Revision as of 16:06, 28 April 2007 editWiki890 (talk | contribs)512 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:31, 4 January 2025 edit undo109.76.186.84 (talk) →InjunctionsTag: Visual edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Photographers who take candid pictures of celebrities}} | |||
{{for|the 2004 film|Paparazzi (film)}} | |||
{{Other uses}} | |||
{{for|the 2006 game|Paparazzi (game)}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2020}} | |||
''Paparatchi redirects here. See ].'' | |||
], Slovakia]] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
'''Paparazzi''' is a plural term ('''paparazzo''' being the singular form<ref name="singular">{{cite web | title=webster.com | work=Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary - Definition of paparazzo | url=http://www.webster.com/dictionary/paparazzo | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref><ref name="singular2">{{cite web | title=dictionary.reference.com | work=paparazzo - Definitions from Dictionary.com (sources: ''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition'', 2000, and ''WordNet 2.0'', Princeton University, 2003) | url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/paparazzo | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref>) for ]s who take ]s of ], usually by relentlessly shadowing them in their public and ] activities. Celebrities claiming to have been hounded by such photographers often use "paparazzi" as a ] term<ref name="scum">{{cite web | title=variety.com | work=Red carpet takes on an Oscar sheen | url=http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=tonys2005&nav=news&content=article&articleID=VR1117924245 | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref> while news agencies commonly use the word in a broader sense to describe all photographers who take pictures of people of note.<ref name="redcarpet">{{cite web | title=google.com | work=red carpet paparazzi - Google Search | url=http://www.google.com/search?q=red+carpet+paparazzi | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref> | |||
] assaults the "King of Paparazzi" ] while a woman hits him with her purse—] 1963.]] | |||
]'s photograph of English singer-songwriter and entertainer ], shot in a paparazzo style in London in 2000]] Paparazzi are independent photographers who take pictures of high-profile people; such as actors, musicians, athletes, politicians, and other celebrities who go about their daily life routines. Paparazzi are known for their relentless pursuit of celebrities, often using long lenses and speedlite flashes or even following them in vehicles to capture personal, unflattering, or private moments. The photographs taken by paparazzi are commonly sold to tabloids, gossip magazines, and websites, where they are published to attract attention and increase sales. This type of invasive photography is often controversial because it can violate the privacy of the subjects involved. | |||
== |
==Description== | ||
Paparazzi tend to be ]s, unaffiliated with ] organizations, who track high-profile people and take pictures of them opportunistically.<ref name=AJR>{{cite news |url= http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=2325 |title= Is Everyone a Journalist? |work= ] |date= October 1997 |access-date= January 27, 2009 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100613080606/http://ajr.org/Article.asp?id=2325 |archive-date= June 13, 2010 |url-status= dead }}</ref> Some journalists have described the behavior of paparazzi as ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Brand |first=Madeleine |date=June 10, 2005 |title='Paparazzi': Stalking Celebs with Cameras |url=https://www.npr.org/2005/06/10/4697388/paparazzi-stalking-celebs-with-cameras |access-date=June 6, 2024 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Zjawinski |first=Sonia |title=My Paparazzo: Hiring a Stalker Is Easy |url=https://www.wired.com/2008/09/st-paparazzi/ |access-date=2024-06-23 |magazine=] |language=en-US |issn=1059-1028}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=January 29, 2005 |title=Turning a Lens on the Paparazzi |url=https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=453247&page=1 |access-date=2024-06-23 |website=ABC News |language=en}}</ref> and anti-stalking laws in many countries address the issue by seeking to reduce harassment of public figures and celebrities, especially when they are with their children.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-xpm-2013-sep-24-la-me-pc-gov-brown-signs-law-protecting-children-of-public-figures-20130924-story.html |title=Gov. Jerry Brown signs law protecting children of public figures |last=McGreevy |first=Patrick |date=September 24, 2013 |newspaper=LA Times |access-date=October 12, 2018 |archive-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131130021240/http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/24/local/la-me-pc-gov-brown-signs-law-protecting-children-of-public-figures-20130924 |url-status=live }}</ref> Some public figures and celebrities, such as ], ], and ], have expressed concern at the extent to which paparazzi go to invade their personal space.<ref name="Kale 2022">{{Cite news |last=Kale |first=Sirin |date=2022-08-17 |title='People think we are scumbags. But celebrities are ringing us!' The changing world of the paparazzi |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/aug/17/people-think-we-are-scumbags-but-celebrities-are-ringing-us-the-changing-world-of-the-paparazzi |access-date=2024-06-21 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |title=The Four Stages of Fame: How Celebrities Learn to Accept—and Regret—Their Popularity |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/116227/celebrity-study-four-phases-accepting-fame |access-date=2024-06-23 |magazine=The New Republic |issn=0028-6583}}</ref> The filing and receiving of judicial support for ]s against paparazzi has increased, as have lawsuits with judgments against them.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Locke|first1=Christina M.|last2=Murrhee|first2=Kara Carnley|date=2011|title=Is Driving with the Intent to Gather News a Crime? The Chilling Effects of California's Anti-Paparazzi Legislation|url=https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol31/iss2/1/|journal=Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review|language=en|volume=31|issue=2|access-date=October 12, 2018|archive-date=October 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181013014628/https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol31/iss2/1/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Paparazzi are often a problem for celebrities, as the latter have become increasingly objectified and worshipped by fans (see: ]), especially through social and mass media.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Alexander |first=Jeffrey C. |date=November 2010 |title=The Celebrity-Icon |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1749975510380316 |url-status=live |journal=Cultural Sociology |language=en |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=323–336 |doi=10.1177/1749975510380316 |issn=1749-9755 |s2cid=145739711 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124001712/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1749975510380316 |archive-date=January 24, 2023 |access-date=June 4, 2023}}</ref> This happens because constant exposure to and coverage of these figures <ref name="razzis">{{cite web |title=What is Razzi |url=https://lisansrazzi.com/hesap |access-date=March 17, 2019}}</ref> leads people to treat celebrities like they are their social intimates, whom they admire, gossip about, or copy habits from.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Seeing by Starlight: Celebrity Obsession |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200407/seeing-starlight-celebrity-obsession |access-date=2023-05-24 |website=Psychology Today |language=en-US}}</ref> A 2009 study which anonymously interviewed a number of celebrities showed that it was a common sentiment that being pursued by paparazzi causes a loss of personal life, lack of anonymity, and a feeling of constantly being watched.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rockwell |first1=Donna |last2=Giles |first2=David |date=2009-01-01 |title=Being a Celebrity: A Phenomenology of Fame |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/jpp/40/2/article-p178_3.xml |url-status=live |journal=Journal of Phenomenological Psychology |language=en |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=178–210 |doi=10.1163/004726609X12482630041889 |issn=1569-1624 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326123411/https://brill.com/view/journals/jpp/40/2/article-p178_3.xml |archive-date=March 26, 2023 |access-date=June 4, 2023}}</ref> This causes them to compensate by forming separate identities, one an image offered to the public, and one reserved for moments of privacy and intimacy. | |||
