Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Pano2QTVR: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:43, 17 May 2007 editEinemnet (talk | contribs)327 edits list of people deleted, regarded as personal attack in the debate, see AfD etiquette← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:17, 18 May 2007 edit undoEinemnet (talk | contribs)327 edits answer on unclaimed accusations from John Spikowski 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<br> <br>
] 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC) ] 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

John, please use the ] for debating about the deletion of the ] article. Defintely stop to list wikipedians that have a different opinion as this is regarded as a personal attack. Following the ] I deleted that part of your edit. ] 22:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Page/Vendor Associated Editors (PanoToolsNG group moderators, list owners and members)

] - Thomas - ] author and PanoToolsNG management.<br>
] - Yuval - Founder of the PanoToolsNG group.<br>
] - Carl - PanoToolsNG management.<br>
] - Roger - PanoToolsNG management.<br>
] - Luca - PanoToolsNG member.<br>
<br>
] 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Carl: I have had it with you removing my content. I'm reporting you to the administrators/SYSOPS for this constant abuse of Misplaced Pages editing policy. I asked nicely to stop removing other peoples content and you refuse to abide by the rules. ] 23:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

John, I don't see the point in listing all those who have a different opinion than yours. It seems as if you want to make those with a different opinion look biased. The ] clearly points out that users familiar with a topic are invited to comment in such a debate. '''Please delete the above list''', I personally feel harrased by finding my name in such a list. I hope we can find a consensus in a proper debate. ] 13:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:17, 18 May 2007

The Pano2QTVR software falls in the same category as Hugin (software), PTgui and PTLens promotional pages that were created around the same time by the same person. The Panorama Tools page was being used as a 'catch all' for Panorama software offerings that were associated. The Panorama Stitchers, Viewers and Utilities page is an attempt to combine this specialized software family into one unbiased / equal treatment page. This brings a sense of notability to the topic rather then a bunch of disassociated pages. Unless you already know a good deal about panorama photography, finding these pages is slim. John Spikowski 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
John Spikowski 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

John, please use the project page for debating about the deletion of the Pano2QTVR article. Defintely stop to list wikipedians that have a different opinion as this is regarded as a personal attack. Following the AfD etiquette I deleted that part of your edit. Einemnet 22:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Page/Vendor Associated Editors (PanoToolsNG group moderators, list owners and members)

User:Wuz - Thomas - Pano2QTVR author and PanoToolsNG management.
User:Yuv - Yuval - Founder of the PanoToolsNG group.
User:Einemnet - Carl - PanoToolsNG management.
User:Roger d williams - Roger - PanoToolsNG management.
User:Luca Vascon - Luca - PanoToolsNG member.

John Spikowski 21:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Carl: I have had it with you removing my content. I'm reporting you to the administrators/SYSOPS for this constant abuse of Misplaced Pages editing policy. I asked nicely to stop removing other peoples content and you refuse to abide by the rules. John Spikowski 23:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

John, I don't see the point in listing all those who have a different opinion than yours. It seems as if you want to make those with a different opinion look biased. The AfD rules and etiquette clearly points out that users familiar with a topic are invited to comment in such a debate. Please delete the above list, I personally feel harrased by finding my name in such a list. I hope we can find a consensus in a proper debate. Einemnet 13:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)