Revision as of 19:44, 26 December 2024 editTheofunny (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users823 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:51, 4 January 2025 edit undo108.48.53.155 (talk) →"Musk claimed that "Only the Alternative for Germany (AfD) can save Germany" in a post on X": ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply |
(23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{afd-merged-from|2024 German anti-immigration protests|2024 German anti-immigration protests|30 December 2024}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
Line 34: |
Line 35: |
|
:::::He responded to the story by claiming that the migrants anti-Islam advocacy was a "scam". Musk's response has received significant coverage in RS. ] (]) 15:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::He responded to the story by claiming that the migrants anti-Islam advocacy was a "scam". Musk's response has received significant coverage in RS. ] (]) 15:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::He is sufficiently connected to the story by virtue of being an influential figure on the side that the perpetrator has also belonged to, and by virtue of him spreading disinformation about the incident. ] (]) 16:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::He is sufficiently connected to the story by virtue of being an influential figure on the side that the perpetrator has also belonged to, and by virtue of him spreading disinformation about the incident. ] (]) 16:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Should not be in the article ] (]) 01:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Viktor Orbán's response == |
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>Viktor Orbán, the prime minister of Hungary, vowed to "fight back" against open border policies after stating that there is a connection behind illegal immigration to western Europe and terrorist attacks. </blockquote> The cited article (<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=December 22, 2024 |title=Magdeburg Christmas market attack suspect faces murder charges |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/22/germany-christmas-market-attack-magdeburg-taleb-al-abdulmohsen-charges |website=]}}</ref>) doesn't seem to contain any information related to Viktor. |
|
|
<references /> |
|
⚫ |
] (]) 21:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:This news article seems to have been edited by someone. It is very different from what it was a day ago. ] (]) 15:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done|2=new citation has been added}}. ] (]) 15:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::The source said nothing about illegal immigration and I've corrected it. In the source, Orban opposes migration full stop. It never said illegal once. Put it this way: if he's saying the EU politicians are ''allowing'' too many immigrants, their entrance to Europe was not illegal. I don't know if this was a subconscious transplant from the editor's own country's politics, but many European right-wing leaders aren't just going to accept Muslims just because their passports were stamped correctly. ] (]) 10:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Should we add a greater emphasis on Taqiyya in his motive? == |
|
== Should we add a greater emphasis on Taqiyya in his motive? == |
Line 67: |
Line 58: |
|
:No, it would not be appropriate. ] (]) 19:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:No, it would not be appropriate. ] (]) 19:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== CCTV footage == |
|
== Dubious Article == |
|
] |
|
|
As with ], I have also obtained the CCTV footage of this incident. Should it be included? ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 15:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
My god. This whoe article is - gelinde gesagt - speculation up until misinformation. Please take an example of the ]. |
|
:In my view, this would not be appropriate (]) |
|
|
⚫ |
Until the official sources, especially prosecutors have more decisive evidence, we should not engage in political specualtion. Especially since he declared himself as a "leftist" and also hosted a website that helped migrants take money from the government with fake stories. ] (]) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:One of the key differences is that foreign media organizations have been able to identify ] as the accused person, which the German media has not been allowed to do due to German privacy law. This has led to foreign news organizations examining things that he has said and done in the past. But I agree that we don't know the exact motive, which is made clear in the lead section.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 17:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
] (]) 19:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
⚫ |
:He said that as a leftist, he came to know that the left are the worst criminals on the whole planet. ] (]) 19:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:You also engaged in a blatant POV by claiming that the "]" (which you emphasized in the edit) interior minister described him as Islamophobe and not the authorities but she mentioned it a lot of times that the authorities can confirm and the sources do too. ] (]) 19:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Its our Minister of Interieur and she is in this party. Which I am proud of. Soit should be reflected inthe intro, no? |
|
⚫ |
::Also we really have to wait till prosecutors make more information public... ] (]) 22:22, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::He is described as a suspect and alleged attacker for this reason. The New York Times and Wall Street Journal are reliable sources. They describe the suspect as a far-right, anti-Islam activist. ] (]) 22:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I can assure you, that I am closer to sources than NYT etc. |
|
|
::::However if you want to be ridiculed, go ahead. -- Cheers ] (]) 23:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:This lede has been kept after a lot of additions and removals for neutrality so you better explain your reasons behind doing so. ] (]) 19:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Wall Street Journal says "anti-Islam activist", which seems like an appropriate term to use in this article. https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/several-wounded-after-car-rams-german-christmas-market-06678562 |