The word ''paparazzi'' was popularized after the ] ] film '']''. One of the characters in the film is a news photographer named Signore Paparazzo (played by Walter Santesso). In his book ''Word and Phrase Origins'', author Robert Hendrickson writes that Fellini took the name paparazzi from an ] dialect word for a particularly noisy, buzzing ]. In his school days, Fellini remembered a boy who was nicknamed "Paparazzo" (Mosquito), because of his fast talking and constant movements, a name Fellini later applied to the fictional character in "La Dolce Vita." | |||
It is also a common practice for celebrities to willingly invite paparazzi to take photographs of them, the main reason being to maintain or increase their relevance and exposure.<ref name="Cunningham 2024">{{Cite web |last=Cunningham |first=Kyndall |date=2024-06-04 |title=Meet the photo agency that turns celeb watchers into conspiracy theorists |url=https://www.vox.com/culture/352715/backgrid-explained-paparazzi-photo-agency-celeb-couple-sightings |access-date=2024-06-21 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="Marcus 2014">{{Cite web |last=Marcus |first=Stephanie |date=2014-04-18 |title=Celebrities Call The Paparazzi On Themselves Sometimes, Obviously |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/celebrities-call-paparazzi_n_5175348 |access-date=2024-06-23 |website=HuffPost |language=en}}</ref> | |||
==Techniques== | |||
] | |||
Technological developments in ]s (such as higher quality ]es and high speed ]s) enable paparazzi to shoot their subjects from afar, and often unseen. Miniaturization allows tiny palm-sized cameras that can effectively engage in ]. Further, ]s and transmission methods allow for rapid distribution of the pictures. They will tend to hide in nearby ] to get a picture of their target. | |||
==Famous paparazzi== | |||
==Restrictions== | |||
] portrays Paparazzo in the 1960 film '']'', marking the character as the eponym of the word ''paparazzi''.<ref>{{cite news|last=Dunne|first=Susan|url=https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2008-04-10-altscreenb0410-art-story.html|title=A Movie That Coined A Word|newspaper=]|date=April 10, 2008|access-date=April 6, 2019|archive-date=April 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407015053/https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2008-04-10-altscreenb0410-art-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Due to the reputation of paparazzi as an annoyance, some states and countries (particularly within ]) restrict their activities by passing laws and ]s, and by staging events in which paparazzi are specifically allowed to take photographs. In Germany and France photographers need the permission of the people in their photographs. | |||
] was well known for his obsessive stalking of several celebrities, most notably ]. Galella has been defined "the Godfather of the U.S. paparazzi culture".<ref>{{cite web|last=Tapp|first=Tom|url=https://deadline.com/2022/05/ron-galella-dead-paparazzi-1235014491/|title=Ron Galella Dies: Controversial "Godfather Of U.S. Paparazzi" Was 91|date=May 2, 2022|access-date=October 1, 2022|archive-date=October 1, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221001210200/https://deadline.com/2022/05/ron-galella-dead-paparazzi-1235014491/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The presence of paparazzi is not always seen as annoying; the arranger of an event may, in order to make the guests feel important, hire a number of actors who ''pretend'' they are paparazzi (so-called "faux-paparazzi"). This was, for instance, seen at extravaganza events during the ].{{Fact|date=February 2007}} | |||
] is an Italian paparazzo known as "The King of Paparazzi" in Italy.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bienstock |first=Miera |date=2010-07-13 |title=Remembering the Italian Hollywood |url=https://www.jpost.com/arts-and-culture/arts/remembering-the-italian-hollywood |access-date=2024-06-21 |website=The Jerusalem Post |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Povoledo |first=Elisabetta |date=2024-05-21 |title=Gérard Depardieu Punches the 'King of Paparazzi' Outside Rome Cafe |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/21/movies/gerard-depardieu-rino-barillari.html |access-date=2024-06-21 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> He was awarded the Commander of the ] in 1998.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Barillari Sig. Saverio |url=https://www.quirinale.it/onorificenze/insigniti/104125 |website=Presidenza della Repubblica |language=it}}</ref> | |||
Paparazzi sell their work to dozens of magazines and newspapers that publish such photos for their readers and subscribers, and many paparazzi feel that they are helping celebrities and public figures in general by increasing their visibility. Photographers often earn large sums of ] for a valuable picture. | |||
==History== | |||
== Paparazzi in the news == | |||
Some observers blamed paparazzi for the deaths of ] and ], who were ] in ], ], while being pursued by paparazzi. Although several paparazzi were briefly taken into ], no one was ever ], and the official French ] of the crash concluded that they had not caused the accident, and in fact the cause of the accident was a drugged and drunken driver named ].{{fact|date=March 2007}} | |||
===Precursors=== | |||
In ], the '']'' of Hong Kong was found guilty of "scandalizing the court", an extremely rare ] that the ] conduct would undermine confidence in the administration of justice.<ref name="WorldLII">{{cite web | title=worldlii.org | work=WorldLII - Wong Yeung Ng v Secretary for Justice ICHRL 12 (9 February 1999) | url=http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICHRL/1999/12.html | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref> The charge was brought after the newspaper had ] abusive articles challenging the ] integrity and accusing it of bias in a ] the paper had instigated over a photo of a ] ]. The paper had also arranged for a "puppy team" to track a ] for 72 hours, to provide the judge with first-hand experience with what paparazzi do.<ref name="ODN">{{cite web | title=uow.edu.au | work=Scandalising the Scumbags: the Secretary for Justice vs the Oriental Press Group | url=http://www.uow.edu.au/crearts/journalism/APME/contents11/TimHamlett.pdf | accessdate=20 August | accessyear=2006}}</ref> | |||
Intrusive photojournalism has existed since the nineteenth century. The invention of quicker and more portable cameras facilitated the process of capturing unauthorized celebrity photographs and publishing them in illustrated newspapers, which started appearing in the 1890s.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Chancey |first=Jill R. |date=1999 |title=Diana Doubled: The Fairytale Princess and the Photographer |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316663 |journal=NWSA Journal |volume=11 |issue=2 |page=165 |jstor=4316663 |issn=1040-0656}}</ref> One of the first instances of a "snatched photograph" was in 1898, when two photographers were able to capture a photograph of ] on his deathbed through bribery.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Day |first=Elizabeth |date=2014-03-02 |title=Paparazzi! How an unloved profession has shaped us |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/mar/02/paparazzi-unloved-profession-major-french-exhibition |access-date=2024-06-21 |work=The Observer |language=en-GB |issn=0029-7712}}</ref> | |||
===Etymology=== | |||
'']'' (Style & Design) in 2005 ran a story entitled "Shooting Stars", in which Mel Bouzad, one of the top paparazzi in ] at the time, claimed to have made ]150,000 for a picture of ] and ] in Georgia after their breakup. "If I get ] and her baby," Bouzad claimed, "I'll be able to buy a house in those hills (above ])."<ref name="Time">{{cite web | title=time.com| work=Time: Shooting Stars | url=http://www.time.com/time/2005/style/091305/shooting_stars_paparazz39a.html | accessdate=16 June | accessyear=2006}}</ref> ''Paparazzi'' author Peter Howe told ''Time'' that "celebrities need a higher level of exposure than the rest of us … so it is a two-way street. The celebrities manipulate." | |||
