| Revision as of 05:31, 1 May 2005 editL33tminion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,124 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:32, 24 April 2006 edit undoCydebot (talk | contribs)6,812,251 editsm Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates. | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br>The result of the debate was - merged - ] 02:04, May 13, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Slang entry in a dictionary at best -- work coined once on an episode of the Simpsons. | Slang entry in a dictionary at best -- work coined once on an episode of the Simpsons. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Merge and redirect''' per Shiri. It's as notable as the other words on that page, but it doesn't deserve it's own article.-] 17:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) | *'''Merge and redirect''' per Shiri. It's as notable as the other words on that page, but it doesn't deserve it's own article.-] 17:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *I'm hesitant to recommend the creation of a disambiguation page for all the words this might be a misspelling of. This is rather an odd case, isn't it? --] <small>(]/])</small> 19:48, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) | *I'm hesitant to recommend the creation of a disambiguation page for all the words this might be a misspelling of. This is rather an odd case, isn't it? --] <small>(]/])</small> 19:48, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Merge''' content and '''disambig''' per L33tminion's suggestion below. --] <small>(]/])</small> 18:54, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Merge content to ] and create a disambig for common mispellings. It's an odd situation, but I think that's the best option. --] ] 05:31, May 1, 2005 (UTC) | *Merge content to ] and create a disambig for common mispellings. It's an odd situation, but I think that's the best option. --] ] 05:31, May 1, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' ] 18:39, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Strong delete''', this does not even require a redirect, '''it is a made up word from a cartoon!''' ] 20:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :*So made up words from cartoons should be deleted? What about super-notable ones, like ]? The Simpsons is a very big part of our culture. Not that I don't respect your opinion-] 01:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Exactly, super notable ones are fine, '''this word was used once!''', shall we make an article on every word from the simpsons just because it is popular? ] 09:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge and Redirect''', per Shiri above. --] 22:10, 2005 May 11 (UTC) | |||
| :''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div> | |||
Latest revision as of 18:32, 24 April 2006
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - merged - SimonP 02:04, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Superliminal
Slang entry in a dictionary at best -- work coined once on an episode of the Simpsons. Tabor 23:57, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Made-up words in The Simpsons. ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 00:59, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
- We could redirect to Supraliminal, which it is a common mis-spelling of - if we had an article on Supraliminal (unlikely, it would probably be a dictdef anyway). Grutness|
05:38, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) - Or treat it as a misspelling of Superluminal by redirecting to Faster-than-light. FWIW, that's the spelling that Google suggests for "superliminal." FreplySpang (talk) 13:06, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per Shiri. It's as notable as the other words on that page, but it doesn't deserve it's own article.-LtNOWIS 17:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I'm hesitant to recommend the creation of a disambiguation page for all the words this might be a misspelling of. This is rather an odd case, isn't it? --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 19:48, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge content and disambig per L33tminion's suggestion below. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 18:54, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Merge content to Made-up words in The Simpsons and create a disambig for common mispellings. It's an odd situation, but I think that's the best option. --L33tminion (talk) 05:31, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Rangerdude 18:39, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Strong delete, this does not even require a redirect, it is a made up word from a cartoon! Bluemoose 20:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- So made up words from cartoons should be deleted? What about super-notable ones, like D'oh!? The Simpsons is a very big part of our culture. Not that I don't respect your opinion-LtNOWIS 01:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
- Exactly, super notable ones are fine, this word was used once!, shall we make an article on every word from the simpsons just because it is popular? Bluemoose 09:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect, per Shiri above. --Dcfleck 22:10, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.