| Revision as of 15:38, 28 December 2024 edit2409:40c1:5e:ba34:8000:: (talk) →Won't bother you again: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:05, 3 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive 20) (bot | ||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| |search=yes | |search=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == On Sanskrit inscriptions in a mosque == | |||
| You might like . ] (]) 16:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Kautilya == | |||
| I ginally understand, I think, why you use the name "Kautilya." I always wondered why you would use a reference to a 'prime minister' of Chandragupta, but it's a reference to encyclopedic collecting and compiling information. Regards, ] - ] 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | When you see an unnecessary block, you defend the affected user. When you see a need for help, you provide advice. You discuss edits with newer editors, explain possible issues with them and implement changes after highly constructive discussion. You do these things in your free time for other volunteers and the encyclopedia. I'm not sure if "random" is the right term, but these are acts of kindness you deserve a barnstar for. ] (]) 19:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| == Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment == | == Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment == | ||
| Line 51: | Line 32: | ||
| :Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- ] (]) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | :Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- ] (]) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? ] (]) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hello {{U|Virabukkaraya}}, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- ] (]) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. ] (]) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Season's Greetings == | == Season's Greetings == | ||
| Line 77: | Line 61: | ||
| : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == |
== Have a look == | ||
| Have a look at . Seems POV. Thanks. - ] (]) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :Yeah, it is ] and a pretty poor one too. -- ] (]) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Regarding a concern == | |||
| As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. ] (]) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons. | |||
| I didn’t know the extent of delusion you carry. It made me realize I am just wasting my time even conversing with you. You are much more flawed than I first thought you were. Nothing is hidden from me—not even your forced attempts to seem neutral in your edits. You can’t even stand up for your own namesake, which you’ve been using for God knows how many years when it was being distorted. I had to. Mr. Avatar, lol. | |||
| :If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- ] (]) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. ] (]) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects. | |||
| :::In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- ] (]) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu ] (]) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- ] (]) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. ] (]) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Your message == | |||
| And one more thing: every time some narcissistic editor threatens me with admins when I am just having a non-abusive, normal conversation with them without even disrupting the article, I know I’ve broken them from the inside. You can say it’s because of my aspersions or other things, but we both know what actually bothered you. If I wanted to destroy your reputation, no power in this world could stop me. But that was never my intent. It’s also not that hard to do a bit of self-introspection from time to time. Easy for an avatar. | |||
| Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. ] (]) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| And don’t worry, I will never waste my time on you anymore. How can I even argue with a god who is perfect in every way possible? What a waste of time and energy. I was wrong about you. It tells me how flawed I am myself. ] (]) 15:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:05, 3 January 2025
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request for Audrey truschke
Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
- Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
|
Happy holidays! |
| Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
Have a look at these changes. Seems POV. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is WP:OR and a pretty poor one too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Regarding a concern
As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons.
- If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects.
- In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. Virabukkaraya (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Your message
Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. Chaipau (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)