A news photographer named Paparazzo (played by ] in the 1960 film '']'' directed by ]) is the ] of the word ''paparazzi''.<ref>{{cite encyclopaedia |url=http://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/paparazzo/ |title=Paparazzo |encyclopaedia= ]|language=it}}</ref> In his book ''The Facts on File Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins'', Robert Hendrickson writes that Fellini named the "hyperactive photographer ... after Italian slang for 'mosquito'".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Robert Hendrickson|url=http://archive.org/details/TheFactsOnFileEncyclopediaOfWordAndPhraseOrigins|title=The Facts on File Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins|language=English}}</ref> As Fellini said in his interview to ''Time'' magazine, "''Paparazzo'' ... suggests to me a buzzing insect, hovering, darting, stinging."<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,872287-1,00.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130525172122/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,872287-1,00.html |url-status= dead |archive-date= May 25, 2013 |title= The Press: Paparazzi on the Prowl |magazine= ] |date= April 14, 1961 |volume=77 |issue=16 |access-date= October 5, 2009}}</ref> Those versions of the word's origin are sometimes contested. For example, in the ] spoken by ], co-scriptwriter of ''La Dolce Vita'', the term ''paparazzo'' refers to the local clam, '']'', and is also used as a metaphor for the shutter of a camera lens. | |||
Further, in an interview with Fellini's screenwriter Flaiano, he said the name came from the book ''Sulla riva dello Jonio'' (1957),<ref>{{cite book |last=Gissing |first=George Robert |author-link=George Gissing |title=Sulla riva dello Ionio. Appunti di viaggio nell'Italia meridionale |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3-0QcgAACAAJ |others=transl. by ] |year=1957 |publisher=Capelli |location=]|language=it}}</ref> a translation by Italian poet ] of ''By the Ionian Sea'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Gissing |first=George |title=By the Ionian Sea. Notes of a Ramble in Southern Italy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CjrJ6aUWOrwC |year=2004 |orig-year=1901 |publisher=] |location=] |edition=illustrated, reprint, revised |isbn=978-1-90266967-0 |page=}}</ref> a 1901 travel narrative in southern Italy by Victorian writer ]. He further states that either Fellini or Flaiano opened the book at random, saw the name of a restaurant owner, Coriolano Paparazzo, and decided to use it for the photographer. This story is further documented by a variety of Gissing scholars<ref>{{cite book |last=Coustillas |first=Pierre |author-link=Pierre Coustillas |chapter=Gissing and the Paparazzi (pp. 256–266) |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=uxDlXxc_8TUC&pg=PA256 |editor-first= Francesco |editor-last=Badolato |title=George Gissing, romanziere del tardo periodo vittoriano |year=2005 |publisher=Rubbettino Editore |location=] |isbn=978-8-84981193-3 }}</ref> and in the book ''A Sweet and Glorious Land. Revisiting the Ionian Sea''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Keahey |first=John |title=A Sweet and Glorious Land. Revisiting the Ionian Sea |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-w-jAwAAQBAJ |year=2014 |orig-date=2000 |publisher=] |location=London |isbn=978-1-46687603-3 |page= |access-date=December 3, 2021 |archive-date=November 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107204354/https://books.google.com/books?id=-w-jAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Some have argued that it is the paparazzi who "make" people celebrities, but very often, the celebrities attempt to act as if they hate and fear the paparazzi. Some paparazzi have responded that if a celebrity, who sought out fame in becoming a celebrity, wants privacy, they shouldn't leave their homes.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} | |||
By the late 1960s, the word, usually in the Italian plural form ''paparazzi'', had entered English as a generic term for intrusive photographers.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.word-origins.com/definition/paparazzi.html |work= Word Origins and History |title= Paparazzi |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20101220005135/http://www.word-origins.com/definition/paparazzi.html |archive-date= December 20, 2010 |df= mdy-all }}</ref> A person who has been photographed by the paparazzi is said to have been "papped".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pap|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160925145644/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pap|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 25, 2016|title=pap - definition of pap in English {{!}} Oxford Dictionaries|website=Oxford Dictionaries {{!}} English|access-date=July 27, 2017}}</ref> | |||
====In other languages==== | |||
The ] network program '']'' used often-confrontational footage of celebrities made by paparazzi. | |||
A ] of ''paparazzi'' is used in several languages that do not use the Latin alphabet, including ] ({{lang|ja|パパラッチ}}), ] ({{lang|ko|파파라치}}), ] ({{lang|uk|папарацці}}), ] ({{lang|ru|папарацци}}), ] (папараци), ] ({{lang|th|ปาปารัสซี}}) and ] ({{lang|he|פפראצי}}). ] uses {{linktext|狗|仔|隊}}, meaning "puppy squad". ] uses {{lang|km|អ្នកប្រមាញ់រូប}} (anak bramanh roub).{{Fact|date=June 2024}} | |||
===Social media era=== | |||
==Waparazzi== | |||
For the majority of the history of paparazzi from the 1950s–2000s, paparazzi have been viewed as "invasive, aggressive, and greedy men" who would commonly clash with public figures,<ref name="Hazlehurst 2021">{{Cite magazine |last=Hazlehurst |first=Beatrice |date=2021-08-11 |title=Who Called the Paps? |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/features/celebrity-fake-candids-paparazzi-1210203/ |access-date=2024-06-23 |magazine=Rolling Stone |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="Cunningham 2024" /> but they have since become calmer and less combative.<ref name="Kale 2022" /><ref name="Cunningham 2024" /> ] grew in size during the 2010s, which made shooting sensational photos more accessible to the public and allowed celebrities to better control what pictures of them were publicized.<ref name="Hazlehurst 2021" /><ref name="Kale 2022" /> This in turn cheapened the value of sensational photos, and made the paparazzi industry riskier and less profitable.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Schrager |first=Allison |title=The 'golden years' of paparazzi have mostly gone |url=https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20190423-how-the-paparazzi-make-their-money |access-date=2024-06-24 |website=] |language=en-GB}}</ref> Although tensions still remain and paparazzi are commonly viewed negatively by the public and many celebrities, more celebrities have begun to regularly (or during a setback) invite, befriend, or ask paparazzi to take photos of them to sustain their careers, such as ] and ].<ref name="Kale 2022" /><ref name="Marcus 2014" /> (However, since the mid-2000s, social media has contributed to the industry's growth in ] and more invasion of privacy there.)<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mollan |first1=Cherylann |last2=Sebastian |first2=Meryl |date=2023-03-17 |title=Bollywood's complex relationship with paparazzi |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-64974628 |access-date=2024-06-24 |language=en-GB}}</ref> Public distrust has also increased around staged paparazzi photos.<ref name="Cunningham 2024" /> | |||
A new term for amateur photographers at major events was coined in February 2006 by ''Orange'' (]).<ref name="orange">{{cite web | title=orange.co.uk | work=Orange: BAFTAs | url=http://www.orange.co.uk/entertainment/film/baftasWaparazzi.php | accessdate=26 February | accessyear=2006}}</ref> Wrote ''MediaGuardian'', "fans armed with mobile phones were given their very own press pen outside the Odeon Leicester Square. And the name for this new breed of amateur snappers? Why, the ]arazzi, of course."<ref name="guardian">{{cite web | title=mediaguardian.co.uk | work=MediaGarden.co.uk: Media Monkey's Diary | url=http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,1713281,00.html | accessdate=26 February | accessyear=2006}}</ref> | |||
==Legality== | |||
Passers-by or witnesses to news events who take images later used for broadcast have been dubbed ]. | |||
] | |||
