Misplaced Pages

:Bureaucrats' noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:24, 9 December 2024 editNovem Linguae (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Interface administrators, Administrators50,641 edits →Desysop request (MaxSem): chronological, whitespace← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:04, 26 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,659 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive 50) (bot 
(34 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Notices of interest to bureaucrats}}{{pp-sock|small=yes}} {{Short description|Notices of interest to bureaucrats}}
<noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}{{User:MiszaBot/config <noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
Line 13: Line 13:
__TOC__ __TOC__


== RfA with no candidate acceptance or required disclosures ==
== Malformed RfA ==
{{moved from|WP:AN}}


There is currently a ] which does not have a signature accepting or perform required disclosures. Best, ] (]) 18:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
I came across ] while patrolling ]. The user is not elligible (not extended confirmed) and the RfA should be closed. Could an admin familiar with this type of thing handle it? Thanks. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 11:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
:Meh, it is not transcluded nor has anything been subst'ed to "start" the RFA. I see no harm in leaving it there for now. ] (]) 16:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ :{{nao|bureaurocart}} If it hasn't been opened, how can it be closed? ]'']'' 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
:I have left a message on the user's talkpage with some general advice regarding requesting adminship. ] (]) 17:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
:Well you might be interested in ], which contains quite a few unfiled RfAs. ] (]) 18:22, 3 December 2024 (UTC)


:I'm not a crat but I un-transcluded it and left notices at various places. I know it's overstepping but I felt this was a very urgent situation since it may be an unauthorized RFA and the voters didn't seem to notice/care. (And the instructions are clear about acceptance before transclusion.) ] (]) 19:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ == Desysop request (Tide rolls) ==
::Thanks for doing that. We can't have that. Maybe we need to change the RfA Template so it stops transcluding being possible without a parameter being met.
::Happy for the transclusion to be reverted again when it is signed. '''] <sup>(] • ])</sup>''' 19:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Should the !votes be blanked? Given the answers to the three questions, I would presume Areaseven was not ready for this to be live. I think that it would be unfair to retain !votes based on incomplete information. ] (]/]) 19:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
::::I have rolled back the nomination to the point pre-submission. If and when Areaseven is ready to run, they can accept the nomination and proceed as normal. ] (]) 20:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ :::::Yeah. Shame about the casual personal attack thrown in of course: the wholly unnecessary speculation as to the motives of those who voted. --]'']''] 21:06, 21 December 2024 (UTC)


::::::{{ping|Primefac}} . ] (]) 01:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ {{rfplinks|Tide rolls}}
:::::::I've asked them to reconsider on their talk page, where they received bad advice to immediately accept after Levivich removed the transclusion. ] (]/]) 01:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


⚫ == Resysop request (Daniel) ==
Please remove my admnin bit. Due to circumstances beyond my control (mostly), I won't be able to effectively serve in that capacity. Thanks ]] 18:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)


⚫ *{{rfplinks|Daniel}}
⚫ :{{done}}. ] (]) 19:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ :Thanks for your many years of service to the pedia, Tide rolls. ] (]) 19:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ :I hope your circumstances change for the better, ]. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 20:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)


Hi Bureaucrats, requesting return of the admin tools which I gave up in October. Was originally planning on waiting until the new year, but per ], upholding my timeline commitment of requesting back in late December instead (], ).
== Desysop request (MaxSem) ==


Original desysop request ] in the BN archives for ease of reference.
{{rfplinks|MaxSem}}

Hi, my participation in the recent years was just drive-by edits, so while it would be cool to just have the banhammer lying around just in case, there's no actual need for it. Thus, I'd like to resign. Thanks! ] (]) 11:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ Thanks,<br>] (]) 01:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ : {{Done}} I've done that, thanks for all you did as an admin. Do you still want edit filter, and would you like Rollback or any other rignts? '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 12:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
:: Thank you {{u|WereSpielChequers}}, I'd like rollback. I'll request more if I need it. ] (]) 18:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC) :Seems fine, admin activity as recently as October this year. Standard 24-hour hold applies. — ] <sup>]</sup> 01:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ ::An early Welcome Back, ]! I look forward to seeing you at AFDLand should you want to spend some time there again. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 00:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
:::{{done}}. Just happened to have this on my watchlist, so I took care of it for you. ] (]) 19:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
: Thanks a lot for your service. Just to remind everyone, Maxsem, in addition to being admin here for ages, used to serve as a steward, and also as CU at the Russian Misplaced Pages (possibly the first ever CU there, but I am not sure).--] (]) 12:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC) :::<small>I hope you also look forward to seeing him on the ArbCom mailing list where I expect you two will run into each other frequently... Best, ] (]) 00:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)</small>
{{done}}
:: Thank you! ] (]) 18:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

:Do you want to retain edit-filter manager? — ] <sup>]</sup> 20:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ Welcome back. I have restored your admin rights. '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 13:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ :Thanks all. Looking forward to a busy 2025! Cheers, ] (]) 17:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 26 December 2024

Notices of interest to bureaucrats

Advice, administrator elections (AdE), requests for adminship (RfA), bureaucratship (RfB), and past request archives
Administrators
Bureaucrats
AdE/RfX participants
History & statistics
Useful pages
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    		 Centralized discussion
    Bureaucrat tasks

    Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
    31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
    41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50


    This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats. Click here to add a new section Shortcuts

    The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs 0
    RfBs 0
    Overdue RfBs 0
    Overdue RfAs 0
    BRFAs 13
    Approved BRFAs 0
    Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
    No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
    It is 15:07:33 on December 26, 2024, according to the server's time and date.


    RfA with no candidate acceptance or required disclosures

    There is currently a live RfA which does not have a signature accepting or perform required disclosures. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

    I'm not a crat but I un-transcluded it and left notices at various places. I know it's overstepping but I felt this was a very urgent situation since it may be an unauthorized RFA and the voters didn't seem to notice/care. (And the instructions are clear about acceptance before transclusion.) Levivich (talk) 19:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for doing that. We can't have that. Maybe we need to change the RfA Template so it stops transcluding being possible without a parameter being met.
    Happy for the transclusion to be reverted again when it is signed. Lee Vilenski 19:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    Should the !votes be blanked? Given the answers to the three questions, I would presume Areaseven was not ready for this to be live. I think that it would be unfair to retain !votes based on incomplete information. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    I have rolled back the nomination to the point pre-submission. If and when Areaseven is ready to run, they can accept the nomination and proceed as normal. Primefac (talk) 20:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    Yeah. Shame about the casual personal attack thrown in of course: the wholly unnecessary speculation as to the motives of those who voted. --SerialNumber54129 21:06, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    @Primefac: They've accepted. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
    I've asked them to reconsider on their talk page, where they received bad advice to immediately accept after Levivich removed the transclusion. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

    Resysop request (Daniel)

    Hi Bureaucrats, requesting return of the admin tools which I gave up in October. Was originally planning on waiting until the new year, but per WP:ACE2024, upholding my timeline commitment of requesting back in late December instead (statement, comment).

    Original desysop request here in the BN archives for ease of reference.

    Thanks,
    Daniel (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    Seems fine, admin activity as recently as October this year. Standard 24-hour hold applies. — xaosflux 01:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    An early Welcome Back, Daniel! I look forward to seeing you at AFDLand should you want to spend some time there again. Liz 00:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
    I hope you also look forward to seeing him on the ArbCom mailing list where I expect you two will run into each other frequently... Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

     Done

    Welcome back. I have restored your admin rights. ϢereSpielChequers 13:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

    Thanks all. Looking forward to a busy 2025! Cheers, Daniel (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
    Categories: