Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImprobabilityDrive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:11, 7 May 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →ImprobabilityDrive← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:08, 4 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on ] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
=== ImprobabilityDrive === === ImprobabilityDrive ===
{{rfcu box|case=ImprobabilityDrive|filed=15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)}} {{rfcu box|case=ImprobabilityDrive|filed=15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)}}
Line 33: Line 43:


:::It does not matter what he did or didn't do, how fast he learned how to put in a signature, or if he was you or not. The checkuser showed that he was a sockpuppet of several banned editors, including VacuousPoet, who himself was a sockpuppet of the banned Kdbuffalo. ID's comments to the contrary aren't relevant, and given the checkuser finding, his claims are probably lies. Since you are SO aware of Wiki procedures, I'm pretty certain you already knew this. ] 16:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC) :::It does not matter what he did or didn't do, how fast he learned how to put in a signature, or if he was you or not. The checkuser showed that he was a sockpuppet of several banned editors, including VacuousPoet, who himself was a sockpuppet of the banned Kdbuffalo. ID's comments to the contrary aren't relevant, and given the checkuser finding, his claims are probably lies. Since you are SO aware of Wiki procedures, I'm pretty certain you already knew this. ] 16:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

::::JP said "based upon the information provided." I'm just asking whether he used information beside what's available to me here, since I can't see any proof on this page that ID=VP. Is there information from some checkuser somewhere that's also being used? ] 19:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::Yes. I ran a checkuser. Feel free to ignore the "based upon the information provided" comment. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 21:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

:::::::And that end's that. ] 21:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

:::::Thanks, JP. Pleasure speaking with you again, OM. ] 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:08, 4 April 2022

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImprobabilityDrive}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

ImprobabilityDrive

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • B,F

A new user who registered ten days ago who has since been aggressively edit warring, personal attacks, advanced knowledge of policy/tags, and straight out paranoia on creationist articles against consensus. With s/he's second edit and within 15 minutes of registering, already knew how to sign s/he username.

Show a remarkable knowledge of tags and policies with 7 days of editing. Interestingly, these edit go against a long decided consensus.

This user accuses others of being socks, but refuses to answer if s/he has had previous accounts.

Some long standing admin/editors are going to seek an RfC for this user, and have condemned this users behavior. Visit User talk:ImprobabilityDrive for a instructive display of what's going on.

This checkuser will prove socks or vindicate the user for the ImprobabilityDrive RfC as well as 3RR rules. Arbustoo 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I suspect this user is likely a sockpuppet of banned user User:Benapgar. JoshuaZ 01:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
no Declined. --jpgordon 03:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 Likely that ImprobabilityDrive is VacuousPoet based upon the information provided. Gnixon seems unrelated. --jpgordon 03:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, I am not ImprobabilityDrive. Could someone clarify what evidence indicates ImprobabilityDrive is VacuousPoet? I can't find it, and ID has claimed (see his talk page) that he is not VP. (Related comment: I'm a little amused by how impressed people are that a newly-registered user found the 4 tildes within a few minutes, and found tags within a week. It seems clear ID was editing under just an IP address for awhile, as I'd imagine is true for most new users.) Gnixon 06:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
It does not matter what he did or didn't do, how fast he learned how to put in a signature, or if he was you or not. The checkuser showed that he was a sockpuppet of several banned editors, including VacuousPoet, who himself was a sockpuppet of the banned Kdbuffalo. ID's comments to the contrary aren't relevant, and given the checkuser finding, his claims are probably lies. Since you are SO aware of Wiki procedures, I'm pretty certain you already knew this. Orangemarlin 16:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
JP said "based upon the information provided." I'm just asking whether he used information beside what's available to me here, since I can't see any proof on this page that ID=VP. Is there information from some checkuser somewhere that's also being used? Gnixon 19:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes. I ran a checkuser. Feel free to ignore the "based upon the information provided" comment. --jpgordon 21:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
And that end's that. Orangemarlin 21:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, JP. Pleasure speaking with you again, OM. Gnixon 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.