| Revision as of 19:17, 14 December 2024 edit2600:6c8a:7000:35:315e:c619:218d:500e (talk) →the lineage: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:03, 28 December 2024 edit undoMerytat3n (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,793 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2024: Reply - p.96Tag: Reply |
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
__TOC__ |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
== Copyright == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{copypaste|url=insert file:///Users/dextermersman/Desktop/540px-CairoEgMuseumTaaMaskMostlyPhotographed%205.03.34%E2%80%AFPM.jpg, if known}} ] (]) 22:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Are you referring to ]? That image has been on Common for eight years and was uploaded as the submitter's own work, so I'm somewhat dubious that it's a copyright violation. What's your evidence for the claim? ] (]) 01:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Because it is in the public domain it may have just been copied off of wikipedia and put on other websites. Sorry for the mis-interpretation. But I did find it on multiple websites using Google Image Search. It again could just be a mirror website. ] (]) 11:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Also please look at this CopyVios link https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Tutankhamun&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 ] (]) 11:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::This isn't a productive way to find copyvios. We encourage use of Commons images by other sites. If you really have a problem with a Commons image, raise it on Commons first. ] (]) 12:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::MersmanD, I know your account is new and you probably don't have a lot of experience with how Misplaced Pages works. But Misplaced Pages is mirrored so widely across the internet that if you used evidence this slender as your standard for copyright-tagging, you'd end up tagging most of Misplaced Pages. The copyvio tool link you provided shows a list of page with text that overlaps with that in this article... and the page with the strongest overlap is a forum page with a post that is explicitly quoting from Misplaced Pages. Copyright violation is an extremely important thing to watch out for. But if you go looking for it, please do some basic due diligence to distinguish when Misplaced Pages is copying from other people, as opposed to other people copying from Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== the lineage == |
|
== the lineage == |
| Line 51: |
Line 41: |
|
I have done my own work and found the Tut was son of KV55, who is either of two possibilities: if the skull is old, it is likely that of Akhenaten, however there are Forensic examiners who independently claim the skull is young and if so would therefore be Smenkhkare, youngest son of Queen Tiye, the mother of KV35YL. |
|
I have done my own work and found the Tut was son of KV55, who is either of two possibilities: if the skull is old, it is likely that of Akhenaten, however there are Forensic examiners who independently claim the skull is young and if so would therefore be Smenkhkare, youngest son of Queen Tiye, the mother of KV35YL. |
|
Secondly: If Kiya's image was replaced in the Amarna Sunshade with that of Merytaten, they were equals where KV35YL must then be Kiya as all possible attending attributes coincide. - Robert Cole ] (]) 19:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Secondly: If Kiya's image was replaced in the Amarna Sunshade with that of Merytaten, they were equals where KV35YL must then be Kiya as all possible attending attributes coincide. - Robert Cole ] (]) 19:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Tutankhamun|answered=yes}} |
|
|
In 2024, based on archaeological and scientific evidence the Egyptologist ] identified the father of Tutankhamun as ] and his mother as ], ] <ref>{{ Cite web|title=Martin Bommas {{!}} Macquarie University - Academia.edu|url=https://mq.academia.edu/MartinBommas|access-date=2024-12-28|website=mq.academia.edu}}</ref>. ] (]) 11:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:<span class="nowrap">] '''Not done'''</span><!--template:not done-->, yet. Your source is simply a list of Bommas' publications. I see that he has a book out about Tutankhamun (apparently so recent it's not listed on that page), but I can't access the book to see where he comments on Tutankhamun's parentage. Can you provide a page number? ] (]) 15:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I did some digging and managed to find the page on the - page 96. ] (]) 21:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
I have done my own work and found the Tut was son of KV55, who is either of two possibilities: if the skull is old, it is likely that of Akhenaten, however there are Forensic examiners who independently claim the skull is young and if so would therefore be Smenkhkare, youngest son of Queen Tiye, the mother of KV35YL.
Secondly: If Kiya's image was replaced in the Amarna Sunshade with that of Merytaten, they were equals where KV35YL must then be Kiya as all possible attending attributes coincide. - Robert Cole 2600:6C8A:7000:35:315E:C619:218D:500E (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale._01.svg){kind=small}
Not done, yet. Your source is simply a list of Bommas' publications. I see that he has a book out about Tutankhamun (apparently so recent it's not listed on that page), but I can't access the book to see where he comments on Tutankhamun's parentage. Can you provide a page number? A. Parrot (talk) 15:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)