| Revision as of 16:20, 29 April 2005 editBrookie (talk | contribs)39,736 edits Place redirects← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:07, 12 May 2023 edit undoSporkBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,244,869 editsm Replace or disable a template per TFD outcome; no change in content | ||
| (104 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|3=December 2005}} | |||
| {{add|Add a new comment here}} | |||
| {{New discussion}} | |||
| Welcome to wikipedia Susvolans! | |||
| == Archives == | |||
| I saw that made a edit under your new name and that you didn't have a | |||
| ] | |||
| talk page so I created one for you! Your talk page is easy to use and | |||
| is a great way for other people to talk to you. If a new message is on | |||
| your talk page a banner should notify you the next time your refresh | |||
| wikipedia. Misplaced Pages's rules can be tricky so if you have any | |||
| questions I will be happy to answer them or redirect you to someone who | |||
| can. Remember to always be bold with your additions and edits as it is | |||
| the quickest and most efficient way for our user driven encyclopedia to | |||
| grow! | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Thanks For Joining and Welcome! | |||
| Thank you for speaking up on the behalf of a user you did not even know. I appreciate your efforts for justice. Should you have any lingering concerns, I encourage you to come to my talk page and join the dialog there on what has occured. Discussion is the best way to calm stormy waters. ] ] 17:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| --] 12:54, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ignore all rules== | |||
| Note: Use the tilda key <nowiki>~</nowiki> to sign your name as I did | |||
| First, obviously, if rule 5 were deleted, it would become four pillars rather than five. I think that any change to the four/five pillars should be well discussed on its talk page first. Failure to do so would be to ignore all rules, which could be seen as ]. | |||
| above. | |||
| I personally think that the five pillars document is fine, because it says that there are no rules other than those listed, and the writers' rules of engagement are one of the pillars. The real problem is that Ignore All Rules is the wrong summary of the guideline, and is sufficiently wrong as to be a destructive title, because it can easily be read as meaning that one can ignore civility. ] 18:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Is there any reason why you made my article on the ] so short? | |||
| Thanks Susvolans - I'm just taking baby steps for now ] 14:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == "Whomever" == | |||
| ==Final decision== | |||
| You seem to have gone through a few articles, removing the occurrences of the above accusitive case and replacing it with the nominative "whoever", wrongly - why? | |||
| The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the ] case ] 02:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <br /> | |||
| ] ] 16:48, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I find that very few people know how to use "whomever" correctly. Some of your changes are appropriate - they really should be "whoever." Others were perfectly correct as "whomever." Were you trying to eliminate "whomever" and "whom" altogether? I have some sympathy for this choice, but it shouldn't be imposed upon other peoples' writing. The most frequent source of confusion is when the pronoun seems to participate in two clauses. Ordinarily the pronoun's case is determined by its role in the subordinate clause: therefore "She talked to whomever she chose," but "She talked to whoever was there." | |||
| <br /> | |||
| ] 07:11, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Regarding the , why is it there then? Is the ], wrong? -- ] 17:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Dashes== | |||
| == Updated poll == | |||
| Hi, Susvolans. | |||
| I have completely changed the poll. Please see ] --] ] 02:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == curly quotes == | |||
| I notice that you're in the process of replacing hyphens with dashes in sundry articles. | |||
| May I ask why you moved ] to ]? — ] | ] 06:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The dash policy on Misplaced Pages is still under construction, whatever preliminary judgement might appear to prevail on the ] page. | |||
| == class="wikitable" == | |||
| The consensus is that &mdash; and &ndash; should appear in the ''rendered'' HTML. While a vocal minority of Wikipedians have lobbied for this policy to be extended to wikitext, the majority of Wikipedians continue to adopt spaced hyphens (sometimes double hyphens for mdash) in their edits either because that's the ''de facto'' web (and Misplaced Pages) standard, or because they eagerly anticipate the much-fabled update of ] that will allow hyphenators and dashers to live together in hair-braiding harmony by performing automatic conversions from the edit-friendly standard to the print-friendly stricture. | |||
| I wouldn't know how, but why would you want to anyway? ] 14:32, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The print style guides that recommend ndash and mdash also recommend title case headings and "smart" quotes, neither of which are acceptable on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| :Aha, so you mean find occurances where it was expanded when it used revision of the prettytable. In which case the only way I think you could find them would be to get someone to use an SQL query on the database dump, but I don't know how successful that would be. At the moment I am not capable of doing this, but plently of other people are. ] 16:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Reorganized General topics == | |||
| Though the Dashes page has railroaded a wording that flouts the very nature (bottom-up not top-down) of Misplaced Pages, I hope I can persuade you to abide by this alternative suggestion from one of the many Dash-related Talk pages: | |||
| Thanks for spotting and flagging those reorganized pages. I thought that I had deleted them all. --'']'' (])• 14:20, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :''Evolving language and the decreased reliance on print world conventions have led to the hyphen becoming an acceptable replacement for other dashes. Where hyphens have been used in place of other dashes, you are discouraged from changing these, in the same way that changing spelling forms is discouraged. (See ]).'' | |||
| == Deleting a useless page == | |||
| See also: | |||
| Hi. You left a message on my talkpage welcoming me and saying I could ask you if I had any questions. Well, I've found a page that seems total junk (]). What should I do in this instance?] 18:08, 1 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| It's OK, someone else seems to have done this now. I'd still appreciate knowing how to do this, in case it comes up again in the future. Perhaps you could post the answer here, or on my talk page when you get chance? Thanks, ] 23:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Best wishes, ] 18:48, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] thank you == | |||
| ===Tori Amos=== | |||
| Hi, Susvolans. | |||
| I love it when someone goes to the source to complain and thereby spurs some action! :-) ] | ] 17:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Didn't we discuss this already? The '']'' contradicts itself on the subject of dashes. It preaches both ]: | |||
| Your input would be useful at ] where the wikilinks and other non-] content is being added back by ]. Thanks/] 18:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :''In the interests of ] and pending the planned update of the Wikimedia software that will automatically convert strings of hyphens into the appropriate correct en- and em dashes, editors are encouraged to be accepting of others' dash preferences and not to modify a chosen style arbitrarily, in the same way as they would refrain from arbitrarily changing "artefact" to "artifact" (or vice-versa).'' | |||
| : Regarding nesting .am under Armenia on ]. Please keep in mind the way the page is used. The reader may have clicked on ".]", with an unlinked dot, to get to the disambiguation page. He may not know that it means Armenia. Instead of associating items on the page using the complex category model that we have formulated when we compile that page, we should list them simply by the term or link, because the reader is just clicking a link, and is unlikely to have formulated this model in his head. ''—] ] <small>2005-12-5 17:06 Z</small>'' | |||
| and ]: | |||
| == Moving a Category == | |||
| :''A single spaced hyphen - actually, there's no real reason to flout the rules of good typesetting in this way.'' | |||
| Hello again. Thanks for your answer to my previous question. I have another - is it possible to 'move' a Category? Normal pages all seem to have a 'move' tab, but I can't see this on Categories. | |||
| This is hardly surprising as there is no consensus (dashes '''or''' hyphens) on the talk page of that article as I've already ]. The only consensus is that hyphens should appear in the wikitext and be rendered as dashes: | |||
| Specifically, there is Category:Lecturers of the University of Nottingham - I was about to populate it, but I thought it might be better as Category:Academics of the University of Nottingham (or 'University of Nottingham Academics'), which is a bit broader. I think it would be better to move / rename it before adding lots of people into the category! | |||
| :''However, editors making such changes should be aware that when MediaWiki is set to automatically convert -- in the source to a real dash, all HTML entities such as &ndash; will be deprecated and changed back to hyphens in the wikitext.'' | |||
| Thanks. ] 18:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article has slowly crept from the ''de facto'' current and ''de jure'' future Misplaced Pages standard favoured by the contributors who took the trouble to add the material in the first place (spaced hyphens) to your pet preference for unspaced mdashes, which is not popular even among most dashers. This kind of drive-by editing, which adds no new material to the article, but succeeds admirably in discouraging contributors like myself who have, contradicts the ''Manual of Style'''s wikilove counsel as well as common courtesy. For more discussion on this latter point, please see ] and ]. | |||
| == Tedernst RFA thanks! == | |||
| ] 19:31, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Am I being provoked, do you think? I've had more conflict this week than ever before! :-) Oh well, thanks much for the support and let me know if I can be of assistance. peace, ] | ] 23:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| Hi again. | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Babel == | |||
| If an editor makes a nontrivial contribution to an article, I'm compelled to respect their stylistic preferences . You've added nothing to ]. If you want to challenge me on my policy proclivities, why don't you (attempt to) remove the ambiguity from ], or remove the clarity from ], rather than disrupting an article I've slaved over to ]? | |||
| You modified the contents of my user page to remove the existing <nowiki>{{ps}}</nowiki> tag and replace it it with a <nowiki>{{photoshop}}</nowiki> tag. While I would have no issue with this if it did not change the appearance of the resulting graphic, it does. Could you please explain why this change was necessary. (I'm not upset or anything - I just like to know when things have been changed and why.) ]]] ] 01:57, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] 09:51, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==Manual of style, "main article" section== | |||
| == "Which" == | |||
| Thanks! You see why it needed to be in the manual of style...:) ] 16:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the info on my nickname... == | |||
| I see that you've removed the word "which" from many pages. Do you have a reason for disliking it? If you continue doing this, please (a) don't make grammar less correct to accommodate it (many people prefer not to end sentences with prepositions) and (b) use a more descriptive name for these changes than "rephrase for readability." I find the word "which" perfectly readable. Thanks for looking out for the state of English on the Misplaced Pages, though. -- ] 14:33, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| I didn't know that, but then of course it fits perfectly, for ''I'' am the one who's spent more than a year engaging in hundreds of revert wars to enforce my preferences.... Do you know what Susvolans means in my language ;) ? ] 17:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Attacks == | |||
