| Revision as of 22:38, 10 December 2024 editUlises Laertíada (talk | contribs)298 edits →About your messages on ANI Notice: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:13, 12 December 2024 edit undoBrocadeRiverPoems (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,074 edits blankTag: Blanking | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{Contentious topics/aware|aa2|a-i|tpm|gg|ya|cid}} | |||
| {{Monthly archive list | |||
| | startyear = 2024 | |||
| | monthformat = longname | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(30d) | |||
| | archive = User talk:BrocadeRiverPoems/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| | archiveheader = {{Monthly archive list}} | |||
| }} | |||
| == Here's a barnstar! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I thank you for continuing to have a presence in the editing of 15.ai. Your responses to many of claims in talk pages and when others were involved were very calm in spite of possible hostility. While I am not completely sure how Barnstars work, I feel quite sure you deserve one. ] (]) 16:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks, I have no idea, either! <b>]</b> 11:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::], ] - They work just as you did. Any editor can give one to any other editor. ] (]) 05:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] closed == | |||
| An arbitration case ] (formerly titled ]) has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: | |||
| * Yasuke is designated as a ]. Starting in 2026 and checked yearly afterwards, this designation expires on 1 January if no sanctions have been logged in the preceding 2 years. | |||
| * The article ] is subject to a ] restriction for a period of one year. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is topic banned from Yasuke, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * ] is warned that disruptive behavior will lead to increasing sanctions if they continue. | |||
| * ] is subject to a one-way interaction ban with Gitz6666, subject to the usual exceptions. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 23:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Yasuke closed}}''' | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you for notifying me of your report. As I have mentioned in my statement, there are both a content dispute and a conduct dispute. The content dispute should be resolved by the RFC. (Maybe more editors will take part in the RFC now that I have neutrally mentioned it at a conduct noticeboard.) ] (]) 05:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Not a problem. Hopefully more users participate in the RfC, getting a broader consensus is helpful in resolving these issues. <b>]</b> 11:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI notice. == | |||
| Hi, BrocadeRiverPoems. Another user has filed a report about you at ] and failed to notify you, so I am giving you that courtesy. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 04:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == AN/I notice == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 05:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Funny how this guy ] trying to do rocket jumps. ]<sup>(])</sup> 15:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::It was an exhausting process which was a large waste of the time of myself and editors at large. It is baffling that people would think continuing to use the WPO thread '''''that I submitted as evidence to ARBCOM''''' against me is a good vehicle of attack, given that ARBCOM saw said thread of accusations and apparently did not find any merit to said accusations since I wasn't sanctioned. <b>]</b> 23:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 --> | |||
| == Xue Tao == | |||
| Hi. The external link on ] is dead (It says "''This site does not exist within the LDAP database.''"). Should we replace it with ? Is there a better link? ] (]) 16:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Also the article says {{tq|About 100 of her poems are known nowadays}} but the tuxfamily site lists 76 so perhaps there is a more complete collection somewhere. ] (]) 16:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, | |||
| :I don't actually know a lot about the Xue Tao article. I glanced at it briefly and it seemed fleshed out enough that I didn't think it warranted my attention. Looking at an archive version of the external link, it doesn't seem to have ever been a substantial collection, even. Your suggested link appears to have a more substantial collection of poems, and I personally do not know of any other website to link. I've read Xue Tao's works in a translated collection in a book, so I've never really looked for a good source of them online. | |||
| :As for the number of extant poems, I have found this {{tq|A Song-dynasty one-juan anthology of her poetry has come down to us and eighty-nine of her works are extant.}} in the ''Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women, Volume II: Tang Through Ming 618 - 1644'' on Page 523. It'd probably be better to cite the Biographical Dictionary and set the number as 89 extant unless another source can be located. | |||
| :Cheers, <b>]</b> 01:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Looking at the article, I see now that there are a lot of issues with it, and I know the cause of a fair amount of them given what occurred at ]. I'll work on gradually improving the article as well going forward, thanks for bringing it to my attention. <b>]</b> 02:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Woah that talkpage. Bookmark ]. Thank you. ] (]) 02:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::It was a disaster that began with them insisting on 3PO and ended with multiple-account abuse. <b>]</b> 02:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::People like {{noping|Liz}} and {{noping|Cullen328}} are good to ping in such situations. And if you are in a hurry is a way to contact a recently active admin. ] (]) 02:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| In my opinion, you made a mistake by making an involved close of the RFC while you not only participated in the discussion but have nominated the article for deletion. I don't plan to do anything about that, because I may be the only editor who has that opinion. There appears to be off-wiki coordination that will complicate the AFD. Please ping me or notify me if any ] or ] threads are opened. I will probably take part in the AFD within the next three days. ] (]) 17:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :To be fair, I just marked the discussion as closed because I had seen in the history of 15.ai that someone had already apparently done so , but I understand what you mean. As for the apparent off-wiki coordination, I more or less expected it would happen. I'm not even sure if it's something that needs to go to ANI or AN, | |||
| :Cheers. <b>]</b> 06:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :For what it's worth, though, there is definitely off-wiki canvassing since they posted it on 4chan within the same day of me posting it at AfD. <b>]</b> 13:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, BrocadeRiverPoems, | |||
| Please remember not to ] this discussion. It's already growing exponentially and you don't need to respond to every editor presenting a Keep argument. You have already made your case in the nomination statement and you probably should cease from participating any further unless someone directly asks you a question. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 03:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Will do! I don't really have anything more to add to the discussion. I do want to say, though, that I don't really agree with the characterization that I've responded to '''''every''''' editor presenting a '''Keep''' argument. I only responded to Tacotron2 to answer why I tagged them as an SPA and didn't try and refute them or anything, I responded to Iliketrains125's "Comment" because they brought up Speechify and I found an academic book which talked about Speechify. I responded to the IP with the details from ] which weren't brought up before and which they left out, and my response to Madeleine961 was asking for them to provide the sources from 2020 if they had them and informing them that the SPS do not contribute to notability since they seemed to be new. | |||
| :I do admit that because UnstableDiffusion said they felt it "just barely" met ] I wanted to respond to them and so I tried to explain why I felt the coverage wasn't significant. I also confess I find ] confusing at times because of the whole "we're having a discussion" thing, and when editors present new information, etc. I want to respond such as Madeleine mentioning coverage from 2020, The IP bringing up ], etc. I find myself usually unsure of when I should or shouldn't respond and I end up messing up. So, again, I apologize. | |||
| :Also like, be honest, | |||
| :''Do my posts come off as extremely grumpy or something''? Because I can try and be more casual, I'm just used to writing super formally and I'm starting to worry it gives me this ominous tone and I'm not really sure what 'vibe' we're supposed to be going for, like, formal? casual? semi-formal? Any advice is greatly appreciated. <b>]</b> 03:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == About your messages on ANI Notice == | |||
| I've been offline for a few days and just saw your messages about the ANI Notice regarding the edit warring between Emiya1980 and LilAhok. Thanks for letting me know, but I haven't really been involved in any way with this particular issue, and I understand that LilAhok's message using my signature was due to a mistake when copying a template from another message. So there's no problem. Thanks again. ] (]) 22:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||