Revision as of 07:49, 28 December 2024 editMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users111,744 edits →File:Bokontayev.jpg: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:25, 4 January 2025 edit undoBusterD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,808 editsm →In a case like this...: in | ||
(24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg == | |||
== Quick note regarding AN discussion on AfD closures that you may be interested in == | |||
Hi, | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding the timing of AfD closures. The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--> — ] <sub>]</sub> 01:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I only got back to editing Misplaced Pages today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (]) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- ] (]) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion of "Unlock It" artwork == | |||
:{{Reply to|Whpq}} Very well, I have restored the file. ]] 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks -- ] (]) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:Bokontayev.jpg == | |||
Hi, I've seen that you decided to delete the "]" artwork yesterday. I wasn't present in the discussion since I was on vacations and didn't look at my talk page frequently. I saw that a sockpuppet answered with reasons I share about why the file should've been kept. However, I don't know the user and I think its unfair that because of them, my upload had to be deleted. I understand that the user has done things not permitted here but I should've been taken into account also since I'm the one that uploaded the artwork. I've already began a discussion with @] but nobody else participated. Now that the issue was taken to Files for discussion, I could've been tagged to share my input (I would've look at the alert and share my opinion too). I have nothing against none of you (I understand you're doing your work) but I disagree with the abrupt ending of the discussion and prefer to start the discussion again. I'm new with these type of discussions so if you can give me some guidance about what I can do now, I would gladly accept it. ] (]) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|GiankM. M}} Hi, this file was actually deleted by {{U|Pppery}}. Perhaps he is willing to reconsider his closure given this comment. ]] 11:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't believe that to be the song's official cover art (it was using the Pop 2 cover almost immediately after). Nor the one at ] actually. See the Unlock It file's talk page.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 13:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Oh, ok. Thank you for clarifying it. ] (]) 14:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: I deleted that because (ignoring a comment by a sock) the nomination argument was uncontested for a month. Deletion discussions have no minimum participation. If you still want the discussion reopened and relisted I would be willing to oblige, but it looks like that is no longer needed. ] ] 16:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] Oh, I got it. Thank you for explaining. But can I upload the file again or we need to do the discussion first? ] (]) 01:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::: I have undeleted the file and reopened the discussion. ] ] 02:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Thank you so much! ] (]) 04:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at ]? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- ] (]) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Help me, please == | |||
* Hello, dear Explicit! Please, tell me how You can create Your own draft in the Enwiki (''for writing future articles'')?.. Otherwise, I must admit, here I am, for now, a complete loser... Thanks. ] (]) 12:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
** Oh, that's it, hang up! It seems that it has already happened... 🤗🙄🙌 ] (]) 13:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Happy Holidays!== | |||
== Season's Greetings == | |||
And happy new year as well! ] (]) 19:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ] | |||
== You Deleted a Page but it's still online. == | |||
<div style="font-size: larger; text-align: center">Hello there! <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> wishes you & yours ]!<br /><br />Whether you celebrate ], ], ], ],<br />] (for the rest of us!) or even the ],<br />here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and<br />- '''especially''' -<br /> | |||
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.<br />CHEERS!<br /> | |||
@] I was going to nominate a page for deletion but discovered it had been nominated in the past and ended as delete. I am surprised that the page (] is still online. What's happening? ] (]) 12:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)<br /></div> | |||
:{{tpw}}{{ping|Joseph4real1995}} It appears the article was recreated per ]. There appears to have been a disagreement as to whether ] applied to the recreation. I can't see the original article that was deleted, but Explicit can. I'm sure Explicit will figure out whether the article needs to go to AfD again or meets the criteria for G4. -- ] (]) 14:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}}</div> <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
:Also, I wanted to know how to add an edit notice like you have... <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
] has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> —] 15:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{Reply to|Vestrian24Bio}} You can create your edit notice at ]. ]] 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Is there a way to create a group edit notice to appear in all my userspace pages... <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 07:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{Reply to|Vestrian24Bio}} This can be done on at ]. Additional information can be found at the ]. ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ] == | ||