Due to the reputation of paparazzi as a nuisance, several countries and states restrict their activities by passing laws and ]s,{{citation needed|date=September 2014}} and by staging events in which paparazzi are specifically not allowed to take photographs.<ref>{{cite web |title= AB 2479 Bill Analysis |first= Ellen M. |last= Corbett |url= http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2451-2500/ab_2479_cfa_20100628_125856_sen_comm.html |access-date= September 30, 2014 |archive-date= March 4, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304073825/http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2451-2500/ab_2479_cfa_20100628_125856_sen_comm.html |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= SB 465 Summary |url= http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Bills/SB465_.HTM |access-date= September 30, 2014 |archive-date= September 23, 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150923224012/http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Bills/SB465_.HTM |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title= How Princess Diana Changed the Way Paparazzi Pursue Kate Middleton |first= Danna |last= Harman |url= http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2011/0429/How-Princess-Diana-changed-the-way-paparazzi-pursue-Kate-Middleton |work= ] |access-date= September 30, 2014 |archive-date= October 6, 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141006104820/http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2011/0429/How-Princess-Diana-changed-the-way-paparazzi-pursue-Kate-Middleton |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= French Paparazzi Laws Favor Celebrities: Jolie, Pitt Latest Couple to Benefit |first= Angela |last= Doland |url= http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2004470054_brangelina11.html |work= ] |access-date= September 30, 2014 |archive-date= October 6, 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141006213201/http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2004470054_brangelina11.html |url-status= live }}</ref> In the United States, celebrity news organizations are protected by the ].<ref>{{cite journal |title= Taking a Shot at Paparazzi |last= Lowry |first= Brian |date= August 6, 2013 |journal= ] |volume= 320 |issue= 17 |id= {{ProQuest|1429233078}} }}</ref> In other words, generally speaking, taking photos or videos of people in public areas without their consent is considered to be an acceptable act.<ref name="krages_photo_rights">{{cite web |url=http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf |title=The Photographer's Right |author=Krages II, Bert P |access-date=2009-06-17 |archive-date=2020-12-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210233720/http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> This standard extends to even potentially embarrassing situations. For example, in July 2012, when Australian supermodel ] leaned over to buckle her son into a car seat, her ] peeked over her ] to create a ]. Because she was in a public location, the streets of ], the photographer not only had the right to take photos but also circulate them publicly.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/miranda-kerr-thong-photos_n_1687134 |title=Miranda Kerr Thong Unfortunately Sees Light Of Day (PHOTOS)|date=July 19, 2012 |access-date=January 2, 2024 |work=The Huffington Post }}</ref> However, to protect the children of celebrities, ] passed Senate Bill No. 606<ref name="CA-SB-606">{{cite web |url=https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB606 |title=Bill Text - SB 606, Harassment: child or ward. |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=September 24, 2013 |website=legislature.ca.gov |publisher=California Legislative Information |access-date=May 22, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200417132607/http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB606 |archive-date=April 17, 2020 |quote=Under existing law, any person who intentionally harasses the child or ward of any other person because of that person’s employment is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or both.}}</ref> in September 2013. The purpose of the bill is to stop paparazzi from taking pictures of children or wards in a harassing manner because of their parent's occupation. This law increased the penalty for harassment of children.<ref>{{cite news |last1= McGreevy |first1= Patrick |last2=Mason |first2=Melanie |title= Gov. Brown Signs Bills Aimed at Paparazzi, Family Leave and Quakes |url= https://www.latimes.com/local/la-xpm-2013-sep-24-la-me-brown-bills-paparazzi-20130925-story.html |access-date= May 22, 2020 |work= ] |date= September 24, 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404041157/https://www.latimes.com/local/la-xpm-2013-sep-24-la-me-brown-bills-paparazzi-20130925-story.html |archive-date=April 4, 2019}}</ref> California Civil Code sections 1708.7 and 1708.8 explicitly address stalking and invasion of physical privacy.<ref name="CA-CC-1708.7">{{cite web |url=https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1708.7. |title=Law section |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=January 1, 2015 |website=legislature.ca.gov |publisher=California Legislative Information |access-date=May 22, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806032534/https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1708.7. |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="CA-CC-1708.8">{{cite web |url=https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1708.8. |title=Law section |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=January 1, 2016 |website=legislature.ca.gov |publisher=California Legislative Information |access-date=May 22, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806031929/https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1708.8. |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Injunctions=== | |||
] often known as paparazzi]] | |||
In 1972, paparazzo photographer ] sued ] after the former First Lady ordered her ] agents to destroy Galella's camera and film following an encounter in New York City's ]. Kennedy counter-sued claiming harassment. The trial lasted three weeks and became a groundbreaking case regarding photojournalism and the role of paparazzi. In ''Galella v. Onassis'', Kennedy obtained a restraining order to keep Galella {{convert|150|ft|m}} away from her and her children. The restriction was later reduced to {{convert|25|ft|m}}. The trial is a focal point in '']'', a 2010 documentary film by director ]. | |||
In 1997, ] and partner ] were ] as their driver was speeding, trying to escape paparazzi. Another person, Trevor Jones, survived.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/504736/Princess-Diana-Security-DIY-Car-Crash-Paris |title= Policeman who Spoke to Dying Princess Diana Blasts 'DIY' Security who Failed to Stop Crash |access-date= November 11, 2014 |last1= Allen |first1= Peter |date= August 29, 2014 |work= Express |location= London |archive-date= November 11, 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141111101358/http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/504736/Princess-Diana-Security-DIY-Car-Crash-Paris |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/31/newsid_2510000/2510615.stm |publisher= ] |title= 1997: Princess Diana Dies in Paris Crash |access-date= November 11, 2014 |archive-date= January 24, 2008 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080124004738/http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/31/newsid_2510000/2510615.stm |url-status= live }}</ref> An ] jury investigated the role of paparazzi in the incident, but no one was convicted. The official inquests into the accident attributed the causes to the speed and manner of driving of the Mercedes, as well as the following vehicles, and the impairment of the judgment of the Mercedes driver, ], through alcohol.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scottbaker_inquests.gov.uk/evidence/docs/inquisition_diana.pdf |title=Jury verdict - Inquisition forms: Princess Diana of Wales |website=Coroner's Inquests into the Deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Mr Dodi Al Fayed |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090607230257/http://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk/evidence/docs/inquisition_diana.pdf |archive-date=June 7, 2009}}</ref> | |||
