Revision as of 18:47, 30 April 2007 edit208.255.152.227 (talk) →Using ordinary differential equations: Fixed A Formula← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:07, 26 November 2024 edit undoJacobolus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,491 edits Undid revision 1259698824 by 103.155.3.118 (talk)Tag: Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Complex exponential in terms of sine and cosine}} | |||
:''This article is about Euler's formula in '']''. For Euler's formula in graph theory see ]. See also ].'' | |||
{{About|Euler's formula in complex analysis||List of things named after Leonhard Euler#Formulas}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2021}} | |||
{{e (mathematical constant)}} | |||
'''Euler's formula''', named after ], is a ] ] in ] that establishes the fundamental relationship between the ] and the ] ]. Euler's formula states that, for any ] {{mvar|x}}, one has | |||
<math display="block">e^{i x} = \cos x + i \sin x, </math> | |||
where {{mvar|e}} is the ], {{mvar|i}} is the ], and {{math|cos}} and {{math|sin}} are the ] ] and ] respectively. This complex exponential function is sometimes denoted {{math|] ''x''}} ("cosine plus ''i'' sine"). The formula is still valid if {{mvar|x}} is a ], and is also called ''Euler's formula'' in this more general case.<ref>{{cite book | first=Martin A. | last= Moskowitz | title=A Course in Complex Analysis in One Variable | publisher = World Scientific Publishing Co. | year=2002 | isbn=981-02-4780-X | pages=7|url={{Google books|Acw5DwAAQBAJ|A Course in Complex Analysis in One Variable|page=7|plainurl=yes}}}}</ref> | |||
Euler's formula is ubiquitous in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering. The physicist ] called the equation "our jewel" and "the most remarkable formula in mathematics".<ref>{{cite book|first=Richard P.|last= Feynman|title=The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. I|publisher=Addison-Wesley|year=1977|isbn=0-201-02010-6|page=22-10| url=https://feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_22.html#Ch22-S5}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
'''Euler's formula''', named after ], is a ] formula in ] that shows a deep relationship between the ] and the complex ]. (] is a special case of the Euler formula.) | |||
When {{math|1=''x'' = ''π''}}, Euler's formula may be rewritten as {{math|1=''e<sup>iπ</sup>'' + 1 = 0}} or {{math|1=''e<sup>iπ</sup>'' = −1}}, which is known as ]. | |||
Euler's formula states that, for any ] ''x'', | |||
: <math>e^{ix} = \cos(x) + i\sin(x) \!</math> | |||
where | |||
:<math> e \,</math> is the ] | |||
:<math> i \,</math> is the ] | |||
:<math> \cos() \,</math> and <math> \sin() \,</math> are ]s. | |||
] called Euler's formula "our jewel" and "the most remarkable formula in mathematics".<ref>{{cite book|first=Richard P.|last= Feynman|title=The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. I|publisher=Addison-Wesley|year=1977|isbn=0-201-02010-6|pages=p. 22-10}}</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
In 1714, the English mathematician ] presented a geometrical argument that can be interpreted (after correcting a misplaced factor of <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>) as:<ref>Cotes wrote: ''"Nam si quadrantis circuli quilibet arcus, radio ''CE'' descriptus, sinun habeat ''CX'' sinumque complementi ad quadrantem ''XE'' ; sumendo radium ''CE'' pro Modulo, arcus erit rationis inter <math>EX + XC \sqrt{-1}</math>& ''CE'' mensura ducta in <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>."'' (Thus if any arc of a quadrant of a circle, described by the radius ''CE'', has sinus ''CX'' and sinus of the complement to the quadrant ''XE'' ; taking the radius ''CE'' as modulus, the arc will be the measure of the ratio between <math>EX + XC \sqrt{-1}</math> & ''CE'' multiplied by <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>.) That is, consider a circle having center ''E'' (at the origin of the (x,y) plane) and radius ''CE''. Consider an angle ''θ'' with its vertex at ''E'' having the positive x-axis as one side and a radius ''CE'' as the other side. The perpendicular from the point ''C'' on the circle to the x-axis is the "sinus" ''CX'' ; the line between the circle's center ''E'' and the point ''X'' at the foot of the perpendicular is ''XE'', which is the "sinus of the complement to the quadrant" or "cosinus". The ratio between <math>EX + XC \sqrt{-1}</math> and ''CE'' is thus <math>\cos \theta + \sqrt{-1} \sin \theta \ </math>. In Cotes' terminology, the "measure" of a quantity is its natural logarithm, and the "modulus" is a conversion factor that transforms a measure of angle into circular arc length (here, the modulus is the radius (''CE'') of the circle). According to Cotes, the product of the modulus and the measure (logarithm) of the ratio, when multiplied by <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>, equals the length of the circular arc subtended by ''θ'', which for any angle measured in radians is ''CE'' • ''θ''. Thus, <math>\sqrt{-1} CE \ln{\left ( \cos \theta + \sqrt{-1} \sin \theta \right ) \ } = (CE) \theta </math>. This equation has a misplaced factor: the factor of <math>\sqrt{-1}</math> should be on the right side of the equation, not the left side. If the change of scaling by <math>\sqrt{-1}</math> is made, then, after dividing both sides by ''CE'' and exponentiating both sides, the result is: <math>\cos \theta + \sqrt{-1} \sin \theta = e^{\sqrt{-1} \theta}</math>, which is Euler's formula.<br /> | |||
Euler's formula was ] for the first time by ] in ] in the form ln(cos(''x'') + ''i'' sin(''x'')) = ''ix'' (where "ln" means natural logarithm, i.e. log to base e)<ref>{{cite book|author=John Stillwell|title=Mathematics and Its History|publisher=Springer|year=2002}}</ref>. It was Euler who published the equation in its current form in ], basing his proof on the ] of both sides being equal. Neither of these men saw the geometrical interpretation of the formula: the view of complex numbers as points in the ] arose only some 50 years later (see ]). | |||
See: | |||
* Roger Cotes (1714) "Logometria," ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London'', '''29''' (338) : 5-45; see especially page 32. Available on-line at: | |||
== Applications in complex number theory == | |||
* Roger Cotes with Robert Smith, ed., ''Harmonia mensurarum'' … (Cambridge, England: 1722), chapter: "Logometria", . | |||
This formula can be interpreted as saying that the function ''e''<sup>''ix''</sup> traces out the ] in the ] plane as ''x'' ranges through the real numbers. Here, ''x'' is the ] that a line connecting the origin with a point on the unit circle makes with the positive real axis, measured counter clockwise and in ]s. The formula is valid only if sin and cos take their arguments in radians rather than in degrees. | |||
* https://nrich.maths.org/1384</ref><ref name="Stillwell">{{cite book|author=John Stillwell|title=Mathematics and Its History|publisher=Springer|year=2002 |isbn=9781441960528| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=V7mxZqjs5yUC&pg=PA315}}</ref><ref>Sandifer, C. Edward (2007), '''', ] {{ISBN|978-0-88385-563-8}}</ref> | |||
<math display="block">ix = \ln(\cos x + i\sin x).</math> | |||
Exponentiating this equation yields Euler's formula. Note that the logarithmic statement is not universally correct for complex numbers, since a complex logarithm can have infinitely many values, differing by multiples of {{math|2''πi''}}. | |||
] | |||
Around 1740 ] turned his attention to the exponential function and derived the equation named after him by comparing the series expansions of the exponential and trigonometric expressions.<ref>] (1748) of ], page 214, section 138 (translation by Ian Bruce, pdf link from 17 century maths).</ref><ref name="Stillwell"/> The formula was first published in 1748 in his foundational work '']''.<ref>Conway & Guy, pp. 254–255</ref> | |||
] had found that<ref>{{cite journal|first=Johann |last=Bernoulli |title=Solution d'un problème concernant le calcul intégral, avec quelques abrégés par rapport à ce calcul |trans-title=Solution of a problem in integral calculus with some notes relating to this calculation |journal=Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris |pages=289–297|volume=1702 |date=1702}}</ref> | |||
The original proof is based on the ] expansions of the ] ''e''<sup>''z''</sup> (where ''z'' is a complex number) and of sin ''x'' and cos ''x'' for real numbers ''x'' (see below). In fact, the same proof shows that Euler's formula is even valid for all ''complex'' numbers ''z''. | |||
<math display="block">\frac{1}{1 + x^2} = \frac 1 2 \left( \frac{1}{1 - ix} + \frac{1}{1 + ix}\right).</math> | |||
And since | |||
Euler's formula can be used to represent complex numbers in ]. Any complex number ''z'' = ''x'' + ''iy'' can be written as | |||
<math display="block">\int \frac{dx}{1 + ax} = \frac{1}{a} \ln(1 + ax) + C,</math> | |||
the above equation tells us something about ]s by relating natural logarithms to imaginary (complex) numbers. Bernoulli, however, did not evaluate the integral. | |||
Bernoulli's correspondence with Euler (who also knew the above equation) shows that Bernoulli did not fully understand ]s. Euler also suggested that complex logarithms can have infinitely many values. | |||
:<math> z = x + iy = |z| (\cos \phi + i\sin \phi ) = |z| e^{i \phi} \,</math> | |||
:<math> \bar{z} = x - iy = |z| (\cos \phi - i\sin \phi ) = |z| e^{-i \phi} \,</math> | |||
The view of complex numbers as points in the ] was described about 50 years later by ]. | |||
where | |||
:<math> x = \mathrm{Re}\{z\} \,</math> the real part | |||
:<math> y = \mathrm{Im}\{z\} \,</math> the imaginary part | |||
:<math>|z| = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}</math> the ] of ''z'' | |||
and <math> \phi \, </math> is the ''argument'' of ''z''— the angle between the ''x'' axis and the vector ''z'' measured counterclockwise and in ]s — which is defined ] addition of 2π. | |||
==Definitions of complex exponentiation== | |||
{{further|Exponentiation#Complex exponents with a positive real base|Exponential function#On the complex plane}} | |||
Now, taking this derived formula, we can use Euler's formula to define the ] of a complex number. To do this, we also use the facts that | |||
The exponential function {{math|''e<sup>x</sup>''}} for real values of {{mvar|x}} may be defined in a few different equivalent ways (see ]). Several of these methods may be directly extended to give definitions of {{math|''e<sup>z</sup>''}} for complex values of {{mvar|z}} simply by substituting {{mvar|z}} in place of {{mvar|x}} and using the complex algebraic operations. In particular, we may use any of the three following definitions, which are equivalent. From a more advanced perspective, each of these definitions may be interpreted as giving the ] ] of {{math|''e<sup>x</sup>''}} to the complex plane. | |||
:<math>a = e^{ln (a)}\,</math> | |||
===Differential equation definition=== | |||
and | |||
The exponential function <math>f(z) = e^z</math> is the unique ] of a ] for which the derivative equals the function <math display="block">\frac{df}{dz} = f</math> and <math display="block">f(0) = 1.</math> | |||
:<math>e^a e^{b} = e^{a + b}\,</math> | |||
===Power series definition=== | |||
both valid for any complex numbers ''a'' and ''b''. | |||
For complex {{mvar|z}} | |||
<math display="block">e^z = 1 + \frac{z}{1!} + \frac{z^2}{2!} + \frac{z^3}{3!} + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{n!}.</math> | |||
Using the ], it is possible to show that this ] has an infinite ] and so defines {{math|''e<sup>z</sup>''}} for all complex {{mvar|z}}. | |||
Therefore, one can write: | |||
===Limit definition=== | |||
:<math> | |||
For complex {{mvar|z}} | |||
z=|z| e^{i \phi} = | |||
<math display="block">e^z = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1+\frac{z}{n}\right)^n.</math> | |||
e^{\ln |z|} e^{i \phi} | |||
= e^{\ln |z| + i \phi}\, | |||
</math> | |||
Here, {{mvar|n}} is restricted to ]s, so there is no question about what the power with exponent {{mvar|n}} means. | |||
for any <math>z\ne 0</math>. Taking the logarithm of both sides shows that: | |||
==Proofs== | |||
: <math>\ln z= \ln |z| + i \phi.\,</math> | |||
Various proofs of the formula are possible. | |||
===Using differentiation=== | |||
and in fact this can be used as the definition for the ]. The logarithm of a complex number is thus a ], due to the fact that <math>\phi \,</math> is multi-valued. | |||
This proof shows that the quotient of the trigonometric and exponential expressions is the constant function one, so they must be equal (the exponential function is never zero,<ref name=Apostol>{{cite book |last=Apostol |first=Tom |title=Mathematical Analysis |page=20 |publisher=Pearson |date=1974 |isbn=978-0201002881}} Theorem 1.42</ref> so this is permitted).<ref>user02138 (https://math.stackexchange.com/users/2720/user02138), How to prove Euler's formula: $e^{i\varphi}=\cos(\varphi) +i\sin(\varphi)$?, URL (version: 2018-06-25): https://math.stackexchange.com/q/8612</ref> | |||
Consider the function {{math|''f''(''θ'')}} | |||
Finally, the other exponential law | |||
<math display="block"> f(\theta) = \frac{\cos\theta + i\sin\theta}{e^{i\theta}} = e^{-i\theta} \left(\cos\theta + i \sin\theta\right) </math> | |||
for real {{mvar|θ}}. Differentiating gives by the ] | |||
<math display="block"> f'(\theta) = e^{-i\theta} \left(i\cos\theta - \sin\theta\right) - ie^{-i\theta} \left(\cos\theta + i\sin\theta\right) = 0</math> | |||
Thus, {{math|''f''(''θ'')}} is a constant. Since {{math|1=''f''(0) = 1}}, then {{math|1=''f''(''θ'') = 1}} for all real {{mvar|θ}}, and thus | |||
<math display="block">e^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta.</math> | |||
===Using power series=== | |||
: <math>(e^a)^k = e^{a k}, \,</math> | |||
] | |||
Here is a proof of Euler's formula using ], as well as basic facts about the powers of {{mvar|i}}:<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PjK0F0T3NBoC&pg=PA428 |title=A Modern Introduction to Differential Equations |first=Henry J. |last=Ricardo |date=23 March 2016 |page=428|publisher=Elsevier Science |isbn=9780123859136 }}</ref> | |||
which can be seen to hold for all integers ''k'', together with Euler's formula, implies several ] as well as ]. | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
i^0 &= 1, & i^1 &= i, & i^2 &= -1, & i^3 &= -i, \\ | |||
i^4 &= 1, & i^5 &= i, & i^6 &= -1, & i^7 &= -i \\ | |||
&\vdots & &\vdots & &\vdots & &\vdots | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
Using now the power-series definition from above, we see that for real values of {{mvar|x}} | |||
==Relationship to trigonometry== | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
Euler's formula provides a powerful connection between ] and ], and provides an interpretation of the sine and cosine functions as ]s of the exponential function: | |||
e^{ix} &= 1 + ix + \frac{(ix)^2}{2!} + \frac{(ix)^3}{3!} + \frac{(ix)^4}{4!} + \frac{(ix)^5}{5!} + \frac{(ix)^6}{6!} + \frac{(ix)^7}{7!} + \frac{(ix)^8}{8!} + \cdots \\ | |||
&= 1 + ix - \frac{x^2}{2!} - \frac{ix^3}{3!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} + \frac{ix^5}{5!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} - \frac{ix^7}{7!} + \frac{x^8}{8!} + \cdots \\ | |||
&= \left( 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \frac{x^8}{8!} - \cdots \right) + i\left( x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots \right) \\ | |||
&= \cos x + i\sin x , | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
where in the last step we recognize the two terms are the ] for {{math|cos ''x''}} and {{math|sin ''x''}}. ] because each series is ]. | |||
===Using polar coordinates=== | |||
: <math>\cos x = {e^{ix} + e^{-ix} \over 2}</math> | |||
Another proof<ref name=Strang>{{cite book |url=http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-18-001-calculus-online-textbook-spring-2005/textbook/ |title=Calculus |first=Gilbert |last=Strang |page=389 |publisher=Wellesley-Cambridge |year=1991 |isbn=0-9614088-2-0}} Second proof on page.</ref> is based on the fact that all complex numbers can be expressed in ]. Therefore, ] {{mvar|r}} and {{mvar|θ}} depending on {{mvar|x}}, | |||
: <math>\sin x = {e^{ix} - e^{-ix} \over 2i}</math> | |||
<math display="block">e^{i x} = r \left(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta\right).</math> | |||
No assumptions are being made about {{mvar|r}} and {{mvar|θ}}; they will be determined in the course of the proof. From any of the definitions of the exponential function it can be shown that the derivative of {{math|''e''<sup>''ix''</sup>}} is {{math|''ie''<sup>''ix''</sup>}}. Therefore, differentiating both sides gives | |||
<math display="block">i e ^{ix} = \left(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta\right) \frac{dr}{dx} + r \left(-\sin \theta + i \cos \theta\right) \frac{d\theta}{dx}.</math> | |||
Substituting {{math|''r''(cos ''θ'' + ''i'' sin ''θ'')}} for {{math|''e<sup>ix</sup>''}} and equating real and imaginary parts in this formula gives {{math|1=''{{sfrac|dr|dx}}'' = 0}} and {{math|1=''{{sfrac|dθ|dx}}'' = 1}}. Thus, {{mvar|r}} is a constant, and {{mvar|θ}} is {{math|''x'' + ''C''}} for some constant {{mvar|C}}. The initial values {{math|1=''r''(0) = 1}} and {{math|1=''θ''(0) = 0}} come from {{math|1=''e''<sup>0''i''</sup> = 1}}, giving {{math|1=''r'' = 1}} and {{math|1=''θ'' = ''x''}}. This proves the formula | |||
<math display="block">e^{i \theta} = 1(\cos \theta +i \sin \theta) = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta.</math> | |||