| Who started the attacks was that idiot. Not me. He have "esquisofrenia" (I dont know how to write this in English, Schizofrennya?!?!?). I'm not a doctor. We need another Brazilian and another Portuguese that understands about this (that dumb doesnt even know what's a dialect and what's a Standard) and name archaic a word that return almost 3 million google hits in Brazil. He even says that I'm responsible for all edits on the article, thing that where written by other Portuguese and Brazilians. He speaks Portuguese from Slum Quarters (favelas) thinks that is Brazilian Portuguese. That is similar to African-American English. -] 16:23, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| * Sorry If I seem rude, but I'm not, I havent read most of the stupidity that he wrote, and I wont read it. It is useless. I'll talk with other people. -] 16:33, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == your reversion of my edits == | |||
| == Requests_for_comment/IZAK == | |||
| Nowhere does it say my good faith edits can or should be reverted. If you have an issue with my edits, take it to an admin. Don't edit war with me, because I think you're only doing it to intentionally cause me distress. -- ] ] 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please see and add your signature under if you agree with the complaint. Thanks. ] 08:23, 2004 Oct 5 (UTC) | |||
| ==Explanations== | |||
| :I doubt if I am qualified to co-sponsor this. Have you tried Alberuni, Gadykozma, Jfdwolff, or Jayjg? Susvolans 13:16, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC). | |||
| TfD, talk page of banned user, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, It was a speedy candidate, A7 speedy, advertisement, improper protection, improper protection, Marsden was a hopeless troll, in accordance with Raul's request for leniancy on Netoholic, it was the autoblock associated with Netoholic. ] 17:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Any user can certify the basis for dispute. The reason I asked you is because you were also unjustly smeared by IZAK. ] 17:45, 2004 Oct 5 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== ON INDIGO VERTIGO == | ||
| <nowiki><br clear=all></nowiki> (use <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki></nowiki> to make it show up) forces the text to line up with the picture, if you have several other pictures on an article, otherwise they will overlap and look messy. See the difference between and . This won't look the same in all browsers, but using clear=all ensures that layout. ] 12:16, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/INDIGO_VERTIGO | |||
| ==Use of quotation mark for glottal stops, etc.== | |||
| I used a generally issued pressrelease for the description of this comic. Was that wrong? I tried to read the copyright-page but just could not figure it out by myself. | |||
| I have reverted your policy revisions on this matter in the Misplaced Pages Manual of style. The matter is more complex than indicated. I moved your suggestion to the talk page at ] with my comments on the matter. The policy as stated affected far more than Hawaiian (and even for Hawaiian probably should have more consensus). I fully agree that something along the lines of your suggestion should replace the current rules. ] 15:33, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| --] 11:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Tony Blair == | |||
| == Rfa thanks == | |||
| Why did you change dashes to hyphens in the ] article? ] 11:56, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| {|width=100% style="border:solid 2px #338" | |||
| :As far as I am aware the <nowiki>—</nowiki> is deprecated in Misplaced Pages and has been for some time. I will check the style manual for you. ] 12:21, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| |width="100%" bgcolor=#eeeeff style="padding:.5em"| Hello Susvolans. Thank you for supporting my Rfa! :) I will try my best to be a good administrator. Please ask me if you need any help. --] <sup>]</sup> 17:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| | | |||
| |} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| You, along with several other editors, suggested replacing {{wiktionary}} with {{wiktionarypar}} a while ago, which is gradually being done. ] is now repeatedly redirecting ]. Please read the prior discussion of this (which I've reminded ] of) at ] and contribute. You may want to put ] on your watchlist. ] 08:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Page name for temperature articles == | |||
| ::Actually a reading of the ] is as convoluted as I remember earlier manifestations of it as being. My apologies, and if you want me to revert the to mdash format please let me know. ] 12:27, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at . Thanks. ] 22:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "regime" is not that POV in english, check with a native speaker == | |||
| ==Please check your ] entry== | |||
| "regime" is not that POV, some people think it is associated with a negative conclusion because it is most often used in association with non-democratic rulers, but if one referred to the the "Bush regime" or the "Clinton regime" in conversation it would not result in any significant offense. Please put all your gratuitious changes back.--] 15:04, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Greetings, editor! Your name appears on ]. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct: | |||
| #If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list. | |||
| #If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in '''bold'''; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update). | |||
| #Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits. | |||
| Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! ] ] 02:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Date links == | |||
| == FYI: Temp injunction in ] == | |||
| Since you have taken an interest in links. Please be kind enough to vote for my ] to reduce overlinking of dates where they are not part of date preferences. ] 20:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| 1) Gzornenplatz and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with German or Polish subjects whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorised to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this. | |||
| =='''Save the List!'''== | |||
| 2) Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, and VeryVerily are banned from reverting any article more than twice in one 24 hour period whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops are hereby authorised to enact 24 blocks for violations of this. | |||
| They are trying to delete the lists we've work so hard on help put a stop to it. ] Vote to keep our precious list!!! | |||
| 3) Shorne and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with the Cold War or communism whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorized to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this. | |||
| -] 21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| --] 21:07, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there {{PAGENAME}}. I see you have edited the above article, I'd like to invite you to a poll on the inclusion or not of the coordinates box, ]. ]<sup>]|]</sup> 02:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bat & Ball railway station== | |||
| == Random Smile! == | |||
| *I really cannot understand why such an unimportant railway station (and there is another more important in Sevenoaks) should warrant having its own article. I have already included info about it under the town, including the full date. | |||
| <div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| *Nor can I really see why the information regarding the whole of the SE Trains (SET) are included here , when there is a full article on SET already. I've copied it there, anyway. | |||
| * And I cannot see why anyone uses Misplaced Pages to find train times as of this minute, like the other External link does!!! | |||
| {{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| All in all I think this article needs deleting altogether ... do you agree? ] 14:20, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == Invitation to Misplaced Pages meetup in London == | |||
| == Deletion in ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| Would you care to explain why you deleted the perfectly existent ], ], ]? -- ] 16:55, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| '''Date:''' 13:00 ''onwards'', Sunday 10 August 2008 | |||
| Discussion continuing on ] | |||
| '''Venue:''' Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 | |||
| ==The Humungous Image Tagging Project== | |||
| Hi. You've helped with the ], so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Misplaced Pages fixing project, ], which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for ''at at'' and ''the the'', non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --] ] | |||
| '''More information:''' ] | |||
| == Article Licensing == | |||
| Hi, I've ] to get users to ] all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the ] Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 ]s or into the ] if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Misplaced Pages's license, the ], but it allows '''other projects''', such as ], to use our articles. Since you are among the ] Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: | |||
| *] - Lots of questions answered | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| Hello, | |||
| To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at ]. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: | |||
| I noticed that you have listed yourself as a ], so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly ]. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month. | |||
| :'''Option 1''' | |||
| :<nowiki>I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki> | |||
| :<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> | |||
| '''OR''' | |||
| :'''Option 2''' | |||
| :<nowiki>I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:</nowiki> | |||
| :<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> | |||
| If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Misplaced Pages enthusiasts in which we chat about Misplaced Pages and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Misplaced Pages, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too. | |||
| Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''". If you only prefer using the ], I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my ''']'''. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- ] (| ] | |||
| The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required! | |||
| Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along. | |||
| ==Stephen King (paedophile)== | |||
| As a general rule a VfD vote needs to be at least a two thirds majority in favour of deletion for an article to be removed. In this case the votes were 9 to 7 in favour of deletion, a majority but not a consensus. - ] 18:04, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Yours, | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] (]) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there, I saw your note on ]. Note that reverting '''more''' than 3 times is disallowed in this rule. Also, he explained his edits in his summaries, so there's nothing wrong with the edit. If there's further problems you can go to ] or ] or notify an admin at ]. ]|<sup>]</sup>]] 12:19, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ''Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!'' | |||
| == Main namespace cleanup == | |||
| ==London Wikimedia Fundraiser== | |||
| Heya, good to see you joining in on the main to user link cleanup fest. ]! Also, my condolances on your not living in Surrey, it really is a wonderful place. | |||
| Good evening! This is a friendly message from ], inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Misplaced Pages, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/London - expect an ], a ] hot tub, a free ], a ] ] and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com. | |||
| :Oh, by the way, you can also use <nowiki>{{del}} instead of {{delete}}. And with any luck, soon: {{d}}</nowiki> (but not yet). --]] 15:33, 2005 Jan 5 (UTC) | |||
| Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - ] (]) 00:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| <h2>The ] cordially invites you to Imperial College London</h2> | |||
| Why did you remove my correction of a misquote in the summary of ]? I dislike being misquoted, moreso when I am misquoted as being vulgar when I said nothing of the sort, as was apparent with my insertion of the actual quote in brackets after the misquote itself (with a cite to the actual entry in question). So could you explain yourself? ]] 05:34, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| | type = notice | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | style = | |||
| | textstyle = | |||
| | text = For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. ] | |||
| }} ] <small>]</small> 11:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Sea of Japan East Sea naming convention == | |||
| :Ahh, alright. Just a misunderstanding then. I just got back after a bit of an absence so I'm still adjusting to the problems abounding lately. That and the situation has me a bit sensitive. Not an excuse of course, but I hope you'll accept my apology. ]] 23:47, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I am reviving a discussion on the naming usage of Sea of Japan and East Sea. See ]. (] (]) 06:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)) | |||
| == ''"revert, please learn how to be selective if you have problems"'' == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Look who is talking, you revived the old "regime" issue that the community had settled long ago, and you mixed it in with some html fixes, and your derogatory portrayal of the insurgents as "guerillas". Please learn to be selective if you want to really make a contribution.--] 12:54, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==VfD of user subpage== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 --> | |||
| Users are allowed to make comments in their user space and on talk pages, except personal attacks, that other users find highly offensive. If a user has been accusing you of something you believe you have not done, make a few good-faith attempts to discuss your objection (be prepared to admit fault if appropriate). If that doesn't work, use the ] process. ] 23:24, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == The Duke of York listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Vfd - Vaughn (Band)== | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''The Duke of York'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> --]]] 17:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Please justify vfd'ing Vaughn (Band). Did you actually do any research or just assume the article was vanity? ] 01:37 GMT, 19 Jan 2005 | |||
| == superscripts == | |||
| I noticed you've fixed some of the superscript issues (at least in some Japanese location stubs, e.g. ]) by using a superscript character rather than the html token "& s u p 2 ;" (many instances are missing the trailing ";"). I'm not entirely sure, but I think the html token is actually more platform neutral and should be preferred. I believe the superscript character likely displays as a single <= character on some (presumably older) Macs. In any event, if you know (for sure) different please let me know and if not can you in the future fix these by adding the trailing ";"? Thanks. -- ] 14:11, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :The edit window superscript characters are puzzling given ] and ]. I'm actually using a relatively new Mac (OS X) and there isn't a problem, but I think OS 9 and earlier use ] which I strongly suspect means a literal ² would display as ≤. -- ] 18:45, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages truncating articles == | |||
| You may have noticed the server problems with Misplaced Pages recently. One of the consequences is that sometimes an article will be truncated during an edit. This happened to your editing of ] yesterday, which I have just fixed. Since I discovered this, I have taken to checking the diff after every edit I make. ] — ] | ] 15:31, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Poland-stub== | |||
| Hi Suslovans - | |||
| I notice you've moved one or two geo-stub articles to <nowiki>{{Poland-stub}}</nowiki> (e.g., ]). I was actually considering making a separate <nowiki>{{Poland-geo-stub}}</nowiki>, since there are about 70 Polish location stubs in ]. ]|<sup>]</sup> ] 04:10, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hey. What have you got say about listing me on ViP? ] 08:02, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==North London Line== | |||
| Good Evening. Looks like I had the same idea as you but on the other end of the line: ] & ]. I like having the insert "National Rail Lines" you might want to copy that. All the best. Steve | |||
| == List of metro systems == | |||
| Yes I think that's the best thing, to remove the Oceanian systems. Keep some sort of a disclaimer, though, or they'll reappear in no time. - ] 04:23, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :That's about right. - ] 23:26, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| ...for your help with the latest Willy on Wheels episode. It certainly halved the workload! -- ] | ] 16:10, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why ist this redirect no candidate for speedy deletion? i want to move the article ] to this name, because there is a similar article about the ]. ] 17:14, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Advice you need== | |||
| People pile onto MY talk page to tell me to space after punctuation marks...I don't agree and won't do it,but they seem to think it worth the effort.So in the similar spirit:''NEVER USE A HTML COMMAND FOR A DASH WHEN THERE ARE PERFECTLY GOOD HYPHENS ON YOUR KEYBOARD!!''--L.E./le@put.com/] 20:46, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Commas and periods go inside the quotation marks in American English, and ] is written in American English. I don't care if you have an ax to grind against me; I'm willing to go all the way back to arbitration to keep the grammar correct in that article. ] 21:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Spui== | |||
| Hah, no, I hadn't seen that. Too bad there's no station name in the photo. By the way, my name comes from ], not the river/whatever in nl. --] (]) 09:12, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Taiwan or RoC?== | |||
| Hi Susvolans - I've added a couple more external links to your list - including the BBC. I also stumbled across the Inaugural Speech of you-know-where's president, in which he uses the two terms Republic of China and Taiwan interchangably throughout - . ]|<sup>]</sup> ] 00:22, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thanks for the heads up on that vote. I had seen the long list of options and decided I didn't care enough (or know enough) to vote on them, but I hadn't noticed that little enforcement clause. I have voted against. --]|] 15:09, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Taiwan and Republic of China== | |||
| Thanks very much for researching on sources that the two groups of islands are listed as part of Taiwan. All the 16 sources on the ] uses "Taiwan" in the place of "Republic of China", as the way it is now known most of the world. None of the sources has addressed the issue on whether the two groups of islands are geographically related to the island of Taiwan, like Pescadores, Orchid Island and Green Island do, or politically part of a political entity called Taiwan Province. | |||
| I understand "Taiwan" is much better known in many parts of the world. It is, however, a consensus on Misplaced Pages after long debates to have placed the article about the government at ] but not ]. According to the ], Taiwan (the island or the province) should be mentioned as part of the ROC, but not as a country on its own. This way of treatment is an NPOV and accurate description of the status quo. I hope this helps understanding the issue. — ]] 17:36 Mar 1 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==RfC== | |||
| The sharing at ] seems to be over. I have made a response there. Please take a look. I do hope that with everyone's effort Misplaced Pages will soon be the best encyclopedia ever. :-D — ]] 21:14 Mar 5 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Tally boxes poll== | |||
| Hi there! You've stated that this poll is based on adversarial principles. I'm not sure what you're referring to, but for the sake of improving possible future polls, would you please explain it to me? Thanks. Yours, ] 14:36, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Welcome template == | |||
| Many thanks! In fact I'd realised that I should have been using 'subst', so perhaps I'd have been safe, but at least now I know what was going wrong (though I'm still not sure why). ] (] | |||
| == My adminship == | |||
| Thank you for voting for me for adminship. I appreciate the confidence you showed in me. — ] ] 08:44, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Developers not removing sysop capabilities == | |||
| Over on the proposed arbcom changes you mentioned a developer removing administrator capabilities. That's not actually what happened. Hopefully this will clarify: | |||
| *Adding and removing sysop capability used to be done via direct server access and those who did it used to be called developers. | |||
| *Later, a flag with text value "developer" was added and those who did the adding and removing got that flag on their accounts and lost server access, ceasing to be developers in any meaning of that word. | |||
| *Later still, the adding and removing capabilities were split and bureaucrats now get a flag with value "bureaucrat" while the value "developer" is used for stewards. | |||
| *One bureaucrat didn't have the flag with value "developer" removed when the software was changed and retained the remove capability (but not the authorisation to use it to remove). During the dispute, that bureaucrat used the capability to remove the sysop flag from several sysops. This is probably the developer you're referring to, though it wasn't actually a developer. No direct server access was involved. | |||
| *Once a developer (me) found out that the old flag was still present on a bureaucrat account, I double checked with a steward to confirm that the person wasn't a steward, then completed the software update, removing the flag with value "developer" which gave steward remove capability to that particular bureaucrat account. This was the only actual developer action in that incident and it was limited to doing what the original software change should have done. A developer rather than a steward did it because it was a software update issue and it was better for a developer to do that to make it clear that that is what it was. | |||
| *I (and others) then told the bureaucrat that the capability wasn't supposed to be there. As the neatest way to undo it, I asked the bureaucrat to add back the sysop flags which had been removed. The bureaucrat promptly did so, returning things to the state they should have been in if the flag had been removed by the software update process. | |||
| *Developers created the bureaucrat and steward flags so developers wouldn't normally need to be involved in this sort of thing. Since we know that, it's unlikely we'll act except to deal with software issues like that one or in a real emergency when there's no steward around. *In the future, the use of the flag with the confusing value "developer" for a steward is going to be changed, to the obvious "steward". ] 16:48, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==maps== | |||
| You have a strange view about what constitutes high quality. See ] ] 17:34, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Leeds Railways== | |||
| Hi Susvolans - you are the only one to have commented on my suggestion re this category; and I am unsure what the procedure is now. I find I cannot change it, so how does one go about it? ] 13:43, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| — ]]] 14:00, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC) | |||
| == Add == | |||
| By the way, I've added {{tl|add}} to the top of this page. This is a service for long Talk pages that helps to confine new comments and speed page load for editors. Please let me know if you find it helpful. — ]]] 14:02, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC) | |||
| == Netoholic == | |||
| Our buddy has rv {{tl|divbox}} again. I do appreciate you showing your support; that counts for much more than anything else. Now, he's slapping {tfd}s on everything. I fear I've angered him. I don't know what we're going to do about him. I've reported him for vandalism, but of course the more threatened he feels, the more destructive he becomes. What has he to lose? | |||
| Please ''sign'' your comments on ]. Thank You! — ]]] 07:49, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| Thank you for supporting my adminship — I vow to use my super powers for good not evil. ] (] 09:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Zürich to Zurich == | |||
| ] has been nominated on ] for a page move to ]. Perhapse you might like to express your opinion about this proposed move on ]. ] 09:47, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Convention == | |||
| Will you consider a Charter Convention? If so, email me. — ]]] 15:14, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| It was part of the merging of various articles into ]. It's not important; you can move it back if you feel it's a good idea. I figured it's best to be consistent across article titles; the choice of ] was to provide a neutral term and prevent another split like the recent one that created ] as a US version of ]. --] (]) 12:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Place redirects == | |||
| What's with all the eccentric mass moving of place names? ] 16:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:07, 12 May 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Susvolans has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 2005. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | Start a new discussion thread |
Archives
Thank you
Thank you for speaking up on the behalf of a user you did not even know. I appreciate your efforts for justice. Should you have any lingering concerns, I encourage you to come to my talk page and join the dialog there on what has occured. Discussion is the best way to calm stormy waters. TheChief (PowWow) 17:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Ignore all rules
First, obviously, if rule 5 were deleted, it would become four pillars rather than five. I think that any change to the four/five pillars should be well discussed on its talk page first. Failure to do so would be to ignore all rules, which could be seen as WP:POINT.
I personally think that the five pillars document is fine, because it says that there are no rules other than those listed, and the writers' rules of engagement are one of the pillars. The real problem is that Ignore All Rules is the wrong summary of the guideline, and is sufficiently wrong as to be a destructive title, because it can easily be read as meaning that one can ignore civility. Robert McClenon 18:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks Susvolans - I'm just taking baby steps for now Redkaty 14:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Final decision
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Louis Epstein case →Raul654 02:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view
Regarding the revert; the claim that all five pillars are unchangeable has no foundation in policy, why is it there then? Is the Misplaced Pages:Five pillars, wrong? -- Zondor 17:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Updated poll
I have completely changed the poll. Please see Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (years in titles)/Poll --AllyUnion (talk) 02:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
curly quotes
May I ask why you moved "—All You Zombies—" to “—All You Zombies—”? — flamingspinach | (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
class="wikitable"
I wouldn't know how, but why would you want to anyway? Martin 14:32, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Aha, so you mean find occurances where it was expanded when it used this revision of the prettytable. In which case the only way I think you could find them would be to get someone to use an SQL query on the database dump, but I don't know how successful that would be. At the moment I am not capable of doing this, but plently of other people are. Martin 16:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Reorganized General topics
Thanks for spotting and flagging those reorganized pages. I thought that I had deleted them all. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 14:20, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Deleting a useless page
Hi. You left a message on my talkpage welcoming me and saying I could ask you if I had any questions. Well, I've found a page that seems total junk (Alan 447 Rifle (disambiguation)). What should I do in this instance?Jamse 18:08, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
It's OK, someone else seems to have done this now. I'd still appreciate knowing how to do this, in case it comes up again in the future. Perhaps you could post the answer here, or on my talk page when you get chance? Thanks, Jamse 23:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
AM thank you
I love it when someone goes to the source to complain and thereby spurs some action! :-) Tedernst | Talk 17:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Your input would be useful at Talk:AM where the wikilinks and other non-MoS:DP content is being added back by User:Tobias Conradi. Thanks/wangi 18:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Regarding nesting .am under Armenia on AM. Please keep in mind the way the page is used. The reader may have clicked on ".am", with an unlinked dot, to get to the disambiguation page. He may not know that it means Armenia. Instead of associating items on the page using the complex category model that we have formulated when we compile that page, we should list them simply by the term or link, because the reader is just clicking a link, and is unlikely to have formulated this model in his head. —Michael Z. 2005-12-5 17:06 Z
Moving a Category
Hello again. Thanks for your answer to my previous question. I have another - is it possible to 'move' a Category? Normal pages all seem to have a 'move' tab, but I can't see this on Categories.