|
:Why not? We also depicts Thompsons death ] (]) 19:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::What encyclopedic benefit would including a video of a car ramming into a group of civilians have? The ] article does not have a similar video. Also, is this video publicly licensed? ] (]) 19:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::It's a visual representation of the attack that you don't get with just text. There was a discussion at the Thompson article, all users agreed it is encyclopedic and benefits the article. Yes, under PD-automated, we are legally allowed to host it; the Berlin one doesn't have a video because no known free video exists. See ], which has a video. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 20:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::What does the video add that the phrase "a car was driven into a crowd" fails to convey? -- ] (]). 20:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::What color was the car? How many people were standing there? What did the surrounding buildings look like? Did people start running? Did the car blow up? Did anyone fly off the hood? What direction down the road was the car moving? Did the car crash into a building? I find it interesting that nobody has an issue with the CCTV still being in the infobox, yet there's such a pushback against the video. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 21:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Okay, let me rephrase that question... What, of encyclopaedic value, does the video add that could not be conveyed by adding a few words to the prose? I'm sure that those things you mentioned could all be covered in a few words if we thought they added encyclopaedic value. And BTW, I'm undecided as to whether the video adds value, which is why I'm asking the questions. -- ] (]). 21:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::As stated above. Most of those things likely don't have reliable sources to back them up, hence why a visual of the attack would be beneficial. And if that isn't enough, already uses the video. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 21:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Perhaps the things that aren't covered in reliable sources are simply not relevant to the incident. Perhaps including the video is to simply pander to the ghoulish desire of some people to watch such videos, rather than to add any real value to article. -- ] (]). 21:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::So gore is the issue. ]. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 22:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::What issue? How does that relate to censorship? The question here is whether that video adds value to the article, not whether Wiki policy allows it to be added to an article. If it adds encyclopaedic value then it should be added, otherwise why would we want to add it? -- ] (]). 22:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:::::::::::It adds no value to the article. Misplaced Pages is not a tabloid. ] (]) 22:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::@], can you imagine a situation where a video might add value to an article? -- ] (]). 23:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Yes, of course I can. The videos embedded in the article about the ] add value, as 9/11 was a unique, historic, and distinctive tragedy. I would, however be opposed to adding videos of every shooting and terrorist attack. ] (]) 23:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::@] Videos of a distinctive natural disaster, such as a volcano eruption, would also be relevant and add value. I don't believe adding graphic videos of car rammings adds any value. ] (]) 00:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::I've given you reasons above why it should be added, and you're discounting them. "Perhaps the things that aren't covered in reliable sources are simply not relevant to the incident" makes zero sense; why don't I also go remove the CCTV still and every other photo in the article since it adds nothing. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::I'm struggling to understand the encyclopaedic value of being able to see stuff that reliable sources don't give due weight to by including in their prose. -- ] (]). 22:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::What else is there to say? It's a video of the incident. Why ''shouldn't'' the video be in the article? Again, with the "prose" rationale, I might as well remove every single image from the article, since they can all be summed up with prose. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 23:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::Per ] (which generally appplies to videos too): {{tq|q=y|each image in an article should have a clear and unique illustrative purpose}}. I don't think we've found that to be the case with this video yet. -- ] (]). 10:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::::I'm at 50-50 or less on including the video. The fact that it has been sourced from a shock site tells you a lot.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 17:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::::Where else was I supposed to get it from? News sites don't typically publish those kind of videos. Anyways, I'll step back for now as to avoid potential escalation. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pastelfa, I don't know what you mean by "I can assure you, that I am closer to sources than NYT etc" but if you have better sources, let's see them. |
|
== Punctuation fix == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
] (]) 00:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Punctuation fix for Heading '''Responses '''Subheading '''Misinformation''': |
|
|
<code> |
|
|
Other sources falsely claimed that the perpetrator had come to Germany as a Syrian refugee during the 2015 European migrant crisis.</code> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:An "anti-Islam activist" calls himself a leftist, says ] is the only true islam and runs his car into a christian "Weihnachtsmarkt". I cant possible believe that international media is that insane and i don't want to believe that they are despicable liars. So what? ] (]) 01:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
