Misplaced Pages

United States v. Bekins: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:19, 14 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,827 edits Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|United States v. Bekins|304|27|April 25|1938|The federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles.}}'  Latest revision as of 02:20, 16 December 2024 edit undoGünniX (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users311,456 editsm v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Unbalanced quotes in ref name or illegal character.)Tag: WPCleaner 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|DecideDate=April 25 |DecideDate=April 25
|DecideYear=1938 |DecideYear=1938
|FullName=United States v. Bekins et al., Trustees, et al.; Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District v. Bekins et al., Trustees, et al.
|FullName=
|USVol=304 |USVol=304
|USPage=27 |USPage=27
Line 13: Line 13:
|Subsequent= |Subsequent=
|Holding=The federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles. |Holding=The federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles.
|Majority= |Majority=Hughes
|JoinMajority= |JoinMajority=Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed
|Dissent=McReynolds
|Concurrence=
|JoinDissent=Butler
|JoinConcurrence=
|NotParticipating=Cardozo
|Concurrence2=
|LawsApplied=]
|JoinConcurrence2=
|Concurrence/Dissent=
|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
|Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
|Dissent2=
|JoinDissent2=
|PerCuriam=
|NotParticipating=
|LawsApplied=
}} }}


'''''United States v. Bekins''''', {{ussc|volume=304|page=27|year=1938|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that the federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=United States v. Bekins|volume=304|page=27|year=1938}}.</ref> '''''United States v. Bekins''''', {{ussc|volume=304|page=27|year=1938|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that the federal government's ] ] state agencies without violating ] principles.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=United States v. Bekins|volume=304|page=27|year=1938}}.</ref><ref name="Lieberman1999">{{Cite book |last=Lieberman |first=Jethro K. |title=A Practical Companion to the Constitution |year=1999 |pages=65|chapter=Bankruptcy}}</ref><ref name="USCourts_Chapter9">{{Cite web |title=Chapter 9 - Bankruptcy Basics |url=https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-9-bankruptcy-basics |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=United States Courts |language=en}}</ref>

==Significance==
Two year earlier, the court invalidated the Municipal Bankruptcy Act of 1934 in '']'', emphasizing concerns over federalism. In response, Congress passed a revised Municipal Bankruptcy Act in 1936 that emphasized the autonomy of states in the bankruptcy process. ''Bekins'' upheld the revised statute. ''Bekins'' did not explicitly overrule ''Ashton''; instead, it said the statute's respect for federalism was constitutionally adequate.<ref name="case"/>

In dissent, Justice McReynolds (who wrote ''Ashton'') said that ''Ashton'' ought to have applied in this case as well.<ref name="case"/>


== References == == References ==
Line 48: Line 44:
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:20, 16 December 2024

1938 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Bekins
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 25, 1938
Full case nameUnited States v. Bekins et al., Trustees, et al.; Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District v. Bekins et al., Trustees, et al.
Citations304 U.S. 27 (more)
Holding
The federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
James C. McReynolds · Louis Brandeis
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Case opinions
MajorityHughes, joined by Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed
DissentMcReynolds, joined by Butler
Cardozo took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Bankruptcy Clause

United States v. Bekins, 304 U.S. 27 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the federal government's bankruptcy powers can extend to state agencies without violating federalism principles.

Significance

Two year earlier, the court invalidated the Municipal Bankruptcy Act of 1934 in Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement District No. 1, emphasizing concerns over federalism. In response, Congress passed a revised Municipal Bankruptcy Act in 1936 that emphasized the autonomy of states in the bankruptcy process. Bekins upheld the revised statute. Bekins did not explicitly overrule Ashton; instead, it said the statute's respect for federalism was constitutionally adequate.

In dissent, Justice McReynolds (who wrote Ashton) said that Ashton ought to have applied in this case as well.

References

  1. ^ United States v. Bekins, 304 U.S. 27 (1938).
  2. Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Bankruptcy". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 65.
  3. "Chapter 9 - Bankruptcy Basics". United States Courts. Retrieved 2024-12-13.

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: