Misplaced Pages

Bank of Minden v. Clement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:22, 11 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,610 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Bank of Minden v. Clement|256|126|April 11|1921|States may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.}}'  Latest revision as of 15:48, 11 December 2024 edit undoBunnysBot (talk | contribs)Bots8,984 editsm →External links: Fix CW Errors with GenFixes (T1)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
|Subsequent= |Subsequent=
|Holding=States may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute. |Holding=States may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.
|Majority= |Majority=McReynolds
|JoinMajority= |JoinMajority=
⚫ |Dissent=Clarke
|Concurrence=
⚫ |LawsApplied=]
|JoinConcurrence=
|Concurrence2=
|JoinConcurrence2=
|Concurrence/Dissent=
|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
⚫ |Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
|Dissent2=
|JoinDissent2=
|PerCuriam=
|NotParticipating=
⚫ |LawsApplied=
}} }}


'''''Bank of Minden v. Clement''''', {{ussc|volume=256|page=126|year=1921|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that states may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=Bank of Minden v. Clement|volume=256|page=126|year=1921}}.</ref> '''''Bank of Minden v. Clement''''', {{ussc|volume=256|page=126|year=1921|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that states may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=Bank of Minden v. Clement|volume=256|page=126|year=1921}}.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Bickel |first=Alexander M. |url=https://archive.org/details/judiciaryrespons0009bick/mode/2up |title=The Judiciary and Responsible Government, 1910-1921 |date=2007 |publisher=New York : Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87764-0 |series=Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the United States Supreme Court |volume=9 |page=643}}</ref>


== References == == References ==
Line 42: Line 31:
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/256/126.html | findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/256/126.html
}} }}

⚫ {{SCOTUS-stub}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]


⚫ {{SCOTUS-stub}}

Latest revision as of 15:48, 11 December 2024

1921 United States Supreme Court case
Bank of Minden v. Clement
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 11, 1921
Full case nameBank of Minden v. Clement
Citations256 U.S. 126 (more)
Holding
States may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
MajorityMcReynolds
DissentClarke
Laws applied
Contracts Clause

Bank of Minden v. Clement, 256 U.S. 126 (1921), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that states may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.

References

  1. Bank of Minden v. Clement, 256 U.S. 126 (1921).
  2. Bickel, Alexander M. (2007). The Judiciary and Responsible Government, 1910-1921. Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the United States Supreme Court. Vol. 9. New York : Cambridge University Press. p. 643. ISBN 978-0-521-87764-0.

External links


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: