| Revision as of 18:02, 1 May 2007 editThomas B (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,921 editsm →Dear Thomas Basboll: sign← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:41, 22 December 2024 edit undoGråbergs Gråa Sång (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers57,698 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (238 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Sorry to see you go. In any case, thanks for what was obviously a tremendous effort on your part. ] 03:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Sandbox == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| (The following discussion is about this draft of an RfC ) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Dear Thomas, I'm sure there are many users who will endorse the summary. Please have a look at . | |||
| </div> | |||
| In my endorsement I would stress on the "evil mechanism" which is in work when users are faced with Mongo's kind of response. Instead of resolving the issue, checking one's own facts, sources, one starts to fight, or abandons the case (this is what Mongo is always hoping for). This is not productive mostly because, as you've pointed out in the summary, one's motives are at stake, not the edit in question. Well, policies ], ] say it all in essence. | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| ==Joyous Season== | |||
| Anyway, it's a sorrow decision from you not to edit anymore. Please come from time to time to make an edit, even if in terrorem of unnecessary comments by, and discussions with, some. ] 19:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:lightyellow; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]{{Center|]}} | |||
| I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! {{smiley|christmas}} Whether you celebrate ], ], ], ], ] or your hemisphere's ], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. ] (]) 16:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC) <br /> | |||
| <small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to your fellow editors' talk pages</small>. | |||
| Hopefully you are working on not accusing others of making attacks when you yourself have done some too. No one wants the articles here taken over by conspiracy theory silliness. That is simply the way it goes and I applaud anyone who does what they can to stop it. That type of silliness simply wrecks whatever little reliability this website has.--] 21:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| ] (]) 16:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :I guess we disagree about the degree to which the means justifies the ends. Silliness should be avoided, yes, but not by sacrificing civility. As for whether people who have been incivil in the past should be able to point out that behaviour in others, note that the desired outcome of my RfC is precisely for Mongo to help fight the sort of incivility he consistently practices. If occasionally crossing the line to incivility disqualifies one from criticizing it, then we may as well just give up the norm altogether. That said, what attack of mine are you talking about?--] 06:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| :Thank you for your nice message. I think it would be better to make a new article. I heard that the 9/11 article is guarded by people like wolves. It is so true. Do you know this article? There are too many incosistants with what President Bush and others said about their actions on 9/11 that it can't be believed, Good night Mr Baseball. I'm logging off now. I am try to come back tomorrow if I have the hours. ] 07:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Dear Thomas Basboll == | |||
| Dear Thomas Basboll, | |||
| I've just sent you an email to reply your concern at my Talk Page. There are a few things I'd like to express to you regarding your dispute with MONGO that I prefer to remain private, as this whole matter has already caused too much stress for everyone involved, mostly MONGO and you; but definitely not limited to you both. I hope it helps to at least give you my input and try and help to put this issue behind us all. Best regards, ] - 17:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I personally wish to thank you for both replying my email, which I will re-reply as soon as possible, and subsequently reconsidering the RfAr against MONGO. I hope this serves to put all this behind us and go on with other more pleasant business. Have a relaxing wikibreak, and I sincerely hope our interactions in the future are more pleasant and fruitful. Best regards, ] - 22:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I look forward to your mail. Your optimism is puzzling, however. But perhaps you know something I don't. There is nothing to indicate to me that anything is behind us. I stand by my statement in the RfA, which I withdrew when an arbitrator called it frivilous. Point taken.--] 23:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This may come-off cold-hearted, but I don't intend it to: You say you "stand by my statement in the RfA". Well, of course you are entitled to dig your heels in and say that the arbitrators were just plain wrong, but that doesn't really help you here. Instead, why don't you accept the arbitrators' decision for what it is: A decision by our enforcement body, and a pretty fair indication of community consensus. </font><small><span style="border: 1px solid #F06A0F">]]</span></small><font color="#ffffff"> · </font> 02:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :As I understand it, ArbCom declined to take the case. It did not arbitrate the case. I think I understand why at least one arbitrator thought it was frivilous, and those who declined to hear the case thought it not worth their time. It's a bit like the Supreme Court saying "We're not going to decide whether you parking ticket was fair." I had simply misunderstood the role of ArbCom in a dispute like the one I stated. So, in my view, ArbCom has refused to settle the issue. The arbitrators were no doubt right to do so and I am not saying they were wrong about anything. My statement was right but delivered to the wrong place, that's all.--] 18:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for arbitration == | |||
| As an Arbitration Committee clerk, I will de-list your request, since you have withdrawn it. As an individual, however, I want to say that the fact that this request was declined does not mean that you should stop contributing to the project. Regards, ] 22:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 22 December 2024
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Joyous Season
.jpg)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! 
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.