Revision as of 17:32, 17 May 2007 editPraveen pillay (talk | contribs)949 edits added Tamil's entry← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:01, 3 January 2025 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,097 edits Added: Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | |||
{{shortcut|]}} | |||
{{rfclistintro}} | |||
{{RFCheader|Language and linguistics}} | |||
</noinclude> | |||
Please note that this page is reserved for disputes in articles '''about language or linguistics''', not policy disputes or language ''usage'' in unrelated articles. | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
Should ] specify the start of a century or millennium as a year ending in 1 (e.g. the 20th century as 1901–2000), as a year ending in 0 (e.g. the 20th century as 1900–1999), or treat both as acceptable options with the use of hatnotes for clarity in the case of ambiguity in articles? See the discussion above. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 14:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
*]. Dispute regarding the antiquity of Tamil & Tamil's influence on Sanskrit. 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{RFC list footer|lang|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} | |||
*], I have been trying to revise page of Babylon Translator to include criticisms. One user rejects all changes. Can one criticize a translation program? What counts as source material for criticisms?] 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
*]; ] – Is Leet to be considered a ]? There is also a discussion on whether the article is neutral in its depiction of Leet. 04:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 15:01, 3 January 2025
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Should MOS:CENTURY specify the start of a century or millennium as a year ending in 1 (e.g. the 20th century as 1901–2000), as a year ending in 0 (e.g. the 20th century as 1900–1999), or treat both as acceptable options with the use of hatnotes for clarity in the case of ambiguity in articles? See the discussion above. Chessrat 14:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for comment (All) | |
---|---|
Articles (All) |
|
Non-articles (All) | |
Instructions | To add a discussion to this list:
|
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot. |