<s>Deleted PROD - please could you let me have the text of the deleted article ], as I think I have sources to warrant keeping it? Thanks, ] (]) 05:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
and</s>Happy New Year! ] (]) 05:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|PARAKANYAA}} {{Done}}, closure adjusted. ]] 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Please don't trouble - the same text, such as it is, is on the Punjabi Wiki. ] (]) 18:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Prod on ] == | ||
Hi Explicit -- Liz suggested that I look at recently deleted prods because there was a bulge in numbers and we were worried that they might have received reduced attention over the holidays. I found ], which you deleted and which I think might be notable -- there's a respectable source in the deleted article (''Boston Globe'') and multiple hits in Proquest, many of which look reliable. Do you mind if I undelete it? Cheers, ] <small>(])</small> 21:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
:{{Reply to|Espresso Addict}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' – as a contested ], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - prod --> ]] 01:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello Explicit, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
— Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Removing link(s) undefined (XFDcloser) == | |||
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
|}<span id="Benison:1734891120337:User_talkFTTCLNExplicit" class="FTTCmt">— Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)</span> | |||
You're leaving a lot of edits with this summary. Perhaps there's a problem with the XFDcloser tool. ~] (]) 04:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Appeal of deletion of "List of controversial elections" == | |||
:{{Reply to|Kvng}} This is a ]. Unfortunately, it has gone unaddressed for several years. ]] 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== File:Rafi malik.jpg == | |||
I would like to appeal the decision to delete the article ], because the article has been on WP for 12 years, with dozens of editors contributing to it, yet it was removed in the midst of a controversial election in the US with only one week of discussion. Also, no opportunity was given to allow content from the article to be moved to other articles prior to deletion. <b>] (]•])</b> 19:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Sparkie82}} There was resounding consensus to delete the article. ] is not a valid argument to keep it. A week of discussion is the standard and is only extended if consensus is unclear, which was not the case here. There was no support to move the content anywhere else. ]] 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I was questioning the timing of the discussion, opening an AFD in the midst of a highly contentious election which could taint any consensus and suggested that the discussion/decision occur some time after the election. In any case, how can I access the information in the article which I need for my own purposes? <b>] (]•])</b> 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi Explicit and Happy New Year! What's your take on the licensing of ]? The file has EXIF data, but it says the image was generated in 2014. I can't find the full image anywhere online, but there's a crop from 2016 found ? Do you think this meets ] or should it be tagged with {{tlx|npd}}? -- ] (]) 09:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I don't think this is a case that requires outright deletion as F9. Tagging it for lacking evidence of permission is the better way to go. ]] 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for taking a look at this. I've tagged the file with {{tlx|npd}}. -- ] (]) 06:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion of Akidearest article == | |||
Hey, might need a quick page protection here! ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Happy new year! | |||
:Already done! No need to worry yourself here. ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I saw you deleted the article for YouTuber Akidearest last month and wanted to ask if there is any way to gain access to the article, since I would like to re-write it and reference the old article. I would of course revamp the sources so it doesn't get taken down again. ] (]) 10:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::{{ec}} {{Reply to|YesI'mOnFire}} I blocked four accounts as obvious sockpuppets of each other. I didn't see the need to protect it after that, but oh well. ]] 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:{{Reply to|Maehii}} Hi, I can restore it as a draft where you can work on it. Then, you can submit it as an ] submission. Would you happen to have any new sources available now? ]] 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::Hi, that would be wonderful. Yes, I collected some new sources so the article will align with Misplaced Pages guidelines. Here are some examples: | |||
::https://metropolisjapan.com/beyond-the-view-counter/ | |||
::https://www.tokyocreative.jp/en/influencer-47-akidearest | |||
::https://youtube.fandom.com/Akidearest | |||
::https://www.podbean.com/podcast-detail/h9y57-4dc32/The-Anime-Show-with-Joey--AkiDearest-Podcast (podcast with The Anime Man) | |||
::https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW-y5RjZOLw (collaboration video with Netflix and CDawgVA) ] (]) 08:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|Maehii}} The content is now available at ]. ]] 00:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Template |
== ] == | ||
Would you be willing to undelete this? It was deleted for having two links but it should have had three (] was missing). I ] the nominator (who is also an admin) if he would be willing to undelete it but he suggested deletion review, which I'm not sure is necessary or not since there was nothing wrong with the delete outcome at the time. ] (]) 17:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|WikiOriginal-9}} The general rule of thumb is that navigational templates require five blue links. This would not survive TFD if only one additional link was added. ]] 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
Regarding ], I don't doubt the nomination and lack of use at that time, but the {{tl|Chembox DrugClass}} template is in support of a feature that was (and still is) implemented and documented. The {{tl|Chembox}} suite is possibly some of the spaghettiest spaghetti we have:( So since then, at least one article invoked {{tl|chembox}} in a way that triggered that template and therefore gave broken output. Is this sufficient basis to un-delete it? ] (]) 13:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 05:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|DMacks}} Yes, the template can be undeleted if it is put to use. The nominator does a lot of cleanup with unused templates and nominates them for that reason, as to not keep hundreds of templates laying around for no one to maintain them. ]] 13:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::] uses it. I definitely have no objection to that sort of cleanup. In this particular case, it would have been easily noticed by the chemistry folks if a note had been posted to the template talkpage. It's a redirect, where the target has decent visibility but the template itself is not, so I'm not surprised nobody noticed that the template itself was tagged. ] (]) 13:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|DMacks}} I've restored the template, so everything is sorted now. ]] 13:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks! ] (]) 13:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== In a case like this... == | ||
] was a G4 which you originally deleted, and I did again today. I'm inclined to salt something like this, but wonder what a more experienced hand has to say. I'm deleting several dozen at once this afternoon (by the same sock) so while I might make some of my own choices, I'd like your opinion: what's the sweet spot on salting? Twice G4'ed seems slam dunk to me. I've also been experimenting with some short term salting, to discourage multiple attempts for now. ] (]) 23:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">]]]{{Center|]}} | |||
:{{Reply to|BusterD}} When I became an admin, the general practice seemed to be that salting was done when a page was deleted three times. That's what I continue to do, kind of like a "three strikes and you're out" rule. It does differ from person to person, though. I think it's ultimately a personal decision. ]] 00:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
'''Hello Explicit:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, ] (]) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for the sage advice, such as it is. I noticed the policy suggests shorter term salting (as I have been trying) in some cases. Three strikes makes perfect sense to me. I've been spending some time every morning on the speedy list. (I'm now #35 among current admin deleters; a dubious distinction but surprising to me.) For clarification, technically any EC editor could potentially (and under policy) recreate a salted title, right? It's not a form of full protection. I'm not sure this is fully understood by the trolling community... ] (]) 00:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
]{{paragraph break}} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; margin-top: 1em; font-size: 88%; font-style: italic">Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings}} to send this message</div>{{-}} ] (]) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Please undelete Draft:Santikaro == | |||
Hi Xplicit and happy holidays to you and all your loved ones! | |||
I've left a message on my talk page and on the deletion page to ask for please reinstating / undeleting my draft | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Santikaro | |||
The only reason I did not get to edit it for six months is that I started teaching and it took all my time. I have been intending to make a minor edit before the deadline but forgot by mistake to set the calendar reminder. | |||
I believe this article can be easily accepted - a number of people on here have given me useful advice on what needs to be done for the article to be easily accepted. | |||
I would greatly appreciate undeleting it, please. | |||
Happy holidays and happy new year, may you be well, happy and safe, | |||
-Peaceful-D ] (]) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Pictures Deleted? == | |||
I recently uploaded 2 pictures that you then moved to the delete log, and I’m not sure why. Both of the are from a public website of a public university, UL. Wouldn’t that make them free content? What is needed to allow these to be published? Thanks. ] (]) 15:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Frank042316}} I guess you're referring to ] and ]. At the upload form, you must have indicated a licensing restriction, like noncommercial use or no derivatives, as these were automatically tagged for speedy deletion in accordance with ]. What are the source links for these images? ]] 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::they are from the universities web page, and were used to nnou de the purchase of the 2 pieces of property, so very much in the public domain. Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
:::{{Reply to|Frank042316}} Being available on the university's webpage does not mean the files are in the public domain, unless it explicitly states so. Can you provide links to determine the copyright status of these two files? ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Sure: | |||
::::https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition | |||
::::https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition | |||
::::Thanks again. ] (]) 11:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{Reply to|Frank042316}} There is nothing on the website which indicates these image are freely licensed. The only copyright notice reads, "© 2024 University of Louisiana at Lafayette. All rights reserved." These images can not be used on Misplaced Pages. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Template:Blockquote protection == | |||
No rush, but I think {{tl|Blockquote}} was at template editor protection, not full protection, before the most recent merge/delete/undelete fun adventure that you appear to have had. It has been useful for me to be able to edit it over the past few years as people change their minds about tiny parts of MOS. – ] (]) 16:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Jonesey95}} Ah, I see it now. The protection log of {{tl|Blockquote}} shows full protection from 2011, but over at its previous title {{tl|Quote}}, it was reduced to template editors three years later. I've adjusted it accordingly. ]] 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Tricky. Thanks for investigating. I think with under 200K transclusions, we'll be OK with template editor protection. – ] (]) 00:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== F7 deletions == | |||
Hi, please restore the following images so I can fix them. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
] (]) 06:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|1989}} {{Done}}, files restored. ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::So because both the taken photograph and the box set are non-free, it can’t be hosted here? I would need to find a free image of the non-free box set covers then use it as fair use? Both of the images were taken by Viz Media, who also owns the box art. Given that, there shouldn’t be a layered copyright issue since there is no two separate owners. Correct me if I’m wrong. ] (]) 14:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion:Akidearest == | |||
Hi there! | |||
I wanted to reach out about the recent deletion of the article on YouTuber Akidearest. I understand the sources in the old article weren't sufficient or notable enough, so I would like to fully revise the article and put it up again for review. The original author's account is gone, so I don't know how to access the old article. I would like to reference it, if possible! ] (]) 13:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
'''Freestyle''', or '''Latin freestyle''' (initially called '''Latin hip hop''') is a form of electronic dance music that emerged in the New York metropolitan area, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami, primarily among Hispanic Americans, Irish Americans and Italian Americans in the 1980s. It experienced its greatest popularity from the late 1980s until the early 1990s. A common theme of freestyle lyricism originated as heartbreak in an urban environment typified by New York City. ] (]) 03:32, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== A misplaced file (commons/enwiki) == | |||
A confused new user has recently uploaded obviously non-free logo to Commons. They clearly meant to upload it to enwiki, as an updated version of file that you have recently correctly deleted as unused. Since you, the deleting admin, are conveniently an admin both here ''and'' on Commons, would you mind fixing this little mess? It seems to be as simple as deleting from Commons, restoring , and then updating that outdated local version with that's on Commons right now. Thanks. ] (]) 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the Commons file and restored the local file with the recent logo. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 10:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg == | |||
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I can't tell whether it's a reupload of the same file you deleted the other day per F4 or whether it's a different image with the same file name. The uploader is the same person so I'm thinking the image also has F4 and F11 issues even if it's a new image. -- ] (]) 22:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it's a different picture from the deleted version. A bot has already tagged it for lacking a source. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for checking on this. -- ] (]) 07:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion Review for ] == | |||
You have deleted ] without any discussion having taken place. I have posted a delete review request. Please restore this image until an actual discussion & review have occurred. ] (]) 15:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg == | |||
Hi, | |||
I only got back to editing Misplaced Pages today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (]) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- ] (]) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Whpq}} Very well, I have restored the file. ]] 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks -- ] (]) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:Bokontayev.jpg == | |||
Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at ]? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- ] (]) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:25, 4 January 2025
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg
Hi,
I only got back to editing Misplaced Pages today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (User:Jheald) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- Whpq (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Very well, I have restored the file. ✗plicit 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- Whpq (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Bokontayev.jpg
Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at File:Bokontayev.jpg? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
And happy new year as well! Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
You Deleted a Page but it's still online.
@Explicit I was going to nominate a page for deletion but discovered it had been nominated in the past and ended as delete. I am surprised that the page (this page) is still online. What's happening? Joseph4real1995 (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher)@Joseph4real1995: It appears the article was recreated per User talk:Reading Beans/Archives/2024/October#Speedy deletion nomination of Oyebanji Akins. There appears to have been a disagreement as to whether WP:G4 applied to the recreation. I can't see the original article that was deleted, but Explicit can. I'm sure Explicit will figure out whether the article needs to go to AfD again or meets the criteria for G4. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Deletion review for Patrik Kincl
Clariniie has asked for a deletion review of Patrik Kincl. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 15:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Bathwala
Deleted PROD - please could you let me have the text of the deleted article here, as I think I have sources to warrant keeping it? Thanks, Ingratis (talk) 05:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
andHappy New Year! Ingratis (talk) 05:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please don't trouble - the same text, such as it is, is on the Punjabi Wiki. Ingratis (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Prod on Wordhunt
Hi Explicit -- Liz suggested that I look at recently deleted prods because there was a bulge in numbers and we were worried that they might have received reduced attention over the holidays. I found Wordhunt, which you deleted and which I think might be notable -- there's a respectable source in the deleted article (Boston Globe) and multiple hits in Proquest, many of which look reliable. Do you mind if I undelete it? Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Espresso Addict: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ✗plicit 01:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Removing link(s) undefined (XFDcloser)
You're leaving a lot of edits with this summary. Perhaps there's a problem with the XFDcloser tool. ~Kvng (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kvng: This is a known issue. Unfortunately, it has gone unaddressed for several years. ✗plicit 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Rafi malik.jpg
Hi Explicit and Happy New Year! What's your take on the licensing of File:Rafi malik.jpg? The file has EXIF data, but it says the image was generated in 2014. I can't find the full image anywhere online, but there's a crop from 2016 found here? Do you think this meets WP:F9 or should it be tagged with {{npd}}
? -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, I don't think this is a case that requires outright deletion as F9. Tagging it for lacking evidence of permission is the better way to go. ✗plicit 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking a look at this. I've tagged the file with
{{npd}}
. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking a look at this. I've tagged the file with
Deletion of Akidearest article
Happy new year! I saw you deleted the article for YouTuber Akidearest last month and wanted to ask if there is any way to gain access to the article, since I would like to re-write it and reference the old article. I would of course revamp the sources so it doesn't get taken down again. Maehii (talk) 10:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Maehii: Hi, I can restore it as a draft where you can work on it. Then, you can submit it as an Articles for creation submission. Would you happen to have any new sources available now? ✗plicit 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, that would be wonderful. Yes, I collected some new sources so the article will align with Misplaced Pages guidelines. Here are some examples:
- https://metropolisjapan.com/beyond-the-view-counter/
- https://www.tokyocreative.jp/en/influencer-47-akidearest
- https://youtube.fandom.com/Akidearest
- https://www.podbean.com/podcast-detail/h9y57-4dc32/The-Anime-Show-with-Joey--AkiDearest-Podcast (podcast with The Anime Man)
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW-y5RjZOLw (collaboration video with Netflix and CDawgVA) Maehii (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Maehii: The content is now available at Draft:Akidearest. ✗plicit 00:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Template:Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox
Would you be willing to undelete this? It was deleted for having two links but it should have had three (Bobby Pesavento was missing). I asked the nominator (who is also an admin) if he would be willing to undelete it but he suggested deletion review, which I'm not sure is necessary or not since there was nothing wrong with the delete outcome at the time. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @WikiOriginal-9: The general rule of thumb is that navigational templates require five blue links. This would not survive TFD if only one additional link was added. ✗plicit 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review for Category:Fulbright Scholars
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Fulbright Scholars. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RubyEmpress (talk) 05:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
In a case like this...
Tafajjal Hossain was a G4 which you originally deleted, and I did again today. I'm inclined to salt something like this, but wonder what a more experienced hand has to say. I'm deleting several dozen at once this afternoon (by the same sock) so while I might make some of my own choices, I'd like your opinion: what's the sweet spot on salting? Twice G4'ed seems slam dunk to me. I've also been experimenting with some short term salting, to discourage multiple attempts for now. BusterD (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @BusterD: When I became an admin, the general practice seemed to be that salting was done when a page was deleted three times. That's what I continue to do, kind of like a "three strikes and you're out" rule. It does differ from person to person, though. I think it's ultimately a personal decision. ✗plicit 00:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the sage advice, such as it is. I noticed the policy suggests shorter term salting (as I have been trying) in some cases. Three strikes makes perfect sense to me. I've been spending some time every morning on the speedy list. (I'm now #35 among current admin deleters; a dubious distinction but surprising to me.) For clarification, technically any EC editor could potentially (and under policy) recreate a salted title, right? It's not a form of full protection. I'm not sure this is fully understood by the trolling community... BusterD (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)