In 1999, the '']'' of ] was found guilty of "scandalizing the court", an extremely rare charge where the judiciary find that the newspaper's conduct undermines confidence in the administration of justice.<ref name="WorldLII">{{cite court | |litigants= Wong Yeung Ng v. Secretary for Justice |reporter= ICHRL |opinion= 12 |date= February 9, 1999 |url= http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICHRL/1999/12.html |access-date=August 20, 2006 }}</ref> The charge was brought after the newspaper had published abusive articles challenging the judiciary's integrity and accusing it of ] in a lawsuit the paper had instigated over a photo of a pregnant ]. The paper had also arranged for a "dog team" (slang for paparazzi in the Chinese language) to track a judge for 72 hours, to provide the judge with first-hand experience of what paparazzi do.<ref name="ODN">{{cite journal |first= Tim |last= Hamlett |date= July–December 2011 |title= Scandalising the Scumbags: The Secretary for Justice vs the Oriental Press Group |url= http://www.uow.edu.au/crearts/journalism/APME/contents11/TimHamlett.pdf |journal= Asia Pacific Media Educator |issue= 11 |pages= 20–33 |access-date= August 20, 2006 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060518072905/http://www.uow.edu.au/crearts/journalism/APME/contents11/TimHamlett.pdf |archive-date= May 18, 2006}}</ref> | |||
'']'' magazine's Style & Design special issue in 2005 ran a story entitled "Shooting Star", in which Mel Bouzad, one of the top paparazzi in Los Angeles at the time, claimed to have made US$150,000 for a picture of ] and ] in ] after their breakup. "If I get a picture of ] and her baby," Bouzad claimed, "I'll be able to buy a house in those hills (above ])."<ref name="Time">{{cite news |title= Shooting Stars |url= http://www.time.com/time/2005/style/091305/shooting_stars_paparazz39a.html |access-date= June 16, 2006 |magazine= Time |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051226032035/http://www.time.com/time/2005/style/091305/shooting_stars_paparazz39a.html |archive-date= December 26, 2005}}</ref> ''Paparazzi'' author Peter Howe told ''Time'' that "celebrities need a higher level of exposure than the rest of us so it is a two-way street. The celebrities manipulate." | |||
In 2006, Former Brazilian Model ] went through a scandal when a paparazzi caught video footage of her having sex with her boyfriend on a beach in Spain, which was posted on ].<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080308025739/http://oglobo.globo.com/cultura/mat/2006/09/28/285875345.asp |date=March 8, 2008 }}</ref> After fighting in the court, it was decided in her favor, causing YouTube to be blocked in Brazil. This caused major havoc among Brazilians, including threatening a ] against ], where Cicarelli worked, unless she was fired.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} The block only lasted a few days, and Cicarelli was not dismissed. The legal action backfired as the court decided she had no ] by having sex in a public location.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} Cicarelli appealed the decision, and the case was finally settled in 2015 with the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil awarding Cicarelli and her boyfriend in the video damages of R$250,000 (US$64,000) from Google.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2015/10/1693779-model-and-tv-presenter-daniela-cicarelli-sues-google-for-r94-million-and-wins-r250000.shtml |title=Model and TV Presenter Daniela Cicarelli Sues Google for R$94 Million and Wins R$250,000 | |||
|publisher=folha.uol.com.br |accessdate=2020-08-01 |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151021234917/https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2015/10/1693779-model-and-tv-presenter-daniela-cicarelli-sues-google-for-r94-million-and-wins-r250000.shtml |archivedate=2015-10-21 }}</ref> | |||
Following the publication of photographs showing ] sunbathing whilst topless at the French holiday home of her husband's cousin ], it was announced on September 14, 2012, that the royal couple were to launch legal action against the French edition of '']'' magazine. It was the first time that a senior British royal has sued in a court outside the UK. The reason cited for the legal action is that the Duchess had a right of ] whilst at the home—the magazine responded that the pictures had been taken from the public highway. The injunction was granted on September 18, 2012, and the publishers of the magazine were ordered not to publish the photographs in France and not to sell the images. The publishers were also ordered to hand over the original material of the published pictures under threat of a €10,000 fine for every day of delay in doing so.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.mrpaparazzi.com |title= mrpaparazzi.com |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080216110716/http://www.mrpaparazzi.com/ |archive-date= February 16, 2008 |url-status= dead |df= mdy-all }}</ref> In 2017, the magazine was ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to Catherine and William, and another €90,000 fine to two staffers.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.vogue.com/article/kate-middleton-topless-photo-lawsuit-significance | title=The Watershed Significance of Kate Middleton's Topless Photo Lawsuit | date=September 6, 2017 | access-date=June 5, 2023 | archive-date=June 5, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605112240/https://www.vogue.com/article/kate-middleton-topless-photo-lawsuit-significance | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In the United Kingdom, ], ], and ] have won injunctions that prevent the paparazzi from following them and gathering outside their houses. Miller was awarded £53,000.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/may/04/celebrities-paparazzi |title= Have Celebrities Finally Snapped? |newspaper= The Guardian |location= London |date= May 4, 2009 |access-date= December 16, 2016 |archive-date= May 10, 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170510225429/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/may/04/celebrities-paparazzi |url-status= live }}</ref> | |||
In 2013, rapper ] faced assault charges after attacking a photojournalist. He stated that he would fight to get the law changed, so celebrities can profit from paparazzi's work.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.3news.co.nz/Kanye-West-demands-money-from-paparazzi/tabid/418/articleID/314523/Default.aspx |title= Kanye West Demands Money from Paparazzi |publisher= 3 News NZ |date= September 25, 2013 |access-date= September 25, 2013 |archive-date= January 12, 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140112121220/http://www.3news.co.nz/Kanye-West-demands-money-from-paparazzi/tabid/418/articleID/314523/Default.aspx |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/kanye-west-paparazzi-should-pay-2296723 |title= Kanye West: 'The Paparazzi Should Pay Me' |work= The Mirror |location= London |date= September 24, 2013 |access-date= April 5, 2018 |archive-date= April 4, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190404041150/https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/kanye-west-paparazzi-should-pay-2296723 |url-status= live }}</ref> | |||
===Other measures=== | |||
In addition to legal action, celebrities have taken other measures to avoid paparazzi. When ] was performing in the play '']'' in London, he wore the same hat and jacket every day for six months, to make the photos look old and therefore "unpublishable".<ref name="CBS-Ratcliffe">{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=July 10, 2007 |title=Daniel Radcliffe Is Growing Up |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/daniel-radcliffe-is-growing-up/ |url-status=live |work=CBS News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216151807/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/daniel-radcliffe-is-growing-up/ |archive-date=December 16, 2017 |access-date= May 23, 2020}}</ref> | |||
==In popular culture== | |||
The ] network program ''Celebrities Uncensored'' used footage of celebrities made by paparazzi.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Slotnik |first=Daniel E. |date=2017-06-02 |title=E. L. Woody, 'King of the Paparazzi,' Dies at 70 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/arts/e-l-woody-dead-self-anointed-king-of-the-paparazzi.html |access-date=2024-06-24 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> | |||
] released the single "]" in 2009 for the album '']'', which she described to be "about wooing the paparazzi to fall in love with me". It received critical acclaim and charted in the top ten in the United States and the United Kingdom.<ref name="ehqueenofpop">{{cite book |last=Herbert |first=Emily |title=] |publisher=] |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-84454-963-4 |pages=156–159}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Commons category-inline}} | |||
{{Wiktionary-inline}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
<div class="references-small"><references /></div> | |||
{{Federico Fellini|state=collapsed}} | |||
] | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 10:31, 4 January 2025
Photographers who take candid pictures of celebrities For other uses, see Paparazzi (disambiguation).
Paparazzi are independent photographers who take pictures of high-profile people; such as actors, musicians, athletes, politicians, and other celebrities who go about their daily life routines. Paparazzi are known for their relentless pursuit of celebrities, often using long lenses and speedlite flashes or even following them in vehicles to capture personal, unflattering, or private moments. The photographs taken by paparazzi are commonly sold to tabloids, gossip magazines, and websites, where they are published to attract attention and increase sales. This type of invasive photography is often controversial because it can violate the privacy of the subjects involved.
Description
Paparazzi tend to be independent contractors, unaffiliated with mainstream media organizations, who track high-profile people and take pictures of them opportunistically. Some journalists have described the behavior of paparazzi as stalking, and anti-stalking laws in many countries address the issue by seeking to reduce harassment of public figures and celebrities, especially when they are with their children. Some public figures and celebrities, such as Adele, Prince Harry, and Kristen Stewart, have expressed concern at the extent to which paparazzi go to invade their personal space. The filing and receiving of judicial support for restraining orders against paparazzi has increased, as have lawsuits with judgments against them.
Paparazzi are often a problem for celebrities, as the latter have become increasingly objectified and worshipped by fans (see: Celebrity worship syndrome), especially through social and mass media. This happens because constant exposure to and coverage of these figures leads people to treat celebrities like they are their social intimates, whom they admire, gossip about, or copy habits from. A 2009 study which anonymously interviewed a number of celebrities showed that it was a common sentiment that being pursued by paparazzi causes a loss of personal life, lack of anonymity, and a feeling of constantly being watched. This causes them to compensate by forming separate identities, one an image offered to the public, and one reserved for moments of privacy and intimacy.
It is also a common practice for celebrities to willingly invite paparazzi to take photographs of them, the main reason being to maintain or increase their relevance and exposure.
Famous paparazzi
Walter Santesso portrays Paparazzo in the 1960 film La Dolce Vita, marking the character as the eponym of the word paparazzi.
Ron Galella was well known for his obsessive stalking of several celebrities, most notably Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. Galella has been defined "the Godfather of the U.S. paparazzi culture".
Rino Barillari is an Italian paparazzo known as "The King of Paparazzi" in Italy. He was awarded the Commander of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic in 1998.
History
Precursors
Intrusive photojournalism has existed since the nineteenth century. The invention of quicker and more portable cameras facilitated the process of capturing unauthorized celebrity photographs and publishing them in illustrated newspapers, which started appearing in the 1890s. One of the first instances of a "snatched photograph" was in 1898, when two photographers were able to capture a photograph of Otto von Bismarck on his deathbed through bribery.
Etymology
A news photographer named Paparazzo (played by Walter Santesso in the 1960 film La Dolce Vita directed by Federico Fellini) is the eponym of the word paparazzi. In his book The Facts on File Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins, Robert Hendrickson writes that Fellini named the "hyperactive photographer ... after Italian slang for 'mosquito'". As Fellini said in his interview to Time magazine, "Paparazzo ... suggests to me a buzzing insect, hovering, darting, stinging." Those versions of the word's origin are sometimes contested. For example, in the Abruzzo dialect spoken by Ennio Flaiano, co-scriptwriter of La Dolce Vita, the term paparazzo refers to the local clam, Venerupis decussata, and is also used as a metaphor for the shutter of a camera lens.
Further, in an interview with Fellini's screenwriter Flaiano, he said the name came from the book Sulla riva dello Jonio (1957), a translation by Italian poet Margherita Guidacci of By the Ionian Sea, a 1901 travel narrative in southern Italy by Victorian writer George Gissing. He further states that either Fellini or Flaiano opened the book at random, saw the name of a restaurant owner, Coriolano Paparazzo, and decided to use it for the photographer. This story is further documented by a variety of Gissing scholars and in the book A Sweet and Glorious Land. Revisiting the Ionian Sea. By the late 1960s, the word, usually in the Italian plural form paparazzi, had entered English as a generic term for intrusive photographers. A person who has been photographed by the paparazzi is said to have been "papped".
In other languages
A transliteration of paparazzi is used in several languages that do not use the Latin alphabet, including Japanese (パパラッチ), Korean (파파라치), Ukrainian (папарацці), Russian (папарацци), Bulgarian (папараци), Thai (ปาปารัสซี) and Hebrew (פפראצי). Chinese uses 狗仔隊, meaning "puppy squad". Khmer uses អ្នកប្រមាញ់រូប (anak bramanh roub).
Social media era
For the majority of the history of paparazzi from the 1950s–2000s, paparazzi have been viewed as "invasive, aggressive, and greedy men" who would commonly clash with public figures, but they have since become calmer and less combative. Social media grew in size during the 2010s, which made shooting sensational photos more accessible to the public and allowed celebrities to better control what pictures of them were publicized. This in turn cheapened the value of sensational photos, and made the paparazzi industry riskier and less profitable. Although tensions still remain and paparazzi are commonly viewed negatively by the public and many celebrities, more celebrities have begun to regularly (or during a setback) invite, befriend, or ask paparazzi to take photos of them to sustain their careers, such as Kim Kardashian and Rihanna. (However, since the mid-2000s, social media has contributed to the industry's growth in Hindi cinema and more invasion of privacy there.) Public distrust has also increased around staged paparazzi photos.
