| Revision as of 18:03, 21 December 2024 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,950 edits →Oppose: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:46, 23 December 2024 edit undoStar Mississippi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators69,985 edits Restored revision 1264383087 by Primefac (talk): Editor has Tags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{safesubst: | |||
| {{RfA/autohold|16:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)|text={{rfah|autohold=yes}}}} | |||
| <!-- To substitute your RfA, remove this line (the HTML comment markup here inactivates the safesubst code)--> | |||
| <span class="plainlinks"></span> (]) | |||
| RfA/readyToSubmit | |||
| '''{{RfA tally|Areaseven}}<!-- WHEN CLOSING THIS RFA, REPLACE THIS PART WITH {{subst:finaltally| OR OR OR OR OR (blank)}} SEE TEMPLATE FOR MORE DETAILS -->; Scheduled to end 16:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)''' | |||
| | user = Areaseven | |||
| ⚫ | | nomStatement = I am pleased to see ]'s contributions to the fields of anime, films, music, and racing. This user is diligent at revising pages, reverting edits, checking facts, and citing sources. He is in the counter-vandalism unit and participates in ], ], ], ], and ]. I believe this user would excel at determining what pages should be ], what pages should be ], and whether certain bad actors (such as ] and ]) need to be ] promptly or if they will be allowed time to reform. With that, and especially your interest and knowledge of anime in mind, I would like to nominate this user for administratorship. ] (]) 23:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| '''Monitors''': <!--list here by signature--> | |||
| | nomStatement2 = | |||
| | acceptance = | |||
| ====Nomination==== | |||
| ⚫ | |<!--Q1: Why are you interested in becoming an administrator? | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | --> Q1_answer = I've been an active editor since 2006, and aside from creating new articles and improving existing ones with proper references, I have been actively countering vandalism by random IP users or persistent sockpuppets. | ||
| ⚫ | |<!--Q2: What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why? | ||
| ⚫ | --> Q2_answer = I have helped expanded articles of several ] artists such as ], ], ], ], ], and ] by adding discography articles. | ||
| :''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'' | |||
| ⚫ | |<!--Q3: Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? | ||
| ⚫ | --> Q3_answer = There are times when other users either post bare references or use incorrect date formats, and I often remind them of their errors. | ||
| ====Questions for the candidate==== | |||
| }} | |||
| Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants: | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ---- | |||
| <span style="font-size:110%">You may ask optional questions below. There is a ] of '''two questions''' per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.</span> | |||
| '''Optional question from ]''' | |||
| :'''4.''' Given that you've been around since 2006, what lead to your decision to RFA at this time? | |||
| ::'''A:''' | |||
| '''Optional question from ]''' | |||
| :'''1.''' Considering your presence since 2006, you've participated in only 10 AfDs, with no involvement since 2019. Is there a particular reason for this? | |||
| ::'''A:'''. | |||
| <!-- Add your question above this comment. --> | |||
| <!-- Use this template to add your question: {{subst:Rfa-question|question number|2=your question}}. If you have two questions, use {{subst:Rfa-question|first question number|2=your first question|3=your second question}}. Check ] for further documentation. --> | |||
| ====Discussion==== | |||
| * Links for Areaseven: {{usercheck-short|Areaseven}} | |||
| * Edit summary usage for Areaseven can be found <span class="plainlinks"></span>. | |||
| ---- | |||
| ''Please keep discussion constructive and ]. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review ] before commenting.'' | |||
| ''Numerated (#) "votes" in the "Support", "Oppose", and "Neutral" sections may only be placed by editors with an ]. All other comments are welcome in the "general comments" section.'' | |||
| {{RfA toolbox|Areaseven}} | |||
| =====Support===== | |||
| # | |||
| <!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> | |||
| =====Oppose===== | |||
| #'''Oppose'''. One of the main traits necessary for adminship is an understanding of community norms. This RfA breaks several of them, by having a non-admin nominator, no acceptance from the candidate with standard disclosures, and very short answers to the standard questions that make it difficult for me to get a sense of the candidate (e.g. for Q3, there are no diffs to examples). I do not mind intentional norm-breaking, but it needs to be done with purpose and a recognition of what the norms are being broken. I see no indications of that here, which makes me uncomfortable supporting. <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #:Just to chip in though, is there a policy against non-admins nominate a user for adminship? I don’t think if I’ve read it somewhere. Best, ] 17:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #::No, although the nom being an admin is a ''de facto'' expectation. ] ] 17:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #::No, there isn't (and independently from other concerns, that baloney should be stopped right here). I am not an admin and have ], with no fails. ] (]) 18:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| # '''<del>Neutral'''</del><del>: At this point, I'm not ready to state that I'm opposed to this nomination, but I echo Sdkb's concerns. ] (]) 17:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)</del> In addition to echoing Sdkb's concerns, I'm raising a few statistical concerns, as well. Looking at , 71.9% of Areaseven's edits do not have edit summaries, which is especially concerning if they're working with vandalism. Further, they've only participated in 10 AfDs with a 71.4% match rate; they also haven't participated in AfD in five years (). I'm not sure if they keep a CSD log, but that would be helpful to see, given that they're potentially interested in deleting pages. ] (]) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #::Adding to my concerns: Not only is the nominating editor not an admin, they have fewer than 2,000 edits. ] (]) 17:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #'''Oppose''' Disagree that a non-admin nominator is ''per se'' against community norms. However I agree that this particular nomination is, ''pace'', not a good example. And since we are here to evaluate the candidate, I generally think we shouldn't hold their noinator against them (noting, for example, that there are some admins whose nominations I would oppose those grounds if I could; but I don't because it would (rightly) be shot down. Thus, the same must apply here). However, as Sdkb suggests, the candidate's answers to the questions—questions deliberately designed to allow candidates to set out their stall/blow their own trumpets for the only time in 168 hours—are not encouraging. And there's no indication of where they intend to work, except a hand wave towards fighting vandalism. With only 10 AfDs participated in, no RfPPs for over two years, and only 20 AIV reports this year it's actually impossible to identify an area where the tool kit would measurably assist. And finally, when the answer to "what conflicts have you been in in?" is "I point out people's errors for them", that copper-fastens it for me; that's far more likely to increase conflict than lessen it. --]'']''] 17:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| # '''Oppose''' Sorry, but per Sdkb and Significa liberdade. It's also difficult to believe a nominator who has been absence for 9 years and only returned to active editing in the last month has a firm grip of community expectations for admins. -- ] (]) 17:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| #'''Oppose''': The candidate did not state their need for the tool, vandalism is something that every editor encounters everyday and can be easily reverted. What is the need for the tool? What do you need the tool for? Also, their AfD track record is not impressive IMO and I wouldn’t trust someone who doesn’t understand the notability guidelines to be able to delete articles. Best, ] 17:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> | |||
| =====Neutral===== | |||
| #I was tempted to say "screw it" and support, but the answers to questions do not give me faith or say an area where they will work. ] ] 17:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| # I can't support this, but I want to make it clear to the candidate that the total they're likely to receive here doesn't mean that the community doesn't value their work. If they want to be an admin, they could likely reach out to some current admins willing to nominate others, get some advice , and come back here in a few months. The current nomination is unlikely to win people over, for rrasons others have explained, but I don't want them to see this as a crushing rejection of their editing work. ] (] | ]) 17:58, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> | |||
| =====General comments===== | |||
| *<!-- | |||
| Place a horizontal rule (----) between separate discussions for organization. | |||
| EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE | |||
| DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE | |||
| When closing this discussion, only the line starting with {{RfA/autohold... and its closing brackets }} need to be removed; the rest is the archive bottom text | |||
| -->{{RfA/autohold|16:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)|text= | |||
| :''The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</strong> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either ] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
| }}<!-- | |||
| DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE | |||
| Please add any General comments above the "EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE" line | |||
| --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:46, 23 December 2024
Areaseven
When you are ready to transclude your nomination, substitute this template; this will start the timer and give the closing date and time of the nomination.
Monitors:
Nomination
Areaseven (talk · contribs) – I am pleased to see Areaseven's contributions to the fields of anime, films, music, and racing. This user is diligent at revising pages, reverting edits, checking facts, and citing sources. He is in the counter-vandalism unit and participates in WikiProject Anime and manga, WikiProject Film, WikiProject Automobiles, WikiProject Metal, and WikiProject NASCAR. I believe this user would excel at determining what pages should be protected, what pages should be deleted, and whether certain bad actors (such as vandals and sockpuppets) need to be blocked promptly or if they will be allowed time to reform. With that, and especially your interest and knowledge of anime in mind, I would like to nominate this user for administratorship. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?
- A: I've been an active editor since 2006, and aside from creating new articles and improving existing ones with proper references, I have been actively countering vandalism by random IP users or persistent sockpuppets.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A: I have helped expanded articles of several J-pop artists such as Pink Lady, Chisato Moritaka, Yōko Oginome, Miho Nakayama, Mari Hamada, and Princess Princess by adding discography articles.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: There are times when other users either post bare references or use incorrect date formats, and I often remind them of their errors.
You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.
Discussion
- Links for Areaseven: Areaseven (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Areaseven can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Numerated (#) "votes" in the "Support", "Oppose", and "Neutral" sections may only be placed by editors with an extended confirmed account. All other comments are welcome in the "general comments" section.
| RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
Oppose
Neutral