurred at ]. I'll work on gradually improving the article as well going forward, thanks for bringing it to my attention. <b>]</b> 02:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Woah that talkpage. Bookmark ]. Thank you. ] (]) 02:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::It was a disaster that began with them insisting on 3PO and ended with multiple-account abuse. <b>]</b> 02:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::People like {{noping|Liz}} and {{noping|Cullen328}} are good to ping in such situations. And if you are in a hurry is a way to contact a recently active admin. ] (]) 02:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, you made a mistake by making an involved close of the RFC while you not only participated in the discussion but have nominated the article for deletion. I don't plan to do anything about that, because I may be the only editor who has that opinion. There appears to be off-wiki coordination that will complicate the AFD. Please ping me or notify me if any ] or ] threads are opened. I will probably take part in the AFD within the next three days. ] (]) 17:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|