==Applications== | |||
The two equations above can be derived by adding or subtracting Euler's formulas: | |||
===Applications in complex number theory=== | |||
: <math>e^{ix} = \cos x + i \sin x \;</math> | |||
] | |||
==== Interpretation of the formula ==== | |||
: <math>e^{-ix} = \cos x - i \sin x \;</math> | |||
This formula can be interpreted as saying that the function {{math|''e''<sup>''iφ''</sup>}} is a ], i.e., it traces out the ] in the ] as {{mvar|φ}} ranges through the real numbers. Here {{mvar|φ}} is the ] that a line connecting the origin with a point on the unit circle makes with the ], measured counterclockwise and in ]s. | |||
The original proof is based on the ] expansions of the ] {{math|''e''<sup>''z''</sup>}} (where {{mvar|z}} is a complex number) and of {{math|sin ''x''}} and {{math|cos ''x''}} for real numbers {{mvar|x}} (]). In fact, the same proof shows that Euler's formula is even valid for all ''complex'' numbers {{mvar|x}}. | |||
and solving for either cosine or sine. | |||
A point in the ] can be represented by a complex number written in ]. Euler's formula provides a means of conversion between cartesian coordinates and ]. The polar form simplifies the mathematics when used in multiplication or powers of complex numbers. Any complex number {{math|1 = ''z'' = ''x'' + ''iy''}}, and its complex conjugate, {{math|1 = {{overline|''z''}} = ''x'' − ''iy''}}, can be written as | |||
These formulas can even serve as the definition of the trigonometric functions for complex arguments ''x''. For example, letting ''x'' = ''iy'', we have: | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
z &= x + iy = |z| (\cos \varphi + i\sin \varphi) = r e^{i \varphi}, \\ | |||
\bar{z} &= x - iy = |z| (\cos \varphi - i\sin \varphi) = r e^{-i \varphi}, | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
where | |||
*{{math|1=''x'' = Re ''z''}} is the real part, | |||
*{{math|1=''y'' = Im ''z''}} is the imaginary part, | |||
*{{math|1=''r'' = {{abs|''z''}} = {{sqrt|''x''<sup>2</sup> + ''y''<sup>2</sup>}}}} is the ] of {{mvar|z}} and | |||
*{{math|1=''φ'' = arg ''z'' = ](''y'', ''x'')}}. | |||
{{mvar|φ}} is the ] of {{mvar|z}}, i.e., the angle between the ''x'' axis and the vector ''z'' measured counterclockwise in ]s, which is defined ] addition of {{math|2''π''}}. Many texts write {{math|1=''φ'' = tan<sup>−1</sup> ''{{sfrac|y|x}}''}} instead of {{math|1= ''φ'' = atan2(''y'', ''x'')}}, but the first equation needs adjustment when {{math|''x'' ≤ 0}}. This is because for any real {{mvar|x}} and {{mvar|y}}, not both zero, the angles of the vectors {{math|(''x'', ''y'')}} and {{math|(−''x'', −''y'')}} differ by {{pi}} radians, but have the identical value of {{math|1=tan ''φ'' = {{sfrac|''y''|''x''}}}}. | |||
:<math> \cos(iy) = {e^{-y} + e^{y} \over 2} = \cosh(y) </math> | |||
==== Use of the formula to define the logarithm of complex numbers ==== | |||
:<math> \sin(iy) = {e^{-y} - e^{y} \over 2i} = i \sinh(y). </math> | |||
Now, taking this derived formula, we can use Euler's formula to define the ] of a complex number. To do this, we also use the definition of the logarithm (as the inverse operator of exponentiation): | |||
<math display="block">a = e^{\ln a}, </math> | |||
and that | |||
<math display="block">e^a e^b = e^{a + b}, </math> | |||
both valid for any complex numbers {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}}. Therefore, one can write: | |||
<math display="block">z = \left|z\right| e^{i \varphi} = e^{\ln\left|z\right|} e^{i \varphi} = e^{\ln\left|z\right| + i \varphi}</math> | |||
for any {{math|''z'' ≠ 0}}. Taking the logarithm of both sides shows that | |||
<math display="block">\ln z = \ln \left|z\right| + i \varphi,</math> | |||
and in fact, this can be used as the definition for the ]. The logarithm of a complex number is thus a ], because {{mvar|φ}} is multi-valued. | |||
Finally, the other exponential law | |||
==Other applications== | |||
<math display="block">\left(e^a\right)^k = e^{a k},</math> | |||
In ], the function ''e''<sup>''ix''</sup> is often used to simplify derivations, even if the final answer is a real function involving sine and cosine. ] is an easy consequence of Euler's formula. | |||
which can be seen to hold for all integers {{mvar|k}}, together with Euler's formula, implies several ], as well as ]. | |||
==== Relationship to trigonometry ==== | |||
In ] and other fields, signals that vary periodically over time are often described as a combination of sine and cosine functions (see ]), and these are more conveniently expressed as the real part of exponential functions with ] exponents, using Euler's formula. Also, phasor analysis of circuits can include Euler's formula to represent the impedance of a capacitor or an inductor. | |||
] | |||
Euler's formula, the definitions of the trigonometric functions and the standard identities for exponentials are sufficient to easily derive most trigonometric identities. It provides a powerful connection between ] and ], and provides an interpretation of the sine and cosine functions as ]s of the exponential function: | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
\cos x &= \operatorname{Re} \left(e^{ix}\right) =\frac{e^{ix} + e^{-ix}}{2}, \\ | |||
\sin x &= \operatorname{Im} \left(e^{ix}\right) =\frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i}. | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
The two equations above can be derived by adding or subtracting Euler's formulas: | |||
==Proofs== | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
e^{ix} &= \cos x + i \sin x, \\ | |||
===Using Taylor series=== | |||
e^{-ix} &= \cos(- x) + i \sin(- x) = \cos x - i \sin x | |||
Here is a proof of Euler's formula using ] expansions | |||
as well as basic facts about the powers of ''i'': | |||
: <math>\begin{align} | |||
i^0 &{}= 1, \quad & | |||
i^1 &{}= i, \quad & | |||