FIX: |
|
|
|
::We rely on reliable sources. The suspect is an ex-Muslim and activist against Islam. He also supported the AfD. ] (]) 01:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
<code> |
|
|
|
:::] is a leftist, he says he is not on the right.https://imgur.com/a/FnmuIU7 |
|
Other sources falsely claimed that the perpetrator had come to Germany as a Syrian refugee during the 2015 European migrant crisis.</code> |
|
|
|
:::He claims that ] is the only true Islam. https://imgur.com/a/lGaXQCs |
|
|
:::He hosted a forum for asylum seekers and how to get the most "material rights" (i.e. money).https://imgur.com/a/lE8PMAS ] (]) 02:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I will not open links to Imgur. It is not a reliable source. |
|
|
::::I do not wish to engage in this discussion anymore. Have a good day. ] (]) 02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::We will have to wait for better sources. Have a good Night. :-) ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::::::You as well, take care ] (]) 02:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::If an individual says that, "Wahhabism is the original Islam", that does not make him a Muslim. If you find reliable sources that contradict the claims in the lead, we can discuss them. ] (]) 02:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::If an individual says that "I and AfD have the common enemy" that does not make him far right. ] (]) 02:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{u|Pastelfa}}, I suggest you read up on ] and why it is not allowed, and on the use of ] sources. Misplaced Pages is based on what reliable, secondary sources say. ] (]) 10:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have the first sentence of article to focus on the most widely reported, and least controversial aspect. Views on the specifics of his politics (e.g. he has shared some far-right posts online, some sources describe him as far-right, some sources describe him as Islamophobic) can be covered in the Suspect section of the article. ] (]) 12:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Double spacing after other, posting here due to previous IP ban and do not wish to get into trouble. ] (]) 14:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Dubious Article == |
|
== Motive == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd recommend adding that, though there is no motive found, it is suspected that his motivate was retaliation at the German government's treatment of Saudi refugees within the lead. This information is stated in the Investigation section of the article, so it would really only be moving pre-existing info into the led for better clarity.] (]) 01:49, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
⚫ |
My god. This whoe article is - gelinde gesagt - speculation up until misinformation. Please take an example of the ]. |
|
⚫ |
Until the official sources, especially prosecutors have more decisive evidence, we should not engage in political specualtion. Especially since he declared himself as a "leftist" and also hosted a website that helped migrants take money from the government with fake stories. ] (]) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:One of the key differences is that foreign media organizations have been able to identify ] as the accused person, which the German media has not been allowed to do due to German privacy law. This has led to foreign news organizations examining things that he has said and done in the past. But I agree that we don't know the exact motive, which is made clear in the lead section.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 17:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:He said that as a leftist, he came to know that the left are the worst criminals on the whole planet. ] (]) 19:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:You also engaged in a blatant POV by claiming that the "]" (which you emphasized in the edit) interior minister described him as Islamophobe and not the authorities but she mentioned it a lot of times that the authorities can confirm and the sources do too. ] (]) 19:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:This lede has been kept after a lot of additions and removals for neutrality so you better explain your reasons behind doing so. ] (]) 19:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
That was before it turned out that the perpetrator was a AfD and Musk fanboy, and AFAIR even before the attack itself. It should be changed accordingly.
As it is written, it seems to be a reaction after the attack, and after the perp's social-media history became public. (IIRC Musk gave the cited statement before the attack, and afterwards reacted by accusing Chancellor Scholz of lame-duckism, and then the perp's political leaning and social-media habits were revealed and I am not aware if Musk has said anything on the issue since - which is probably wise, since the perp repeatedly cited Musk to "justify" his murderous agenda.) 2A0A:A547:22A4:0:C9BE:3FA8:1520:B410 (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Currently, the suspected perpetrator is described as Islamophobic. Would it be appropriate to state that this is disputed, and that many argue that he is a Muslim who practiced Taqiyya to hide his religion? Is this a fringe view? Would like to hear Misplaced Pages's thoughts.
My god. This whoe article is - gelinde gesagt - speculation up until misinformation. Please take an example of the German Article.
Until the official sources, especially prosecutors have more decisive evidence, we should not engage in political specualtion. Especially since he declared himself as a "leftist" and also hosted a website that helped migrants take money from the government with fake stories. Pastelfa (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Pastelfa, I don't know what you mean by "I can assure you, that I am closer to sources than NYT etc" but if you have better sources, let's see them.
I'd recommend adding that, though there is no motive found, it is suspected that his motivate was retaliation at the German government's treatment of Saudi refugees within the lead. This information is stated in the Investigation section of the article, so it would really only be moving pre-existing info into the led for better clarity.108.48.53.155 (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2025 (UTC)