| Revision as of 20:40, 24 May 2007 editGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 edits →+ replies to Bish, Michael: + r Leebo - I knew, but thx anyways← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009 edit undoRobofish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,579 edits AfD nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. (TW) | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | #REDIRECT ] | ||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk plainlinks" style="padding:5px; width:auto;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | '''This user has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages.'''<br /><small>(see: • ] • • )</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| == + replies to Bish, Michael == | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. | |||
| :Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place -to actually read the other person's argument.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again. | |||
| :I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirm) | |||
| :Huh? What? "Autoconfirmed?" - What do you mean? And, by corollary, what do you all mean when you write: " (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)?"--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:02, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) (280 bytes) (rm protection template. Semi-protecting. Full protection seems overkill. | |||
| : I agree. It seems now days overkill happens a lot too much.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint.) | |||
| :I agree it was worth repeating.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:28, 23 May 2007 MichaelLinnear (Talk | contribs) (896 bytes) (removing temp category) | |||
| :Huh? I looked at your edit, and the info box seems to look the same as before. What were you trying to say, Michael?--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :One more thing: Even if I feel that I have a moral right to express my opinion just like others on their user pages, it seems that your suggestion ("Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint") is appropriate (I agree, Bish), since the "rules" governing expression on one's user pages are not uniformly enforced -that is, enforced the same as with others, so I think I shall restrain myself from expressing opinions of any sort on this page. Can't we change that? Lack of uniformity in enforcement is unfair and wrong: The rules are "for all" --- or "not at all" -anything else is just not fair or just.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Gordon, you asked about why the admin wrote this when blocking you "(anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)." They didn't write that, it's the description of the parameters of your block. When users are blocked, there are different settings that the admin chooses, and they're automatically displayed there. You might ask which each parameter is, because I'm not sure myself, but it's not like the admin was trying be cryptic. ] ]/] 20:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for your attempt to help me here, Leebo. I knew it was not the admin himself/herself penning that. (I knew it was some computer mumbo-jumbo.) But, since the "buck stops here," and each admin is responsible for that which he or she edits (including this), I figured it would be a good segue to inquire. Some of that computer-Internet stuff looks like greek to me!--] 20:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009
Redirect to:
Articles for deletion nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case
I have nominated Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)