i^2 &{}= -1, \quad & | |||
i^3 &{}= -i, \\ | |||
i^4 &={} 1, \quad & | |||
i^5 &={} i, \quad & | |||
i^6 &{}= -1, \quad & | |||
i^7 &{}= -i, \\ | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
and solving for either cosine or sine. | |||
These formulas can even serve as the definition of the trigonometric functions for complex arguments {{mvar|x}}. For example, letting {{math|1=''x'' = ''iy''}}, we have: | |||
and so on. The functions ''e''<sup>''x''</sup>, cos(''x'') and sin(''x'') (assuming ''x'' is ]) can be expressed using their Taylor expansions around zero: | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
\cos iy &= \frac{e^{-y} + e^y}{2} = \cosh y, \\ | |||
: <math> \begin{align} | |||
\sin iy &= \frac{e^{-y} - e^y}{2i} = \frac{e^y - e^{-y}}{2}i = i\sinh y. | |||
\cos x &{}= 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \cdots \\ | |||
\sin x &{}= x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
In addition | |||
For complex ''z'' we ''define'' each of these function by the above series, replacing ''x'' with ''z''. This is possible because the ] of each series is infinite. We then find that | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
\cosh ix &= \frac{e^{ix} + e^{-ix}}{2} = \cos x, \\ | |||
: <math>\begin{align} | |||
\sinh ix &= \frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2} = i\sin x. | |||
e^{iz} &{}= 1 + iz + \frac{(iz)^2}{2!} + \frac{(iz)^3}{3!} + \frac{(iz)^4}{4!} + \frac{(iz)^5}{5!} + \frac{(iz)^6}{6!} + \frac{(iz)^7}{7!} + \frac{(iz)^8}{8!} + \cdots \\ | |||
&{}= 1 + iz - \frac{z^2}{2!} - \frac{iz^3}{3!} + \frac{z^4}{4!} + \frac{iz^5}{5!} - \frac{z^6}{6!} - \frac{iz^7}{7!} + \frac{z^8}{8!} + \cdots \\ | |||
&{}= \left( 1 - \frac{z^2}{2!} + \frac{z^4}{4!} - \frac{z^6}{6!} + \frac{z^8}{8!} - \cdots \right) + i\left( z - \frac{z^3}{3!} + \frac{z^5}{5!} - \frac{z^7}{7!} + \cdots \right) \\ | |||
&{}= \cos (z) + i\sin (z) | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are mathematically easier to manipulate than their sine and cosine components. One technique is simply to convert sines and cosines into equivalent expressions in terms of exponentials sometimes called ''complex sinusoids''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Complex Sinusoids |url=https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/filters06/Complex_Sinusoids.html |access-date=2024-09-10 |website=ccrma.stanford.edu}}</ref> After the manipulations, the simplified result is still real-valued. For example: | |||
The rearrangement of terms is justified because each series is ]. Taking ''z'' = ''x'' to be a real number gives the original identity as Euler discovered it. | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
\cos x \cos y &= \frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2} \cdot \frac{e^{iy}+e^{-iy}}{2} \\ | |||
&= \frac 1 2 \cdot \frac{e^{i(x+y)}+e^{i(x-y)}+e^{i(-x+y)}+e^{i(-x-y)}}{2} \\ | |||
&= \frac 1 2 \bigg( \frac{e^{i(x+y)} + e^{-i(x+y)}}{2} + \frac{e^{i(x-y)} + e^{-i(x-y)}}{2} \bigg)\\ | |||
&= \frac 1 2 \left( \cos(x+y) + \cos(x-y) \right). | |||
\end{align} | |||
</math> | |||
Another technique is to represent sines and cosines in terms of the ] of a complex expression and perform the manipulations on the complex expression. For example: | |||
===Using calculus=== | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
Define the function <math>f \ </math> by | |||
\cos nx &= \operatorname{Re} \left(e^{inx}\right) \\ | |||
&= \operatorname{Re} \left( e^{i(n-1)x}\cdot e^{ix} \right) \\ | |||
&= \operatorname{Re} \Big( e^{i(n-1)x}\cdot \big(\underbrace{e^{ix} + e^{-ix}}_{2\cos x } - e^{-ix}\big) \Big) \\ | |||
&= \operatorname{Re} \left( e^{i(n-1)x}\cdot 2\cos x - e^{i(n-2)x} \right) \\ | |||
&= \cos \cdot - \cos. | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
This formula is used for recursive generation of {{math|cos ''nx''}} for integer values of {{mvar|n}} and arbitrary {{mvar|x}} (in radians). | |||
: <math>f(x) = \frac{\cos x+i\sin x}{e^{ix}}. \ </math> | |||
Considering {{math|cos ''x''}} a parameter in equation above yields recursive formula for ] of the first kind. | |||
This is allowed since the equation | |||
{{see also|Phasor#Arithmetic}} | |||
: <math>e^{ix}\cdot e^{-ix}=e^0=1 \ </math> | |||
===Topological interpretation=== | |||
implies that <math>e^{ix} \ </math> is never zero. | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=November 2022}} | |||
In the language of ], Euler's formula states that the imaginary exponential function <math>t \mapsto e^{it}</math> is a (]) ] of ]s from the real line <math>\mathbb R</math> to the unit circle <math>\mathbb S^1</math>. In fact, this exhibits <math>\mathbb R</math> as a ] of <math>\mathbb S^1</math>. Similarly, ] says that the ] of this map is <math>\tau \mathbb Z</math>, where <math>\tau = 2\pi</math>. These observations may be combined and summarized in the ] below: | |||
] | |||
The ] of <math>f \ </math> is, according to the ]: | |||
===Other applications=== | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
{{see also|Complex number#Applications}} | |||
f'(x) &{}= \frac{(-\sin x+i\cos x)\cdot e^{ix} - (\cos x+i\sin x)\cdot i\cdot e^{ix}}{(e^{ix})^2} \\ | |||
&{}= \frac{-\sin x\cdot e^{ix}-i^2\sin x\cdot e^{ix}}{(e^{ix})^2} \\ | |||
&{}= \frac{(-1 - i^2) \cdot \sin x \cdot e^{ix}}{(e^{ix})^2} \\ | |||
&{}= \frac{(-1 - (-1)) \cdot \sin x \cdot e^{ix}}{(e^{ix})^2} \\ | |||
&{}= 0. | |||
\end{align} </math> | |||
In ]s, the function {{math|''e<sup>ix</sup>''}} is often used to simplify solutions, even if the final answer is a real function involving sine and cosine. The reason for this is that the exponential function is the ] of the operation of ]. | |||
Therefore, <math>f \ </math> must be a ]. Thus, | |||
In ], ], and similar fields, signals that vary periodically over time are often described as a combination of sinusoidal functions (see ]), and these are more conveniently expressed as the sum of exponential functions with ] exponents, using Euler's formula. Also, ] of circuits can include Euler's formula to represent the impedance of a capacitor or an inductor. | |||
:<math>\frac{\cos x + i \sin x}{e^{ix}}=f(x)=f(0)=\frac{\cos 0 + i \sin 0}{e^0}=1.</math> | |||
In the ] of ]s, there is a ] of ]s. For any point {{mvar|r}} on this sphere, and {{mvar|x}} a real number, Euler's formula applies: | |||
Rearranging, | |||
<math display="block">\exp xr = \cos x + r \sin x,</math> | |||
and the element is called a ] in quaternions. The set of all versors forms a ] in the 4-space. | |||
==Other special cases== | |||
:<math>\displaystyle\cos x + i \sin x=e^{ix} .</math> | |||
The ]s that evaluate to units illustrate rotation around the complex unit circle: | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" | |||
] | |||
! {{math|''x''}} !! {{math|1=''e<sup>ix</sup>''}} | |||
|- | |||
===Using ordinary differential equations=== | |||
| {{math|0 + 2''πn''}} || {{math|1}} | |||
Define the function ''g''(''x'') by | |||
: <math>g(x)\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ e^{ix} .\ </math> | |||
Considering that ''i'' is constant, the first and second derivatives of ''g''(''x'') are | |||
: <math>g'(x) = i e^{ix} \ </math> | |||
: <math>g''(x) = i^2 e^{ix} = -e^{ix} \ </math> | |||
because ''i''<sup> 2</sup> = −1 by definition. From this the following 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ] ] is constructed: | |||
: <math>g''(x) = -g(x) \ </math> | |||
or | |||
: <math>g''(x) + g(x) = 0. \ </math> | |||
Being a 2<sup>nd</sup>-order differential equation, there are two ] solutions that satisfy it: | |||
: <math>g_1(x) = \cos(x) \ </math> | |||
: <math>g_2(x) = \sin(x). \ </math> | |||
Both cos(''x'') and sin(''x'') are real functions in which the 2<sup>nd</sup> derivative is identical to the negative of that function. Any ] of solutions to a ] differential equation is also a solution. Then, in general, the solution to the differential equation is | |||
:{| | |||
|<math>g(x)\,</math> | |||
|<math>= A g_1(x) + B g_2(x) \ </math> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{math|{{sfrac|''π''|2}} + 2''πn''}} || {{math|''i''}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|<math>= A \cos(x) + B \sin(x) \ </math> | |||
| {{math|''π'' + 2''πn''}} || {{math|−1}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{math|{{sfrac|''3π''|2}} + 2''πn''}} || {{math|−''i''}} | |||
|} | |} | ||
The special case at {{math|1=''x'' = ''τ''}} (where {{math|1=''τ'' = 2''π''}}, one ]) yields {{math|1=''e<sup>iτ</sup>'' = 1 + 0}}. This is also argued to link five fundamental constants with three basic arithmetic operations, but, unlike Euler's identity, without rearranging the ]s from the general case: | |||
for any constants ''A'' and ''B''. But not all values of these two constants satisfy the known ] for ''g''(''x''): | |||
<math display="block">\begin{align} | |||
e^{i\tau} &= \cos \tau + i \sin \tau \\ | |||
: <math>g(0) = e^{i0} = 1 \ </math> | |||
&= 1 + 0 | |||
: <math>g'(0) = i e^{i0} = i \ </math>. | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
An interpretation of the simplified form {{math|1=''e<sup>iτ</sup>'' = 1}} is that rotating by a full turn is an ].<ref name="Hartl_2019">{{cite web |title=The Tau Manifesto |author-first=Michael |author-last=Hartl |author-link=Michael Hartl |date=2019-03-14 |orig-date=2010-03-14 |url=http://tauday.com/tau-manifesto |access-date=2013-09-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190628230418/https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto |archive-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> | |||
However these same initial conditions (applied to the general solution) are | |||
: <math>g(0) = A \cos(0) + B \sin(0) = A \ </math> | |||
: <math>g'(0) = -A \sin(0) + B \cos(0) = B \ </math> | |||
resulting in | |||
: <math>g(0) = A = 1 \ </math> | |||
: <math>g'(0) = B = i \ </math> | |||
and, finally, | |||
: <math>g(x) \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ e^{ix} = \cos(x) + i \sin(x). \ </math> | |||
] | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{cite book |first=Paul J. |last=Nahin |title=Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula: Cures Many Mathematical Ills | url=https://archive.org/details/dreulersfabulous0000nahi |url-access=registration |year=2006 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-11822-2}} | |||
* {{cite book | last = Wilson | first = Robin | isbn = 978-0-19-879492-9 | mr = 3791469 | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = Oxford | title = Euler's Pioneering Equation: The Most Beautiful Theorem in Mathematics | year = 2018}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* | |||
* by Julius O. Smith III | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Leonhard Euler}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 17:07, 26 November 2024
Complex exponential in terms of sine and cosine This article is about Euler's formula in complex analysis. For other uses, see List of things named after Leonhard Euler § Formulas.
Part of a series of articles on the |
mathematical constant e |
---|
Properties |
Applications |
Defining e |
People |
Related topics |
Euler's formula, named after Leonhard Euler, is a mathematical formula in complex analysis that establishes the fundamental relationship between the trigonometric functions and the complex exponential function. Euler's formula states that, for any real number x, one has where e is the base of the natural logarithm, i is the imaginary unit, and cos and sin are the trigonometric functions cosine and sine respectively. This complex exponential function is sometimes denoted cis x ("cosine plus i sine"). The formula is still valid if x is a complex number, and is also called Euler's formula in this more general case.
Euler's formula is ubiquitous in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering. The physicist Richard Feynman called the equation "our jewel" and "the most remarkable formula in mathematics".
When x = π, Euler's formula may be rewritten as e + 1 = 0 or e = −1, which is known as Euler's identity.
History
In 1714, the English mathematician Roger Cotes presented a geometrical argument that can be interpreted (after correcting a misplaced factor of ) as: Exponentiating this equation yields Euler's formula. Note that the logarithmic statement is not universally correct for complex numbers, since a complex logarithm can have infinitely many values, differing by multiples of 2πi.
Around 1740 Leonhard Euler turned his attention to the exponential function and derived the equation named after him by comparing the series expansions of the exponential and trigonometric expressions. The formula was first published in 1748 in his foundational work Introductio in analysin infinitorum.
Johann Bernoulli had found that
And since the above equation tells us something about complex logarithms by relating natural logarithms to imaginary (complex) numbers. Bernoulli, however, did not evaluate the integral.
Bernoulli's correspondence with Euler (who also knew the above equation) shows that Bernoulli did not fully understand complex logarithms. Euler also suggested that complex logarithms can have infinitely many values.
The view of complex numbers as points in the complex plane was described about 50 years later by Caspar Wessel.
Definitions of complex exponentiation
Further information: Exponentiation § Complex exponents with a positive real base, and Exponential function § On the complex planeThe exponential function e for real values of x may be defined in a few different equivalent ways (see Characterizations of the exponential function). Several of these methods may be directly extended to give definitions of e for complex values of z simply by substituting z in place of x and using the complex algebraic operations. In particular, we may use any of the three following definitions, which are equivalent. From a more advanced perspective, each of these definitions may be interpreted as giving the unique analytic continuation of e to the complex plane.
Differential equation definition
The exponential function is the unique differentiable function of a complex variable for which the derivative equals the function and
Power series definition
For complex z
Using the ratio test, it is possible to show that this power series has an infinite radius of convergence and so defines e for all complex z.
Limit definition
For complex z
Here, n is restricted to positive integers, so there is no question about what the power with exponent n means.
Proofs
Various proofs of the formula are possible.
Using differentiation
This proof shows that the quotient of the trigonometric and exponential expressions is the constant function one, so they must be equal (the exponential function is never zero, so this is permitted).
Consider the function f(θ) for real θ. Differentiating gives by the product rule Thus, f(θ) is a constant. Since f(0) = 1, then f(θ) = 1 for all real θ, and thus
Using power series
Here is a proof of Euler's formula using power-series expansions, as well as basic facts about the powers of i:
Using now the power-series definition from above, we see that for real values of x where in the last step we recognize the two terms are the Maclaurin series for cos x and sin x. The rearrangement of terms is justified because each series is absolutely convergent.
Using polar coordinates
Another proof is based on the fact that all complex numbers can be expressed in polar coordinates. Therefore, for some r and θ depending on x, No assumptions are being made about r and θ; they will be determined in the course of the proof. From any of the definitions of the exponential function it can be shown that the derivative of e is ie. Therefore, differentiating both sides gives Substituting r(cos θ + i sin θ) for e and equating real and imaginary parts in this formula gives dr/dx = 0 and dθ/dx = 1. Thus, r is a constant, and θ is x + C for some constant C. The initial values r(0) = 1 and θ(0) = 0 come from e = 1, giving r = 1 and θ = x. This proves the formula
Applications
Applications in complex number theory
Interpretation of the formula
This formula can be interpreted as saying that the function e is a unit complex number, i.e., it traces out the unit circle in the complex plane as φ ranges through the real numbers. Here φ is the angle that a line connecting the origin with a point on the unit circle makes with the positive real axis, measured counterclockwise and in radians.
The original proof is based on the Taylor series expansions of the exponential function e (where z is a complex number) and of sin x and cos x for real numbers x (see above). In fact, the same proof shows that Euler's formula is even valid for all complex numbers x.
A point in the complex plane can be represented by a complex number written in cartesian coordinates. Euler's formula provides a means of conversion between cartesian coordinates and polar coordinates. The polar form simplifies the mathematics when used in multiplication or powers of complex numbers. Any complex number z = x + iy, and its complex conjugate, z = x − iy, can be written as where
- x = Re z is the real part,
- y = Im z is the imaginary part,
- r = |z| = √x + y is the magnitude of z and
- φ = arg z = atan2(y, x).
φ is the argument of z, i.e., the angle between the x axis and the vector z measured counterclockwise in radians, which is defined up to addition of 2π. Many texts write φ = tan y/x instead of φ = atan2(y, x), but the first equation needs adjustment when x ≤ 0. This is because for any real x and y, not both zero, the angles of the vectors (x, y) and (−x, −y) differ by π radians, but have the identical value of tan φ = y/x.
Use of the formula to define the logarithm of complex numbers
Now, taking this derived formula, we can use Euler's formula to define the logarithm of a complex number. To do this, we also use the definition of the logarithm (as the inverse operator of exponentiation): and that both valid for any complex numbers a and b. Therefore, one can write: for any z ≠ 0. Taking the logarithm of both sides shows that and in fact, this can be used as the definition for the complex logarithm. The logarithm of a complex number is thus a multi-valued function, because φ is multi-valued.
Finally, the other exponential law which can be seen to hold for all integers k, together with Euler's formula, implies several trigonometric identities, as well as de Moivre's formula.
Relationship to trigonometry
Euler's formula, the definitions of the trigonometric functions and the standard identities for exponentials are sufficient to easily derive most trigonometric identities. It provides a powerful connection between analysis and trigonometry, and provides an interpretation of the sine and cosine functions as weighted sums of the exponential function:
The two equations above can be derived by adding or subtracting Euler's formulas: and solving for either cosine or sine.
These formulas can even serve as the definition of the trigonometric functions for complex arguments x. For example, letting x = iy, we have:
In addition
Complex exponentials can simplify trigonometry, because they are mathematically easier to manipulate than their sine and cosine components. One technique is simply to convert sines and cosines into equivalent expressions in terms of exponentials sometimes called complex sinusoids. After the manipulations, the simplified result is still real-valued. For example:
Another technique is to represent sines and cosines in terms of the real part of a complex expression and perform the manipulations on the complex expression. For example:
This formula is used for recursive generation of cos nx for integer values of n and arbitrary x (in radians).
Considering cos x a parameter in equation above yields recursive formula for Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
See also: Phasor § ArithmeticTopological interpretation
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In the language of topology, Euler's formula states that the imaginary exponential function is a (surjective) morphism of topological groups from the real line to the unit circle . In fact, this exhibits as a covering space of . Similarly, Euler's identity says that the kernel of this map is , where . These observations may be combined and summarized in the commutative diagram below:
Other applications
See also: Complex number § ApplicationsIn differential equations, the function e is often used to simplify solutions, even if the final answer is a real function involving sine and cosine. The reason for this is that the exponential function is the eigenfunction of the operation of differentiation.
In electrical engineering, signal processing, and similar fields, signals that vary periodically over time are often described as a combination of sinusoidal functions (see Fourier analysis), and these are more conveniently expressed as the sum of exponential functions with imaginary exponents, using Euler's formula. Also, phasor analysis of circuits can include Euler's formula to represent the impedance of a capacitor or an inductor.
In the four-dimensional space of quaternions, there is a sphere of imaginary units. For any point r on this sphere, and x a real number, Euler's formula applies: and the element is called a versor in quaternions. The set of all versors forms a 3-sphere in the 4-space.
Other special cases
The special cases that evaluate to units illustrate rotation around the complex unit circle:
x | e |
---|---|
0 + 2πn | 1 |
π/2 + 2πn | i |
π + 2πn | −1 |
3π/2 + 2πn | −i |
The special case at x = τ (where τ = 2π, one turn) yields e = 1 + 0. This is also argued to link five fundamental constants with three basic arithmetic operations, but, unlike Euler's identity, without rearranging the addends from the general case: An interpretation of the simplified form e = 1 is that rotating by a full turn is an identity function.
See also
- Complex number
- Euler's identity
- Integration using Euler's formula
- History of Lorentz transformations
- List of things named after Leonhard Euler
References
- Moskowitz, Martin A. (2002). A Course in Complex Analysis in One Variable. World Scientific Publishing Co. p. 7. ISBN 981-02-4780-X.
- Feynman, Richard P. (1977). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. I. Addison-Wesley. p. 22-10. ISBN 0-201-02010-6.
- Cotes wrote: "Nam si quadrantis circuli quilibet arcus, radio CE descriptus, sinun habeat CX sinumque complementi ad quadrantem XE ; sumendo radium CE pro Modulo, arcus erit rationis inter & CE mensura ducta in ." (Thus if any arc of a quadrant of a circle, described by the radius CE, has sinus CX and sinus of the complement to the quadrant XE ; taking the radius CE as modulus, the arc will be the measure of the ratio between & CE multiplied by .) That is, consider a circle having center E (at the origin of the (x,y) plane) and radius CE. Consider an angle θ with its vertex at E having the positive x-axis as one side and a radius CE as the other side. The perpendicular from the point C on the circle to the x-axis is the "sinus" CX ; the line between the circle's center E and the point X at the foot of the perpendicular is XE, which is the "sinus of the complement to the quadrant" or "cosinus". The ratio between and CE is thus . In Cotes' terminology, the "measure" of a quantity is its natural logarithm, and the "modulus" is a conversion factor that transforms a measure of angle into circular arc length (here, the modulus is the radius (CE) of the circle). According to Cotes, the product of the modulus and the measure (logarithm) of the ratio, when multiplied by , equals the length of the circular arc subtended by θ, which for any angle measured in radians is CE • θ. Thus, . This equation has a misplaced factor: the factor of should be on the right side of the equation, not the left side. If the change of scaling by is made, then, after dividing both sides by CE and exponentiating both sides, the result is: , which is Euler's formula.
See:- Roger Cotes (1714) "Logometria," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 29 (338) : 5-45; see especially page 32. Available on-line at: Hathi Trust
- Roger Cotes with Robert Smith, ed., Harmonia mensurarum … (Cambridge, England: 1722), chapter: "Logometria", p. 28.
- https://nrich.maths.org/1384
- ^ John Stillwell (2002). Mathematics and Its History. Springer. ISBN 9781441960528.
- Sandifer, C. Edward (2007), Euler's Greatest Hits, Mathematical Association of America ISBN 978-0-88385-563-8
- Leonhard Euler (1748) Chapter 8: On transcending quantities arising from the circle of Introduction to the Analysis of the Infinite, page 214, section 138 (translation by Ian Bruce, pdf link from 17 century maths).
- Conway & Guy, pp. 254–255
- Bernoulli, Johann (1702). "Solution d'un problème concernant le calcul intégral, avec quelques abrégés par rapport à ce calcul" [Solution of a problem in integral calculus with some notes relating to this calculation]. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris. 1702: 289–297.
- Apostol, Tom (1974). Mathematical Analysis. Pearson. p. 20. ISBN 978-0201002881. Theorem 1.42
- user02138 (https://math.stackexchange.com/users/2720/user02138), How to prove Euler's formula: $e^{i\varphi}=\cos(\varphi) +i\sin(\varphi)$?, URL (version: 2018-06-25): https://math.stackexchange.com/q/8612
- Ricardo, Henry J. (23 March 2016). A Modern Introduction to Differential Equations. Elsevier Science. p. 428. ISBN 9780123859136.
- Strang, Gilbert (1991). Calculus. Wellesley-Cambridge. p. 389. ISBN 0-9614088-2-0. Second proof on page.
- "Complex Sinusoids". ccrma.stanford.edu. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
- Hartl, Michael (14 March 2019) . "The Tau Manifesto". Archived from the original on 28 June 2019. Retrieved 14 September 2013.
Further reading
- Nahin, Paul J. (2006). Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula: Cures Many Mathematical Ills. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11822-2.
- Wilson, Robin (2018). Euler's Pioneering Equation: The Most Beautiful Theorem in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-879492-9. MR 3791469.