| Revision as of 15:27, 11 May 2007 editKim Bruning (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,995 edits →Removal of the template: some more wording to permit WP:BRD← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:22, 20 January 2010 edit undoCydebot (talk | contribs)6,812,251 editsm Robot - Moving category Other matters related to requests for adminship to Matters related to requests for adminship per CFD at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 January 5. | ||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{rejected}} | |||
| {{notice|'''Experimental Concept'''. This process is not yet ready for mainline use on wikipedia. For now, it should only be used in a controlled environment. See the talk page for discussions on where and how these environments are set up.}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{shortcut|WP:PROA}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{shortcut| |
||
| Proposed adminship is a simplified method by which users may be granted the ] to serve the community. It does not replace or deprecate ]. | Proposed adminship is a simplified method by which users may be granted the ] to serve the community. It does not replace or deprecate ]. | ||
| ==The process== | ==The process== | ||
| Any user may propose another user for adminship by adding {{tl|Rfaprod}} to the user page of the user they wish to become an administrator ('''please note that this template must be ]'''). If the template remains in place without objection for '''7''' days, the user |
Any user may propose another user for adminship by adding {{tl|Rfaprod}} to the user page of the user they wish to become an administrator ('''please note that this template must be ]'''). If the template remains in place without objection for '''7''' days, the user may be made an administrator by a ]. When the template is added, the user will automatically appear in ], which appears on the main ]. | ||
| Any nominations must also be noted on ] which interested people can watchlist. | |||
| ===Removal of the template=== | ===Removal of the template=== | ||
| ⚫ | If the template is removed by another user, the reason for removal '''must''' be given at the candidate's talk page, and should also be summarized in the ]. When giving this reason, please remember to be constructive and remain ]. The candidate may remove the template themselves at any time without explanation. | ||
| For a user to validly remove the {{tl|rfaprod}} template from a user page, they should have: | |||
| #a user account, for at least 30 days; | |||
| #made at least 100 total edits (to whichever ]s); | |||
| #a stated reason as to why the candidate is not suitable; | |||
| Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the process has been completed, albeit unsuccessfully. | |||
| ⚫ | If the template is removed by another user, the reason for removal '''must''' be given at the candidate's talk page, and should also be summarized in the ]. When giving this reason, please remember to be constructive and remain ]. | ||
| A user may not go through the proposed adminship process more than once and may not go through it at all if they have a previous unsuccessful RfA. | |||
| The candidate may remove the template themselves at any time without explanation and ]. | |||
| ⚫ | ===Directions for closing bureaucrat=== | ||
| Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the simplified process has been completed, albeit unsuccessfully. The candidate can try to convince the person to place the template back, at which point, the clock starts ticking from the start. As long as the ] process exists, a candidate can also apply there at any subsequent time. | |||
| ⚫ | Before promoting a user based on the proposed adminship process, a bureaucrat may instead decide to remove the template themselves as outlined above, even if the 7 day period has expired. If the bureaucrat decides that the candidate is not suitable, they should also provide a reason on the candidate's talk page. Otherwise, the candidate should be made an administrator. | ||
| == Current Experimental Variants == | |||
| If a user has passed through this process once, or has a failed or withdrawn RFA to his name, he may not pass through this process a second time, but must use regular RFA instead. | |||
| <small>''Archive this section if/when experiment terminated''</small> | |||
| For the duration of this experiment, instead of actually promoting a candidate, a bureaucrat or someone acting reliably like a bureaucrat will instead merely post a message on the candidates page, stating "If this had been a real process, you would now be an admin". Candidates should be encouraged to also run on ], so that the results of requests for adminship can be compared with this process. | |||
| ⚫ | ==Directions for closing bureaucrat== | ||
| ⚫ | Before promoting a user based on the proposed adminship process, a bureaucrat may instead decide to remove the template themselves as outlined above, even if the 7 day period has expired. If the bureaucrat decides that the candidate is not suitable, they should also provide a reason on the candidate's talk page. Otherwise, the candidate should be made an administrator. | ||
| === Variant A: Initial === | |||
| First variant tried. | |||
| Wording as above: | |||
| Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the process has been completed, albeit unsuccessfully. | |||
| A user may not go through the proposed adminship process more than once and may not go through it at all if they have a previous unsuccessful RfA. | |||
| === Variant B: Allow consensus editing of template === | |||
| Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the template may be placed back by anyone, ''provided there is (rough) consensus to do so''. | |||
| Normal page editing concepts apply to the template (including concepts such as ], ], ] and ]) | |||
| If the template remains unchallenged/status unchanged for 7 days, the candidate may be granted the admin flag by a bureaucrat. | |||
| If consensus is that the candidate is not suited for adminship, or if no consensus can be found after 14-21 days, the proposed adminship is said to have failed. | |||
| A candidate may re-apply after 3-4 months (this is to prevent the need to create a new account if a request fails.) | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:22, 20 January 2010
 | This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
Proposed adminship is a simplified method by which users may be granted the administrative tools to serve the community. It does not replace or deprecate Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship.
The process
Any user may propose another user for adminship by adding {{Rfaprod}} to the user page of the user they wish to become an administrator (please note that this template must be substituted). If the template remains in place without objection for 7 days, the user may be made an administrator by a bureaucrat. When the template is added, the user will automatically appear in Category:Proposed administrators, which appears on the main requests for adminship page.
Any nominations must also be noted on some noticeboard which interested people can watchlist.
Removal of the template
If the template is removed by another user, the reason for removal must be given at the candidate's talk page, and should also be summarized in the edit summary. When giving this reason, please remember to be constructive and remain civil. The candidate may remove the template themselves at any time without explanation.
Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the process has been completed, albeit unsuccessfully.
A user may not go through the proposed adminship process more than once and may not go through it at all if they have a previous unsuccessful RfA.
Directions for closing bureaucrat
Before promoting a user based on the proposed adminship process, a bureaucrat may instead decide to remove the template themselves as outlined above, even if the 7 day period has expired. If the bureaucrat decides that the candidate is not suitable, they should also provide a reason on the candidate's talk page. Otherwise, the candidate should be made an administrator.
Current Experimental Variants
Archive this section if/when experiment terminated
For the duration of this experiment, instead of actually promoting a candidate, a bureaucrat or someone acting reliably like a bureaucrat will instead merely post a message on the candidates page, stating "If this had been a real process, you would now be an admin". Candidates should be encouraged to also run on Requests for adminship, so that the results of requests for adminship can be compared with this process.
Variant A: Initial
First variant tried.
Wording as above:
Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the process has been completed, albeit unsuccessfully.
A user may not go through the proposed adminship process more than once and may not go through it at all if they have a previous unsuccessful RfA.
Variant B: Allow consensus editing of template
Following removal of the template by anyone other than the candidate, the template may be placed back by anyone, provided there is (rough) consensus to do so.
Normal page editing concepts apply to the template (including concepts such as Editwarring, revert limits, harmonious editing and disputed editing)
If the template remains unchallenged/status unchanged for 7 days, the candidate may be granted the admin flag by a bureaucrat.
If consensus is that the candidate is not suited for adminship, or if no consensus can be found after 14-21 days, the proposed adminship is said to have failed.
A candidate may re-apply after 3-4 months (this is to prevent the need to create a new account if a request fails.)
Categories: