| Revision as of 22:07, 19 March 2005 editRomanm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,444 editsm →Production: renamed section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:58, 5 December 2010 edit undoSable232 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,819 edits rm tag (page was redirected) | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| == Title of the article == | == Title of the article == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| I believe the last 126p had an original flat-twin engine instead of the original straight-twin of the Italian 126. Can somebody confirm ? ] 21:22, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Zastava 126 PGL == | == Zastava 126 PGL == | ||
| This car was known in ] as ]. Was it imported from ] and rebranded, or was it produced in ] factory in ]? --] ] 22:06, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) | This car was known in ] as ]. Was it imported from ] and rebranded, or was it produced in ] factory in ]? --] ] 22:06, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I don't know but Zastava built some fiat models in Yugoslavia. I think the Yugo were in fact Zastavas. ] 21:22, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| This is true, but "Polski Fiat 126p" was not branded under Yugo trademark - it was built way before Yugo. --] ] 22:16, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Late reply :) But, that particular model was made after Fiat's license in Zastava as well even though many of those were imported from Poland. So really, both. It was similar with some other Fiat's cars. --] 07:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image== | |||
| I think the photo of the car with the missing wheels is silly and unnecessary. The other photograph suffices. I'll remove it if no one objects. ] 19:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *I second that. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:58, 5 December 2010
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polski Fiat 126p redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Title of the article
Dear Authors, Let me draw your attention to the fact the "Polish Fiat 126p" is only the English translation of Polski Fiat, a trademark used in Poland between the World Wars and after World War II, in connection with cars built in Poland under the licence of Fiat.
I think it would be better to use this name as the title of this Wiki article and "Polish Fiat" should be given as an explanation only.
Best regards
I believe the last 126p had an original flat-twin engine instead of the original straight-twin of the Italian 126. Can somebody confirm ? Ericd 21:22, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Zastava 126 PGL
This car was known in Yugoslavia as Zastava 126 PGL. Was it imported from Poland and rebranded, or was it produced in Zastava factory in Kragujevac? --romanm (talk) 22:06, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I don't know but Zastava built some fiat models in Yugoslavia. I think the Yugo were in fact Zastavas. Ericd 21:22, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is true, but "Polski Fiat 126p" was not branded under Yugo trademark - it was built way before Yugo. --romanm (talk) 22:16, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Late reply :) But, that particular model was made after Fiat's license in Zastava as well even though many of those were imported from Poland. So really, both. It was similar with some other Fiat's cars. --Dejan Čabrilo 07:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Image
I think the photo of the car with the missing wheels is silly and unnecessary. The other photograph suffices. I'll remove it if no one objects. Appleseed 19:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I second that.