| Revision as of 07:29, 7 December 2024 editWcquidditch (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers129,869 edits Updating nomination page with notices (assisted)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:02, 21 December 2024 edit undoDoczilla (talk | contribs)Administrators49,015 edits →Joy (Inside Out): Closed as keep (XFDcloser) | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ] <sub>]</sub> 06:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|1=Joy (Inside Out)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Joy (Inside Out)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|title=Joy (Inside Out)}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Joy (Inside Out)}}) | ||
| I tried to do BEFORE, but I don't see any SIGCOV but movie reviews and about actors. Her current reception was mostly about the actress, who voiced Joy; not the character itself. 🍕]🍕 (]) 05:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | I tried to do BEFORE, but I don't see any SIGCOV but movie reviews and about actors. Her current reception was mostly about the actress, who voiced Joy; not the character itself. 🍕]🍕 (]) 05:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Keep''' there's already sufficient coverage in the article to meet GNG. Nom suggests that coverage of the voice actress is irrelevant. I disagree. The reception section is appropriate already, although likely improvable. ] (]) 07:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' there's already sufficient coverage in the article to meet GNG. Nom suggests that coverage of the voice actress is irrelevant. I disagree. The reception section is appropriate already, although likely improvable. ] (]) 07:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ''']''' ] ] 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ''']''' ] ] 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' A well-written article about one of the main characters in a major Pixar movie franchise. I think enough coverage is given to the Joy character within the included sources. --] (]) 14:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Redirect''' to ] per nom. Not seeing any SIGCOV in the article and no search on the part of any of the participants seems to have turned up anything either. Willing to change my vote if anything's discovered but from what I'm seeing there's not much here that indicates standalone notability. ''] Considerer:'' ''']''' (]) (]) 21:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Weak keep''' My impulse was to suggest a merge, but the text and sources in the criticism/reception section are good enough. ] (]) 22:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Redirect''' to ] per nom. Not independently notable; the mentions of her are pulled from sources about the film itself. ] (]) 12:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Relisting, arguments are divided between Keep and Redirect.<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> | |||
| *'''Keep''' - There are enough sources in the article to show GNG. More sources can be found online too (e.g. - talks about the character in depth. ] (]) 06:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Redirect''' to ] per nom. and ZXCVBNM. Not independently notable. Lazy, but I don't plan on restating previous points. | |||
| :] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 06:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Comment''' - Added a bit of content from three more sources. This one in particular focuses more on the Joy character: - ] (]) 14:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *:This source falls under ] and is not helpful in demonstrating notability ''] Considerer:'' ''']''' (]) (]) 22:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Leaning keep''' worse case scenario '''merge'''. ] says that "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material", so a paragraph or two of content in movie reviews may be enough. There may be enough reception in the article for GNG to be met if it is expanded sufficiently, though the appearances section will need to be cleaned up. At the least there is production info to merge. ]@] 04:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 06:02, 21 December 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Joy (Inside Out)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Joy (Inside Out) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I tried to do BEFORE, but I don't see any SIGCOV but movie reviews and about actors. Her current reception was mostly about the actress, who voiced Joy; not the character itself. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 05:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 05:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there's already sufficient coverage in the article to meet GNG. Nom suggests that coverage of the voice actress is irrelevant. I disagree. The reception section is appropriate already, although likely improvable. Jclemens (talk) 07:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A well-written article about one of the main characters in a major Pixar movie franchise. I think enough coverage is given to the Joy character within the included sources. --Alan Islas (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Inside Out (franchise)#Cast and characters per nom. Not seeing any SIGCOV in the article and no search on the part of any of the participants seems to have turned up anything either. Willing to change my vote if anything's discovered but from what I'm seeing there's not much here that indicates standalone notability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep My impulse was to suggest a merge, but the text and sources in the criticism/reception section are good enough. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Inside Out (franchise)#Cast and characters per nom. Not independently notable; the mentions of her are pulled from sources about the film itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, arguments are divided between Keep and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 05:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - There are enough sources in the article to show GNG. More sources can be found online too (e.g. - talks about the character in depth. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Inside Out (franchise)#Cast and characters per nom. and ZXCVBNM. Not independently notable. Lazy, but I don't plan on restating previous points.
- Comment - Added a bit of content from three more sources. This one in particular focuses more on the Joy character: - Alan Islas (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- This source falls under Misplaced Pages:VALNET and is not helpful in demonstrating notability Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Leaning keep worse case scenario merge. WP:SIGCOV says that "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material", so a paragraph or two of content in movie reviews may be enough. There may be enough reception in the article for GNG to be met if it is expanded sufficiently, though the appearances section will need to be cleaned up. At the least there is production info to merge. ミラP@Miraclepine 04:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.