Legality
Due to the reputation of paparazzi as a nuisance, several countries and states restrict their activities by passing laws and curfews, and by staging events in which paparazzi are specifically not allowed to take photographs. In the United States, celebrity news organizations are protected by the First Amendment. In other words, generally speaking, taking photos or videos of people in public areas without their consent is considered to be an acceptable act. This standard extends to even potentially embarrassing situations. For example, in July 2012, when Australian supermodel Miranda Kerr leaned over to buckle her son into a car seat, her thong underwear peeked over her jeans to create a whale tail. Because she was in a public location, the streets of New York City, the photographer not only had the right to take photos but also circulate them publicly. However, to protect the children of celebrities, California passed Senate Bill No. 606 in September 2013. The purpose of the bill is to stop paparazzi from taking pictures of children or wards in a harassing manner because of their parent's occupation. This law increased the penalty for harassment of children. California Civil Code sections 1708.7 and 1708.8 explicitly address stalking and invasion of physical privacy.
Injunctions
In 1972, paparazzo photographer Ron Galella sued Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis after the former First Lady ordered her Secret Service agents to destroy Galella's camera and film following an encounter in New York City's Central Park. Kennedy counter-sued claiming harassment. The trial lasted three weeks and became a groundbreaking case regarding photojournalism and the role of paparazzi. In Galella v. Onassis, Kennedy obtained a restraining order to keep Galella 150 feet (46 m) away from her and her children. The restriction was later reduced to 25 feet (7.6 m). The trial is a focal point in Smash His Camera, a 2010 documentary film by director Leon Gast.
In 1997, Diana, Princess of Wales and partner Dodi Fayed were killed in a limousine crash as their driver was speeding, trying to escape paparazzi. Another person, Trevor Jones, survived. An inquest jury investigated the role of paparazzi in the incident, but no one was convicted. The official inquests into the accident attributed the causes to the speed and manner of driving of the Mercedes, as well as the following vehicles, and the impairment of the judgment of the Mercedes driver, Henri Paul, through alcohol.
In 1999, the Oriental Daily News of Hong Kong was found guilty of "scandalizing the court", an extremely rare charge where the judiciary find that the newspaper's conduct undermines confidence in the administration of justice. The charge was brought after the newspaper had published abusive articles challenging the judiciary's integrity and accusing it of bias in a lawsuit the paper had instigated over a photo of a pregnant Faye Wong. The paper had also arranged for a "dog team" (slang for paparazzi in the Chinese language) to track a judge for 72 hours, to provide the judge with first-hand experience of what paparazzi do.
Time magazine's Style & Design special issue in 2005 ran a story entitled "Shooting Star", in which Mel Bouzad, one of the top paparazzi in Los Angeles at the time, claimed to have made US$150,000 for a picture of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez in Georgia after their breakup. "If I get a picture of Britney and her baby," Bouzad claimed, "I'll be able to buy a house in those hills (above Sunset Boulevard)." Paparazzi author Peter Howe told Time that "celebrities need a higher level of exposure than the rest of us so it is a two-way street. The celebrities manipulate."
In 2006, Former Brazilian Model Daniella Cicarelli went through a scandal when a paparazzi caught video footage of her having sex with her boyfriend on a beach in Spain, which was posted on YouTube. After fighting in the court, it was decided in her favor, causing YouTube to be blocked in Brazil. This caused major havoc among Brazilians, including threatening a boycott against MTV Brasil, where Cicarelli worked, unless she was fired. The block only lasted a few days, and Cicarelli was not dismissed. The legal action backfired as the court decided she had no expectation of privacy by having sex in a public location. Cicarelli appealed the decision, and the case was finally settled in 2015 with the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil awarding Cicarelli and her boyfriend in the video damages of R$250,000 (US$64,000) from Google.
Following the publication of photographs showing Catherine, Princess of Wales sunbathing whilst topless at the French holiday home of her husband's cousin Viscount Linley, it was announced on September 14, 2012, that the royal couple were to launch legal action against the French edition of Closer magazine. It was the first time that a senior British royal has sued in a court outside the UK. The reason cited for the legal action is that the Duchess had a right of privacy whilst at the home—the magazine responded that the pictures had been taken from the public highway. The injunction was granted on September 18, 2012, and the publishers of the magazine were ordered not to publish the photographs in France and not to sell the images. The publishers were also ordered to hand over the original material of the published pictures under threat of a €10,000 fine for every day of delay in doing so. In 2017, the magazine was ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to Catherine and William, and another €90,000 fine to two staffers.
In the United Kingdom, Sienna Miller, Amy Winehouse, and Lily Allen have won injunctions that prevent the paparazzi from following them and gathering outside their houses. Miller was awarded £53,000.
In 2013, rapper Kanye West faced assault charges after attacking a photojournalist. He stated that he would fight to get the law changed, so celebrities can profit from paparazzi's work.
Other measures
In addition to legal action, celebrities have taken other measures to avoid paparazzi. When Daniel Radcliffe was performing in the play Equus in London, he wore the same hat and jacket every day for six months, to make the photos look old and therefore "unpublishable".
In popular culture
The E! network program Celebrities Uncensored used footage of celebrities made by paparazzi.
Lady Gaga released the single "Paparazzi" in 2009 for the album The Fame, which she described to be "about wooing the paparazzi to fall in love with me". It received critical acclaim and charted in the top ten in the United States and the United Kingdom.
See also
Media related to Paparazzi at Wikimedia Commons The dictionary definition of paparazzi at Wiktionary
References
- "Is Everyone a Journalist?". American Journalism Review. October 1997. Archived from the original on June 13, 2010. Retrieved January 27, 2009.
- Brand, Madeleine (June 10, 2005). "'Paparazzi': Stalking Celebs with Cameras". NPR. Retrieved June 6, 2024.
- Zjawinski, Sonia. "My Paparazzo: Hiring a Stalker Is Easy". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- "Turning a Lens on the Paparazzi". ABC News. January 29, 2005. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- McGreevy, Patrick (September 24, 2013). "Gov. Jerry Brown signs law protecting children of public figures". LA Times. Archived from the original on November 30, 2013. Retrieved October 12, 2018.
- ^ Kale, Sirin (August 17, 2022). "'People think we are scumbags. But celebrities are ringing us!' The changing world of the paparazzi". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- "The Four Stages of Fame: How Celebrities Learn to Accept—and Regret—Their Popularity". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- Locke, Christina M.; Murrhee, Kara Carnley (2011). "Is Driving with the Intent to Gather News a Crime? The Chilling Effects of California's Anti-Paparazzi Legislation". Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review. 31 (2). Archived from the original on October 13, 2018. Retrieved October 12, 2018.
- Alexander, Jeffrey C. (November 2010). "The Celebrity-Icon". Cultural Sociology. 4 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1177/1749975510380316. ISSN 1749-9755. S2CID 145739711. Archived from the original on January 24, 2023. Retrieved June 4, 2023.
- "What is Razzi". Retrieved March 17, 2019.
- "Seeing by Starlight: Celebrity Obsession". Psychology Today. Retrieved May 24, 2023.
- Rockwell, Donna; Giles, David (January 1, 2009). "Being a Celebrity: A Phenomenology of Fame". Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 40 (2): 178–210. doi:10.1163/004726609X12482630041889. ISSN 1569-1624. Archived from the original on March 26, 2023. Retrieved June 4, 2023.
- ^ Cunningham, Kyndall (June 4, 2024). "Meet the photo agency that turns celeb watchers into conspiracy theorists". Vox. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- ^ Marcus, Stephanie (April 18, 2014). "Celebrities Call The Paparazzi On Themselves Sometimes, Obviously". HuffPost. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- Dunne, Susan (April 10, 2008). "A Movie That Coined A Word". Hartford Courant. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved April 6, 2019.
- Tapp, Tom (May 2, 2022). "Ron Galella Dies: Controversial "Godfather Of U.S. Paparazzi" Was 91". Archived from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
- Bienstock, Miera (July 13, 2010). "Remembering the Italian Hollywood". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- Povoledo, Elisabetta (May 21, 2024). "Gérard Depardieu Punches the 'King of Paparazzi' Outside Rome Cafe". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- "Barillari Sig. Saverio". Presidenza della Repubblica (in Italian).
- Chancey, Jill R. (1999). "Diana Doubled: The Fairytale Princess and the Photographer". NWSA Journal. 11 (2): 165. ISSN 1040-0656. JSTOR 4316663.
- Day, Elizabeth (March 2, 2014). "Paparazzi! How an unloved profession has shaped us". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- "Paparazzo". Treccani (in Italian).
- Robert Hendrickson. The Facts on File Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins.
- "The Press: Paparazzi on the Prowl". Time. Vol. 77, no. 16. April 14, 1961. Archived from the original on May 25, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2009.
- Gissing, George Robert (1957). Sulla riva dello Ionio. Appunti di viaggio nell'Italia meridionale (in Italian). transl. by Margherita Guidacci. Bologna: Capelli.
- Gissing, George (2004) . By the Ionian Sea. Notes of a Ramble in Southern Italy (illustrated, reprint, revised ed.). Oxford: Signal Books. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-90266967-0.
- Coustillas, Pierre (2005). "Gissing and the Paparazzi (pp. 256–266)". In Badolato, Francesco (ed.). George Gissing, romanziere del tardo periodo vittoriano. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore. ISBN 978-8-84981193-3.
- Keahey, John (2014) . A Sweet and Glorious Land. Revisiting the Ionian Sea. London: Macmillan. p. 184. ISBN 978-1-46687603-3. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2021.
- "Paparazzi". Word Origins and History. Archived from the original on December 20, 2010.
- "pap - definition of pap in English | Oxford Dictionaries". Oxford Dictionaries | English. Archived from the original on September 25, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2017.
- ^ Hazlehurst, Beatrice (August 11, 2021). "Who Called the Paps?". Rolling Stone. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- Schrager, Allison. "The 'golden years' of paparazzi have mostly gone". BBC. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- Mollan, Cherylann; Sebastian, Meryl (March 17, 2023). "Bollywood's complex relationship with paparazzi". Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- Corbett, Ellen M. "AB 2479 Bill Analysis". Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- "SB 465 Summary". Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- Harman, Danna. "How Princess Diana Changed the Way Paparazzi Pursue Kate Middleton". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- Doland, Angela. "French Paparazzi Laws Favor Celebrities: Jolie, Pitt Latest Couple to Benefit". Seattle Times. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- Lowry, Brian (August 6, 2013). "Taking a Shot at Paparazzi". Variety. 320 (17). ProQuest 1429233078.
- Krages II, Bert P. "The Photographer's Right" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved June 17, 2009.
- "Miranda Kerr Thong Unfortunately Sees Light Of Day (PHOTOS)". The Huffington Post. July 19, 2012. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- "Bill Text - SB 606, Harassment: child or ward". legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. September 24, 2013. Archived from the original on April 17, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
Under existing law, any person who intentionally harasses the child or ward of any other person because of that person's employment is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or both.
- McGreevy, Patrick; Mason, Melanie (September 24, 2013). "Gov. Brown Signs Bills Aimed at Paparazzi, Family Leave and Quakes". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
- "Law section". legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. January 1, 2015. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
- "Law section". legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. January 1, 2016. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
- Allen, Peter (August 29, 2014). "Policeman who Spoke to Dying Princess Diana Blasts 'DIY' Security who Failed to Stop Crash". Express. London. Archived from the original on November 11, 2014. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
- "1997: Princess Diana Dies in Paris Crash". BBC. Archived from the original on January 24, 2008. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
- "Jury verdict - Inquisition forms: Princess Diana of Wales" (PDF). Coroner's Inquests into the Deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Mr Dodi Al Fayed. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 7, 2009.
- Wong Yeung Ng v. Secretary for Justice, ICHRL 12 (February 9, 1999).
- Hamlett, Tim (July–December 2011). "Scandalising the Scumbags: The Secretary for Justice vs the Oriental Press Group" (PDF). Asia Pacific Media Educator (11): 20–33. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 18, 2006. Retrieved August 20, 2006.
- "Shooting Stars". Time. Archived from the original on December 26, 2005. Retrieved June 16, 2006.
- Justiça mantém liminar que obriga sites a tirar vídeo de Cicarelli com namorado do ar Archived March 8, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
- "Model and TV Presenter Daniela Cicarelli Sues Google for R$94 Million and Wins R$250,000". folha.uol.com.br. Archived from the original on October 21, 2015. Retrieved August 1, 2020.
- "mrpaparazzi.com". Archived from the original on February 16, 2008.
- "The Watershed Significance of Kate Middleton's Topless Photo Lawsuit". September 6, 2017. Archived from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved June 5, 2023.
- "Have Celebrities Finally Snapped?". The Guardian. London. May 4, 2009. Archived from the original on May 10, 2017. Retrieved December 16, 2016.
- "Kanye West Demands Money from Paparazzi". 3 News NZ. September 25, 2013. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved September 25, 2013.
- "Kanye West: 'The Paparazzi Should Pay Me'". The Mirror. London. September 24, 2013. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved April 5, 2018.
- "Daniel Radcliffe Is Growing Up". CBS News. July 10, 2007. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
- Slotnik, Daniel E. (June 2, 2017). "E. L. Woody, 'King of the Paparazzi,' Dies at 70". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- Herbert, Emily (2010). Lady Gaga: Queen of Pop. John Blake Publishing. pp. 156–159. ISBN 978-1-84454-963-4.