Revision as of 07:10, 2 May 2007 editMartinBotIII (talk | contribs)136,346 editsm Bot: Retargeting WP:EA per this RfD ( (-)[[WP:EA +[[Misplaced Pages:Esperanza)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:26, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | ||
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. – ''']]]''' 04:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | The result of the debate was '''delete'''. – ''']]]''' 04:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
Not notable, ]. Thanks/] 11:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | Not notable, ]. Thanks/] 11:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
*]? Oh, not him. Not notable, '''Delete'''. ] | ] 19:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | *]? Oh, not him. Not notable, '''Delete'''. ] | ] 19:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't explain what high level he operates at. ] 00:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Doesn't explain what high level he operates at. ] 00:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
* '''Strong delete''' per nom. Possibly speedy ]<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup> 09:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Strong delete''' per nom. Possibly speedy ]<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup> 09:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |
Latest revision as of 20:26, 6 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 04:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Franklin Chalmers
Not notable, WP:BIO. Thanks/wangi 11:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Super Nintendo Chalmers? Oh, not him. Not notable, Delete. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 19:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't explain what high level he operates at. Blnguyen 00:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete per nom. Possibly speedy Werdna648/C\ 09:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -Jcbarr 13:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. Stifle 21:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.