Specifically, there is Category:Lecturers of the University of Nottingham - I was about to populate it, but I thought it might be better as Category:Academics of the University of Nottingham (or 'University of Nottingham Academics'), which is a bit broader. I think it would be better to move / rename it before adding lots of people into the category!
Thanks. Jamse 18:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Tedernst RFA thanks!
Am I being provoked, do you think? I've had more conflict this week than ever before! :-) Oh well, thanks much for the support and let me know if I can be of assistance. peace, Tedernst | talk 23:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Babel
You modified the contents of my user page to remove the existing {{ps}} tag and replace it it with a {{photoshop}} tag. While I would have no issue with this if it did not change the appearance of the resulting graphic, it does. Could you please explain why this change was necessary. (I'm not upset or anything - I just like to know when things have been changed and why.) Denni ☯ 01:57, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Manual of style, "main article" section
Thanks! You see why it needed to be in the manual of style...:) Stevage 16:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the info on my nickname...
I didn't know that, but then of course it fits perfectly, for I am the one who's spent more than a year engaging in hundreds of revert wars to enforce my preferences.... Do you know what Susvolans means in my language ;) ? Sortan 17:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
your reversion of my edits
Nowhere does it say my good faith edits can or should be reverted. If you have an issue with my edits, take it to an admin. Don't edit war with me, because I think you're only doing it to intentionally cause me distress. -- Netoholic @ 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Explanations
TfD, talk page of banned user, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, TfD, It was a speedy candidate, A7 speedy, advertisement, improper protection, improper protection, Marsden was a hopeless troll, in accordance with Raul's request for leniancy on Netoholic, it was the autoblock associated with Netoholic. Phil Sandifer 17:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
ON INDIGO VERTIGO
http://en.wikipedia.org/INDIGO_VERTIGO
I used a generally issued pressrelease for the description of this comic. Was that wrong? I tried to read the copyright-page but just could not figure it out by myself.
--boomvavavoom 11:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Rfa thanks
| Hello Susvolans. Thank you for supporting my Rfa! :) I will try my best to be a good administrator. Please ask me if you need any help. --a.n.o.n.y.m 17:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) |
Template:Wiktionarypar
You, along with several other editors, suggested replacing {{wiktionary}} with {{wiktionarypar}} a while ago, which is gradually being done. Netoholic is now repeatedly redirecting Template:Wiktionarypar. Please read the prior discussion of this (which I've reminded Netoholic of) at Template talk:Wiktionary and contribute. You may want to put Template:Wiktionarypar on your watchlist. Uncle G 08:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Page name for temperature articles
To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Please check your WP:NA entry
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Misplaced Pages:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:
- If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
- If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
- Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.
Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Date links
Since you have taken an interest in links. Please be kind enough to vote for my new bot application to reduce overlinking of dates where they are not part of date preferences. bobblewik 20:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Save the List!
They are trying to delete the lists we've work so hard on help put a stop to it. List of J-pop Artists Vote to keep our precious list!!! -Bilaber 21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Tinsley Viaduct
Hi there Susvolans. I see you have edited the above article, I'd like to invite you to a poll on the inclusion or not of the coordinates box, here. L.J.Skinner 02:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Random Smile!
Guest9999 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Invitation to Misplaced Pages meetup in London
Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008
Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map
More information: Misplaced Pages:Meetup/London 12
Hello,
I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.
If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Misplaced Pages enthusiasts in which we chat about Misplaced Pages and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Misplaced Pages, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.
The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!
Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.
Yours,
James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!
London Wikimedia Fundraiser
Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Misplaced Pages, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.
Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London
 | For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you! |
All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 11:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Sea of Japan East Sea naming convention
I am reviving a discussion on the naming usage of Sea of Japan and East Sea. See Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Korean)/Disputed names. (Chunbum Park (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC))
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The Duke of York listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duke of York. Since you had some involvement with the The Duke of York redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories: